logo
Françoise Hampson obituary

Françoise Hampson obituary

The Guardian29-04-2025

After Nato jets bombed Serbian state radio and television (RTS) in Belgrade in 1999, killing 16 technicians and editors, it was a British lawyer, Françoise Hampson, who took on the relatives' quest for legal redress.
Hampson, who has died aged 74 of lung cancer, had the unusual distinction of being a prominent expert in both human rights and international humanitarian law – the rules of armed conflict.
The air raid during the Kosovo war, justified by Nato as necessary to silence President Slobodan Milosevic's 'propaganda', raised the crucial issue of whether the European court of human rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg had jurisdiction to hear the claim.
Hampson, who had previously argued cases challenging territorial limits of responsibility for military operations, was also an authority on the principle of proportionality in war – the balancing of military advantage against civilian suffering.
As professor of international law of armed conflicts and human rights at Essex University, she was at ease both in rarefied courtroom exchanges over legal abstractions and out in the field interviewing witnesses to possible war crimes.
In Bosnia, Turkey and sub-Saharan Africa, she gathered evidence first-hand to present to courts. Among colleagues she was renowned for the intensity of her case preparations, often reading through the night to master legal details. She was a 'whirlwind', they said, with an 'infinite capacity for work' who could bring clarity to the most complex ideas.
Several of her cases set legal precedents. In Aydin v Turkey – brought on behalf of a Kurdish woman who had been blindfolded, beaten and abused in police detention – the ECHR ruled for the first time that rape constituted an act of torture under article 3 of the European convention on human rights.
The RTS case, known as Bankovic v Belgium and others, however, did not result in victory for Hampson and those representing the Belgrade victims. Advocates for 17 Nato European member nations, including the UK, disputed the case's admissibility.
The court found that aerial bombardment did not fall within the definition of state control for the purpose of convention rights. The damaged RTS building today remains unreconstructed as a memorial to the attack. The jurisdiction of international courts over military operations abroad continues to be fiercely debated.
Born in Bolton, Françoise was the daughter of Norman Hampson, a historian of the French Revolution, and Jacqueline (née Gardin), a French-born teacher. Her parents met through his military service as liaison officer on a Free French warship; a shipmate suggested Norman visit his sister in Paris on his way home after the second world war in 1945.
Jacqueline, one side of whose family were Jewish, had survived the occupation despite Nazi attempts to arrest her grandfather. Another relative was a senior judge. That family history influenced Françoise's decision to pursue human rights law.
She attended first Manchester high school for girls then Dame Allan's school in Newcastle as the family moved around northern universities. She initially read French at University College London, but switched after a year to study law at Newcastle University, and was called to the bar at Lincoln's Inn.
In 1975, she became a law lecturer at Dundee University, remaining there until 1983, when she transferred to the University of Essex, where its specialist courses in law and human rights were gaining an international reputation.
As a professor there, she worked alongside Sir Nigel Rodley and Kevin Boyle on cases at the European court of human rights.
With Boyle, she pursued cases of torture, murder and enforced disappearances against Turkey brought on behalf of the London-based Kurdish Human Rights Project. She derived great satisfaction from helping families from remote villages pursue justice in the highest international courts in Europe. Boyle and Hampson were jointly named lawyer of the year in 1998, an award made by Liberty and the Law Society Gazette to mark the 50th anniversary of the UN declaration of human rights.
Hampson also served as an independent expert member of the UN sub-commission on the promotion and protection of human rights (1998-2007). In 2005, she was appointed OBE for services to international law and to human rights.
For years she taught at military staff colleges in the UK, US, Canada and Ghana as well as at the International Institute of Humanitarian Law in Sanremo, Italy, which runs courses for officers and legal advisers from around the world. Her enthusiasm for engaging with the military on issues such as targeting and detention was widely appreciated. She was also a consultant on international humanitarian law to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).
In 2011, she retired from teaching but continued working – drafting submissions to parliament's joint committee on human rights, providing expert evidence to the ECHR on the Georgia/Russia conflict, exploring the battlefield implications of autonomous weapon systems as well as travelling to Africa as a member of the UN commission of inquiry on Burundi to investigate complaints of human rights abuses.
An inspirational figure to generations of students, she could appear intimidating to those not fully prepared for legal argument. Those she trusted were rewarded with warm friendships and an irreverent sense of humour: a favourite T-shirt depicted a cow manacled to the wall bearing the legend 'The terrible truth about whipped cream'.
Her legal papers were recently transferred to the archives of the Irish Centre for Human Rights at Galway University. Away from law, she loved giving dinner parties and escaping into the garden of her Colchester home.
She is survived by her younger sister, Michèle.
Françoise Jane Hampson, lawyer and academic, born 11 April 1951; died 18 April 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reeves signs off on £14bn to build new nuclear plant Sizewell C
Reeves signs off on £14bn to build new nuclear plant Sizewell C

Leader Live

time43 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Reeves signs off on £14bn to build new nuclear plant Sizewell C

The Chancellor is set to confirm the funding at the GMB Congress on Tuesday. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said new nuclear power capacity was needed to deliver a 'golden age of clean energy abundance'. Trade unions welcomed the move, which the Treasury said would go towards creating 10,000 jobs, including 1,500 apprenticeships. But the head of a campaign group opposing the plant criticised the decision to commit the funding, saying it is still not clear what the total cost will be. Nuclear plants are seen as increasingly important electricity sources as the Government tries to decarbonise Britain's grid by 2030, replacing fossil fuels with green power. The last time Britain completed one was in 1987, which was the Sizewell B plant. Hinkley Point C, in Somerset, is under construction and is expected to produce enough power for about six million homes when it opens, but that may not be until 2031. The Energy Secretary said: 'We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis. 'This is the Government's clean energy mission in action – investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security.' It will get the UK off the 'fossil fuel rollercoaster', he separately told The Guardian. 'We know that we're going to have to see electricity demand at least double by 2050. All the expert advice says nuclear has a really important role to play in the energy system. 'In any sensible reckoning, this is essential to get to our clean power and net zero ambitions.' The joint managing directors of Sizewell C, Julia Pyke and Nigel Cann, said: 'Today marks the start of an exciting new chapter for Sizewell C, the UK's first British-owned nuclear power plant in over 30 years.' At the peak of construction, Sizewell C is expected to provide 10,000 jobs and the company behind the project has already signed £330 million worth of contracts with local businesses. The plant, which will power the equivalent of six million homes, is planned to be operational in the 2030s. The Government is also due to confirm one of Europe's first small modular reactor programmes and will invest £2.5 billion over five years in fusion energy research as part of plans to boost the UK's nuclear industry. The GMB union said giving Sizewell C the go-ahead was 'momentous'. Regional Secretary Warren Kenny said: 'Nuclear power is essential for clean, affordable, and reliable energy – without new nuclear, there can be no net zero. 'Sizewell C will provide thousands of good, skilled, unionised jobs and we look forward to working closely with the Government and Sizewell C to help secure a greener future for this country's energy sector.' Mike Clancy, general secretary of Prospect, said: 'Delivering this funding for Sizewell C is a vital step forward, this project is critical to securing the future of the nuclear industry in the UK. 'New nuclear is essential to achieving net zero, providing a baseload of clean and secure energy, as well as supporting good, unionised jobs. 'Further investment in SMRs and fusion research shows we are finally serious about developing a 21st-century nuclear industry. All funding must be backed up by a whole-industry plan to ensure we have the workforce and skills we need for these plans to succeed.' Alison Downes of Stop Sizewell C said ministers had not 'come clean' about the full cost of the project, which the group have previously estimated could be some £40 billion. 'There still appears to be no final investment decision for Sizewell C, but £14.2 billion in taxpayers' funding, a decision we condemn and firmly believe the government will come to regret. 'Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C? 'Ministers have still not come clean about Sizewell C's cost and, given negotiations with private investors are incomplete, they have signed away all leverage and will be forced to offer generous deals that undermine value for money. Starmer and Reeves have just signed up to HS2 mark 2.'

Reeves signs off on £14bn to build new nuclear plant Sizewell C
Reeves signs off on £14bn to build new nuclear plant Sizewell C

ITV News

timean hour ago

  • ITV News

Reeves signs off on £14bn to build new nuclear plant Sizewell C

Rachel Reeves has signed off on £14.2 billion of investment to build the new Sizewell C nuclear plant as part of the spending review. The Chancellor is set to confirm the funding at the GMB Congress on Tuesday. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said new nuclear power capacity was needed to deliver a 'golden age of clean energy abundance'. Trade unions welcomed the move, which the Treasury said would go towards creating 10,000 jobs, including 1,500 apprenticeships. But the head of a campaign group opposing the plant criticised the decision to commit the funding, saying it is still not clear what the total cost will be. Nuclear plants are seen as increasingly important electricity sources as the Government tries to decarbonise Britain's grid by 2030, replacing fossil fuels with green power. The last time Britain completed one was in 1987, which was the Sizewell B plant. Hinkley Point C, in Somerset, is under construction and is expected to produce enough power for about six million homes when it opens, but that may not be until 2031. The Energy Secretary said: 'We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis. 'This is the Government's clean energy mission in action – investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security.' It will get the UK off the 'fossil fuel rollercoaster', he separately told The Guardian. 'We know that we're going to have to see electricity demand at least double by 2050. All the expert advice says nuclear has a really important role to play in the energy system. 'In any sensible reckoning, this is essential to get to our clean power and net zero ambitions.' The joint managing directors of Sizewell C, Julia Pyke and Nigel Cann, said: 'Today marks the start of an exciting new chapter for Sizewell C, the UK's first British-owned nuclear power plant in over 30 years.' At the peak of construction, Sizewell C is expected to provide 10,000 jobs and the company behind the project has already signed £330 million worth of contracts with local businesses. The plant, which will power the equivalent of six million homes, is planned to be operational in the 2030s. The Government is also due to confirm one of Europe's first small modular reactor programmes and will invest £2.5 billion over five years in fusion energy research as part of plans to boost the UK's nuclear industry. The GMB union said giving Sizewell C the go-ahead was 'momentous'. Regional Secretary Warren Kenny said: 'Nuclear power is essential for clean, affordable, and reliable energy – without new nuclear, there can be no net zero. 'Sizewell C will provide thousands of good, skilled, unionised jobs and we look forward to working closely with the Government and Sizewell C to help secure a greener future for this country's energy sector.' Mike Clancy, general secretary of Prospect, said: 'Delivering this funding for Sizewell C is a vital step forward, this project is critical to securing the future of the nuclear industry in the UK. 'New nuclear is essential to achieving net zero, providing a baseload of clean and secure energy, as well as supporting good, unionised jobs. 'Further investment in SMRs and fusion research shows we are finally serious about developing a 21st-century nuclear industry. All funding must be backed up by a whole-industry plan to ensure we have the workforce and skills we need for these plans to succeed.' Alison Downes of Stop Sizewell C said ministers had not 'come clean' about the full cost of the project, which the group have previously estimated could be some £40 billion. 'There still appears to be no final investment decision for Sizewell C, but £14.2 billion in taxpayers' funding, a decision we condemn and firmly believe the government will come to regret. 'Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C? 'Ministers have still not come clean about Sizewell C's cost and, given negotiations with private investors are incomplete, they have signed away all leverage and will be forced to offer generous deals that undermine value for money. Starmer and Reeves have just signed up to HS2 mark 2.'

Family visa income threshold should not rise to skilled worker level
Family visa income threshold should not rise to skilled worker level

Leader Live

timean hour ago

  • Leader Live

Family visa income threshold should not rise to skilled worker level

Skilled workers are only eligible to come to the UK if they earn a salary of £38,700 or more, compared to £29,000 required mainly for British citizens or settled residents to bring their partner to the country under family visas. The Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) set out its recommendations after a review requested by the Home Secretary to look at how to set a minimum income requirement (MIR) for family visas that balances economic wellbeing and family life. The previous government planned to introduce the higher threshold for family visa applicants to be equivalent to the skilled worker level. But the committee's report said: 'Given the family route that we are reviewing has a completely different objective and purpose to the work route, we do not understand the rationale for the threshold being set using this method. 'We do not recommend the approach based on the skilled worker salary threshold as it is unrelated to the family route and is the most likely to conflict with international law and obligations (e.g. Article 8).' Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights is the right to private and family life that can be applied to migration cases in the UK. The UK's current £29,000 threshold is high compared to other high-income countries reviewed by the MAC. The analysis found a high proportion of applicants for partner visas are women and 90% are under the age of 44. Pakistan is the largest nationality to use the route applying from outside the country. The committee's analysis gave some options that a threshold of £24,000 to £28,000 could give more priority to economic wellbeing, such as reducing the burden to taxpayers, than on family life. It also suggested a criteria of £23,000 to £25,000 to ensure families can support themselves but not necessarily require them to earn a salary above minimum wage. Chairman of MAC, Professor Brian Bell, said: 'While the decision on where to set the threshold is ultimately a political one, we have provided evidence on the impacts of financial requirements on families and economic wellbeing, and highlight the key considerations the government should take into account in reaching its decision.' While the committee said it is not possible to predict how different threshold changes would impact net migration, it said lowering the amount to £24,000, for example, could mean an increase of around one to three percent of projected future net migration. The report added: 'Determining the MIR threshold involves striking a balance between economic wellbeing and family life. 'Whilst a lower threshold would favour family life and entail a higher net fiscal cost to the taxpayer, a higher threshold (below a certain level) would favour economic wellbeing. 'But a higher number of families would experience negative impacts relating to financial pressures, prolonged separation, relationships, adults' mental health and children's mental health and education.' The committee advised against raising the threshold for families with children as despite them facing higher living costs, the impacts on family life appear 'particularly significant' for children. It also recommended keeping the income amount required the same across all regions of the UK. The MAC also said their review was 'greatly hindered' by insufficient data and urged for better data collection by the Home Office on characteristics of each applicant to be linked to outcomes to inform further policy decisions. Reacting to the recommendations, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the report shows that raising the salary threshold will drive migration numbers down and urged for the threshold to be increased to £38,000. 'Migration figures remain far too high. It's time to end ECHR obstruction, raise the salary thresholds, and take back control of who comes into this country,' he said. 'As Kemi and I said on Friday, if the ECHR stops us from setting our own visa rules, from deporting foreign criminals or from putting Britain's interests first, then we should leave the ECHR.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'The Home Secretary commissioned the independent Migration Advisory Committee to undertake a review. 'We are now considering its findings and will respond in due course. More broadly, the government has already committed to legislate to clarify the application of Article 8 of the ECHR for applicants, caseworkers and the courts.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store