Google, Amazon, Others Respond to Senators' Inquiry About Funding CSAM Via Ads
Under pressure from bipartisan lawmakers, Google, Amazon, and other major ad industry players have shared the actions they're taking after they inadvertently helped facilitate advertising on a site known to host child sexual abuse material (CSAM).
Amazon has issued refunds to advertising customers whose ads appeared on the website. Google has blocked advertising on the site but did not clarify whether it will reimburse advertisers who were affected.
"We have always strictly prohibited ads that we serve from appearing next to content of this nature–this was a clear breach of our policies," Amazon's vice president of public policy Brian Huseman wrote in a letter addressed to Senators Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), obtained by ADWEEK.
Earlier this month, the two senators demanded answers from the tech giants and other advertising groups after an Adalytics report found that, through advertising networks operated by Google and Amazon, ads from Fortune 500 brands appeared on an image-hosting site and a sister site that had been flagged by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) for publishing CSAM.
In his letter to lawmakers, Amazon's Huseman said the company "immediately blocked these websites from any further ads through our systems." The company has refunded all advertisers whose messages appeared on pages on the site in question, ibb.co and the associated img.bb, he said.
Only "a tiny portion of advertising spend for a small number of advertisers" was impacted, and the company has refunded all advertisers whose content appeared on the website in question, an Amazon spokesperson told ADWEEK.
"We regret that this occurred and took swift action to block these websites from showing our ads," the spokesperson added. "We have strict policies in place against serving ads on content of this nature, and we are taking additional steps to help ensure this does not happen in the future."
Meanwhile, in a response to senators issued by Google's head of U.S. federal government affairs and public policy, Anne Wall, the company said it has "invested significant resources-in technology, specialized teams, and time-to deterring, detecting, removing, and reporting child sexual exploitation content and behavior."
Google said it demonetized ibb.co in January 2024, and the site has generated no ad revenue since then. The associated imgbb.com, the company said, was demand-restricted last July, meaning that most ads were already disallowed on Google's ad network. Google fully demonetized imgbb.com when it learned about the forthcoming Adalytics report.
The company also emphasized its strict publisher monetization policies, enforcement measures, and advertiser controls. Google did not announce any policy or product changes, but said it will "continue to holistically evaluate our processes to determine whether any additional steps should be taken."
Google declined a request for comment and did not respond to questions about whether it would reimburse affected advertisers.
The senators also questioned verification vendors DoubleVerify and Integral Ad Science (IAS) over apparent brand safety failures, as well as the Media Rating Council (MRC) and the Trustworthy Accountability Group (TAG), which issued stamps of approval for their technology.
All six organizations-Google, Amazon, DoubleVerify, IAS, the MRC, and TAG-have responded to senators' inquiries in letters obtained by ADWEEK.
In its letter, DoubleVerify claimed that its tools function based on advertiser preferences and that technical limitations contributed to ads appearing alongside explicit content on the site in question.
Following the scandal, DoubleVerify has rolled out a handful of brand safety updates, expanded its blocklists, and begun working more closely with law enforcement and NCMEC to enhance detection and prevention measures. The firm has also enabled access to full URL-level reporting for clients, which allows brands to understand the exact pages on which their ads appear, not just the domains.
IAS, for its part, said it has blacklisted the flagged domains-which it found represented less than 0.00025% of its monitored impressions-and is reassessing how it classifies image-hosting sites. The verification company also outlined limitations in monitoring image-only pages, but reaffirmed its commitment to industry safety standards.
Earlier this month, IAS also expanded its exclusion list, adding domains flagged in five years of NCMEC reports. It's also improving its user-generated content filtering tech and boosting URL-level reporting to improve transparency for advertisers.
"We are committed to working in partnership with the industry and other companies to reduce the proliferation of bad actors while preserving the open internet," wrote IAS CEO Lisa Utzschneider.
Meanwhile, MRC head George Ivie took the opportunity to explain that both DoubleVerify and IAS hold MRC accreditation for 'Property Level Ad Verification,' which examines text and keywords rather than visual content. This distinction is significant, he said, as the CSAM-hosting site in question typically contains minimal text, making the content undetectable through current accredited methods.
Moving forward, Ivie wrote, "MRC encourages services to submit Content Level Brand Safety products for audit and accreditation." He also said MRC will consider strengthening disclosure requirements about the limitations of current verification technologies.
In a 23-page response to senators signed by vice president of policy and compliance Todd Miller, TAG claimed to be "the leading global initiative fighting criminal activity and increasing trust in the digital advertising industry."
The company pushed back against Blackburn's and Blumenthal's broad labeling of platforms as 'CSAM sites' merely for receiving NCMEC notifications, adding that operating on this standard would have negative implications for user-generated content platforms like Amazon, Facebook, Pinterest, X, and others.
TAG said it has reached out to NCMEC to "understand whether there is a list or tool providing actionable intelligence that TAG and its member companies could employ to ensure the avoidance of association with or monetization of CSAM content."
In the fallout since the initial report was published, the MRC and TAG have come under fire from ad industry leaders who view their approaches as insufficiently stringent.
The six letters from industry players have not been published publicly.
DoubleVerify, IAS, MRC and TAG did not respond to requests for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
States are trying to save local news from Big Tech. Trump isn't helping.
SACRAMENTO, California — Blue-state lawmakers are increasingly turning to tech giants for cash to save struggling newsrooms, fearful that President Donald Trump's policies could crush already reeling local news outlets. Democrats in five blue states — Hawaii, Illinois, New York, Oregon and Washington — have been pushing to make tech companies pay outlets in exchange for displaying news content, arguing newsrooms should be reimbursed for advertising revenues lost to aggregation on sites like Google News and Facebook. The efforts are ratcheting up in the face of a multifaceted challenge from the Trump administration, already hostile to traditional journalism outlets, as it seeks spending cuts for public media and enacts economic policies that states say have hurt their ability to backstop local newsroom funding. 'Whether it's tariffs on newsprint imported from Canada or a reduction in funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and others — all of these have a negative impact,' said Democratic Washington state Sen. Marko Liias, who introduced a tech tax proposal this year. 'What they're doing at the federal level is pushing us in the wrong direction.' The strategy of forcing online platforms to pay for news content isn't new, tested in countries like Canada and Australia, which saw fierce pushback from Google and Meta when they passed their own laws. Still, state lawmakers see it as the best option to tap into vast tech resources, given their own tight budgets. 'Big Tech should compensate local newsrooms for [content] they've been profiting from for many, many years,' said Illinois Sen. Steve Stadelman, a Democrat who worked as a local TV journalist for more than two decades before assuming office. California — home to one of the country's largest media markets that has seen significant journalist layoffs in recent years — attempted the same approach last year, but also faced forceful opposition from tech. Sacramento ended up striking a handshake deal with Google to jointly fund newsrooms through public and private funds, but even that effort has been downsized this year. That may spell trouble ahead for the other states trying to follow its lead: Bills in Hawaii, Illinois, New York and Washington all failed this year, though lawmakers have vowed to revive them. Oregon's proposal is still working through the Legislature but is short on time. 'There's no question that our state budget this year doesn't leave any room for discretionary funding,' said California state Sen. Catherine Blakespear, a vocal advocate for funding local news with public money. 'The question is, what are the state's priorities?' Journalism's decline started long before the Trump era. Newspaper employment has plummeted 70 percent in the last two decades as a net total of 3,300 papers shuttered, according to Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism. Shrinking ad revenue coupled with dwindling print subscriptions has fueled the downward spiral. A 2023 Pew Research report found annual U.S. newspaper ad revenues fell from a 2005 peak of nearly $50 billion to less than $10 billion in 2022 as the advertising business shifted away from lucrative print placements toward less profitable online ads. The decline coincides with skyrocketing ad revenues for tech companies. Online advertising is projected to be a $1 trillion market by 2027, with Google and Meta dominating the sector; Google's advertising revenue alone represented nearly 1 percent of America's entire economic output in 2023. Changes under the Trump administration have exacerbated journalism's struggles, critics argue. House Republicans last week approved the president's plan to claw back $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which awards grants to PBS and NPR affiliate stations. The funding cut promises to trigger staff and programming reductions for rural stations that rely more heavily on CPB grants. 'It's so ideological and frustrating, because the people who benefit most from public broadcast stations tend to be, ironically, in Republican areas, more rural areas,' Stadelman said. Meanwhile, Trump's on-again, off-again tariffs and proposed cuts to Medicaid and federal food aid in congressional Republicans' domestic policy megabill threaten to destabilize already tight budgets in blue states, forcing lawmakers to reconsider how much cash they're willing to spare for local journalism. Trump has argued his funding cuts recoup wasted government spending and accused NPR and PBS of being 'very biased' toward left-leaning causes. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said it's 'well within' Republicans' authority to eliminate taxpayer funding for 'biased news services.' Public media leaders insist their coverage is nonpartisan and argue the president's move to slash their funding is unlawful. 'It's no surprise that Democrat governors are shamelessly gaslighting the President's effective tariff policies to cover for their abysmal mismanagement of their states,' Fields said in a statement. 'This mission will continue regardless of what blue-state blowhards say.' Tech critics seeking to make up for journalism losses argue platforms like Google News and Facebook allow readers to skim hundreds of headlines without paying for a news subscription, stealing viewers from news sites and leaving outlets with fewer, less profitable advertising opportunities. 'They are the ones who are in part responsible for destroying local news,' said Connie Leyva, a former California state senator who now leads PBS member station KVCR in San Bernardino, outside Los Angeles. 'They're not hurting.' Google and Meta didn't respond to questions about state journalism efforts, but have previously argued measures taxing their advertising revenue are illegal and impede online access to news content. In California, State Assemblymember Buffy Wicks proposed legislation in 2023 that would have forced Google and Meta to bargain with outlets on a set price for sharing news content. Wicks used the legislation as leverage to negotiate with Google, resulting in a first-of-its-kind news funding agreement last August. But the agreement has been pared back as California stares down a $12 billion budget hole that Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom blamed largely on Trump's tariffs. Newsom in his May budget plan slashed the state's first-year payment by two-thirds to just $10 million. A week later, Google reduced its first-year contribution by one-third to match California's investment. Journalist groups that already saw the agreement as a sweetheart deal for Google said the downsizing left newsrooms to fight for crumbs. Wicks and her allies were relieved to receive any public money in a tough budget year, even though the amount was lower than anticipated. 'Facing what we're facing now, it could have been zero,' said Regina Wilson, executive director of California Black Media, which advocates for Black-owned, independent news publications. Democrats in other states that are eager to make platforms finance local journalism are struggling to advance their legislation amid similar budget challenges and tech pushback. 'That's why it was kind of a big deal when Assemblymember Wicks announced that settlement last year because it wasn't really just about California. It was about all the other states too,' said Matt Pearce, policy director at the nonprofit Rebuild Local News. 'California was definitely a huge letdown to that community.' The most promising effort so far has come in Oregon, where Democratic state Sen. Khanh Pham is pushing to make tech firms pay local outlets for monetizing their digital news content, with 10 percent of the proceeds earmarked for journalism programs housed at the University of Oregon. Pham's bill is awaiting a vote in the Legislature's upper chamber, and Democratic Gov. Tina Kotek has expressed support for the idea. However, First Amendment complaints from tech companies forced staffers to spend extra time ensuring the bill was legally sound. Now, Pham has mere days to push the bill through both houses of Oregon's Legislature before session ends on June 29. 'The platforms have been lobbying very intensively against this bill from day one of the session,' said Pham staffer Doyle Canning. 'It's quite remarkable that we have made it this far.' Liias wasn't as successful across the border in Washington. The senator's proposal to fund a journalism grant program by taxing social media platforms and search engines stalled early in the legislative process amid resistance from tech companies, and as Washington advanced other taxes to close budget gaps. Lawmakers cannot reconsider the measure until 2026. 'Unfortunately, we don't have the same market power that Californa does,' Liias said. '[It] would've been nice to reach some sort of negotiated agreement.' Other Democrat-led bills fared even worse: New York state Sen. Rachel May's proposal to make tech companies negotiate a fair price for news-link sharing stalled this spring without receiving a committee hearing, as did Hawaii state Rep. Ikaika Hussey's plan to fund outlets by taxing platforms' advertising revenues. Hussey chalked the result up to his inexperience as a first-term lawmaker and said he plans to tweak his approach before reintroducing the bill. In Illinois, Stadelman for the second year in a row decided to delay his bill that would force platforms to pay local publishers an agreed-upon fee for sharing news links. His decision comes as Illinois advances more than $700 million in new taxes aimed at closing budget gaps that Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker blamed in part on 'Trump's incomprehensible tariff policies.' It didn't help that Meta vowed to ban news content from its platforms in Illinois if Stadelman's measure passed — a threat the company and Google have posed in other places that passed or attempted similar legislation, like California, Australia and Canada. Stadelman said he's 'waiting to see how things play out in California' before reviving his bill. However, he cautioned that the funding model other lawmakers are pushing — raising funds by making companies pay for sharing news links — could face yet another threat from an emergent technology: artificial intelligence, which sites like Google are increasingly embracing to generate search summaries. Stadelman hopes state lawmakers will coordinate their efforts to find a solution that thwarts Big Tech's lobbying playbook while guarding against the growing threat that AI will further reduce traffic to local news sites. 'We need to find a way for the states to work together,' Stadelman said. 'If states work together, maybe that increases our leverage.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scott Galloway Says People Are Still Spending, Shopping At Whole Foods, And Vacationing Despite 'Irrational Economic Policy.' Why Is That?
On a recent episode of 'Prof G Markets,' marketing professor and investor Scott Galloway noted that Americans are still eating out, booking trips, and shopping at places like Whole Foods, even though the economy feels increasingly uncertain. In his view, consumer spending habits haven't yet reflected what he calls 'irrational economic policy.' 'If you didn't know all of this was going on, I'm not sure you would know what's going on,' Galloway said, referring to President Donald Trump's policies and global instability. Markets remain near record highs. People are spending. Unemployment is still low. On the surface, the economy looks fine. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target – Many are rushing to But podcast guest, economist Kathryn Anne Edwards, warned it's more complicated than it seems. 'We are witnessing... a slow slowing of the U.S. economy,' she said. Job growth has been revised downward in recent months, and more people are quietly dropping out of the labor force. For job seekers, it's already feeling like a recession. One key reason for the economy's resilience, according to Edwards, is that the threats haven't fully materialized yet. 'Trump has more bark than bite,' she said. 'Were he to pursue [his policies] fully... we'd start to see declines in the labor force, massive shortages, and reductions in government spending.' In short, the damage hasn't kicked in because many of the policies are still just talk. Businesses are holding back but not retreating, waiting to see what happens. 'They're terrible, but they're also not in full practice,' she said. Trending: Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. Beneath the headline numbers, there are warning signs. Healthcare jobs are growing, but Edwards said that's due to an aging population, not economic strength. Podcast co-host Ed Elson cited LinkedIn data that says entry-level hiring is down 23% from March 2020, with recent college grads facing some of the highest unemployment rates in years. 'The unemployment rate for young people is always higher,' she said, with Elson adding that it's the highest in years. The conversation also turned to long-term economic policy and the ongoing push for more tax cuts. '37% of the increase in the federal debt [since 2001] comes from tax cuts,' Edwards explained. 'That's a pretty large number for what I would struggle to point to a single clear accomplishment.' She argued that policymakers have done little to reduce inequality and that tax cuts are more political than economic. Galloway agreed: 'We've been pursuing a strategy of tax cuts for several decades and it isn't working.' As for raising the minimum wage, Edwards said it's more reasonable to link it to average or median wages in the economy instead of productivity growth, which can be distorted by factors like corporate profits or acknowledged the difficulty younger workers face but suggested part of the issue may be expectations. 'I don't believe they can't get jobs,' he said, referring to recent college grads. 'I just don't think they're willing to take the jobs that are available.' He argued that high salary expectations, especially among elite college graduates, may not match the current hiring climate. 'The average compensation at [New York University] Stern is $212,000. I think there's an absence of $212,000 a year jobs at Salesforce being product managers.' Elson pointed a finger at universities. 'The colleges should be on the hook for a low employment rate if you graduate at that time and can't find a job,' he said. Maybe it's not just the market or the student—maybe it's the college, too. Read Next: Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. Inspired by Uber and Airbnb – Deloitte's fastest-growing software company is transforming 7 billion smartphones into income-generating assets – Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Scott Galloway Says People Are Still Spending, Shopping At Whole Foods, And Vacationing Despite 'Irrational Economic Policy.' Why Is That? originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson reports $2M payment for her memoir ‘Lovely One' in 2024
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson reported receiving over $2 million from Penguin Random House, which published her book, 'Lovely One: A Memoir,' in 2024. Jackson's financial disclosure report indicated that Penguin Random House paid her a $2,068,750 book advance in 2024. The company also provided reimbursements for transportation, food, and lodging to promote her book at events across the country. 'Lovely One,' whose title references her West African birth name's meaning, was published in early September, and is described by Amazon as 'tracing her family's ascent from segregation to her confirmation on America's highest court within the span of one generation.' Her book tour spanned the country with stops in major cities including San Francisco, Seattle, Chicago, Miami and Atlanta. This is not the first time Penguin Random House has sent her a massive payment, as a similar disclosure report revealed the company paid her a $893,750 book advance in 2023, bringing the total over two years to almost $3 million. Jackson's financial disclosure report indicated that Penguin Random House paid her a $2,068,750 book advance in 2024. AP The Supreme Court recently adopted a formal ethics code for receiving free travel and other gifts. However, there is no current cap on how much justices may earn from book deals. 'Last month, Barrett, Jackson, Gorsuch and Sotomayor recused themselves from a decision over whether to hear a case involving the parent company of the book publisher Penguin Random House,' the Washington Post reported. Her book tour spanned the country with stops in major cities including San Francisco, Seattle, Chicago, Miami and Atlanta. Penguin Random House 'The justices did not explain their reasoning for sitting out the discussion, but an ethics expert said it was probably because the case involved the German company Bertelsmann, which owns the publishing house that has published or will be publishing their books.'
