Bee-nado! Swarm warning after truck tips in Washington, setting 250 million insects free
LOS ANGELES, May 31 — A truck crash that set 250 million bees free has sparked warnings in the western US, with police telling people to avoid swarms of the stinging insects.
The accident happened in Washington state in the far northwest of the country, when a semi trailer carrying a load of hives overturned.
'250 million bees are now loose,' wrote Whatcom County Sheriff on its social media page.
'AVOID THE AREA due to the potential of bee escaping and swarming'.
Roads in the region, which nestles the border with Canada and is just 30 miles from Vancouver, have been closed as bee experts help with the clean-up.
While some beekeepers aim only to produce honey, many others rent out their hives to farmers who need the insects to pollinate their crops. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
6 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
EU ‘deeply regrets' US sanctions on ICC judges
Neither the United States nor Israel was a party to the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court in 2002. (AP pic) BRUSSELS : The EU 'deeply regrets' the US sanctions imposed on four judges of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the European Commission said Friday, voicing full support for the Hague-based court. 'The ICC holds perpetrators of the world's gravest crimes to account and gives victims a voice,' Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen posted on X. 'It must be free to act without pressure.' 'We deeply regret the decision to impose sanctions on four additional individuals,' added commission spokesperson Anitta Hipper. 'We will provide the full support and contribution to ensure the protection of the court and its staff,' she told reporters. The sanctions imposed Thursday – in part over the ICC arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – come as Washington ramps up its efforts to neuter the court. Neither US nor Israel are party to the Rome Statute that established the court in 2002, to prosecute individuals for the world's gravest crimes when countries are unwilling or unable to do so themselves. Two of the targeted judges, Beti Hohler of Slovenia and Reine Alapini-Gansou of Benin, took part in proceedings that led to the warrant being issued for Netanyahu last November. The other two, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru and Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, were part of proceedings that led to a probe into allegations US forces committed war crimes in Afghanistan. European Council chief Antonio Costa earlier underscored the EU's support for the ICC, which he said 'does not stand against nations – it stands against impunity.' 'We must protect its independence and integrity. The rule of law must prevail over the rule of power,' Costa wrote on X.
Malay Mail
10 hours ago
- Malay Mail
If Anwar's constitutional questions are preposterous, absurd and legal nonsense, let the court say it — Hafiz Hassan
JUNE 6 — Cornell Law School offers an insightful read on qualified immunity. It says that qualified immunity is a type of legal immunity that protects a government official from lawsuits alleging that the official violated a plaintiff's rights, only allowing suits where officials violated a 'clearly established' statutory or constitutional right. A plaintiff is the party who sues in a civil suit. A defendant is the party sued. It says further that qualified immunity balances two important interests—the need to hold public officials accountable when they exercise power irresponsibly and the need to shield officials from harassment, distraction, and liability when they perform their duties reasonably. (Emphasis added) When determining whether a right was 'clearly established,' courts in the US consider whether a hypothetical reasonable official would have known that the defendant's conduct violated the plaintiff's rights. Courts conducting this analysis apply the law that was in force at the time of the alleged violation, not the law in effect when the court considers the case. Qualified immunity is not immunity from having to pay money damages , but rather immunity from having to go through the costs of a trial at all. (Emphasis added) Accordingly, courts must resolve qualified immunity issues as early in a case as possible, preferably before discovery. Qualified immunity only applies to suits against government officials as individuals, not suits against the government for damages caused by the officials' actions. (Emphasis added) Although qualified immunity frequently appears in cases involving police officers, it also applies to most other executive branch officials. Does qualified immunity apply to a prime minister in Malaysia? That's the constitutional question proposed to be referred by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim for a ruling by the Federal Court. Some, even from the legal fraternity, have vilified Anwar and his legal team for the proposed constitutional questions which have been called preposterous, absurd and 'legal nonsense'. But if they are such, let the court having the ultimate authority say it.
Malay Mail
14 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Beyond the recycling bin: Why Gen Z is putting employers' green cred to the test — Elman Mustafa El Bakri
JUNE 6 — Putting a recycling bin in the pantry doesn't make you a green company anymore. That may have been acceptable a decade ago, but today's workforce — particularly Gen Z — is far more discerning. They are no longer content with symbolic gestures. When it comes to the environment, they expect substance, transparency, and accountability. According to LinkedIn, 74 per cent of Gen Z find it crucial to work at companies that reflect their values, and 87 per cent are willing to switch jobs if the employer's values do not align. They want transparency on environmental policies alongside diversity, equity, and inclusion. And according to a 2024 article, Gen Z looks for employers who provide meaningful sustainability initiatives, such as reducing carbon footprints, committing to net-zero emissions, offering sustainable products, and providing sustainability training. They want these efforts embedded in company culture, not just as PR. For many years, employers have been the ones leading the conversation during job interviews. But that dynamic is shifting. Increasingly, Gen Z candidates are the ones asking the more profound questions: 'What does this organisation stand for?' And for a growing number of them, one of the first filters is a company's environmental stance. Environmental responsibility can no longer be confined to an annual CSR campaign or a glossy page in a sustainability report. This generation is not simply seeking jobs — they are seeking alignment. They want to work in spaces that reflect their values, including a sincere commitment to the planet they hope to protect. And while these questions may not come in the form of a checklist, the audit is real. Gen Z professionals are asking how seriously companies take their environmental footprint. They pay attention to how a business sources its materials, whether hybrid or remote work is genuinely encouraged, and whether any sustainability claims are backed by evidence. They are not looking for perfection, but they are looking for intention. They want to see the work behind the words — the plan behind the promises. What distinguishes this shift is not just the demand for environmental action, but the demand for consistency. To Gen Z, sustainability is not about compliance or marketing. It's cultural. It reflects how decisions are made, who gets involved, and whether those decisions are aligned with long-term thinking rather than short-term image. This is why surface-level efforts — such as replacing plastic cups or holding a one-off 'green day' — often fall flat. Gen Z professionals are informed, connected, and aware of the deeper issues at stake. Performative actions are easily spotted. And once a company loses that trust, it is difficult to regain. In my role working across both industry and academia, I've observed how environmental expectations are quickly becoming part of the employer brand. It's no longer just about salaries, perks, or even work-life balance. Increasingly, it's also about environmental credibility. And companies that don't keep up may find themselves struggling not only to attract talent, but to retain it. The good news is that there is space for progress. You don't need to have all the answers today, but you do need to be asking the right questions. Organisations can begin by understanding their environmental footprint — energy usage, waste patterns, procurement habits — and identifying where change is both needed and possible. Integrating sustainability into operational decisions, enabling more climate-conscious policies such as hybrid work arrangements, and engaging staff in ongoing environmental initiatives are all meaningful steps. Equally important is the culture of inclusion. Young professionals should be given the opportunity to participate in shaping sustainability efforts, rather than simply being expected to follow them. Progress is far more likely when employees feel they are part of the solution. And whatever the starting point, transparency matters. Admitting that there is still work to be done is not a weakness — it is often seen as a strength. At its core, this is not about appeasing a generation. It is about evolving with the times. The environmental expectations of Gen Z reflect a broader shift in how work is perceived. Employment is no longer just a transaction — it is an extension of identity and purpose. And businesses that understand this shift will be better positioned to lead in the future. As we mark World Environment Day 2025, it is worth asking ourselves: What kind of workplace are we building? Is it one that future employees would be proud to join — not just because of what we do, but because of how we choose to do it? In an age where values drive choices, where integrity is visible, and where climate action is no longer optional, the organisations that lead with purpose will also lead in performance. Because in the end, it's not just about attracting talent. It's about earning their belief. * The author is CEO and Founder of HESA Healthcare Recruitment Agency and serves on the Industrial Advisory Panel for the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Universiti Malaya. He may be reached at [email protected] ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
