
Young teens could pay more for Welsh buses than 16-21 year-olds
Plans to discount bus travel for young people in Wales have been botched, according to Plaid Cymru.As part of its budget deal with the Liberal Democrats, the Welsh government announced a trial scheme to cap single bus fares at £1 for 16-21 year olds.Under current fare rates, in some areas 11-15 year olds will pay more than the new fares.Transport Secretary Ken Skates said negotiations are underway with the bus industry to ensure young people do not have to pay more than the cap.
He said that "ideally" bus companies would contribute to ensure tickets for younger bus users, but that this had not been confirmed.
Peredur Owen Griffiths, Plaid Cymru transport spokesperson, said the party agreed with the principle of the scheme but that it showed "all the signs of a botched job, designed in haste to pass this Labour Welsh government's unambitious budget"."Under the new system, learners travelling to schools will be at a disadvantage to 16-21 years olds," he said. Currently, fares in Cardiff for people aged 5-15 are £1.70 for a single journey anywhere in the city and £1.40 for the shortest journey within a local zone, such as Ely.In Newport, a child aged between 5-15 pays £1.70 for any single journey in the city. In Swansea on First Bus, they pay between £1.10 and £2 depending on distance.Under the pilot, from September 16-21 year olds will pay £1 for all single fares, and £3 for unlimited all-day tickets.Plaid says it wants learner travel laws updated so that 11-15 year-olds travelling to school are not disadvantaged.
In the Senedd on Wednesday, Skates told the Senedd: "We are still in negotiations with the industry to ensure that young people that do not benefit from our £1 flat fair don't have to pay more."Later, in response to questions from Owen Griffiths, he added: "Ideally, bus operators will at least contribute to reducing the cost of fares for under-16s."But this is yet to be confirmed and that's why negotiations are ongoing."We intend to bring those negotiations to a satisfactory conclusion as soon as possible and certainly in time for the scheme's introduction."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Wales will overhaul its democracy at the next election. Here's what's changing
Next May's Senedd (Welsh parliament) election won't just be another trip to the polls. It will mark a major change in how Welsh democracy works. The number of elected members is increasing from 60 to 96, and the voting system is being overhauled. These changes have now passed into law. But what exactly is changing – and why? When the assembly was first established in 1999, it had limited powers and just 60 members. Much has changed since then and it now has increased responsibility, including primary law-making powers over matters such as health, education, environment, transport and economic development. The Wales Act 2014 also bestowed a number of new financial powers on the now Senedd, including taxation and borrowing powers. But its size has stayed the same. This led to concerns about capacity and effectiveness. In 2017, an independent expert panel on electoral reform concluded that the Senedd was no longer fit for purpose. It warned that 60 members simply weren't enough to scrutinise the Welsh government, pass legislation and respond to constituents. A bigger chamber, it argued, would improve both the quality of lawmaking and democratic accountability. Wales also has fewer elected politicians per person than any other UK nation. Scotland has 129 MSPs, while Northern Ireland has 90 MLAs. Even with next year's changes, Wales will still have fewer elected members per citizen compared with Northern Ireland. More Senedd members could ease workloads, improve local representation and importantly, may encourage a more diverse pool of people to stand for office. How is the voting system changing? Alongside expansion will be a change in how Senedd members are elected. Since its inception, Wales has used the 'additional member system', which is a mix of first-past-the-post for constituency seats and proportional representation for regional ones. From 2026, that system will be replaced by a closed list proportional system, using the D'Hondt method. It's a system which is designed to be fairer, ensuring that the proportion of seats a party wins more closely reflects the votes they get. But it also means voters will have less say over which individuals get elected. Wales will be divided into 16 constituencies, each electing six MSs. Instead of voting for a single candidate, voters will choose one party or an independent candidate. Parties will submit a list of up to eight candidates per constituency. Seats will then be allocated based on the overall share of the vote each party gets, with candidates elected in the order they appear on their party's list. For example, if a party wins a percentage share of the vote equating to three seats, the top three people on their party list will be elected. The calculation for this is defined by the D'Hondt formula. The decision to adopt this method in Wales was one of the recommendations of the special purpose committee on Senedd reform in 2022. Several countries across Europe use this system for their elections, including Spain and Portugal. In countries with small constituency sizes, D'Hondt has sometimes favoured larger parties and made it harder for smaller parties to gain ground. That's something observers in Wales will be watching closely. An alternative method, Sainte-Laguë, used in Sweden and Latvia, is often seen as more balanced in its treatment of small and medium-sized parties, potentially leading to more consensual politics. But it, too, has its downsides. In countries which have many smaller parties, it can lead to fragmented parliaments and make decision-making more difficult. In sum, no system is perfect. But D'Hondt was chosen for its balance between proportionality, simplicity and practicality. Could this confuse voters? One concern is the growing differences between electoral systems across the UK and even within Wales itself. At the UK level, first-past-the-post (FPTP) is the method used for Westminster elections. Meanwhile, some Welsh councils are experimenting with the single transferable vote method, which lets voters rank candidates in order of preference. So, some people in Wales could find themselves navigating three different voting systems for three different elections. Obviously, this raises the risk of confusion. Voters who are used to one vote and the 'winner takes all' nature of FPTP may be confused by how seats are allocated in Wales come 2026. With numerous different systems, the risk is that people do not fully understand how their vote translates into representation. In turn, this risks undermining confidence and reducing voter turnout. Voters will need clear, accessible information on how their vote works – and why it matters. But this is particularly challenging when UK-wide media often defaults to FPTP-centric language and framing surrounding debates, which can shape public expectations. News about Wales often barely registers beyond its borders, while news about politics in Wales barely registers within. Electoral reform often prompts broader conversations. As Welsh voters adjust to the new proportional system, some may begin to question Westminster's FPTP model, especially if the Senedd better reflects the diversity of votes cast. FPTP is frequently criticised for producing 'wasted votes' and encouraging tactical voting, particularly in safe seats. Under a more proportional system, tactical voting becomes less necessary, which has the potential to shift voter habits in Wales. If the 2026 reform leads to a more representative and effective Senedd, it may not only reshape Welsh democracy, but reignite debates about electoral reform across the UK.


Sky News
6 hours ago
- Sky News
South Wales road finally opens after 23 years of roadworks
A South Wales road has officially been opened, 23 years after roadworks first began. The A465 Heads of the Valleys Road has been described by the Welsh government as one of the UK's "most technically challenging" road projects, in an upgrade programme costing £2bn. The final phase of the dual carriageway to be completed was sections 5 and 6, from Dowlais to Hirwaun. The Welsh government says the final phase of the project has created 2,200 new jobs across the country. Transport secretary Ken Skates said that delivering "better transport" was a "priority". He said the project was "complex" and admitted that it had "not been without its challenges". Skates also acknowledged a project on this scale was "inevitably going to have an impact on local residents" and thanked them for their patience. When it was confirmed in January that the Heads of the Valleys Road would be completed this year, Damien Pearce, owner of Valley Carpets in Pant Industrial Estate, told Sky News road closures had "impacted [the business] massively". But he said the shop was now "more visible" and that the completed road would "definitely" benefit the local area. Sam Rowlands, the Welsh government's shadow transport secretary, said there would be "a huge measure of relief" for "long-suffering residents and businesses". "The project has taken far too long, cost far too much, and it's clear that important lessons need to be learned," he added. But finance secretary and former first minister Mark Drakeford said investing in the project had "created real benefits for local people", including £400m for the local supply chain.

South Wales Argus
6 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
'UK - EU agreement is huge boost for farmers'
The sheer amount of red tape has meant it has been very difficult for the export of shelf-life foods such as meat, fruit and vegetables. The need for increased identity and physical checks, including all the additional paperwork such as export health certificates and phytosanitary certificates have all contributed to long queues with produce sat at the border, incurring further costs and difficulties for the industry. When you consider that a third of Welsh lamb and around 90 per cent of Welsh food and drink exports go to the European single market, it's clear to see how fettered access has a huge impact on farmers across the country. Thankfully, the details of the new agreement penned in May look positive for agriculture across the region. Firstly, there will be the removal of some routine checks on medium risk fruit and veg and much of the additional paperwork will be reduced or eliminated entirely. There will also be the removal of some routine checks on animal and plant products, meaning that the UK can again sell raw sausages and burgers to the EU, something the British Meat Processors Association declared could 'bring back the trade that simply ceased after Brexit, due to crippling red tape and tens of millions of extra costs'. Over all, the NFU has welcomed the agreement, which essentially will mean faster and simpler border checks and reduced export costs. However, it stressed the need to secure exclusions from dynamic alignments, such as the Precision Breeding Bill, and for protections in the UK's ability to make regulatory decisions as further agreements are made. Nick Park is director of Cwmbran-based Accountants & Tax Advisors, Green & Co, and a member of the Country Landowners Association (CLA) National Taxation Committee.