Army gay ban led to Shropshire woman's mental breakdown
Claire Ashton felt different to other soldiers in the Royal Artillery.She had joined the army in 1969 and was deployed to Germany during the Cold War and later to Northern Ireland at the start of The Troubles.At the time it was illegal to be gay in the armed forces, something Ms Ashton was not, she was in fact transgender."They thought I was gay but trans hadn't crossed their radar all those years ago," said Ms Ashton, who lives in Uffington, Shropshire.
She was a good soldier and a talented surveyor but her skills could not stop the bullying and harassment.She faced constant speculation and inappropriate questioning, and the pressure of hiding her identity became so overbearing that she had a mental breakdown while on deployment in Germany in 1972 and was medically discharged by the army."One of the main pressures was being so close to other people in the unit all the time."When I went to Northern Ireland, we were on a ship in Belfast harbour called NHS Maidstone and the bunks were about four high. I found that a tremendous pressure."People who were discharged were discovered by private letters which had been sent between friends."People had put down their hopes and dreams in letter and this is what brought them down."Rooms would be stripped bare looking for evidence", she added.
The so-called gay ban, which made it illegal to be homosexual in the armed forces, was lifted by the UK government in January 2000 following a hearing in the European Court of Human Rights.Some of those caught faced prison sentences of up to two years.The LGBT+ military charity Fighting With Pride estimated that between 2,000 and 5,000 people were impacted by the ban.In 2022, the Ministry of Defence commissioned Britain's first openly gay judge, Lord Etherton, to carry out an independent review into the treatment of LGBT personnel between 1967 and 2000.It made 49 recommendations, including an official apology by the prime minister and individual apologies from the heads of the armed forces.The government has subsequently implemented 38 of the 49 recommendations.On publication of the review in July 2023, the then Prime Minister Rishi Sunak apologised on behalf of the country to veterans who were affected by the policy.The review also recommended that those dismissed from the armed forces because of the ban should be eligible for up to £70,000 in compensation.Applications opened in December.
"Whether I'm due recognition payments, I don't know, but I have applied," said Ms Ashton."We've been told there's an 18 week wait."What will never be compensated for is the hurt and distress caused to people, some who were interrogated for hours on end without food and water."I know of people who'd gone to chaplains to speak with them confidentially and the chaplains passed on the information, which is appalling, but they were instructed to do so."In 2023, Ms Ashton was chosen by Fighting With Pride to carry the charity's flag during the Festival of Remembrance at the Royal Albert Hall in front of the King and Queen."There wasn't a prouder veteran that day," said Ms Ashton.
In December, Ms Ashton was invited to Westminster by Labour's Shrewsbury MP Julia Buckley to watch a parliamentary debate on the Etherton Review.Buckley told Ms Ashton's story to the House of Commons, describing her as a "brave and committed soldier" who, after being medically discharged, "disappeared back up north into obscurity... never having been thanked" for her service.Ms Ashton, who was sat in the Commons' public gallery, said the debate was the recognition that affected veterans had been fighting for. The Ministry of Defence said it now actively encourages LGBT+ people to join the armed forces and had policies to prevent discrimination and bullying.
Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
13 hours ago
- The Sun
Protecting Net Zero dreams over national security reality could prove an expensive mistake for Labour
Cold war NOTHING more sums up the madness of Government thinking than not being prepared to fund 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence, but deciding it IS still fine to lavish tens of billions on Net Zero. Britain is facing rising threats from the dictator regimes of both China and demented Putin's Russia. 1 Our Armed Forces have been hollowed out and urgently need a vastly upgraded Navy, Air Force and hi-tech weaponry to become a proper global force again. There is a real and present danger to this country NOW. Keir Starmer says the UK is firmly on a war footing. But he still won't commit to anything beyond 2.5 per cent by 2027 — even as Nato leaders meet to agree to pledge five per cent. Instead, the PM IS pressing full steam ahead with Labour's £13.5billion Warm Homes scheme. How much of a comfort will it be — as Russian bombers patrol our skies or Chinese cyber attacks knock out our infrastructure — that your roof has taxpayer-funded insulation and your shiny new heat pump performs worse than your old boiler? Protecting Net Zero dreams over national security reality could prove an expensive mistake in more ways than one. They are fed up of paying record taxes to put illegal migrants in hotels. Just as rage-inducing is watching our Government being powerless in the face of foreign criminals using human rights laws to avoid deportation. Years of broken promises have led to widespread despair among a disbelieving electorate. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch appears to be listening, with her policy review today putting the Tories on the path to quitting the ECHR. Playing by the rules of a foreign court that is mis-interpreting outdated laws springing from the Second World War has got us nowhere. Certainly the public is crying out for someone to end the madness. Becks appeal DAVID Beckham's incredible career has taken him from kicking a ball with his dad in his local park in Chingford to becoming a global sports megastar, fashion icon and philanthropist. The only thing missing in his glittering life was a knighthood. That final goal has been smashed into the back of the net. Sir Becks and Lady Posh — already with their own country manor — now well and truly have it all.
Daily Mail
19 hours ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Multiple earthquakes hit Nevada military base known for testing nuclear weapons
Multiple earthquakes hit just miles outside of a military base in Nevada, which played a significant role in America's nuclear bomb testing. The US Geological Survey (USGS) detected three tremors on Thursday with a 3.3 hitting at 9:52am ET about 14 miles northeast from Nellis Air Force Base, which was followed by two smaller tremors just minutes later. Nellis Air Force Base tested US nuclear weapons from the 1950s until 1992 due to the end of the Cold War and as a way for America to lead by example and encourage other nations to stop such testing as well. There was also strong public opposition due to environmental damage and health risks from previous tests, especially from fallout in areas like Nevada and the Pacific, which led to the decision. The USGS received reports of shaking as far west as Las Vegas, but no injuries or damages have been reported. An assessment from Michigan Tech University showed that people typically do not feel quakes with a magnitude of 2.5 or less. Those from 2.5 to 5.4 are often felt but only cause minor damage. This is a developing story... More updates to come
Leader Live
a day ago
- Leader Live
Nato set to approve new military purchases as part of a defence spending hike
The 'capability targets' lay out goals for each of the 32 nations to purchase priority equipment such as air defence systems, long-range missiles, artillery, ammunition, drones and 'strategic enablers' such as air-to-air refuelling, heavy air transport and logistics. Each nation's plan is classified, so details are scarce. 'Today we decide on the capability targets. From there, we will assess the gaps we have, not only to be able to defend ourselves today, but also three, five, seven years from now,' Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte said. 'All these investments have to be financed,' he told reporters before chairing the meeting at Nato's Brussels headquarters. US President Donald Trump and his Nato counterparts will meet on June 24-25 to agree to new defence investment goals. US defence secretary Pete Hegseth said that 'to be an alliance, you've got to be more than flags. You got to be more than conferences. You need to keep combat ready capabilities'. Spurred on by their own security concerns, European allies and Canada have already been ramping up military spending, including arms and ammunition purchases, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At the same time, some allies balk at US demands to invest 5% of their gross domestic product in defence – 3.5% on core military spending and 1.5% on the roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports needed to deploy armies more quickly – when they have already struggled to grow their budgets to 2% of GDP. The new targets are assigned by Nato based on a blueprint agreed upon in 2023 – the military organisation's biggest planning shake-up since the Cold War — to defend its territory from an attack by Russia or another major adversary. Under those plans, Nato would aim to have up to 300,000 troops ready to move to its eastern flank within 30 days, although experts suggest the allies would struggle to muster those kinds of numbers. The member countries are assigned roles in defending Nato territory across three major zones – the high north and Atlantic area, a zone north of the Alps, and another in southern Europe. Nato planners believe that the targets must be met within five to 10 years, given the speed at which Russia is building its armed forces now, and which would accelerate were any peace agreement reached to end its war on Ukraine. Some fear Russia might be ready to strike at a Nato country even sooner, especially if Western sanctions are eased and Europe has not prepared. 'Are we going to gather here again and say 'OK, we failed a bit', and then maybe we start learning Russian?' Lithuanian Defence Minister Dovile Sakaliene said. Swedish Defence Minister Pal Jonson also warned that while Russia is bogged down in Ukraine right now, things could quickly change. 'We also know after an armistice or a peace agreement, of course, Russia is going to allocate more forces closer to our vicinity. Therefore, it's extremely important that the alliance use these couple of years now when Russia is still limited by its force posture in and around Ukraine,' Mr Jonson said. If the targets are respected, the member countries will need to spend at least 3% of GDP on defence. Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans said his country calculates in the medium term that 'we should spend 3.5% at least on defence, which in the Netherlands means an additional 16 to 19 billion euro (£13-16 billion) addition to our current budget.' The Netherlands is likely to buy more tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and long-range missile systems, including US-made Patriots that can target aircraft, cruise missiles and shorter-range ballistic missiles.
