Great Highway mural vandalized and artists harassed, local leaders say
The Brief
A mural painted near Ocean Beach was vandalized over the weekend.
Within 24 hours of it being vandalized, the artist gathered a large group of volunteers to help restore the piece.
Artist Emily Fromm hopes the mural will be completed with a new protective sealant in the coming week.
SAN FRANCISCO - A mural on the Great Highway in San Francisco was vandalized late Friday, the same day the area was closed to motorists, according to community members and leaders.
In addition to the vandalism, artists working on the mural and other public art were harassed.
"It's painful to see something meant to uplift the community and celebrate our history be treated with disrespect," Emily Fromm said.
Fromm is a local artist and worked on the mural at the Judah bathroom on the Great Highway.
"Vandalism like this doesn't just damage a mural, it undermines the spirit of community that this project is all about. It's my sincere hope that we can turn down the temperature and show our neighbors and local art the respect they deserve," she said.
Friends of Ocean Beach Park said they filed a report with park rangers to investigate the vandalism.
By Sunday morning, more than a dozen volunteers joined Fromm to help restore the mural that was defaced.
"The mural is intended as a gift for the community, and vandalizing my artwork will have no bearing on this voter-approved measure," Fromm told KTVU on Sunday. "I am so grateful for the outpouring of the community support that has greeted this, and I look forward to getting the project back on track with the help of the kind people who have reached out to help."
Local perspective
Despite disagreeing about the new Oceanfront Park's existence, both its supporters and opponents found common ground, condemning the vandalism.
"Vandalizing a beautiful mural to protest a park is a bit like slashing your own tires to complain about traffic. It just doesn't make sense," said San Francisco's Recreation and Parks Department's general manager Phil Ginsburg.
Among supporters decrying the vandalism was State Sen. Scott Wiener.
"This kind of vandalism and harassment has no place in San Francisco," Wiener said, according to the organization. "Attacking artists and volunteers who are bringing this vision to life is shameful. We need to stand up for public art, civil discourse, and the right of every San Franciscan to help shape a more vibrant and inclusive city."
On social media, Wiener added that while people have the right to oppose the creation of the park, "vandalism — & particularly defacement of public art & harassment of artists — crosses a line."
Prop K opponent Malcom Young also spoke against the defacing of the new mural.
"While I did not support Prop K, San Francisco voters as a whole did," Yeung said.
"In the face of national developments that are dangerously ignoring or intentionally trying to destroy democratic processes, it's important now more than ever that we as San Franciscans uplift these principles," he added.
The backstory
The new park is not without controversy. Opponents of the new park have expressed their disdain, saying closure of the Great Highway to cars will push traffic into their neighborhood.
A lawsuit has been filed by opponents saying the supporters overstepped the State's authority on how roads are used and that the park plans do not address environmental concerns.
Additionally, Supervisor Joel Engardio who represents the district, is facing calls for a recall following his support for the Great Highway closure's to cars.
Prop K passed with 54% of voters in favor with shutting down the Great Highway to vehicles.
The Source
Friends of Ocean Beach Park, State Sen. Scott Wiener, previous KTVU reporting
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
San Francisco wants to use AI to save itself from bureaucracy
San Francisco's municipal code runs about the same length as the entire U.S. federal rulebook — that's 75 "Moby Dick"s and counting. No lawyer, or even a team of them, could ever muck out all the redundant and outdated sections contained in it. So City Attorney David Chiu, a former state assemblymember and city supervisor, is calling in Stanford's AI experts to help him out. And he hopes others in government will follow him. A team from Stanford's Regulation, Evaluation and Governance Lab trained an AI program to chew over a city's legal code in search of every instance in which a city department is mandated to produce a report. Then Chiu's team went to those departments to see which reports could be tweaked for efficiency, combined with similar requirements, or slashed altogether. 'This tool saved us countless hours of work," Chiu said. 'Because of the length of our code … it's likely a project we would never have undertaken.' Now Chiu is sponsoring city legislation that would change more than a third of the nearly 500 reporting requirements that can be altered by a city ordinance. Chiu wants to do away with 140 of them entirely. 'This isn't just a San Francisco problem,' Chiu said, referencing a report that described the millions of pages produced by Congress every year as a black hole. 'We need to be delivering results and services, not just churning out more reports,' he said. 'Particularly in this era of budget scarcity we need to get up staff time to focus on the truly pressing issues of the day.' Stanford professor and HAI Senior Fellow Daniel Ho, who leads the team behind the AI endeavor, said to tackle those reams of legalese, his team trained an AI model to essentially think like a lawyer to find and parse the required reports. One requirement still on the books that Chiu and Ho pointed to requires the city's Public Works Department to issue a biennial report on the city's fixed newspaper racks. The problem is those don't exist anymore. Chiu said that while hundreds of similarly obsolete reports were required of departments across the city government, the controller, city administrator, planning department and the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development were particularly backed up with what Ho dubbed 'policy sludge.' Chiu will see his legislation introduced at the San Francisco Board of Supervisors next week. While city rules prohibit supervisors from co-sponsoring legislation brought by another city department, Supervisor Bilal Mahmood said in a statement that City Hall has been weighted down by unnecessary code for too long. 'This legislation will cut through that clutter, freeing up staff time so departments can focus on what matters most—serving San Franciscans.' Ho said his team calibrated and tested the tool before running the city search, trolling through the U.S. legal code and successfully turning up 1,400 known reports, along with hundreds more. It's the first time he said the tool has been used in this way, although last year his lab trained an AI tool to identify racial restrictions in millions of property records.
Politico
21 hours ago
- Politico
San Francisco wants to use AI to save itself from bureaucracy
San Francisco's municipal code runs about the same length as the entire U.S. federal rulebook — that's 75 'Moby Dick"s and counting. No lawyer, or even a team of them, could ever muck out all the redundant and outdated sections contained in it. So City Attorney David Chiu, a former state assemblymember and city supervisor, is calling in Stanford's AI experts to help him out. And he hopes others in government will follow him. A team from Stanford's Regulation, Evaluation and Governance Lab trained an AI program to chew over a city's legal code in search of every instance in which a city department is mandated to produce a report. Then Chiu's team went to those departments to see which reports could be tweaked for efficiency, combined with similar requirements, or slashed altogether. 'This tool saved us countless hours of work,' Chiu said. 'Because of the length of our code … it's likely a project we would never have undertaken.' Now Chiu is sponsoring city legislation that would change more than a third of the nearly 500 reporting requirements that can be altered by a city ordinance. Chiu wants to do away with 140 of them entirely. 'This isn't just a San Francisco problem,' Chiu said, referencing a report that described the millions of pages produced by Congress every year as a black hole. 'We need to be delivering results and services, not just churning out more reports,' he said. 'Particularly in this era of budget scarcity we need to get up staff time to focus on the truly pressing issues of the day.' Stanford professor and HAI Senior Fellow Daniel Ho, who leads the team behind the AI endeavor, said to tackle those reams of legalese, his team trained an AI model to essentially think like a lawyer to find and parse the required reports. One requirement still on the books that Chiu and Ho pointed to requires the city's Public Works Department to issue a biennial report on the city's fixed newspaper racks. The problem is those don't exist anymore. Chiu said that while hundreds of similarly obsolete reports were required of departments across the city government, the controller, city administrator, planning department and the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development were particularly backed up with what Ho dubbed 'policy sludge.' Chiu will see his legislation introduced at the San Francisco Board of Supervisors next week. While city rules prohibit supervisors from co-sponsoring legislation brought by another city department, Supervisor Bilal Mahmood said in a statement that City Hall has been weighted down by unnecessary code for too long. 'This legislation will cut through that clutter, freeing up staff time so departments can focus on what matters most—serving San Franciscans.' Ho said his team calibrated and tested the tool before running the city search, trolling through the U.S. legal code and successfully turning up 1,400 known reports, along with hundreds more. It's the first time he said the tool has been used in this way, although last year his lab trained an AI tool to identify racial restrictions in millions of property records.
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
S.F. Mayor Lurie wants to end free parking in Golden Gate Park
Anyone who's unfurled a picnic blanket in Golden Gate Park has probably witnessed the line of cars packing its curbs, taking advantage of free parking. That privilege could soon end. San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie has introduced budget legislation to make visitors pay to stow their cars, probably at a rate of $3 an hour, though the cost would fluctuate according to demand. When Recreation and Park officials proposed the idea earlier this year, they hoped to stave off a budget deficit that could balloon to $15 million by 2027. Parking fees were among a slew of possible funding initiatives put forward during a Rec and Park Commission meeting in late February. Other recommendations included a $5-an-hour charge to rent a tennis court. Without a steady and reliable new revenue stream, the parks department could be forced to make crippling cuts across its system, including closing swimming pools and offering fewer summer camps. Additionally, staff might have to mow ball fields less frequently, scale back the gardener apprentice program and reduce custodial facilities. 'San Francisco's parks are one of our greatest treasures,' Lurie wrote in a statement. 'And despite serious fiscal challenges, our budget offers a fair, responsible way to keep them clean, safe and open to everyone.' He emphasized the importance of prioritizing core services as the city makes agonizing cuts across its departments. The Board of Supervisors would have to approve Lurie's parking legislation for it to take effect in 2027. Lurie must sign the budget into law by Aug. 1. • Live event: Can the Bay Area save public transit? Join reporter Rachel Swan, Muni head Julie Kirschbaum, BART GM Bob Powers and State Sen. Scott Wiener live at Manny's at 6 p.m. on June 18. Get your ticket. Parking kiosks alone could generate a windfall for city parks, with revenue projections of $1.2 million in the upcoming fiscal year, and $9.2 million the following year. Although San Franciscans often grumble over parking fees, some call the Golden Gate Park proposal a worthy trade-off. 'A lot of people come to the park to visit the museum or the botanical gardens, and I don't think it's a huge ask for them to pay a few dollars for parking,' said Steffen Franz, president of the neighborhood group Friends of Lafayette Park in Pacific Heights. While Golden Gate Park has two paid parking lots, spaces are free along Martin Luther King Drive — the main artery other than John F. Kennedy Drive, where cars are not allowed on the east section. For the time being, motorists can also find free street parking on Nancy Pelosi or Bowling Green drives or JFK Drive on the west side of the park.
