logo
More employers are sending workers shopping for their own health coverage

More employers are sending workers shopping for their own health coverage

A small, growing number of employers are putting health insurance decisions entirely in the hands of their workers.
Instead of offering traditional insurance, they're giving workers money to buy their own coverage in what's known as Individual Coverage Health Reimbursement Arrangements, or ICHRAs.
Advocates say this approach provides small companies that couldn't afford insurance a chance to offer something. It also caps a growing expense for employers and fits conservative political goals of giving people more purchasing power over their coverage.
But ICHRAs place the risk for finding coverage on the employee, and they force them to do something many dislike: Shop for insurance.
'It's maybe not perfect, but it's solving a problem for a lot of people,' said Cynthia Cox, of the nonprofit KFF, which studies health care issues.
Here's a closer look at how this approach to health insurance is evolving.
What's an ICHRA?
Normally, U.S. employers offering health coverage will have one or two insurance options for workers through what's known as a group plan. The employers then pick up most of the premium, or cost of coverage.
ICHRAs are different: Employers contribute to health insurance coverage, but the workers then pick their own insurance plans. The employers that use ICHRAs hire outside firms to help people make their coverage decisions.
ICHRAs were created during President Donald Trump's first administration. Enrollment started slowly but has swelled in recent years.
What's the big deal about ICHRAs?
They give business owners a predictable cost, and they save companies from having to make coverage decisions for employees.
'You have so many things you need to focus on as a business owner to just actually grow the business,' said Jeff Yuan, co-founder of the New York-based insurance startup Taro Health.
Small businesses, in particular, can be vulnerable to annual insurance cost spikes, especially if some employees have expensive medical conditions. But the ICHRA approach keeps the employer cost more predictable.
Yuan's company bases its contributions on the employee's age and how many people are covered under the plan. That means it may contribute anywhere from $400 to more than $2,000 monthly to an employee's coverage.
How is this approach different?
ICHRAs let people pick from among dozens of options in an individual insurance market instead of just taking whatever their company offers.
That may give people a chance to find coverage more tailored to their needs. Some insurers, for instance, offer plans designed for people with diabetes.
And workers can keep the coverage if they leave — potentially for longer periods than they would be able to with traditional employer health insurance plans. They likely will have to pay the full premium, but keeping the coverage also means they won't have to find a new plan that covers their doctors.
Mark Bertolini, CEO of the insurer Oscar Health, noted that most people change jobs several times.
'Insurance works best when it moves with the consumer,' said the executive, whose company is growing enrollment through ICHRAs in several states.
What are the drawbacks for employees?
Health insurance plans on the individual market tend to have narrower coverage networks than employer-sponsored coverage.
It may be challenging for patients who see several doctors to find one plan that covers them all.
People shopping for their own insurance can find coverage choices and terms like deductibles or coinsurance overwhelming. That makes it important for employers to provide help with plan selection.
The broker or technology platform setting up a company's ICHRA generally does this by asking about their medical needs or if they have any surgeries planned in the coming year.
How many people get coverage this way?
There are no good numbers nationally that show how many people have coverage through an ICHRA or a separate program for companies with 50 workers or less.
However, the HRA Council, a trade association that promotes the arrangements, sees big growth. The council works with companies that help employers offer the ICHRAs. It studies growth in a sample of those businesses.
It says about 450,000 people were offered coverage through these arrangements this year. That's up 50% from 2024. Council Executive Director Robin Paoli says the total market may be twice as large.
Still, these arrangements make up a sliver of employer-sponsored health coverage in the United States. About 154 million people were enrolled in coverage through work last year, according to KFF.
Will growth continue?
Several things could cause more employers to offer ICHRAs. As health care costs continue to climb, more companies may look to limit their exposure to the hit.
Some tax breaks and incentives that encourage the arrangements could wind up in a final version of the Republican tax bill currently under consideration in the Senate.
More people also will be eligible for the arrangements if extra government subsidies that help buy coverage on the Affordable Care Act's individual marketplaces expire this year.
You can't participate in an ICHRA if you are already getting a subsidy from the government, noted Brian Blase, a White House health policy adviser in the first Trump administration.
'The enhanced subsidies, they crowd out private financing,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EchoStar (SATS) Skyrockets By 50% as Trump Orders Firm, FCC to Resolve Dispute
EchoStar (SATS) Skyrockets By 50% as Trump Orders Firm, FCC to Resolve Dispute

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

EchoStar (SATS) Skyrockets By 50% as Trump Orders Firm, FCC to Resolve Dispute

EchoStar Corporation (NASDAQ:SATS) is one of the . EchoStar Corporation jumped by 50 percent on Monday to close at $25.11 apiece as investor sentiment was buoyed by reports that President Donald Trump stepped in to its ongoing battle with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), spurring optimism about business continuations. According to a report by Reuters, Trump urged FCC Chairman Brendan Carr and EchoStar Corporation (NASDAQ:SATS) Chairman Charlie Ergen to reach a deal over the fate of the latter's wireless spectrum licenses. This followed a letter from the FCC last month notifying the company that it initiated an investigation to look into the company's compliance obligations to provide 5G services in the US. A telecom engineer behind the control board in a comms facility. Following the probe, EchoStar Corporation (NASDAQ:SATS) announced that it intentionally did not pay worth $326 million of interest payments for one of its senior notes, saying that its ongoing battle with the FCC froze its ability to make decisions. While we acknowledge the potential of SATS as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Daily News and other outlets ask judge to reject OpenAI effort to keep deleting data
Daily News and other outlets ask judge to reject OpenAI effort to keep deleting data

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Daily News and other outlets ask judge to reject OpenAI effort to keep deleting data

Lawyers for the Daily News, The New York Times and other news outlets suing ChatGPT's parent company, OpenAI, have asked a Manhattan judge to reject an effort by the technology giant to continue deleting data that could prove it stole journalists' work. Manhattan Federal Magistrate Judge Ona Wang last month ordered OpenAI to preserve its output logs and any related information slated for deletion after the news outlets accused the tech company of permanently dumping enormous swaths of data, hindering their ability to prove AI products could circumvent paywalls to 'plagiarize and regurgitate copyrighted content.' OpenAI has asked Wang to vacate the order, arguing that continuing to store the data would be a 'massive burden' and infringe on the privacy of users. The news outlets say that the argument runs contrary to what OpenAI tells its users about being subject to retaining data if the law requires it. They have noted that the AI companies don't deny the data deleted were pertinent to the lawsuit. 'What it does not dispute is that the output log data is relevant to the News Cases, which as OpenAI has long recognized, include infringement claims based on outputs generated by [OpenAI's] models and products,' lawyers wrote Tuesday. 'Nor can it dispute that, as a highly sophisticated technology company that is currently valued at more than $300 billion, it has both the means and ability to preserve this concededly relevant data.' The news outlets say that OpenAI has used every trick in the book to skirt accountability. In addition to the mass deletions, they have accused the tech company of installing filters 'designed to make it harder' to elicit answers containing journalists' copyrighted works. 'OpenAI's preferred course of action to 'protect its users' data and privacy' — immediately resuming mass deletions — will also, coincidentally, allow it to continue to destroy data that would show its liability for copyright infringement,' lawyers for the news outlets wrote. Addressing privacy concerns, Wang's May 13 order outlined that it was solely meant to preserve and segregate information that would not be provided 'wholesale' to anyone — or stored 'forever' — but used to address concerns raised in the suit. If Wang is inclined to entertain the AI companies' objection, the newspapers said she should give them a chance to analyze different populations of data and present findings to the court. The suit alleges OpenAI has illegally harvested millions of news stories to train its large language models and build generative AI products that can vomit them out — or versions of them — to users. That has sometimes resulted in journalists' pirated reporting being misstated or misrepresented, misinforming ChatGPT users, the newspapers have argued. While the newspapers' publishers have spent billions of dollars to send 'real people to real places to report on real events in the real world,' the two tech firms are 'purloining' the papers' reporting without compensation 'to create products that provide news and information plagiarized and stolen,' according to the lawsuit. OpenAI has argued that the vast amount of data used to train its artificial intelligence bots is protected by 'fair use' rules. The doctrine applies to rules that allow some to use copyrighted work for purposes like criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching and research. However, lawyers for the newspapers have argued that the fair use test involves transforming a copyrighted work into something new, and the new work cannot compete with the original in the same marketplace. The judge has rejected OpenAI's position that the newspapers haven't produced 'a shred of evidence' that people are using ChatGPT or OpenAI's API products to get news instead of paying for it. The newspapers noted Tuesday that engineers for the tech companies had all but admitted it themselves by acknowledging the chatbots weren't designed to slip past paywalls — not that they couldn't. They also cited another suit involving Google, in which an OpenAI engineer acknowledged local news was a 'pretty common quer[y]' among ChatGPT users. The Times originally brought the Manhattan Federal Court suit in December 2023. The News, along with other newspapers in affiliated companies MediaNews Group and Tribune Publishing, filed in April 2024. The other outlets included The Mercury News, The Denver Post, The Orange County Register and the St. Paul Pioneer Press, and Tribune Publishing's Chicago Tribune, Orlando Sentinel and South Florida Sun Sentinel. Lawyers for OpenAI did not respond to The News' requests for comment.

Asian shares decline after mixed Wall Street finish and tensions simmer in the Middle East
Asian shares decline after mixed Wall Street finish and tensions simmer in the Middle East

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Asian shares decline after mixed Wall Street finish and tensions simmer in the Middle East

TOKYO (AP) — Asian shares retreated Thursday as worries persisted about conflict in the Middle East. Ratcheting up tensions, President Donald Trump warned of the possibility of getting directly involved in the conflict with Israel, while Iran's supreme leader rejected U.S. calls for surrender. Oil prices and U.S. futures declined. In Asian trading, Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 shed 0.7% to 38,619.17. Shares in Japan's Nippon Steel Corp. rose 0.8% after it announced that its acquisition of U.S. Steel, which met U.S. government opposition for more than a year, was finally completed. Hong Kong's Hang Seng dropped 2% to 23,231.48 on heavy selling of tech-related shares, while the Shanghai Composite lost 0.9% to 3,359.78. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 was little changed at 8,528.30 and in South Korea, the Kospi lost 0.4% to 2,960.81. U.S. financial markets will be closed Thursday for the Juneteenth holiday. On Wednesday, U.S. stocks drifted to a mixed finish after the Federal Reserve indicated it may cut interest rates twice this year, though it's far from certain about that. The S&P 500 finished nearly unchanged at 5,980.87. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dipped 0.1% to 42,171.66, and the Nasdaq composite rose 0.1% to 19,546.27. Treasury yields also wavered but ultimately held relatively steady after the Fed released projections showing the median official expects to cut the federal funds rate twice by the end of 2025. That's the same number they were projecting three months ago, and it helped calm worries a bit that inflation caused by T rump's higher tariffs could tie the Fed's hands. Cuts in rates would make mortgages, credit-card payments and other loans cheaper for U.S. households and businesses, which in turn could strengthen the overall economy. But they could likewise fan inflation higher. So far, inflation has remained relatively tame, and it's near the Fed's target of 2%. But economists have been warning it may take months to feel the effects of tariffs. And inflation has been feeling upward pressure recently from a spurt in oil prices because of Israel's fighting with Iran. Fed Chair Jerome Powell stressed on Wednesday that all the uncertainty surrounding tariffs means the median forecast for two cuts to interest rates this year could end up being far from reality. 'Right now it's just a forecast in a very foggy time,' he said Fed officials are waiting to see how big Trump's tariffs will ultimately be, what they will affect and whether they will drive a one-time increase to inflation or something more dangerous. There is also still deep uncertainty about how much tariffs will grind down on the economy's growth. 'Because the economy is still solid, we can take the time to actually see what's going to happen,' Powell said. 'We'll make smarter and better decisions if we just wait a couple months or however long it takes to get a sense of really what is going to be the passthrough of inflation and what are going to be the effects on spending and hiring and all those things.' A report released Wednesday said fewer workers applied for unemployment benefits last week, possibly indicating fewer layoffs. But another said homebuilders broke ground on fewer homes last month than economists expected. That suggests higher mortgage rates may be casting a chill on the industry. In other dealings early Thursday, benchmark U.S. crude declined 10 cents to $73.40. Brent crude, the international standard, fell 24 cents to $76.46 a barrel. Oil prices have been yo-yoing as fears rise and ebb that the conflict between Israel and Iran could disrupt the global flow of crude. Iran is a major producer of oil and also sits on the narrow Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world's crude passes. In currency trading, the U.S. dollar fell to 145.05 Japanese yen from 145.13 yen. The euro cost $1.1468, down from $1.1484. ___ AP Business Writer Stan Choe contributed. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store