Small boat migrant avoids jail after punching female police officers
A small boat migrant who repeatedly punched two female police officers has been spared jail.
Tariku Hadgu, 21, was told by a judge his brain 'is not fully formed' and he would be imprisoned if he committed another offence.
The Ethiopian asylum seeker had to be dragged off one of his victims by a member of the public as he punched her outside a bar in Bournemouth, Dorset.
One of them had fallen to the ground after being hit, allowing him to climb on top of her as he continued his assault.
Hadgu, who arrived in the UK three years ago on a small boat, was given a 16-week prison sentence suspended for one year at Poole magistrates' court.
Addressing him, the district judge Michael Snow said: 'This is more serious than your standard assault as it was on two officers.
'The Home Office needs to know about this because it is extremely relevant information as to whether he should be allowed to stay in the country.
'You're a young man of 20 and your brain is not fully formed. If you commit another criminal offence, you will be going to prison for 16 weeks.'
Bruised cheekbones
The court heard the incident took place on April 18 in central Bournemouth after reports of a man carrying a knife matched descriptions of Hadgu and his friend.
Charles Nightingale, the prosecutor, said: 'The two officers who were assaulted by the defendant say they approached the two males to arrest them.
'Both officers describe being punched in the face, and one was punched repeatedly in the abdomen by the defendant who was on top of her.'
The court heard one officer was left with bruises on her face and cheekbones, and feared one of the men could brandish a knife at any moment. However, no knife was found.
Mr Nightingale said Hagdu was 'very drunk' and was also found in possession of a small amount of cannabis, it was heard.
Hadgu – who claims to have no memory of the incident – lives in a shared house in the town with three other asylum seekers and has been learning English at a college.
'Extremely remorseful'
In mitigation, Niall Theobald said Hagdu was 'extremely remorseful for his behaviour'.
Hagdu was also given a 12-week curfew and banned from all bars, pubs and clubs in Dorset for one year.
He was also ordered to pay £250 compensation to each officer, paid out of the £67.50 a week he receives as a basic living allowance.
James Dimmack, chairman of the Dorset Police Federation, said: 'It is never acceptable to attack and assault police officers. That message must be universal.
'Police officers are not punchbags. We are mothers and fathers, sons and daughters, husbands, wives and partners. We should be going home at the end of our shifts, not to hospital.
'An effective deterrent must be in place to better protect the protectors. In this case I am hugely reticent to say that the punishment fits the crime.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Former Kent prostitute says she was a victim of rape and abuse
A former prostitute has opened up on her experience selling sex, detailing how women were often assaulted and raped, and that she was forced to make a "different personality" for herself in order to who is aged in her 20s, said sex workers can be "demonised" by authorities, as she detailed one harrowing account of her being in hospital after being attacked by a was contacted by the charity Streetlight UK, which has expanded its operation across south-east England, and has called for additional funding and resources to support more women in the Home Office has been approached for comment. The exchange of sexual services for money is legal in England, Scotland and it is illegal to partake in solicitation on the streets, pay for sex if someone is forced into it, own or manage a brothel, control a prostitute and the money they earn, and advertise sexual services, like putting cards in a phone activities such as kerb crawling are also illegal. Jane, not her real name, was a prostitute in Kent until a couple of months started selling sex at a property when she was 18 for a short period of time. By the time she was 24 she couldn't work due to her health and decided to go back into says selling sex was an option to earn money."You don't work many hours and you get quite a lot [of money] but it's not worth the risk that is involved," she told BBC South East."People stole from me, assault was not uncommon, rape, attempted rape, all those kind of things - and that's considered lucky."I made a completely different personality for myself in order to cope, so I would just switch off and try to essentially become a different person."When you first get into it there are people that purposely prey on the ones that are new, because you haven't established the red flags that you need to."You just somehow become more savvy in knowing who to avoid and who not to." She was supported by the charity Streetlight UK, a support service for women involved in prostitution, sexual exploitation and says prostitutes are demonized, and when she was treated in hospital after an assault, the staff were not very said: "There was like no support at all, because I didn't want to report it, because of how it occurred basically."I think there needs to be more empathy." Streetlight UK says since it started operating in Medway in March 2023, it has directly supported 244 service recently began operated in East Kent, and 59 women have received support since April last the number supported in Surrey and Sussex has steadily grown from 366 in 2020/21 to 459 in 2024/ executive Helena Croft said there was demand for its services in the community."Homeless charities, mental health, sexual health, they're telling us there's nothing like us and they really need help," she said."They need that support to understand the trauma and impact of prostitution on women." Potential exploitation of victims Ms Croft said the internet has changed prostitution "significantly" because it's become accessible to anyone at any added the government was doing "some good work", but she would like to see more services like hers rolled out across London and the South East.A lot of the organisation's crisis work involves supporting women in financial hardship who've turned to prostitution, but they also work with police and support suspected victims of sex trafficking. In 2024, 1246 people were identified by the National Referral Mechanism (NRM) as being potential victims of sexual exploitation. The NRM, run by the Home Office, is a process in the UK for identifying and supporting victims of modern slavery and human trafficking. Dr Erin Sanders-McDonagh, a senior criminologist at the University of Kent, says many women choose to go into prostitution, and not all of them want to leave the industry. She said: "Single mothers with young children, these are the kinds of people who are suffering the most under austerity, particularly in places like north Kent where there's not a lot of access to high paying jobs."Sex becomes a very reasonable and logical option for women who need to make extra money." 'Exploitation and rape' The National Police Chiefs guidance encourages forces to focus on the vulnerability of street sex workers and prioritise pursuing those who commit exploitation or violence against sex Vajzovic, the NPCC lead for the policing of sex work, says guidance recognises the vulnerability of many sex workers, "particularly those who're involved in selling sex on the street".He added: "Over recent years we have seen really strong recognition to understand the vulnerability of sex workers and focus our enforcement activities on those carrying out that exploitation"."In this context it is about criminal exploitation and rape and to prosecute those types of offences." If you have been affected by the issues raised in this story you can visit the BBC Action Line for support.
Spectator
9 hours ago
- Spectator
Has deporting illegals become illegal?
The circus around Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia – whose full name the New York Times likes to trot out as if citing an old-school English aristocrat – speaks volumes about the immigration battle roiling the US. Our friend Kilmar is what we fuddy-duddies insist on calling an illegal immigrant. The Salvadoran crossed clandestinely into the US in 2012. As for what he's done since, that depends on whom you ask. According to his GoFundMe page, Kilmar is a 'husband, union worker and father of a disabled five-year-old'. Left-wing media portray 'the Maryland man' – a tag akin to Axel Rudakubana's 'a Welshman' – as an industrious metalworker devoted to his family. His wife has rowed back on the temporary protective order she once requested, claiming she'd been over-cautious. Yet according to the Trump administration, Kilmar is a member of the notoriously violent street gang MS-13 who's derived his primary source of income from smuggling hundreds of illegals over the southern border for several years. Choose A or B. In 2019, Kilmar was arrested for loitering along with three other men, one a suspected MS-13 member. He was carrying marijuana, for which (of course) he wasn't charged. From his clothing, tattoos and, more persuasively, a 'past proven and reliable' confidential source who verified he was an active gang member using the moniker 'Chele', police adjudged that Kilmar was a gangbanger, for which (of course) he wasn't charged. He was turned over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement – whose acronym, ICE, reinforces its rep as cold-hearted – which moved to deport him. Kilmar (of course) contested his removal. The immigration judge hearing Kilmar's case concurred that the defendant was indeed a gang member and deportable; the Salvadoran (of course) appealed the decision, which nevertheless was upheld. Kilmar (of course) then filed for asylum, as well as for a 'withholding of removal'. A subsequent immigration judge stayed his deportation to his home country, where his wellbeing might be endangered by local gangs. Now, you might suppose that putting yourself in the way of other famously rivalrous gangs would come with the territory when you join one yourself. Like, inter-gang violence seems a natural hazard of this line of work. But it's not only British immigration judges who are soft touches. Only mass round-ups and swift group trials could effectively address the millions of gate-crashers Kilmar (of course) remained in the US. In 2022, he was pulled over for speeding while driving eight other Hispanic men of uncertain immigration status in an SUV altered to add a third row of seats for extra passengers. The officers suspected human-trafficking; Kilmar's driving licence had expired; a run of his number plate through the database turned up a federal note on likely membership of MS-13. Yet when the patrolmen contacted the feds, ICE (of course) declined to pick him up. So Kilmar was (of course) released without charge. Even so, his claim that he was merely transporting construction workers between jobs did not, under investigation, hold up. Fast-forward to 2025 and why this otherwise obscure Salvadoran who is or is not a thug merits such a detailed lowdown. Meaning (of course) that this case has to do with Donald Trump – whose evil minions in March flew more than 230 purported criminals to a Salvadoran prison, including none other than Kilmar, whom ICE did finally pick up (no 'of course' there). The flights' timing was judicially dodgy. The planes did or didn't take off after a federal judge ruled that the flights could not proceed until the deportees were given the opportunity to challenge their removal. The administration appealed to the Supreme Court, which directed Trump to 'facilitate' Kilmar's return to the US. Because, remember, there was only one country to which he could not be deported because of that credulous 2019 decision: his own. Hence the Justice Department's acceptance that Kilmar's deportation was an 'administrative error'. During this proxy war with Trump, Democrats have pretended to hair-tear over poor Kilmar, mouldering away in a nasty foreign prison and deprived of due process. But the story I just laid out has due process, not to mention leniency or even dereliction on the part of the authorities, up the wazoo. Meanwhile, after slyly getting their jurisprudential ducks in a row, last week Trump and co finally got Kilmar flown back to the US, only to arrest him immediately for human-trafficking – with every intention of convicting the guy and then deporting him right back to El Salvador. What do we make of this farce? The American commentariat has focused on a potential showdown between Trump and the judiciary, claiming to fear a flat-out executive refusal to follow court orders but secretly rather hoping that Trump does defy the courts and thus reveals himself as an unconstitutional tyrant. I view this absurd tale through a different lens. All these trials and flights for a lone illegal alien are expensive. The amount of 'due process' the American justice system affords every single illegal makes deportation at any scale impossible. There isn't enough time and money and there aren't nearly enough judges to make any but a token gesture toward the mass deportation of illegals that Trump has promised. That amounts to a victory not just for Democrats but also for disorder. I'd assess the odds that Kilmar is a thug at about 90 per cent. But proving membership of unofficial allegiances in court is a bastard. If every individual deportation case must be adjudicated according to exacting evidentiary rules and appeal procedures, America's drastic, undemocratic demographic change will proceed inexorably. Only mass round-ups and swift group trials could effectively address the staggering ten million gate-crashers during the Biden administration alone. What are the chances of that? In New York at the weekend, ICE raids were impeded by LA-style crowds of righteously indignant protestors screaming: 'Let them go! Let them go!' The officers just doing their jobs looked beleaguered, tired, numb and pre-defeated. After all the ICE agents' thankless labours, what proportion of their detainees will still get to stay in the country in the end? I'll take another stab at 90 per cent.
Telegraph
12 hours ago
- Telegraph
Contractor in Heathrow migrant escape ‘lost another deportee'
The contractor at the centre of a migrant escape at Heathrow airport 'lost' another deportee in Istanbul, a former officer has claimed. Gary Costin, a former deportee custody officer with the contractor Mitie, said the escape attempt at Heathrow was not an isolated case, and cited four other examples of deportees attempting to abscond in the past three years. On Sunday, an illegal migrant about to be deported back to India was filmed being chased across the airport tarmac pursued by security officers before being caught. He was being escorted by contractors Mitie Care and Custody on behalf of the Home Office. Mr Costin, who was sacked by Mitie after sharing a Reform MP's post, claimed: 'Subcontractors who were working for Mitie taking people back to Somalia lost this individual in Turkey. 'I don't believe he has ever been found. He managed to escape through a hole in the roof, in the toilet or smoking area at Istanbul airport.' Speaking on Talk Radio, he also alleged another deportee on a courtroom visit for a hearing managed to escape out of a window while a third pushed past escorts on an air bridge crowded with passengers at Heathrow before he was subsequently found in a lavatory. A fourth managed to smash a window in the back of a van in Heathrow before evading two escorts, claimed Mr Costin. A team leader managed to detain him. He alleged that the 'gene pool' of good escorts had been watered down by an intensive recruitment campaign by Mitie. 'Training then was done by inexperienced staff who hadn't been in the job five minutes. And it was like the blind leading the blind,' he said. He alleged a basic lack of fitness among officers. 'The fitness of 50 per cent of the staff, I would say, is questionable, and there is no fitness test whatsoever. There were thoughts and talk about bringing fitness tests in, but this didn't happen because they realised they would lose too many staff because of this,' he said. Mitie said it could not comment on individual operations but sources maintained the incident at Heathrow airport on Sunday was extremely rare and was being fully investigated. 'We are proud of the high standards and professional conduct that our care and custody colleagues exhibit every day, often in very challenging circumstances, when carrying out escorting services,' said a source. 'All of our officers have undergone an extensive training programme including the Home Office manual for escorting safely training course – specialist training to ensure escorts have all the skills required to safely remove people from the country – as well as having annual refreshers.' Mr Costin was sacked after sharing a post on X by then Reform leader Richard Tice. It commented on a GB News article headlined 'Home Office Islamic Network aimed to recruit Muslim staff and 'influence policymakers' from the inside'. The piece pointed to Home Office documents showing that a group of more than 700 civil servants aimed to make policy more inclusive of Muslim needs. Mr Costin, who had spent 15 years working for government contractors G4S and Mitie, forwarded a screenshot of Tice's post, which had already been captioned 'Uh oh'. The 57-year-old was suspended in April last year and later sacked, although he had not added any of his own comments when sending the message to a WhatsApp group.
