logo
US DOJ investigates UnitedHealth for alleged Medicare fraud: Report

US DOJ investigates UnitedHealth for alleged Medicare fraud: Report

Al Jazeera15-05-2025

The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) is carrying out a criminal investigation into UnitedHealth Group for possible Medicare fraud.
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) first broke the story on Wednesday.
UnitedHealth said it had not been notified by the DOJ about the 'supposed criminal investigation reported', and the company stood by 'the integrity of our Medicare Advantage program'.
The DOJ's healthcare-fraud unit is overseeing the criminal investigation, which focuses on the company's Medicare Advantage business practices, WSJ reported, citing people familiar with the matter.
While the exact nature of the potential criminal allegations against UnitedHealth is unclear, it has been an active probe since at least last summer, the newspaper said.
A DOJ spokesperson declined to comment to the WSJ about the fresh criminal probe. The department did not immediately respond to requests for comments from the Reuters news agency.
Last week, UnitedHealth said in a regular filing that it had been 'involved or is currently involved in various governmental investigations, audits and reviews', without disclosing further details.
The new investigation follows broader scrutiny into the Medicare Advantage programme, in which Medicare-approved plans from a private company supplement regular Medicare for Americans age 65 and older by covering more services that the government-only plans do not, such as dental and vision services.
In February, the WSJ reported a civil fraud investigation into UnitedHealth's Medicare practices. The company had then said that it was unaware of any new probe.
In the same month, US Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa launched an inquiry into UnitedHealth's Medicare billing practices, requesting detailed records of the company's compliance programme and other related documents.
The DOJ earlier this month filed a lawsuit accusing three of the largest US health insurers of paying hundreds of millions of dollars in kickbacks to brokers in exchange for steering patients into the insurers' Medicare Advantage plans.
Nearly half of the 65 million people covered by Medicare, the US programme for people aged 65 and older or with disabilities, are enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans run by private insurers.
The insurers are paid a set rate for each patient, but can be paid more if patients have multiple health conditions. Standard Medicare coverage is managed by the government.
The health insurer has been under pressure for months. On Tuesday, UnitedHealth Group's CEO, Andrew Witty, stepped down unexpectedly, and the company simultaneously suspended its 2025 financial forecast due to rising medical costs, triggering an 18 percent drop in shares to a four-year low.
Stephen Hemsley, who led the company for more than a decade until 2017, is taking back the reins following setbacks including the December murder of Brian Thompson, the CEO of its insurance unit, which catapulted UnitedHealth into the public consciousness.
On Thursday, after the news of the probe broke, UnitedHealth Group shares plunged 18 percent to hit a five-year low.
'The stock is already in the doghouse with investors, and additional uncertainty will only pile on,' James Harlow, senior vice president at Novare Capital Management, which owns shares in UnitedHealth, told the news agency Reuters.
If losses hold, UnitedHealth will be the worst-performing stock on the S&P 500 index in two of the last three days.
The past month's selloff has wiped out nearly $300bn from UnitedHealth's market capitalization, or more than half of its value since its shares hit a record high in November.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Marines prepare for deployment in Los Angeles as protests spread across US
Marines prepare for deployment in Los Angeles as protests spread across US

Al Jazeera

time16 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Marines prepare for deployment in Los Angeles as protests spread across US

The secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, promises that forces will continue their immigration crackdown in an effort to 'liberate' Los Angeles, pushing back at criticism that sending the US military into the city was unwarranted and illegal. 'We have more assets now, today, than we did yesterday. We had more yesterday than we did the day before, so we are only building momentum,' Noem said during a news conference in the city. 'This is only going to continue and be increased until we have peace on the streets of Los Angeles.' As Noem was speaking, a US Democratic senator from California, Alex Padilla, was forcefully ejected from the room while trying to make himself heard – a removal that was swiftly condemned by other Democrats. Padilla's office said that once outside the room, the senator was pushed to the ground and handcuffed. He was later released. President Donald Trump's decision to dispatch troops to Los Angeles over the objections of California Governor Gavin Newsom has sparked a national debate about the use of the military in law enforcement operations on US soil. Some 700 US Marines will be on the streets of the city by Thursday or Friday, the military has said, to support up to 4,000 National Guard troops in protecting federal property and federal agents, including on immigration raids. Noem defended the use of National Guard troops and Marines alongside ICE agents and other federal personnel, saying Trump 'has the right to utilise every authority that he has.' The state of California is seeking a federal court order later today that would stop troops from 'patrolling the streets of Los Angeles' and limit their role to protecting federal personnel and property. California's lawsuit ultimately seeks to rescind Trump's order to deploy the National Guard to the area. In a court filing on Thursday, California argued that the federal government has already violated the law by having National Guard troops assist ICE agents in immigration raids. Noem said federal officers have arrested more than 1,500 people and that the department has 'tens of thousands of targets' in the region. She said the Internal Revenue Service was investigating whether there are financial links between the protests and political advocacy groups, something of which there has been little evidence. On Saturday, Americans likely will see split-screen images of US troops on the streets of two major cities: Los Angeles, where troops are guarding federal buildings, and Washington where soldiers, accompanied by tanks and other armored vehicles, will rumble down Constitution Avenue in a rare public display of military might to celebrate the Army's 250th birthday. Nearly 2,000 protests against the parade, which is taking place on Trump's 79th birthday, are planned around the country in one of the biggest demonstrations against Trump since he returned to power in January. Mostly peaceful street protests so far this week have taken place in multiple cities besides Los Angeles, including New York, Chicago, Washington, DC and San Antonio, Texas. Texas Governor Greg Abbott said Thursday he has ordered the deployment of more than 5,000 Texas National Guard troops, along with more than 2,000 state police, to help local law enforcement manage protests against Trump and the continuing federal immigration raids. Abbott's announcement did not detail where the troops were sent, but some were seen at a protest Wednesday night in downtown San Antonio near the Alamo. That protest drew hundreds of demonstrators but did not erupt into violence. 'Peaceful protests are part of the fabric of our nation, but Texas will not tolerate the lawlessness we have seen in Los Angeles in response to President Donald Trump's enforcement of immigration law,' Abbott said. 'Anyone engaging in acts of violence or damaging property will be arrested and held accountable to the full extent of the law.' Mayors in San Antonio and Austin have said they did not ask for Abbott to mobilise the National Guard to their cities. Missouri Governor Mike Kehoe on Thursday also activated the state's National Guard 'in response to civil unrest'. 'We respect, and will defend, the right to peacefully protest, but we will not tolerate violence or lawlessness in our state,' Kehoe said in a statement on the governor's website. 'While other states may wait for chaos to ensue, the State of Missouri is taking a proactive approach in the event that assistance is needed to support local law enforcement in protecting our citizens and communities.' The Los Angeles protests began last Friday in response to a series of immigration raids in the city. Trump, in turn, called in the National Guard on Saturday, then ordered the deployment of Marines on Monday. 'Los Angeles was safe and sound for the last two nights. Our great National Guard, with a little help from the Marines, put the LA Police in a position to effectively do their job,' Trump posted on social media on Thursday. State and city officials say Trump is exaggerating what is happening in the city and that local police have the situation under control. The protests have been largely orderly but occasionally punctuated by violence, mostly contained to a few blocks. Police said demonstrators at one location threw commercial-grade fireworks and rocks at officers on Wednesday night. Another group of nearly 1,000 demonstrators was peacefully marching through downtown when police suddenly opened fire with less lethal munitions in front of City Hall. Trump is carrying out a campaign promise to deport immigrants, employing forceful tactics consistent with the norm-breaking political style that got him elected twice. The administration has circulated images showing National Guard troops protecting immigration agents who were arresting suspected undocumented migrants – a permissible function for the troops under federal law. But the state argues those Guard troops have crossed the line into illegal activity under the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits the military from participating in civilian law enforcement. 'For example, photos posted on social media by ICE depict heavily armed members of the National Guard standing alongside ICE agents during arrests,' California said in its latest court filing. Unless a judge intervenes, the military's role likely will grow to include 'detention, interrogation, and other activities that are practically indistinguishable from urban policing operations', the filing asserts. The Trump administration said in a Wednesday court filing that the judge should not restrict the military's activities in Los Angeles. 'Neither the National Guard nor the Marines are engaged in law enforcement. Rather, they are protecting law enforcement, consistent with longstanding practice and the inherent protective power to provide for the safety of federal property and personnel,' the administration wrote. US Army Major General Scott Sherman, who commands the task force of Marines and Guardsmen, told reporters the Marines will not load their rifles with live ammunition, but they will carry live rounds.

California senator handcuffed during Trump administration news conference
California senator handcuffed during Trump administration news conference

Al Jazeera

time16 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

California senator handcuffed during Trump administration news conference

Democratic lawmakers have expressed outrage after United States Senator Alex Padilla of California was roughly removed from a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) news conference, then forced to the ground and handcuffed. A video of the incident shows Padilla appearing to interrupt a Thursday news conference in Los Angeles held by DHS chief Kristi Noem. 'I am Senator Alex Padilla,' he said, stepping forward as Noem spoke. 'I have a question for the secretary.' But he never got a chance to ask the question. Agents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had already surrounded Padilla and were pushing him out of the conference room. A mobile phone video shot by a member of Padilla's staff showed the senator yelling, 'Hands off,' as he was escorted into an adjacent hallway. Agents ultimately forced him to the ground, as Padilla protested he could not keep his hands behind his back as requested and lay his body flat at the same time. One FBI agent then stood in front of the camera and ordered the staffer to stop recording. The senator's office has said Padilla is currently not detained. In a statement, it explained that Padilla had hoped to question Noem and General Gregory Guillot about the US military deployment against protesters in Los Angeles. 'Senator Padilla is currently in Los Angeles exercising his duty to perform Congressional oversight of the federal government's operations in Los Angeles and across California,' his office said in a statement. 'He was in the federal building to receive a briefing with General Guillot and was listening to Secretary Noem's press conference. He tried to ask the Secretary a question, and was forcibly removed by federal agents.' What just happened to @SenAlexPadilla is absolutely abhorrent and outrageous. He is a sitting United States Senator. This administration's violent attacks on our city must — Mayor Karen Bass (@MayorOfLA) June 12, 2025Padilla himself held a news conference afterwards, where he drew a parallel between his rough treatment and the immigration raids happening under the administration of President Donald Trump. 'If this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question, I can only imagine what they're doing to farm workers, to cooks, to day labourers out in the Los Angeles community and throughout California and throughout the country,' Padilla told reporters. The recent protests in Los Angeles came in response to the Trump administration's aggressive deportation campaign, which has targeted undocumented workers at places such as the Home Depot hardware store chain. Trump has since responded to those protests by deploying nearly 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 US Marines to southern California, in what critics have called an illegal use of military power against civilians. On Thursday, Padilla's Democratic colleagues in the Senate rushed to voice their support after the incident. 'I just saw something that sickened my stomach — the manhandling of a United States senator,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said. 'We need immediate answers to what the hell went on.' Representative Maxwell Frost of Florida later shot a video showing Democrats walking to Senate Majority Leader John Thune's office to call for action. 'There must be accountability for the detainment of a Senator. This is not normal,' Frost wrote. On social media, however, DHS accused Padilla of engaging in 'disrespectful political theatre'. It argued that the senator had not identified himself as he 'lunged' towards Noem, something that appears to be contradicted by video of the incident. DHS said Noem met Padilla after the news conference for 15 minutes. California officials have accused Trump of provoking tensions in the state by sending the military to crack down on the protests, some of which turned violent but have already started to ease. The last time a president deployed the National Guard in a state over the objections of a governor was in 1965, to protect civil rights protesters from violence in segregated Alabama. Governor Gavin Newsom has since sued the Trump administration to block the use of US military might outside of federal sites, calling it a step towards 'authoritarianism'. Earlier this week, Padilla said that Trump's immigration raids were 'terrorising communities, breaking apart families and putting American citizens in harm's way'. Trump has suggested that he could have California Governor Gavin Newsom arrested and mused that he could declare martial law if the protests continue. He also described the protesters as 'animals' and 'a foreign enemy', framing them as part of a wider 'invasion' that justifies emergency powers. 'If they can handcuff a US Senator for asking a question, imagine what they will do to you,' Newsom said in a social media post that showed a picture of Padilla being held on the ground by three agents.

In nixing EV standards, Trump strikes at two foes: California and Elon Musk
In nixing EV standards, Trump strikes at two foes: California and Elon Musk

Al Jazeera

time16 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

In nixing EV standards, Trump strikes at two foes: California and Elon Musk

United States President Donald Trump has signed a series of congressional resolutions to roll back standards in California that would have phased out petrol-powered cars and promoted the use of electric vehicles (EVs). But Thursday's signing ceremony gave Trump a platform to strike blows against several of his political foes, including the Democratic leadership of California and ally-turned-critic Elon Musk. Musk famously leads the electric vehicle company Tesla. California, meanwhile, has long been a Democratic stronghold, and since taking office for a second term in January, Trump has continuously sparred with its governor, Gavin Newsom. Thursday's resolutions gave Trump a chance to skewer one of Newsom's signature environmental achievements: a state mandate that would have gradually required new cars in California to produce zero greenhouse gas emissions. That goal was meant to unfold in stages. By 2026, 35 percent of all new cars sold would be emission-free vehicles. By 2030, that number would rise to 68 percent. And by 2035, California would reach 100 percent. But Trump argued that California's standards would hamper the US car industry and limit consumer choice. Already, 17 other states have adopted some form of California's regulations. 'Under the previous administration, the federal government gave left-wing radicals in California dictatorial powers to control the future of the entire car industry all over the country — all over the world, actually,' Trump said on Thursday. ' This horrible scheme would effectively abolish the internal combustion engine, which most people prefer.' But critics point out that many carmakers did not necessarily oppose California's mandate: Rather, automobile companies like General Motors had already put in place plans to transition to electric-vehicle manufacturing, to keep up with global trends. Already, California and 11 other states have announced they will sue to keep the electric vehicle mandate in place. Here are three takeaways from Thursday's signing ceremony. The decision to roll back California's electric-vehicle standards was only the latest chapter in Trump's long-running beef with the state. Just last week, protests broke out in the Los Angeles area against Trump's push for mass deportation, as immigration raids struck local hardware stores and other workplaces. Trump responded by deploying nearly 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to southern California, in the name of tamping down protest-related violence. Though Thursday's ceremony was ostensibly about the electric-vehicle mandate, Trump took jabs at the state's management of the protests, blaming Governor Newsom for allowing the situation to spiral out of control. 'If we didn't go, Los Angeles right now would be on fire. It would be a disaster. And we stopped it,' Trump said, accusing Newsom of having 'a faulty thought process' and trying to protect criminals. Trump also drew a parallel to the wildfires that ravaged the Los Angeles area in January, whose flames were whipped and spread by dangerous wind conditions that kept aerial support out of the skies. 'Los Angeles would be right now burning to the ground just like the houses burned to the ground,' Trump said, referencing the wildfires. 'It's so sad, what's going on in Los Angeles.' California's electric-vehicle mandate, he argued, would have likewise spurred another emergency. 'Today, we're saving California, and we're saving our entire country from a disaster. Your cars are gonna be thousands of dollars less,' Trump said. 'Energy prices would likewise soar as the radical left forced more electric vehicles onto the grid while blocking approvals for new power plants,' he continued. ' The result would be rolling blackouts and a collapse of our power systems.' Earlier this week, Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta dismissed Trump's concerns as little more than an attack on state rights. 'Trump's all-out assault on California continues — and this time he's destroying our clean air and America's global competitiveness in the process,' Newsom said in a statement. 'We are suing to stop this latest illegal action by a President who is a wholly-owned subsidiary of big polluters.' Newsom has also denounced the deployment of troops to Los Angeles as an 'unmistakable step toward authoritarianism' and has sued to limit that action as well. As Trump continued to outline his reasoning for peeling back the EV mandates, his speech briefly veered into another area of conflict: his recently rocky relationship with Musk. A billionaire, Musk leads several high-profile companies with government contracts, including the rocket manufacturer SpaceX and the satellite communication firm Starlink. And then, of course, there is Musk's car company Tesla, which produces electric vehicles. Musk was one of the largest donors in the 2024 elections, spending north of $280m to back Trump and other Republicans. Trump, for his part, featured Musk on the campaign trail and named him the leader of the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) shortly after his election. In January, Musk joined the Trump administration as a 'special government employee', an advisory role with a time limit of about 130 days per year. As he reached the end of that term, Musk became increasingly outspoken about Trump's signature budget legislation, the One Big Beautiful Bill. While the bill would have cemented Trump's 2017 tax cuts and funnelled more money into immigration enforcement, it would have also increased the national debt by trillions of dollars. Musk also objected to the 'pork' — the extra spending and legislative provisions — that were packed into the lengthy, thousand-page bill. The billionaire took to social media to call the bill a 'disgusting abomination', as the two men entered into an increasingly heated exchange of words. Trump called Musk 'crazy', and Musk suggested Trump should be impeached. The billionaire has since said he 'regrets' some of his remarks. On Thursday, Trump repeated his assertion that Musk's outburst was the result of his policies towards electric vehicles, something Musk has denied. Early in his second term, Trump pulled the plug on a goal set under former President Biden to have 50 percent of all new vehicles sold be electric by 2030. 'On my first day in office, I ended the green new scam and abolished the EV mandate at the federal level,' Trump said on Thursday. 'Now, I know why Elon doesn't like me so much. Which he does, actually. He does.' He continued to muse on their unravelling relationship, saying that Musk 'never had a problem' with his electric vehicle policies. 'I used to say, 'I'm amazed that he's endorsing me,' because that can't be good for him,' Trump said. 'He makes electric cars, and we're saying, 'You're not going to be able to make electric cars, or you're not gonna be forced to make all of those cars. You can make them, but it'll be by the market, judged by the market.'' Trump added that he feels Musk 'got a bit strange' but that he still likes the car company Tesla — and 'others too'. Amid the talk about his feuds with Musk and California, Trump also dropped a possible bombshell: More automobile tariffs may be on the way. Already, Trump has relied heavily on tariffs — taxes on imported products — to settle scores with foreign trading partners and push for greater foreign investment in domestic industries, including car manufacturing. 'If they want a Mercedes-Benz, you're going to have it made here. It's OK to have a Mercedes, but they're going to make it here,' he said on Thursday. 'Otherwise, they're going to pay a very big tariff. They already are.' Currently, automobiles imported to the US from abroad are subject to a 25-percent tax, a cost that critics say is passed along to the consumer. But Trump warned on Thursday that he is prepared to go higher, as he has done with taxes on steel and aluminium. ' To further defend our auto workers, I imposed a 25-percent tariff on all foreign automobiles. Investment in American auto manufacturing is surging because of it,' Trump said. 'Auto manufacturing — all manufacturing — is surging. I might go up with that tariff in the not-too-distant future. The higher you go, the more likely it is they build a plant here.' Trump pointed to his negotiations over steel imports as a success story. 'American Steel is doing great now because of what we did. If I didn't put tariffs on steel, China and a lot of other countries were dumping steel in our country,' he said. 'Garbage steel, dirty steel, bad steel, not structurally sound steel. Real garbage.' But by raising tariffs from 25 to 50 percent earlier this month, Trump said he protected the US steel industry. He also shared details about a deal that would see the Japanese company Nippon invest in the company US Steel. 'We have a golden stock. We have a golden share, which I control — or the president — controls. Now, I'm a little concerned whoever the president might be, but that gives you total control,' Trump said. 'It's 51-percent ownership by Americans.' US industry leaders had been concerned that the deal with Nippon would see further erosion of the US manufacturing industry, which suffered from decades of foreign competition. The deal with Nippon has been previously described as a takeover, prompting concerns about the future and independence of the US steel industry.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store