NHS programme to reduce brain injuries in childbirth to be rolled out nationally
The Avoiding Brain Injury in Childbirth (ABC) programme will help maternity staff to better identify signs that the baby is in distress during labour so they can act quickly, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) said.
It will also help staff respond more effectively to obstetric emergencies, such as where the baby's head becomes lodged deep in the mother's pelvis during a caesarean birth, the DHSC added.
The Government programme, which will begin from September and follows a development phase and pilot scheme, will reduce the number of avoidable brain injuries during childbirth – helping to prevent lifelong conditions like cerebral palsy, according to the DHSC.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: 'All expectant mothers giving birth in an NHS hospital should have peace of mind that they are in safe hands.
'This vital programme will give staff across the country the right tools and training to deliver better care to women and their babies, reducing the devastating impact of avoidable brain injuries.
'Under our Plan for Change, we are supporting trusts to make rapid improvements and training thousands more midwives – but I know more needs to be done. We will put women's voices right at the heart of our reforms as we work to improve care.'
The national rollout follows a pilot in 12 maternity units that was launched in October and delivered by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Midwives (RCM) and The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute.
The pilot has shown the programme will fill a gap in current training by bringing multi-disciplinary teams together to work more collaboratively to improve outcomes, the DHSC said.
It added that the programme will give clinicians more confidence to take swift action in managing an emergency during labour.
It is expected to reduce inequalities in maternity outcomes across England – so that most maternity units achieve outcomes comparable to the highest-performing 20% of trusts.
Ranee Thakar, president of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), said: 'The ABC programme supports multi-disciplinary maternity teams to deliver safer, more personalised care.
'Hundreds of maternity staff, including obstetricians, midwives and anaesthesiologists have been involved in developing and testing this quality improvement programme.
'We have heard what a difference it makes, supporting teams to work effectively together in time-sensitive and high-pressure situations. The RCOG is extremely proud to have been part of this fantastic collaboration.'
Gill Walton, Royal College of Midwives chief executive, said: 'Every midwife, maternity support worker, obstetrician, anaesthetist and sonographer wants to provide good, safe care – and the best way to do that is by working and training together. The ABC programme has brought together all those involved in maternity care, offering practical solutions to some of the most acute clinical challenges.
'Crucially the ABC programme tools and training have been developed based on the voices of women, families and maternity staff. This has been the key to the success of the pilot programme.
'Equally the will and drive of midwives and the wider multi-disciplinary team to improve safety and outcomes for women and their families has been evident across the course of the training at the pilot sites.'
Professor Mary Dixon-Woods, director of The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, said: 'The ABC programme design is based on the principle that evidence-based, co-designed patient-focused standardisation of clinical practice can reduce unwarranted variation and improve care and outcomes.
'Crucially, this needs to be supported by comprehensive improvement resources, including training, tools and assets to enable good clinical practice and teamwork and respectful and inclusion communication and decision-making with women and birth partners.
'The pilot has shown that it's possible to train people effectively and efficiently. A national commitment to implement the programme at scale will be important in ensuring that the benefits are seen.'
Professor Donald Peebles, national clinical director for maternity, NHS England, said: 'The national implementation of the ABC programme will make a huge difference to babies and their families, helping to prevent the devastating impact of avoidable brain injuries and ensure more healthy babies are returning home with their families.
'This is hugely welcome news for maternity teams across the country who are set to benefit from this important training programme that will help ensure women and babies receive high quality, safe and personalised care.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
9 hours ago
- Telegraph
The NHS and Royal Mail are a match made in hell
Your bank doesn't send letters ticking you off about your overdraft anymore. Neither does your lawyer, or your accountant, or anyone else for that matter. Even your birthday or Christmas cards typically arrive via your phone's inbox instead of the front door. There is, however, one organisation that still finds a piece of paper delivered by hand to be the most efficient way to communicate: the NHS. Its spending on the Royal Mail is still soaring – with taxpayers footing the bill. The Health Secretary Wes Streeting may still trot out his standard speech about how the NHS is a global leader in new technologies and how Artificial Intelligence will drive a new era of productivity. The reality, as so often, turns out to be very different. We learned this week that the technology that the health service relies on is one from the 1840s: the letter with a stamp on it. Despite pledging to switch to a completely digital way of communicating with patients, according to research from the Taxpayer's Alliance the amount the health service spent on mail punched through £100 million this year, up by 12.5 per cent over the last twelve months. Even though up to a quarter of the estimated eight million missed appointments a year were the fault of delays in the post, hospital managers persist in using letters as their main form of managing the system. The last quarter of a century of technological progress has completely passed it by. Indeed, at the current rate of growth the NHS will be spending £180 million a year by the end of the decade on the postal service, and more than £500 million by the 2040s. Perhaps the takeover of the mail system by the Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky makes sense after all. While most of us may have imagined the postal business was in terminal decline, perhaps there is a fortune to be made as the booking system of the NHS. The trouble is that it should hardly come as a surprise to anyone. In reality, the NHS and Royal Mail are perfect partners for each other. They are both relics of a different era, created at a time when we still believed that government-owned monopolies were the most effective way to deliver a product or a service. They are both hopelessly inefficient and riddled with restrictive practices. They are both dominated by trade unions that are resistant to change; that protect their privileges with a single-minded determination; and bask in a sense of entitlement that justifies everything they do. And they are both completely resistant to new technology, even if it could transform both the quality and the efficiency of the service they are meant to be delivering. They could both move with the times if they wanted to. But it would cause too much inconvenience for the staff. Instead, they are perfectly happy to prop each other up – with the long-suffering taxpayer left to foot the bill for both of them.
The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
Nottingham attack families to meet Streeting after questions ‘stonewalled'
The families of the Nottingham attack victims are set to meet with the Health Secretary following claims that an NHS trust has 'stonewalled' their questions about staff who treated killer Valdo Calocane. A report into the care received by Calocane, released in February, detailed how he was not forced to have long-lasting antipsychotic medication because he did not like needles, and how other patients at Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust also went on to commit 'extremely serious' acts of violence. The families of 19-year-old students Grace O'Malley-Kumar and Barnaby Webber, and 65-year-old caretaker Ian Coates, said they will meet with Wes Streeting on Monday to discuss the mental health trust's failings. Calocane, who had been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, killed his three victims and attempted to kill three others in Nottingham in June 2023. He was sentenced to an indefinite hospital order in January 2024 after admitting manslaughter by diminished responsibility and attempted murder. In a statement ahead of their meeting with Mr Streeting, the families said their correspondence with the mental health trust's chief executive Ifti Majid had been 'light on detail, vague, evasive, defensive and contradictory'. They said: 'Extensive failures of Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust have been published in three reports. 'Questions about who failed to do their job have been stonewalled by the trust and NHS England. 'Ifti Majid, the trust's chief executive, has not answered questions posed by Grace's father Dr Sanjoy Kumar. 'The NHS reporting system is archaic and ineffective, as evidenced by the sheer number of reports gathering dust on the 'lessons never learnt' shelf.' NHS England previously indicated it would publish a summary of a report into Calocane's care due to data protection laws, but reversed the decision and published a full version after the Health Secretary said 'sunlight is the best disinfectant'. The families' statement continued: 'Other families in the country who have suffered tragedies have been provided only summary reports, which is just not good enough. 'Every family deserves the detail of failures that led to mental health homicide of their loved ones. 'Even recording of mental health-related homicide nationally is archaic, inaccurate and does not give a true and full picture of the problem. 'There is an utter lack of professional responsibility by senior management teams in the Nottinghamshire NHS Trust who continue to take no action against failing medical professionals even with previous serious blunders coming to light in months prior to the attacks. 'This is shameful, wrong and dangerous.' The statement added: 'The correspondence with Ifti Majid, the chief executive of the trust, has been shocking – light on detail, vague, evasive, defensive and contradictory. 'The trust must not be allowed to rely on an inquiry, which will take years, to do the right thing. 'This is lazy, dishonest, disrespectful and ultimately continues to put the public at risk.' Their meeting with Mr Streeting also follows a complaint lodged with the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) by the families regarding an 'offensive' encounter with one of the watchdog's regional directors. Grace's father, Dr Kumar, told the Sunday Times that their meeting with the IOPC nine months after the attacks began with a prayer, which he found 'patronising'. He told the newspaper: 'I didn't want a prayer, I wanted answers. I've lost my daughter and it was his job to give me the truth, not a prayer.' An IOPC spokesperson said: 'We can confirm we've received a complaint about one of our directors and we are dealing with it in line with our complaints and feedback procedure.'
Daily Mail
21 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Fury grows over the NHS staff who are turning away sick private school pupils
Wes Streeting was urged to 'act swiftly' yesterday after a child was denied vital treatment because he goes to a private school. Head teachers called on the Health Secretary to step in after the eight-year-old was unable to access occupational therapy for his hypermobility syndrome. The Independent Schools Council (ISC), which represents most private schools, said pupils should receive 'equal access' to NHS care regardless of whether they are fee-paying. The intervention comes after The Mail on Sunday revealed the family of the child, who asked to remain anonymous, believe a 'two-tier system' is now at play. They say the Government's attack on private school pupils, which prompted the new VAT on fees, has 'filtered' into the NHS. However, the Department of Health said yesterday any suggestion school choice was a factor was a 'miscommunication'. According to the boy's mother, he was referred to a paediatrician at Kingston Hospital in south-west London after she noticed he was 'struggling to hold the pen well enough to write properly', along with other mobility issues. At the hospital appointment she was asked to fill in a form which asked: 'Where does your child go to school?' She was hoping to get an appointment with Richmond children's occupational therapy service that would have been the 'most important stage' of his assessment. However, days later, she received a text message saying the child had been 'declined' the crucial next appointment with occupational therapists. She then discovered the specialist unit had written to her GP, seen by the Mail, saying: 'We are unable to see this child as we do not provide a service to school-age children who attend an independent schools [sic]. We are only commissioned to provide a service to the mainstream schools.' The boy's brother had been treated for the same condition without issue several years ago. Yesterday, a spokesman for the ISC said: 'Any child coping with ill health should receive equal access to NHS services. We would urge the Government to act swiftly to ensure no child is denied care they are entitled to.' A spokesman for parent group Education Not Taxation added: 'Parents pay for these services through their taxes, and their children have the same right to these services as other children. We urge the Government to end this discrimination and ensure equal access to these services.' Yesterday, a spokesman for Kingston and Richmond NHS Foundation Trust said the boy had not been denied treatment because of his school – a prep in Kew. They said occupational therapy services are provided to all children with an education, health and care plan (EHCP), regardless of their school. EHCPs entitle children with special needs or disabilities to state-funded support and care, and are issued by councils. However, they are rationed due to funding shortages. For those without an EHCP, some state schools provide an onsite NHS occupational therapy service. The spokesman added: 'We are sorry if the wording of our correspondence has caused upset and confusion; we will amend it.' It is understood anyone without an EHCP who attends a private school would not be able to use onsite services at state schools. But there remained questions last night as to why the child was not treated at source by the NHS and instead expected to seek care at a school site. It comes after the Mail revealed other similar cases. These included the mother of an autistic girl in Somerset saying her daughter was denied access to NHS mental health services, and was told: 'If you can afford the school fees, you should pay privately.' It is also understood a child in Norfolk was refused a standing frame by the NHS because he went to private school. And young cancer patients from private schools had to pay £115 an hour for tutoring in an Edinburgh hospital's wards, while it is provided free to state school pupils by the city council.
