25 Investigates: Lawmakers, advocates want to revamp reading instruction in Mass. schools
With literacy rates at a crisis level in Massachusetts schools, some want to change how students are being taught to read. For months, 25 Investigates has been tracking the troubling downward trend.
Now on Beacon Hill, there is a proposal to change and revamp the teaching materials districts are using.
'Massachusetts students have been going in the wrong direction when it comes to literacy for more than a dozen years now,' said Mary Tamer, executive director of Mass Potential, a nonprofit dedicated to K-12 education.
As 25 Investigates has reported, 60% of Massachusetts 4th graders are reading below grade level, according to a national report.
'In some of our cities it's only 2 out of 10 or 3 out of 10,' Tamer said.
The numbers are even more stark for certain student groups. 78% of black 4th-grade students, 79% of Hispanic students, and 80% of students considered 'economically disadvantaged' are reading below grade level in the Commonwealth.
Tamer was among those who gathered at the State House Wednesday to support new legislation. An 'Act promoting high-quality comprehensive literacy instruction in all Massachusetts schools' would require all districts use high-quality literacy instruction. And the curricula selected '…must be aligned with evidence-based literacy instruction.'
Tamer says that includes teaching phonics and removing methods that have been 'debunked'.
State Representative Sal DiDomenico is one of the sponsors on the bipartisan bill.
'This bill will address that in a meaningful way, trying to find a way to improve literacy rates and give the teachers the tools they need, the skills they need to do just that,' DiDomenico said.
According to a 2024 EdTrust study, 123 or 47% of Massachusetts public school districts that reported their literacy curriculum to the state, reported using low-quality curriculum'. In fact, districts are not required to report the curriculum they are using.
'More than 40 states at this point have passed legislation or policies that supports research and evidence-based instruction. Massachusetts is one of the few that hasn't,' Tamer said.
The Massachusetts Teachers Association (MTA) says the state should continue to focus on educators rather than a 'boxed curriculum.'
MTA President Max Page and Vice President Deb McCarthy told 25 Investigates in a statement:
'Thanks to funds from the Fair Share Amendment, the Commonwealth was able to make substantial investments in literacy education last year, wisely focusing on educators rather than on a boxed curriculum.
Massachusetts has in place a process that allows our expert educators and other stakeholders to design reading programs that best meet the needs of their students. With federal Title I grants in jeopardy, Massachusetts needs to be prepared to protect the vital reading support that those federal funds have made available to students in low-income districts.
Now, with so many districts facing a fiscal crisis and possible additional losses in federal funds, it is even more harmful to introduce new state-mandated spending that local districts can't control on limited curriculum packages.
The MTA advocates for continued recruitment and retention of a diverse teaching force with literacy-education training. Legislating narrow curriculum from the state is a deeply flawed approach to addressing the literacy needs of students and could hamper educators' ability to best serve students.'
It also calls for dese to ensure districts have what they need to train teachers on evidence-based reading instruction, including online training modules available and free to all teachers.'
The Mass Reads Coalition reports literacy rates among students in Grades 3-8 in Massachusetts, only 39% were meeting grade-level expectations in 2024, down from 57% in 2014.
Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.
Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Padilla backlash could backfire on Democrats, some in party worry
Democratic Party officials have been united in their public and vigorous support of Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) after he was forcibly removed and handcuffed at a news conference for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Thursday. Since then, Democrat after Democrat has offered their backing to Padilla, calling the incident a grave miscarriage of justice and signaling an effort to take on President Trump and his administration. But behind the scenes, a number of Democrats worry the incident won't play well for the party in the long run, especially since the chatter appeared to fall along party lines in the aftermath of Padilla's removal. In interviews Friday, these Democrats didn't want to speak on the record given that officials in their party are publicly unanimous in backing Padilla. But these sources say they fear the Padilla incident could have negative ramifications as the party tries to find its way back from their devastating loss in November. 'Here's the thing: Did it change anyone's minds or did it just rev up the base?' said one Democratic strategist worried the incident could backfire on their party. 'This is what we don't understand. We think these moments will cause outrage, but they miss the point. It's not swaying anyone. It just makes us look petty.' Some Democrats said the moment was political theater that would just become another thing for red and blue America to disagree over. 'I'm not sure it stands out, especially as more Democrats begin to take a stand,' a second party strategist said. 'Let's put it this way, it's a zero-sum game.' The mild-mannered Padilla remained the talk of political circles Friday, even as news about the incident disappeared from cable television airwaves amid Israel's strikes on Iran and Tehran's counterattacks. Even with that conflict crowding the Padilla controversy out of the spotlight, Democrats were seeking to turn the moment into a talking point against President Trump — and a fundraising opportunity to boot. Padilla himself was fundraising off the incident and doing interviews. 'If that's what they do to a United States senator with a question, imagine what they do to farm workers, day laborers, cooks, and the other nonviolent immigrants they are targeting in California and across the country,' a fundraising note from Padilla said. In his own fundraising appeal, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) called Padilla 'one of the most decent people.' And the Democratic National Committee said the incident 'isn't normal and are steps toward authoritarianism,' a sentiment other Democrats echoed in statements. Some Democrats said their party should go even further. Democratic strategist Christy Setzer said she hoped Padilla and Democrats could 'successfully leverage this moment … but I'm skeptical.' 'Trump's thugs chose Padilla to rough up for a reason: to show they'll physically take on anyone who dares to question them, including and especially a Hispanic man with power,' Setzer said. 'The response from congressional Democrats should be absolutely apoplectic 'They should shut down the Senate. Even the meekest response — calling for DHS to fire the men who handcuffed Padilla — would be welcome,' Setzer added. The incident surrounding Padilla comes at a time when Democrats are anxious to stand up to Trump and the GOP. While there was some thought early in the Trump administration to try to work alongside Republicans, some Democrats have concluded that it's the wrong approach. Instead, they're leaning into a fighting stance against the president. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) dared Trump to arrest him, after the two men got into a back-and-forth over the immigration raids in Los Angeles and the protests and at times violent disorder that followed. 'Just get it over with,' Newsom said. 'Arrest me.' Earlier this year, Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) took a tough stance while participating in a 25-hour filibuster on the floor of the upper chamber. And in April, Sen. Chris Van Holden (D-Md.) traveled to El Salvador to meet with Kilmar Abrego Garcia, one of his constituents who was deported to a prison in that country. Democrats said they expected the tougher stance to continue in the months ahead. 'Democrats are at a moment where the base needs to see them show their willingness to fight,' said Democratic strategist Joel Payne, who predicted that more Democrats would follow Padilla and Newsom in standing up to Trump. 'We need to demonstrate to our voters that we're not just going to talk the tack but we're going to walk the walk.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Fans may have to prove migration status at World Cup-linked match
Fans attending the inaugural FIFA World Club Cup match in Miami have been told to carry proof they are in the country legally. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will be at the Hard Rock Stadium where Inter Miami, whose team includes Lionel Messi, will be playing against Egypt's Al Ahly on Saturday. Fear among fans was heightened when CBP said on social media that its officers would be 'suited and booted' at the fixture, before deleting the post. 'They are insisting that attendees bring proof of legal status to the games,' Thomas Kennedy, deputy director of the Florida Immigrant Coalition, told The Telegraph. 'It would be logistically a nightmare to check immigration status as a single person. They could be checking randomly, or it could just be general guidance to tell people to bring their immigration status. 'The problem is of clarity superimposed on the political tension gripping the country. 'This just provokes more tension,' he added. 'I would certainly say that people have to be wary and cautious.' NBC Florida also reported that fans could be asked to prove their immigration status on Saturday. CBP has confirmed it will be at all the matches. ICE declined to comment on its deployment plans. Ostensibly, both organisations will be on hand to provide added security at a major sporting event, as they have in the past. But such is the mistrust of ICE many fans are staying away. 'What I can tell you is there are multiple reports and stats tracking how overseas travel to the United States has already plummeted since the beginning of the year because of the action by the current administration,' Mr Kennedy added. 'And FIFA has had to lower prices for these club World Cup tickets a couple of times.' With more than 70 per cent of the Miami population being Hispanic, the presence of ICE at the inaugural game is particularly sensitive. 'The presence of ICE, CBP and other law enforcement agencies at major sporting events is not unusual,' John Sandweg, who was acting director of ICE from August 2013 to February 2014, told The Telegraph. But sounding a note of caution, he added: 'I could see them maybe potentially looking at something like this as an opportunity to do a lot of enforcement. 'On the other hand, I think the administration is obviously promoting the World Cup. And wants these things to be a success, and it's certainly not lost on ICE. 'If there's a perception out there that they're going to be doing enforcement operations at events like this, it can really depress attendance. And it can really just scare people off, not just people who are immigrants.' Tension was further heightened earlier this week when the US coastguard boarded a boat taking people – including the mayor of Miami Dade – to a World Cup party and checked the immigration status of staff on board. Another potential flashpoint is on Monday when LAFC, one of the leading teams in the USA, whose supporters have been vocal in their opposition to ICE, plays Chelsea in Atlanta. Against the backdrop of the National Guard being called in to quell violent anti-ICE protests in the club's home city of Los Angeles, feelings have been running high. Fans displayed banners calling for ICE's abolition, and, somewhat pointedly, they have been backed by the club, which wrote on social media that it stood 'shoulder to shoulder with all members of our community'. Gianni Infantino, FIFA's president, played down the potential problems at a press conference earlier this week. 'No, I don't have any concerns about anything in the sense that we are very attentive on any security question. Of course, the most important thing for us is to guarantee security for all the fans who come to the games. 'This is our priority. This is the priority of all the authorities who are here. And we want everyone who comes to the games to pass a good moment.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
How ICE crackdowns are impacting the homebuilding sector so far
Kinloch Partners CEO and co-founder Bruce McNeilage joins Market Domination Overtime to discuss the impact of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) crackdowns on undocumented immigrants, noting that, so far, there have been limited interruptions to job sites in the southeast region of the US. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here. Well, those protests against immigration raids have been spreading in the US. And as we just heard, they're expected to further galvanize more protests this weekend. Several industries are also facing the weight of President Trump's immigration crackdown. Undocumented immigrants make up an estimated 15 to 20% or more of the US workforce in industries like crop production, food processing, and construction, according to Goldman Sachs. To discuss specifically the impact on housing construction, we're joined by Kinloch Partners co-founder and CEO, Bruce McNeilage. Bruce, it's good to see you back on the show, um, and this is an issue that we've spoken a little bit about before. I'm curious, first of all, as we see sort of an expansion of this crackdown, what you're seeing in your business, what you're hearing about from your colleagues. Sure. So at first, in the first few weeks, we did see a little lull in construction. We haven't seen anything major lately, and I think it was just a little lull. I don't see any major problems on construction sites, building homes, and we have such a deficit of homes and so many homes that need to be built in the United States. We just don't see ice, we don't see any interruptions. And I've talked to different folks on job sites, and they said they haven't seen anyone. Uh, there haven't been any issues, and so I think that's good if you're in the home building business. Now, remind us, Bruce. Kinloch Partners, you guys do build to rent, primarily, and you're mostly centered in the Southeast, is that correct? Is that, I wonder, is that, do you think that sort of the lack of disruption is regional, or do you think that the housing industry is being spared to some extent? Yes, we're in Georgia, Tennessee, and South Carolina, throughout those states. And regionally, the answer to your question is yes. There is a heavier percentage of Hispanic construction workers in Texas and California than there are in the Southeast. Now, there's still over 60% of your roofers are Hispanic, over 50% of your painters are Hispanic nationally. And I've never seen a roofing contractor, quite frankly, that is not Hispanic. I've never seen a painter and a painting crew that is not Hispanic. And so it's prevalent throughout the country, but in the Southeast, we see a little bit less. Then Texas and California, it's a higher percentage. And Bruce, I'm just curious here, right. If you're, you know, if you've got a roofing company, or if you've got some kind of construction company, or a contractor, I mean, even when I've been hired for various jobs, you know, I'm not giving them my birth certificate. You know, I present, you present a, a driver's license in many cases, which many immigrants can get even if they are not in this country legally. So what's, what I guess is the responsibility of the employer in terms of trying to ensure that these folks are in the country legally? That's an excellent question, and all these folks that get hired to build houses are subcontractors. Uh, the companies are asked to produce licenses, workmen's compensation insurance, certificates, and things like that. But then downline, the different workers of those subcontractors are usually not checked. So it's really the responsibility of the subcontractor, the roofing or the drywall, the companies that are doing the building, to manage that, and it's not the responsibility of the home builder.
