Almost biblical in its timing, Francis' funeral falls under the same shadow as his papacy
Rome: As the world teeters under the weight of war, displacement and disillusionment, the death of Pope Francis this week was not just a religious milestone but a moment that seems almost biblical in its timing.
On Saturday, in St Peter's Square, an extraordinary gathering will unfold – one of the most historically charged funerals in living memory. World leaders, adversaries and allies alike will sit shoulder to shoulder to mourn the death of a pope who, for over a decade, sought to reconcile the irreconcilable.
Among them, US President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and dignitaries representing both war rooms and refugee camps. Their presence is a potent final symbol of Francis's legacy: a man who often failed to say enough, but who tried – sometimes quietly, sometimes stubbornly – to act.
While the late pontiff, who died aged 88 on Easter Monday, has been remembered as a champion of the poor, of climate change and of inclusion, his papacy unfolded under the long, grim shadow of conflict – particularly the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which erupted into full-scale violence nine years into his reign. From the beginning, his response was both bold and baffling.
On February 25, 2022, just one day after Russian forces rolled into Ukraine, Francis made an unannounced visit to the Russian embassy in Rome. Breaking with Vatican diplomatic protocol, he went in person to express concern and call for peace. The gesture was unprecedented, but it also raised questions. He didn't name Russian President Vladimir Putin. He didn't outright condemn the invasion. The ambiguity would come to define his response.
By May, that ambiguity turned into controversy. Francis suggested NATO's expansion might have 'provoked' the Kremlin – remarks that seemed to echo Russian talking points. When asked about the morality of supplying Ukraine with weapons, he dodged, criticising the global arms trade but declining to speak directly on the matter. Many in Ukraine and throughout Eastern Europe were outraged. They wanted clarity. What they got was caution.
That caution, however frustrating, was deeply rooted in history.
'He was on the right side of history,' Professor Cyril Hovorun, a Ukrainian Orthodox theologian and former adviser to the Moscow Patriarchate, said this week.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
23 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
US Congress and Senate ‘emphatically' support AUKUS
Former Australian ambassador to the US Joe Hockey discusses the US officials who 'emphatically' support AUKUS, including Donald Trump, Pete Hegseth, and the Secretary of the US Navy. 'There's no doubt the Secretary of the United States Navy, Secretary Phelan, is very supportive of AUKUS,' Mr Hockey told Sky News Australia. 'I believe Secretary Hegseth, Department of Defence Secretary, is the same – I know Donald Trump supports AUKUS, and there is no doubt Congress and the Senate … they emphatically support AUKUS.'

Sydney Morning Herald
25 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump hails ‘done deal' on China trade. What's actually in it is fuzzy
US President Donald Trump has declared that a deal with China has been done, with Beijing agreeing to supply rare earths and magnets, and the US committing to rolling back restrictions on technology sales and visa curbs on Chinese students. But it remains unclear whether this agreement – hashed out over two days of negotiations in London – represents a final deal between the two sides, or a de-escalation measure with a broader pact still to be pursued. 'We made a great deal with China. We're very happy with it,' Trump told reporters before a Wednesday evening (Thursday AEST) performance at Washington's Kennedy Centre. 'We have everything we need, and we're going to do very well with it. And hopefully they are too.' The full details of the agreement have not been released, but it appears to be limited to winding back the recent punitive measures that the two sides had slapped on each other's economies since Trump kicked off his global trade war in April. Loading This included an agreement by Beijing to temporarily restore rare earth licences to allow shipments to continue – but The Wall Street Journal reported China has imposed a six-month limit on the licences, signalling the fragility of the agreement. Rare earths are critical for the manufacturing of many products, including electrical vehicles, wind turbines and defence technology. The agreement did not seem to address other key issues that were the rationale for the trade war, including China's massive trade surplus with the US or its role as a chemical manufacturer in the fentanyl crisis. Trump's declaration of a deal has been met with scepticism by many analysts.

The Age
25 minutes ago
- The Age
Trump hails ‘done deal' on China trade. What's actually in it is fuzzy
US President Donald Trump has declared that a deal with China has been done, with Beijing agreeing to supply rare earths and magnets, and the US committing to rolling back restrictions on technology sales and visa curbs on Chinese students. But it remains unclear whether this agreement – hashed out over two days of negotiations in London – represents a final deal between the two sides, or a de-escalation measure with a broader pact still to be pursued. 'We made a great deal with China. We're very happy with it,' Trump told reporters before a Wednesday evening (Thursday AEST) performance at Washington's Kennedy Centre. 'We have everything we need, and we're going to do very well with it. And hopefully they are too.' The full details of the agreement have not been released, but it appears to be limited to winding back the recent punitive measures that the two sides had slapped on each other's economies since Trump kicked off his global trade war in April. Loading This included an agreement by Beijing to temporarily restore rare earth licences to allow shipments to continue – but The Wall Street Journal reported China has imposed a six-month limit on the licences, signalling the fragility of the agreement. Rare earths are critical for the manufacturing of many products, including electrical vehicles, wind turbines and defence technology. The agreement did not seem to address other key issues that were the rationale for the trade war, including China's massive trade surplus with the US or its role as a chemical manufacturer in the fentanyl crisis. Trump's declaration of a deal has been met with scepticism by many analysts.