Almost biblical in its timing, Francis' funeral falls under the same shadow as his papacy
Rome: As the world teeters under the weight of war, displacement and disillusionment, the death of Pope Francis this week was not just a religious milestone but a moment that seems almost biblical in its timing.
On Saturday, in St Peter's Square, an extraordinary gathering will unfold – one of the most historically charged funerals in living memory. World leaders, adversaries and allies alike will sit shoulder to shoulder to mourn the death of a pope who, for over a decade, sought to reconcile the irreconcilable.
Among them, US President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and dignitaries representing both war rooms and refugee camps. Their presence is a potent final symbol of Francis's legacy: a man who often failed to say enough, but who tried – sometimes quietly, sometimes stubbornly – to act.
While the late pontiff, who died aged 88 on Easter Monday, has been remembered as a champion of the poor, of climate change and of inclusion, his papacy unfolded under the long, grim shadow of conflict – particularly the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which erupted into full-scale violence nine years into his reign. From the beginning, his response was both bold and baffling.
On February 25, 2022, just one day after Russian forces rolled into Ukraine, Francis made an unannounced visit to the Russian embassy in Rome. Breaking with Vatican diplomatic protocol, he went in person to express concern and call for peace. The gesture was unprecedented, but it also raised questions. He didn't name Russian President Vladimir Putin. He didn't outright condemn the invasion. The ambiguity would come to define his response.
By May, that ambiguity turned into controversy. Francis suggested NATO's expansion might have 'provoked' the Kremlin – remarks that seemed to echo Russian talking points. When asked about the morality of supplying Ukraine with weapons, he dodged, criticising the global arms trade but declining to speak directly on the matter. Many in Ukraine and throughout Eastern Europe were outraged. They wanted clarity. What they got was caution.
That caution, however frustrating, was deeply rooted in history.
'He was on the right side of history,' Professor Cyril Hovorun, a Ukrainian Orthodox theologian and former adviser to the Moscow Patriarchate, said this week.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
27 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
It's clear who has greater leverage in the trade talks. It's not Trump
As the latest rounds of trade negotiations between the US and China enter their second day, it is clear who has the greater leverage. And it's not America. Unlike last month's talks in Geneva, where the 90-day trade truce centred on the tit-for-tat exchange of extreme tariffs, the London meetings appear to be focused on export controls. For China, they're about the US restrictions on exports of advanced semiconductors to China, and for the US, they're about China's restrictions on exports of rare earths to the US and its allies. The shift in the nature of the negotiations points to a belated recognition by the US that China's dominance of the rare earths that are critical to most advanced manufacturing could shut down key manufacturing sectors in the US, including the auto industry and defence. It's a more potent trade weapon than Donald Trump's tariffs because those exports can be turned on and off, almost instantly, by Beijing's decree. With China supplying about 90 per cent of the world's rare earths and almost all rare earth magnets, there is no significant alternative source of supply. When the US decided to impose punitive tariffs on China in April as the centrepiece of its 'Liberation Day' trade war on the rest of the world, it should have recognised that China had a more powerful weapon up its sleeve than the retaliatory tariffs that it imposed on US imports. The fact that it didn't just shows how poor the Trump administration's preparation for its escalation of trade hostilities with China has been. China is showing [rare earths] can be deployed against multiple objectives, and Beijing's export controls make them more sophisticated, less cumbersome and arguably more effective than the crude weapon of Trump's tariffs. China's stranglehold on rare earths has hardly been a state secret, with the Biden administration going to great lengths to help develop alternate sources of supply, albeit that none of those new mines and processing plants will be available at sufficiently meaningful scale in the near term. It has taken China more than a decade to entrench its dominance of rare earths, a dominance that was an important plank of the 'Made in China 2025' strategy -- complete with state directions and subsidies – that it first unveiled in 2015.
The Age
27 minutes ago
- The Age
It's clear who has greater leverage in the trade talks. It's not Trump
As the latest rounds of trade negotiations between the US and China enter their second day, it is clear who has the greater leverage. And it's not America. Unlike last month's talks in Geneva, where the 90-day trade truce centred on the tit-for-tat exchange of extreme tariffs, the London meetings appear to be focused on export controls. For China, they're about the US restrictions on exports of advanced semiconductors to China, and for the US, they're about China's restrictions on exports of rare earths to the US and its allies. The shift in the nature of the negotiations points to a belated recognition by the US that China's dominance of the rare earths that are critical to most advanced manufacturing could shut down key manufacturing sectors in the US, including the auto industry and defence. It's a more potent trade weapon than Donald Trump's tariffs because those exports can be turned on and off, almost instantly, by Beijing's decree. With China supplying about 90 per cent of the world's rare earths and almost all rare earth magnets, there is no significant alternative source of supply. When the US decided to impose punitive tariffs on China in April as the centrepiece of its 'Liberation Day' trade war on the rest of the world, it should have recognised that China had a more powerful weapon up its sleeve than the retaliatory tariffs that it imposed on US imports. The fact that it didn't just shows how poor the Trump administration's preparation for its escalation of trade hostilities with China has been. China is showing [rare earths] can be deployed against multiple objectives, and Beijing's export controls make them more sophisticated, less cumbersome and arguably more effective than the crude weapon of Trump's tariffs. China's stranglehold on rare earths has hardly been a state secret, with the Biden administration going to great lengths to help develop alternate sources of supply, albeit that none of those new mines and processing plants will be available at sufficiently meaningful scale in the near term. It has taken China more than a decade to entrench its dominance of rare earths, a dominance that was an important plank of the 'Made in China 2025' strategy -- complete with state directions and subsidies – that it first unveiled in 2015.
The Australian
30 minutes ago
- The Australian
Leaders warn race for minerals could turn seabed into 'wild west'
World leaders on Monday called for strict rules to govern deep-sea mining and warned against racing to exploit the ocean floor in a thinly veiled rebuke of US President Donald Trump. Growing anxiety over Trump's unilateral push to fast-track deep-sea mining in international waters shot to the surface at the opening of the UN Ocean Conference in southern France. "I think it's madness to launch predatory economic action that will disrupt the deep seabed, disrupt biodiversity, destroy it and release irrecoverable carbon sinks -- when we know nothing about it," said French President Emmanuel Macron. Imposing a moratorium on seabed mining was "an international necessity", said Macron. The number of countries opposed to seabed mining rose to 36 on Monday, according to a tally kept by the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition, an umbrella group of non-governmental organisations. Trump was not among the roughly 60 heads of state and government in the seaside town of Nice but his spectre loomed large as leaders defended the global multilateralism he has spurned. Of particular concern is his move to sidestep the International Seabed Authority (ISA) and issue permits directly to companies wanting to extract nickel and other metals from waters beyond US jurisdiction. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva called for "clear action" from the seabed authority to end a "predatory race" for deep-ocean minerals. "We now see the threat of unilateralism looming over the ocean. We cannot allow what happened to international trade to happen to the sea," he said. The deep sea, Greenland and Antarctica were "not for sale", Macron said in further remarks directed clearly at Trump's expansionist claims. The ISA, which has jurisdiction over the ocean floor outside national waters, is meeting in July to discuss a global mining code to regulate mining in the ocean depths. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said he supported these negotiations and urged caution as countries navigate these "new waters on seabed mining". "The deep sea cannot become the wild west," he said, to applause from the plenary floor. - 'Wave of hope' - Island nations also spoke out against seabed mining, which scientists warn could result in untold damage to ecosystems largely unexplored by humanity. "Here in Nice, we can feel that the looming threat of deep-sea mining, and the recent reckless behaviour of the industry is seen by many states as unacceptable," said Megan Randles from Greenpeace. Meanwhile, a flurry of last-minute signatures in Nice brought a treaty to protect 60 percent of the world's oceans outside national jurisdiction closer to law. Macron told reporters that 55 nations had ratified the high seas treaty, just five shy of the number required for its enactment. The president gave two thumbs up and a broad grin as he posed with the new signatories, and said the accord would come into force by January 1, 2026. According to the UN, 18 new ratifications took place on Monday, bringing the total to 50. Others could arrive in the coming days. "Today's surge of ratifications for the High Seas Treaty is a tidal wave of hope and a huge cause for celebration," Rebecca Hubbard, director of the High Seas Alliance, told AFP. - 'Prove you're serious' - On Monday, the United Kingdom announced plans to extend a partial ban on bottom trawling in some of its protected marine areas, following a similar move by France at the weekend. Greece, Brazil and Spain took the opportunity Monday to announce the creation of new marine parks, following recent similar action from Samoa. And French Polynesia unveiled what will be the world's largest marine protected zone, said the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Just eight percent of global oceans are designated for marine conservation, despite a globally agreed target to achieve 30 percent coverage by 2030. Macron said he hoped that coverage would grow to 12 percent by the summit's close on Friday. Environment groups say that for marine parks to be considered truly protected they need to ban trawling and other harmful activities, and be properly funded. Wealthy nations face pressure in Nice to commit money to make that level of ocean conservation a reality. Small island states are leading the charge for money and political support to better combat rising seas, marine trash and the plunder of fish stocks that hurt their economies. "We say to you, if you are serious about protecting the ocean, prove it," said President Surangel Whipps Jr of Palau, a low-lying Pacific nation. np-aag-fcc-fff/gv/aha
