logo
Athletics world watching as 'Grand Slam Track' prepares for launch

Athletics world watching as 'Grand Slam Track' prepares for launch

Yahoo03-04-2025

What is being billed as a "revolution" for the sport of athletics gets under way in Kingston on Friday with the opening meeting of US sprinting legend Michael Johnson's ambitious Grand Slam Track series.
Four-time Olympic gold medallist Johnson believes the four-event circuit represents a landmark moment for track and field, a bold new attempt to reinvigorate interest in the sport after years of decline.
Johnson, 57, says the format of his new circuit –- which promises to create more head-to-head races between the world's best track athletes -- represents a winning formula that will bring eyeballs back to athletics outside the pinnacle of Olympic competition.
"People love racing. People want to see the best of the best. And at the core of Grand Slam Track is the best of the best athletes, only the fastest, competing head-to-head against one another four times a year," Johnson said of his new circuit last year.
"My objective is to create the opportunities that athletes have always wanted and to put them on a stage that is worthy of their greatness, with races that mean something."
Fittingly, the action gets under way in Jamaica, long-regarded as the spiritual home of sprinting, before moving to meetings in Miami (May 2-4), Philadelphia (May 30-June 1) and Los Angeles (June 27-29).
- Prize money bonanza -
Uniquely, Grand Slam Track has 48 athletes under contract who will be present at all four competitions, with 48 "challengers" joining the field at each event.
The 96 athletes (48 women, 48 men) are divided by specialty into 12 groups of eight, each participating in two races over the three-day meeting.
The financial stakes for participating athletes are attractive, with prize money ranging from $100,000 for the winner of each group to $10,000 for runners-up.
This week's opening leg in Kingston will feature some 32 medalists from the Paris Olympics, including the likes of American women's 400m hurdles star Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone and Olympic 200m champion Gabby Thomas.
But in a significant blow to Johnson's hopes of attracting the "best of the best" in their respective events, neither of the reigning Olympic 100m champions – US sprinter Noah Lyles and Saint Lucia's Julien Alfred – are in the field.
Sha'Carri Richardson, the reigning women's 100m world champion and runner-up in Paris, and men's 100m silver medallist Kishane Thompson of Jamaica, are also notable absentees from a largely US-Caribbean field that has opted to exclude jumps and throws, much to the chagrin of track and field purists.
European athletes have also largely sidestepped an event which falls early in the season, and just weeks after the indoor World Championships in China.
- Return on investment? -
Johnson says absenteeism is inevitable for an event in its inaugural year, and understandably prefers to put the emphasis on the athletes who will be in Kingston.
"All the athletes are not going to come in Year One," he told Citius Mag in a recent interview.
"You can over-index and get hyper-focused on who's not here, which, in my opinion, is somewhat disrespectful to the 48 who are here."
The format of the series also allows for stars such as Lyles, Alfred and Richardson to enter the fields at future events as "challengers".
Lyles recently expressed scepticism at the league's ability to attract sponsors.
"Money is not the thing that's going to drive me every time," Lyles said. "I'm looking, who are your outside sponsors? Who are your non-track and field sponsors?"
Lyles' US team-mate Rai Benjamin, the Olympic 400m hurdles champion, has also questioned the financial viability of the circuit.
"I look at it as a business," Benjamin said. "At the end of the day, if there's no ROI (return on investment), then you have a failed business model. And it's like, how long could you be sustainable?
"They're not going to make any money this year, they're not going to make any money next year."
Johnson brushed off those concerns in an interview with The Times, adamant that Grand Slam Track's format will generate interest once it is up and running.
"I've started several successful businesses in my life and not a single one was profitable in year one," Johnson said. "That's not how you build businesses.
"But when you say we're going to get 48 of the best athletes in the world contracted to go head-to-head, people start to pay attention."
The circuit has attracted some $30 million in funding from investors while also securing broadcasting deals in the United States with CW and NBC, via the network's streaming platform, as well as Eurosport in Europe and Asia and TNT in the United Kingdom.
rg/rcw

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2025 ShopRite LPGA Classic prize money payouts for each LPGA player at Seaview
2025 ShopRite LPGA Classic prize money payouts for each LPGA player at Seaview

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

2025 ShopRite LPGA Classic prize money payouts for each LPGA player at Seaview

2025 ShopRite LPGA Classic prize money payouts for each LPGA player at Seaview Jennifer Kupcho won three times in 2022, including a major, but hadn't won again until this week's ShopRite LPGA Classic. The 28-year-old American held on in cold and soupy conditions at Seaview's historic Bay Course to win by one over South Korea's Ilhee Lee, a now part-time player making her 200th start on the LPGA. "It just feels amazing," Kupcho told fellow ShopRite winner Mel Reid on the broadcast. "I think I struggled a lot early in the year and had a lot of tough weeks, a lot of hard conversations. It feels good, it feels really good." Kupcho carded a final-round 66 to clinch the $262,500 winner's check in the 54-hole event. A total of 68 players made the 36-hole cut, with 2025 champion Linnea Strom and recent U.S. Women's Open champion Maja Stark both missing Sunday's action. Here's the full breakdown of the $1.75 million purse. 2025 U.S. Women's Open prize money payouts

Chukwu's wonder goal the difference as Canada women crowned CONCACAF U-20 champions
Chukwu's wonder goal the difference as Canada women crowned CONCACAF U-20 champions

Hamilton Spectator

time2 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Chukwu's wonder goal the difference as Canada women crowned CONCACAF U-20 champions

ALAJUELA - Canada won the CONCACAF Women's Under-20 Championship on Sunday, defeating Mexico 3-2 after extra time thanks to a marvellous goal by Annabelle Chukwu in the 122nd minute. Chukwu beat two defenders at the byline and then, from an almost impossible angle, roofed the winner as the clock counted down in stoppage time. It was the fifth goal of the tournament for the 18-year-old from Ottawa who plays collegiate soccer at Notre Dame. Chukwu added to her Canadian youth international scoring record, previously held by Christine Sinclair. Chukwu now has 39 goals in 42 games from the under-15 to under-20 level. 'We stuck through for 120 minutes together … It's a dream come true,' said Chukwu. The Canadians celebrated by making snow angels in the confetti that covered the pitch after they received the trophy in the rain at Estadio Alejandro Morera Soto. Canada also won the CONCACAF tournament in 2004 and 2008. It was the Canadian women's first trip to the final since 2015, when it lost 1-0 to the U.S. Mexico was in its fourth straight final, having won two of the previous three (2018 and 2023). Mexico defeated Canada 4-2 in earlier Group B play, the lone blemish on the Canadian record at the tournament. Sunday's rematch was full of twists and turns with Mexico reduced to 10 players when goalkeeper Mariangela Medina was sent off in the 90th minute. And Chukwu had a chance to put Canada ahead in the 119th minute, only to see substitute goalkeeper Camila Vazquez make a diving save to stop her. The extra-time penalty was awarded after American referee Delia Bradley went to the pitchside monitor to check a possible handball by defender Berenice Ibarra after a shot hit her outstretched arm. Mexico was reduced to 10 players when Medina was sent off for denying an obvious scoring chance. The 'keeper took Chukwu down going after the ball outside the penalty box with the red card coming after video review. Vazquez took over in goal, with forward Deiry Ramirez giving way. Canada had taken a 2-1 lead in the 96th minute when, off a corner, the ball bounced in off Adriana Bianchin after a touch from fellow Canadian Iba Oching sent the ball on. But two minutes later Montserrat Saldivar beat Canadian goalkeeper Noelle Henning after a teammate found her behind the Canadian defence with a looping ball. Sienna Gibson had given Canada the lead in the 50th minute. Saldivar tied it up from the penalty spot in the 61st minute after she was bodied to the ground by Janet Okeke. The Canadian side was coached by Cindy Tye Canada was appearing in its fourth CONCACAF U-20 final — and first in 10 years. Defending champion Mexico was appearing in its fifth consecutive final. Lea Larouche's 56th-minute goal had given Canada a 1-0 victory over the seven-time champion United States in semifinal play Friday. Mexico blanked Costa Rica 4-0 in the other semifinal. It was just the Americans' fourth loss in 66 games at the CONCACAF tournament (57-4-5). And it marks the first time in tournament history that the U.S. will not be part of the championship game. All four teams had already accomplished their goal of qualifying for the 2026 FIFA U-20 World Cup in Poland by reaching the semifinals. Canada has taken part in nine of the previous 11 editions of the FIFA U-20 tournament, missing out in 2010 and 2018. The Canadians lost 2-1 to Spain in the round of 16 at last year's FIFA U-20 World Cup in Colombia. Canada booked its ticket to the CONCACAF tournament by winning its qualifying group with ease in February. The Canadians outscored their qualifying opposition 43-0, dispatching Dominica 22-0, Bermuda 9-0 and host Trinidad and Tobago 12-0. The U.S. and Mexico, as the top-ranked countries in CONCACAF, skipped the qualifying round and were given direct entry to the CONCACAF championship. Canada and 23 other teams had to win their way there, with Costa Rica, Guyana, Nicaragua, Panama and Puerto Rico also topping their groups. —- This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2025

Best tennis match ever? Carlos Alcaraz's French Open win ushers in new rivalry
Best tennis match ever? Carlos Alcaraz's French Open win ushers in new rivalry

USA Today

time3 hours ago

  • USA Today

Best tennis match ever? Carlos Alcaraz's French Open win ushers in new rivalry

Best tennis match ever? Carlos Alcaraz's French Open win ushers in new rivalry Show Caption Hide Caption Jessica Pagula on accomplished Coco Gauff, Emma Navarro, Madison Keys Tennis player Jessica Pegula discusses how amazing it is to have other amazing American women in tennis dominating the sport. Sports Seriously So, tennis fans, how'd you like another decade or so of that? After Sunday's French Open men's final – a 5-hour, 29-minute epic that somehow ended with Carlos Alcaraz holding up the trophy for a second consecutive year – we can now officially close the book on the so-called Big Three era. There's a new game in town. And it's as spectacular to watch as anything tennis has ever seen. Yes, Alcaraz's improbable comeback to beat Jannik Sinner 4-6, 6-7 (4-7), 6-4, 7-6 (7-3), 7-6 (10-2) is the story of the day. Not only did Alcaraz win his fifth Grand Slam title at just one month into his 22nd year of life – an absurd accomplishment on its own – but he did it by summoning a competitive aura only the all-time greats possess. He is, already, a legend. And that might have been the greatest match in the history of the sport. But the best part of Sunday's match is that it's not the end of the story. In many ways, it's just the beginning. HIGHLIGHTS: Alcaraz outlasts Sinner in epic French Open final The first Slam final between Alcaraz and Sinner not only exceeded every possible expectation, it sets an entirely new narrative for the sport. As Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal faded into retirement – most likely followed by Novak Djokovic in the next year or two – there was deep concern about what would come next after a 1½-decade battle between arguably the three best to ever hold a racket. Now we know definitively. Tennis is in the safest of hands. And barring something unforeseen, these two spectacular athletes are going to be doing battle in Grand Slam finals for many, many years to come. If you managed to watch the whole thing, or even just the last couple sets, it was easy to understand why that's such a tantalizing possibility. Let's start with the level of play. In a word, spectacular. Though Sinner and Alcaraz are each elite individually, combining to win the last six Grand Slam titles, the greatness they manage to draw out of each other is unique. Though different players stylistically and tactically, they have now twice played matches that could be considered among the best in the history of the sport in terms of ballstriking, endurance and the high standard it took to win a single point. When they played a US Open quarterfinal deep into the night in 2022, with Alcaraz emerging after 5 hours, 15 minutes, it showed the possibility of a friendly rivalry between two generational talents that had stretched back to childhood. It has widely been considered the best match of the decade, not just for the length of the match but the drama and the quality they both laid on the line. It only took three years to exceed that standard. Which leads to the second element of this ongoing story. What it took for Alcaraz to win that match – to beat Sinner on this particular day – was a sustained effort that few players in history could have managed. Maybe Djokovic. Maybe Nadal. Maybe. Because even though the all-time greats have all come back from two sets down and saved match points on the way to Grand Slam titles, few have had so little help from an opponent. Sure, there may be a shot or two that Sinner would want back after failing to convert three match points in the fourth set, then failing to serve out the tournament in the next game. But mostly, from that point until the final winner came off Alcaraz's racket, it was mostly about his greatness and his relentless shotmaking. Even in the fifth set, with Sinner clearly tiring more quickly than his opponent, he summoned enough energy to erase Alcaraz's early break of serve and send the match to a final tiebreak where – guess what – Alcaraz continued to pound clean winners off impossible angles. Sinner did not lose this match. Alcaraz just got up off the clay and stole it. We can debate where this final ranks among the 2008 Wimbledon final between Nadal and Federer or the 1980 Wimbledon final between John McEnroe and Bjorn Borg when you factor in all the intangibles. But if we're just talking about the quality of tennis played by two men over that length of time? It would be difficult to say there's ever been a better match. If the world was watching Sunday, it had to love what it saw. And when you realize what's ahead between them – more finals, more trophies, more history – this one felt like a moment to mark in time. One chapter of tennis closes, another begins. And it's going to be as entertaining as any we've seen.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store