Arkansas lawmakers file bill to restrict phone access at school
Rep. Jon Eubanks (left) and Sen. Tyler Dees, both Republicans, discuss a bill to restrict cell phone use in schools at the Arkansas Capitol on Jan. 29, 2025. (Mary Hennigan/Arkansas Advocate)
State lawmakers filed legislation Wednesday that would ban smartphones and other personal electronic devices from all Arkansas public schools beginning with the 2025-2026 school year.
Senate Bill 142, also called the Bell to Bell, No Cell Act, follows through on the promise to ban cellphones in schools made by Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders during her State of the State address this month.
Speaking during a mental health event at the Capitol rotunda in Little Rock Wednesday morning, Sanders said the bill will curtail 'unrestricted access to smartphones and social media,' which she said has caused a decline in children's mental health over the last decade.
'Arkansas has the opportunity to lead on this issue globally and pass one of the most comprehensive phone-free school bills in the world, and that's a good thing,' Sanders said. 'And when we do that, I truly believe we won't just improve test scores and school discipline, we'll also get to one of the root causes of so many of the mental health issues facing our state today.'
Co-sponsored by Sen. Tyler Dees, R-Siloam Springs, and Rep. Jon Eubanks, R-Paris, SB142 requires cellphone policies — which school districts must publish on their websites — to include exemptions for health reasons, Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), extracurricular activities and emergencies.
Policies must be submitted to the Division of Elementary and Secondary Education for approval, and a district that fails to adopt or enforce a policy will be cited for a violation of state accreditation standards.
Under the proposed law, districts would not be liable if a personal electronic device is lost, stolen or damaged.
Eubanks told the Advocate he has first-hand knowledge of health issues and learning problems for students because his daughter is a counselor at an elementary school. SB142 is a way for the Legislature 'to help our young kids have a bright future,' he said.
'We want to be able to limit the distraction that students have in school,' Eubanks said. 'They're there to learn, and we want to make sure that that happens.'
Arkansas governor, education secretary call on schools to join mental health pilot project
Proposals to reduce smartphone usage have gained traction in recent years in states like California and Florida. Arkansas joined the conversation last summer when the governor and education secretary invited schools to participate in a pilot program focused on restricting cellphone access during the school day. In August, state lawmakers permitted the Arkansas Department of Education to distribute $7 million to districts to cover the cost of pouches or lockers where students could store their phones during class time.
Sanders said Wednesday the administration 'received an overwhelmingly positive response from school leaders.' Stakeholders, who used data from the pilot program to inform SB142, have been working on the legislation for over a year, Dees said in an interview. The bill aims to respond to parents' concerns, he said.
'Our response today with this bill is that we're no longer going to allow our children to be guinea pigs of Big Tech and social media and the ramifications that have affected our kids,' he said.
Dees anticipates the bill will be presented in committee next week and said it will have bipartisan support. As of Wednesday afternoon, Sen. Reginald Murdock of Marianna was the sole Democratic co-sponsor of the bill.
This is not the first time state lawmakers have tried to limit Arkansas children's access to social media. Dees and Eubanks sponsored the Social Media Safety Act of 2023 to prohibit minors from creating a social media account without parental consent. It would have been the first such law in the nation, but a federal judge blocked the law in August 2023 before it was set to take effect.
Echoing statements made in her State of the State address, Sanders in a press release Wednesday said she plans to update the law so it's no longer held up in court, and to give parents the right to sue tech companies under state law 'so they can hold bad actors accountable.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Utah lawmakers oppose AI regulation in Trump's ‘Big, beautiful bill'
SALT LAKE CITY () — Utah Lawmakers have signed a letter opposing specific measures related to artificial intelligence in President Donald Trump's In a letter addressed to Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Senator John Curtis (R-Utah), state lawmakers say they are 'concerned with the proposed ten-year moratorium on state-level artificial intelligence regulation.' According to , initially the bill was and block dozens of states from enforcing preexisting AI regulations and oversight structures in any way. But on June 5, the Senate Commerce Committee altered the text on the bill. The new version would only require states not to regulate AI if they want access to federal broadband funding. The bill allocates $500 million over the next 10 years to modernize government systems with the help of AI and automation technologies. In a letter signed by nearly 50 lawmakers including House Speaker Mike Schultz (R-Hooper) and Senate Majority Leader Kirk Cullimore (R-Draper), they claim the provision would hinder Utah's nationally recognized efforts 'to strike the right balance between innovation and consumer protection.' They add that since Utah to establish an Office of Artificial Intelligence Policy, followed by the launch of an AI learning Lab, Lawmakers say these initiatives 'allow Utah to encourage responsible AI development, empower industry leaders and shield consumers from real-world harms, all without stifling innovation.' According to , a centerpiece of the legislation is making the 2017 Trump tax cuts permanent — which nonpartisan scorers and think tanks estimate would cost trillions of dollars over the next decade. Utah taxpayers may take a hit if 2017 cuts expire The bill also includes a proposal that would raise the cap for the state and local tax (SALT) deduction, which would allow taxpayers — especially those in higher-tax blue states — to deduct more of their regional taxes from their federal tax bill. The bill also has major reforms to Medicaid, estimated to lead to millions of people losing coverage by 2034. Trump is pushing Congress, where Republicans have majority control, to send the final product to his desk to become law by the Fourth of July. RSL hoping to make a run in second half of season Utah lawmakers oppose AI regulation in Trump's 'Big, beautiful bill' 'Somebody has to stop it:' Gov. Cox defends Trump's decision to deploy troops to LA 'We're living in the dumbest timeline' — Gov. Cox comments on SLC Sego pride flags Calif. governor asks court to block Trump administration from using troops in immigration raids Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Newsom, in California address, says Trump purposely 'fanned the flames' of L.A. protests
Gov. Gavin Newsom on Tuesday night accused President Trump of intentionally fanning the flames of the Los Angeles protests and "pulling a military dragnet across" the city endangering peaceful protesters and targeting hardworking immigrant families. The Democratic governor's comments were a forceful rebuke to the president's claims that deploying the California National Guard and U.S. Marines to the city was necessary to control the civil unrest. "Donald Trump's government isn't protecting our communities — they're traumatizing our communities," Newsom said. "And that seems to be the entire point." The governor posted his video address to California on social media hours after Trump said at Ft. Bragg in North Carolina that he sent in troops to protect immigration agents from 'the attacks of a vicious and violent mob.' The picture Trump painted of the federal government's role in the protests against immigration raids marks a sharp contrast to Newsom's assertion that state and local law enforcement were successfully keeping the peace before federal authorities deployed "tear gas," "flash-bang grenades" and "rubber bullets" on Angelenos exercising their constitutional right to free speech and assembly. Then Trump "illegally" called up the California National Guard, Newsom said. "This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers, and even our National Guard at risk," Newsom said. "That's when the downward spiral began. He doubled down on his dangerous National Guard deployment by fanning the flames even harder. And the president, he did it on purpose." The governor, who has become a target for Republicans and a central figure in the political and legal battle over the protests, has said for days that an "unhinged" Trump deployed troops to intentionally incite violence and chaos, seeking to divert attention away from his actions in Washington and assert his 'dictatorial tendencies.' Read more: L.A. immigration raids draw California Gov. Gavin Newsom back into the fight with Trump Newsom and state Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta filed a request for a restraining order earlier Tuesday asking a federal judge to call off the 'Department of Defense's illegal militarization of Los Angeles and the takeover of a California National Guard unit.' The request came the day after California filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration alleging that the deployment of the guard without the governor's consent violated the U.S. Constitution. After returning to Washington, Trump commented on the 'good relationship' he's always had with Newsom, before blaming the governor for the unrest. 'This should never have been allowed to start, and if we didn't get involved, Los Angeles would be burning down right now,' Trump said, and then made a reference to the deadly wildfires in the Los Angeles area in January. 'Just as the houses burned down." He said the military is in the city to de-escalate the situation and control what he described as paid 'insurrectionists,' 'agitators' and 'troublemakers.' 'We have a lot of people all over the world watching Los Angeles,' Trump said. 'We've got the Olympics, so we have this guy allowing this to happen.' On Monday, Trump said his top border policy advisor Tom Homan should follow through on threats to arrest the governor. Newsom immediately jumped on the comment, comparing the federal administration to an 'authoritarian regime.' 'I never thought I'd hear those words. Honestly, Democrat, Republican. Never thought I'd hear those in my lifetime — to threaten a political opponent who happens to be sitting governor,' Newsom said. Read more: California asks court for restraining order to block Guard, U.S. Marine deployments in L.A. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) declined to answer a question about whether Newsom should be arrested on Tuesday and instead said the governor should be 'tarred and feathered.' Newsom took a shot at Johnson during his address, saying the speaker has "completely abdicated" his responsibility for Congress to serve as a check on the White House. He warned that "other states are next." "At this moment, we all need to stand up and be held to account, a higher level of accountability," Newsom said, imploring protesters to exercise free-speech rights peacefully. "I know many of you are feeling deep anxiety, stress and fear. But I want you to know that you are the antidote to that fear and anxiety. "What Donald Trump wants most is your fealty. Your silence. To be complicit in this moment. Do not give in to him." Times staff writer Laura Nelson and Washington bureau chief Michael Wilner contributed to this report. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump-backed Jack Ciattarelli wins GOP primary for New Jersey governor
Former state Assembly member Jack Ciattarelli has won the Republican nomination for governor of New Jersey a second time, giving him a chance to get over the finish line after falling short four years ago, according to Decision Desk HQ. Ciattarelli defeated a few other challengers for the GOP nod, most notably former talk radio host Bill Spadea and state Sen. Jon Bramnick. His renomination wasn't ever in serious doubt as he led by significant margins consistently throughout the race, had a significant fundraising advantage and earned an endorsement from President Trump. During the primary, Ciattarelli faced some attacks particularly from Spadea for not being supportive enough of Trump and his MAGA agenda. Ciattarelli was at one time a critic of Trump, calling him unfit to serve as president. But he's since gradually moved closer to Trump and was seeking his endorsement ahead of Trump's announcement last month. Ciattarelli also pointed to past comments Spadea made criticizing Trump and wanting the GOP to move on from him as their candidate for president in 2024. Ciattarelli surprised many observers in 2021 when he came within almost 3 points of upsetting Gov. Phil Murphy (D) in his reelection bid. But he may face more of an uphill battle with Trump in the White House. Since the 1970s, New Jersey has elected a governor from the opposite party of the president every gubernatorial election except for four years ago. But the state has also gone back and forth in electing Democratic and Republican governors despite being a lean-Democratic state on the federal level, potentially giving Republicans an opportunity after eight years of Murphy. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.