Kin of accused Gilgo Beach killer Rex Heuermann recall night their lives changed in new documentary: ‘This isn't happening'
The pounding on the door of the unkempt Massapequa Park house late on the night of July 13, 2023, changed the lives of Rex Heuermann's family forever.
FBI agents and local cops forced their way in and upended the lives of the accused Long Island serial killer's wife and two grown children, just hours after the hulking architect was arrested outside his Manhattan office in the grisly cold-case murder of three women.
Their beloved father is a monster.
Advertisement
7 Rex Heuermann's wife, Asa Ellerup, left, and her daughter, Victoria Heuerrmann, recall the 2023 FBI raid.
Peacock
7 Rex Heuermann's Massapequa Park home has been mobbed by media and onlookers since his 2023 arrest.
James Keivom
'And I just hear banging: 'FBI, open up!'' Victoria Heuermann, the accused killer's daughter, said in her first public interviews in the new Peacock docu-series, 'The Gilgo Beach Killer: House of Secrets.' 'This isn't happening. This isn't happening.
Advertisement
'I knew my dad had stuff with the IRS, Dept. of Labor. But the FBI?' she said. 'And they said we have evidence your dad murdered all these women and your home is now a crime scene. I never would imagine I'd hear that in my life.'
Rex Heuermann, 61, now stands charged with the murder and mutilation of seven sex workers who disappeared more than 30 years and were dumped in desolate stretches of Long Island.
7 Rex Heuermann is charged with the murder and mutilation of seven Long Island sex workers since 1993.
Newsday
7 Rex Heuermann is charged with killing seven sex workers since 1993. He has not been linked to the death of Karen Vergata, who is shown at bottom right.
Suffolk County Police Department
Advertisement
Suffolk County prosecutors maintain that the accused killer kept a detailed 'how-to' document on his computer to plan the gruesome slayings — and may have slaughtered the women in the family basement while his wife and daughters were away.
They suggested the murders could have happened inside a concrete gun vault in the family's basement, where Heuermann, a gun enthusiast, stored as many as 300 weapons.
To his wife and children, news of his alleged exploits shattered their lives in one night.
Asa Ellerup, Rex Heuermann's wife, recalled waiting up for her husband to return from his Midtown office on the day of the FBI raid, when the knock on the door came around 11 p.m.
Advertisement
'I was waiting for my husband, but he didn't come home. And then suddenly I see them come on the front porch,' she said. 'They push their way in and they asked me, do you know why we're here. And I said, my husband's guns?
7 Peacock's new docu-series, 'The Gilgo Beach Killer: House of Secrets,' includes first-ever interviews.
AP
'And the woman investigator says to me, 'Have you heard about the murders on Gilgo Beach?' And I said, 'I heard of them, but I don't know anything. And she said, 'Your husband, he knows all about it,'' Ellerup recalled. 'They're telling me that my husband is alleged to be some horrific serial killer
'And then the investigator says to me my husband will be charged in the morning with murdering three women,' she said in the documentary. 'And I told her she's crazy.'
Ellerup, Victoria and her half-brother Christopher Sheridan were all kicked out of the house and into a nearby hotel with little more than the clothes on their backs — but only after being grilled by the feds.
'They started asking about if my dad was ever sexually advancive towards mem or touched me, and I said no, I cannot really recall any time he was like that,' Victoria Heuermann said.
7 Victoria Heuermann, left, and her mother, Asa Ellerup, said the FBI barged into their home on July 13, 2023.
Peacock
'For the first time in my life, I'm not waking up in the morning and going to work. I actually don't even know what tomorrow was even gonna look like.'
Advertisement
What followed was the first of two intrusive and thorough searches of the house that saw local, state and federal authorities rummage inside and dig out the backyard in a hunt for evidence.
Suffolk County District Attorney Ray Tierney said DNA evidence from hairs found on the bodies of all seven victims linked back to the Heuermanns — including a sample found on a pizza box outside the Manhattan office and a sample snatched from a soft drink Victoria tossed into a trash can.
Heuermann, 61, stands accused of killing seven sex workers since 1993 and dumping them along Ocean Parkway — with the remains found between 2010 and 2011.
7 Rex Heuermann and Asa Ellerup met when they were 18 and eventually married in 1995 in Sweden.
Peacock
Advertisement
The murders remained unsolved until his 2023 arrest in the deaths of Amber Lynn Costello, Megan Waterman and Melissa Barthelemy. In January 2024 he was also charged with killing Maureen Brainard-Barnes, with the four women collectively known as the 'Gilgo Four' among locals.
Tierney ultimately charged Heuermann with three other murders — Valerie Mack, Jessica Taylor and Sandra Costilla, the first victim, who was killed in 1993.
Heuermann pleaded not guilty to all of the charges lodged against him.
His lawyer, Michael Brown, has asked the judge to separate at least some of the murder cases to have them tried separately, and has raised doubts about the DNA evidence.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
32 minutes ago
- New York Post
Alleged LA riot leader's father slams him for handing out supplies to anti-ICE protesters
The dad of a young union worker and socialist activist arrested by the FBI for handing out face shields to dozens of LA rioters said his son isn't a criminal — but slammed him for supplying the anti-ICE riots, and leading the feds to bust down the door of their family home. Francisco Orellana's reaction to seeing his son Alejandro 'Alex' Orellana driving a truck loaded with supplies for protesters was: 'What the f–k are you doing?' The elder Orellana, a US citizen who moved to the US in the 1970s, told The Post the feds handcuffed the whole family in pursuit of his son on Thursday morning, smashing in the front door of their Los Angeles house and breaking a window on his truck. 10 Alejandro 'Alex' Orellana was arrested after passing out face shields to LA rioters. USAttyEssayli/X 10 The FBI raided Orellana's LA house where he lives with his parents and sibling. Courtesy of Francisco Orellana The younger Orellana was busted on charges of conspiracy to commit civil disorders, US Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli said. Images taken at the riot show dozens of protesters running up to a truck Alex was allegedly driving to grab 'Bionic Shield' transparent masks, which are normally used at jobsites to protect workers' faces from flying debris or chemical splashes. Francisco Orellana, a construction technician, told The Post he didn't know how his son got involved in the protests, and said he may have been in the truck because someone asked him for a favor. 'My son is a good boy … he's not a criminal. He doesn't have a bad record, he's clear,' he said. 'I saw the picture [of Alejandro in the truck], which my sister-in-law sent to my wife. I said, 'what the f–k are you doing? Why are you doing that?'' 10 Boxes of face shields being passed out the back of a truck in LA. FOX11 10 Orellana's father Francisco told The Post his son is a 'good boy' and doesn't have a criminal record — but still questioned why he would allegedly help rioters. FOX11 He said his son told him, 'Papa, I don't think this is illegal,' but the concerned dad had his doubts. 'I said, 'it ends up being a big problem when you're giving stuff to people [who do violence]. They burned police cars, they broke windows, this is not right.' I said, 'It's illegal to [help] people fighting with the police, people fighting with immigration.' Alex Orellana, a US Marine veteran, is a UPS worker and a shop steward for the Teamster's union who has been active for years with fighting for social justice causes — including with Centro CSO, which famously trained Cesar Chavez, according to social media posts. One video shows him giving a May Day speech last year in black combat boots and camouflage pants. 10 Orellana's Marine uniform seen on a pile of clothes after the FBI raided his house. Courtesy of Francisco Orellana 10 A damaged door frame in the house after the FBI raid. Courtesy of Francisco Orellana On June 6, he wrote gleefully for the socialist news site Fight Back! about protesters chasing down federal agents in Los Angeles and forcing them to leave the neighborhood of Boyle Heights. The elder Orellana said he disagrees with the protesters' tactics, even though some cheered his son's alleged actions in helping them. 'Some people are thinking, 'he's helping people. He's doing a good job.' I don't think that. I tell a lot of people, 'don't go to the protests,'' he said. 10 FBI agents took the entire family's electronic devices in the raid, Francisco Orellana told The Post. Courtesy of Francisco Orellana 10 Damage inside Orellana's house seen after the raid. Courtesy of Francisco Orellana He detailed the federal agents' raid on the family home, where Francisco lives with his wife and two adult sons, including Alex. 'They broke down my door, broke the window of my truck, they broke my wall. … I woke up, and I heared boom boom boom on the door. I said, 'wait, wait, wait! Let me put on my clothes, let me put on my shoes …The FBI, they arrested me, they arrested my wife, my other son,' he said. 'They go through my house. Who's going to pay for my house? Who's going to fix these things?' Francisco said the FBI took the phones and laptops for everyone in the home and held them in custody for an hour. 10 A protester waving a Mexican-US flag in front of police officers in downtown LA on June 9, 2025. Photo by RONALDO SCHEMIDT/AFP via Getty Images 10 Police officers in riot gear blocking an on ramp to the 101 freeway in LA on June 11, 2025. Photo byAs for his take on immigration, Francisco said law-abiding people coming into the country to work is a good thing, but condemned the many he sees as taking advantage of the system. 'It's too many people not working. Who's paying for them? You and me, and everybody working. We're paying to keep those people here,' he said, sharing a story about one of his neighbors. 'She has seven kids. They said the government pays rent, gives them money for food, everything. I told her one day, 'I am the government. They're taking that money from my check. You eat because we're working. We don't work, you don't eat,' he said. He also spared no praise for the lefty policies of Golden State politicians, whom he blames for the current state of affairs. 'California is no good. Democratic people left the state really, really bad.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The FBI Raided This Innocent Georgia Family's Home. The Supreme Court Just Revived Their Lawsuit.
It's been almost eight years since an FBI SWAT team arrived at Curtrina Martin and Toi Cliatt's home, detonated a flash grenade inside, ripped the door off, and stormed into the couple's bedroom with guns drawn. Agents handcuffed Cliatt at gunpoint, and Martin, who had tried to barricade herself inside of her closet, says she fell on a rack amid the mayhem. But law enforcement would not find who they were looking for there, because that suspect, Joseph Riley, lived in a nearby house on a different street. The issue is still a relevant one for Martin and Cliatt, along with Martin's son, Gabe—who was 7 years old at the time of the raid—as the group has fought for years, unsuccessfully, for the right to sue the government over the break-in. The Supreme Court on Thursday resurrected that lawsuit, unanimously ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit had settled on a faulty analysis when it barred Martin and Cliatt from suing in April 2024. But the plaintiffs' legal battle is still far from over. "If federal officers raid the wrong house, causing property damage and assaulting innocent occupants, may the homeowners sue the government for damages?" wrote Justice Neil Gorsuch. "The answer is not as obvious as it might be." The issue before the Court did not pertain to immunity for any individual law enforcement agent, whom the 11th Circuit shielded from liability in its decision last year. The justices instead considered if the lower court had erred when it also blocked the lawsuit from proceeding under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), the law that allows individuals to bring certain state-law tort claims against the federal government for damages caused by federal workers acting within the scope of their employment. There are many exceptions to the FTCA, however, that allow the feds to evade such claims—a microcosm of the convoluted maze plaintiffs must navigate to sue the government. One of those, the intentional tort exception, dooms suits that allege intentional wrongdoing, including assault, battery, false imprisonment, and false arrest, among several others. Yet the FTCA also contains a law enforcement proviso—essentially an exception to the exception—that permits claims to get around that carve-out when the misconduct in question is committed by "investigative or law enforcement officers." Notably here, Congress passed that addition in the 1970s in response to two highly publicized wrong-house raids. The 11th Circuit accordingly observed that the proviso would allow Martin and Cliatt's intentional tort claims to survive the exception. The court killed those claims anyway. It cited the Supremacy Clause, which the judges said protected the government from liability if its employees' actions had "some nexus with furthering federal policy and [could] reasonably be characterized as complying with the full range of federal law." Not so, said the Supreme Court. Somewhat surprisingly, that put it in agreement with the government—which, prior to oral arguments, conceded the 11th Circuit's conclusion there was incorrect, and that it did not care to defend it. "We find the government's concession commendable and correct," writes Gorsuch. "The FTCA does not permit the Eleventh Circuit's Supremacy Clause defense." Arguably the bigger question before the Court pertained to a different FTCA carve-out: the discretionary function exception, which, true to its name, precludes claims from proceeding if the alleged misconduct came from a duty that involves discretion. The 11th Circuit dismissed Martin and Cliatt's claims alleging negligent wrongdoing—distinctive under the law from intentional torts—writing that "the FBI did not have stringent policies or procedures in place that dictate how agents are to prepare for warrant executions." Lawrence Guerra, a former FBI special agent and the leader of the raid, thus had discretion, the judges said. But the 11th Circuit took its discretionary analysis a step further, ruling that, for acts of wrongdoing that have intentionality, the law enforcement proviso trumps the discretionary exception outright. The justices rejected that. "The law enforcement proviso…overrides only the intentional-tort exception in that subsection," the Court said, "not the discretionary-function exception or other exceptions." So where does that leave Martin and Cliatt? "On remand, the 11th Circuit will need to decide whether raiding the wrong house is a 'discretionary function,'" says Patrick Jaicomo, an attorney at the Institute for Justice, who represented the pair. Jaicomo was hoping the Court would address that very confusion. The plaintiffs "call on us to determine whether and under what circumstances the discretionary-function exception bars suits for wrong-house raids and similar misconduct," writes Gorsuch. "Unless we take up that further question, they worry, the Eleventh Circuit on remand may take too broad a view of the exception and dismiss their claims again. After all, the plaintiffs observe, in the past that court has suggested that the discretionary-function exception bars any claim 'unless a source of federal law "specifically prescribes" a course of conduct' and thus deprives an official of all discretion." The Supreme Court, however, ultimately opted for a narrow approach, though the justices acknowledged "that important questions surround whether and under what circumstances that exception may ever foreclose a suit like this one." In a concurring opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, said there are no such circumstances when considering the fact pattern presented in Martin and Cliatt's suit. "Like driving, executing a warrant always involves some measure of discretion," she wrote. "Yet it is hard to see how Guerra's conduct in this case, including his allegedly negligent choice to use his personal GPS and his failure to check the street sign or house number on the mailbox before breaking down Martin's door and terrorizing the home's occupants, involved the kind of policy judgments that the discretionary-function exception was designed to protect." That would seem like the right conclusion, particularly when considering the genesis of that law enforcement proviso, which Congress enacted to give recourse to victims who suffered at the hands of near-identical misconduct. Those lawmakers clearly did not think the discretionary exception would doom their claims. That the law was meant to protect people like Martin, Cliatt, and Martin's son is why a bipartisan group of lawmakers—including Sens. Rand Paul (R–Ky.), Ron Wyden (D–Ore.), and Cynthia Lummis (R–Wyo.), along with Reps. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.), Nikema Williams (D–Ga.), and Harriet Hageman (R–Wyo.)—had urged the Court to take up their case. Sotomayor's description of Guerra's negligence is also salient and was the subject of one of the more interesting exchanges when the Supreme Court heard the case. Arguing for the Justice Department, Frederick Liu, assistant to the solicitor general, said it was too much for Martin and Cliatt to expect "that the officer should have checked the house number on the mailbox." "Yeah, you might look at the address of the house before you knock down the door," Gorsuch responded. Liu countered that such a decision "is filled with policy tradeoffs." "Really?" Gorsuch replied. The post The FBI Raided This Innocent Georgia Family's Home. The Supreme Court Just Revived Their Lawsuit. appeared first on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Man handcuffed for allegedly giving out face shields to ‘suspected rioters' at LA protest
LOS ANGELES (KTLA) – Federal authorities handcuffed a man in East Los Angeles on Thursday who allegedly handed out face shields during an immigration protest. His detainment sparked a backlash from local residents. FBI agents handcuffed Alejandro Theodoro Orellana for allegedly 'distributing face shields to suspected rioters' on Tuesday, U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli posted on the social media platform X. The post included a photo of the suspect, along with a broadcast clip from Fox News appearing to show a man providing masks to protestors from the back of a pickup truck. Protesters attempt to disturb ICE agents at Los Angeles-area hotels 'We are moving quickly to identify and arrest those involved in organizing and/or supporting civil disorder in Los Angeles,' Essayli stated in the post. An LA resident living in the area of East 6th Street and South Rowan Avenue told Nexstar's KTLA that he knew Orellana — not very well — but was unaware of any criminal activity on Orellana's part. 'No, nothing of the sort. Nothing at all. No one in this block have I heard any, you know, bad news from or any gossip,' the resident said. Protests over immigration raids continue across the US with more planned At the time of the interview, the resident said he was not aware of why authorities had detained Orellana. He did say, however, that he awoke on Thursday to the sound of flash bangs and calls from authorities to stay indoors. Video shared to showed a small crowd shouting at law enforcement near East 6th Street and South Ditman Avenue around 6:30 a.m. One person is seen using a bullhorn while another is heard shouting expletives at deputies. Law enforcement left the area around 6:45 a.m. This story was updated at 5:14 p.m. EDT to reflect that Orellana was handcuffed and detained, not arrested. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
