logo
Analysis-Hamas remains potent threat to Israel despite muted response to strikes

Analysis-Hamas remains potent threat to Israel despite muted response to strikes

Yahoo21-03-2025

By Nidal al-Mughrabi and Emily Rose
CAIRO/JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel inflicted serious damage on Hamas with airstrikes this week that killed its Gaza government chief and other top officials, but Palestinian and Israeli sources say the group has shown it can absorb major losses and still fight and govern.
After its main Gaza chief Yahya Sinwar was killed in October, it moved to a leadership council, less reliant on a single figure, Hamas sources said. As its rocket arsenal was reduced, it refocused on guerrilla warfare, while both its military and political wings switched to using human messengers to avoid electronic spying.
The latest Israeli strikes were mainly aimed at weakening Hamas' ability to rule in Gaza, signalling a major new round of military attacks that the group has so far responded to with only a few rockets fired at Tel Aviv.
The violence shattered a weeks-long ceasefire after 15 months of relentless conflict in which Israel tried to destroy Hamas with a pounding bombardment and repeated ground offensives in retaliation for the deadly Oct. 7, 2023 attacks.
Hamas' de facto government head Essam Addalees and internal security chief Mahmoud Abu Watfa were killed by Israeli strikes on Monday, adding to a tally of thousands of Hamas fighters lost in the war, including many of its military and political chiefs.
With a full-blown conflict now poised to resume in a volatile Middle East, Hamas' capacity to withstand a renewed Israeli assault will be crucial in determining the timescale of a new conflict and what Gaza will look like afterwards.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly said the main aim of the war is to destroy Hamas as a military and governing entity. He has said the aim of the new campaign is to force the group to give up remaining hostages.
Reuters interviews with four sources inside, and close to, Hamas, as well as with Israeli and Palestinian analysts well-versed in the group's abilities and operations, suggest that although it is weakened, Hamas remains a potent adversary.
Sources' accounts of Addalees' own example throughout the war so far - holding meetings, appointing officials, paying salaries and negotiating security for aid deliveries - showed Hamas' ability to retain some control even amid the chaos.
"Hamas is still on its feet. Hamas still governs the territory and the population and Hamas does its utmost to reconstitute itself militarily," said Kobi Michael at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies.
CASUALTIES
Hamas' first response to Israel's renewed airstrikes, which began on Monday with its ground assault starting on Wednesday, came with the firing of three rockets at Tel Aviv on Thursday.
The group had previously said it was not responding to give more time for mediators to work out a possible way to continue the ceasefire - something that seems increasingly unlikely.
In the weeks before the ceasefire took effect in January, Hamas killed dozens of Israeli soldiers with hit-and-run guerrilla warfare that was some of the deadliest of the conflict.
"If Israel sends forces deep into Gaza areas then fighting becomes inevitable and Israeli soldiers will begin to get killed," said a source close to Hamas thinking.
Israel says its campaign has significantly reduced Hamas' arsenal of rockets and its ability to operate as a coherent military organisation, and that it has killed around 20,000 fighters.
Hamas disputes that assertion, though it has not said how many fighters it has lost.
Michael Milshtein, a former Israeli military intelligence officer at the Moshe Dayan Center in Tel Aviv, said Hamas had been able to recruit thousands more fighters drawn from the many jobless young men in Gaza.
Meanwhile, despite being cut off from external arms supply and although Israeli operations have hit its internal manufacturing sites, Hamas has proven able to still make new bombs from unexploded ordnance, said Michael.
GOVERNING ABILITY
Inside Gaza, the killing of Addalees and other top figures on Monday was a significant blow to the group.
"They lost several very senior figures. Essam Addalees was the head of the shadow government in Gaza. But even after the damage they control the street," said Milshtein, describing Hamas as the "dominant player" in the territory.
"There is always someone who will replace him," he added, without suggesting specific candidates.
Addalees' own ability to operate even in the most intense phases of the war underscores the difficulties for Israel.
"He remained at work throughout the war, moving secretly between institutions to oversee work," said Ismail al-Thawabta, who worked under Addalees as head of his office.
A source associated with Addalees said he had been able to move around Gaza discreetly, sometimes in vehicles, sometimes on foot, to meet people. He had mostly communicated with colleagues with messages on paper, the source said.
Addalees and his office even managed to ensure continued salary payments to government workers, the source associated with him and a source close to Hamas said.
"Imagine the difficulty in coordinating the distribution of salaries and getting them to employees in areas across the Gaza Strip where tanks and warplanes operated," the source close to Hamas said, without revealing how this was accomplished.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

There's nothing ‘spontaneous' about radical ICE protests — here are the groups behind them
There's nothing ‘spontaneous' about radical ICE protests — here are the groups behind them

New York Post

time14 minutes ago

  • New York Post

There's nothing ‘spontaneous' about radical ICE protests — here are the groups behind them

The same media who told you in 2020 that the violent Black Lives Matter riots were 'fiery, but mostly peaceful' are at it again, pretending that your eyes are lying to you: No, they claim, there are no rampaging throngs or marauders waving foreign flags and attacking the forces of order. And the peaceful protests in Los Angeles are spontaneous. Nobody is organizing them. Advertisement Or so pretends the media. 'The Trump administration's immigration raids in the California city prompted mostly peaceful protests,' blared the leftwing British paper The Guardian. Of course, these supposedly perfectly serene public gatherings then 'escalated when the president sent in the National Guard — and then the US Marines,' added the Guardian. So, no, the scenes of mayhem and invasion that played on TV for days before the first National Guard unit arrived in the City of Angels didn't prompt Trump to act — don't believe your lying eyes. Advertisement It's like Guardian writer Chris Michael has no idea of the mockery that CNN correspondent Omar Jimenez has succumbed to since August 2020, when he went on air in front of a building engulfed in flames and complete chaos behind him, and a chyron with the 'mostly peaceful' claim. One other key thing that the left-wing media is not telling you is who is organizing the disorder, and who is funding it. Ignoring this aspect leads the public to believe two things that aren't true: that the violence is spontaneous, and that it reflects true national discontent with the deportation raids. Advertisement In fact, the opposite is true. A Polling Insights newsletter that the pollster Scott Rasmussen sends out reports that, 'In the current stand-off, 57% approve of efforts by immigration officials to find and arrest illegal immigrants in Los Angeles. Fifty-two percent approve of President Trump's decision to send in the National Guard.' Other opinon surveys support this trend. So, if the American people largely support the deportation raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), who is organizing the riots against them? Advertisement We can see, from the placards and signs captured in photographs, that one key group organizing the protests comes from what one can call the list of usual suspects: the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL). The PSL, a communist party, has been involved with BLM and pro-Hamas terrorism violence. The PSL has organizational ties with the ANSWER Coalition, which the Network Contagion Research Institute says has ties with the Chinese Communist Party. ANSWER was involved with organizing a rally in sympathy with the Los Angeles rioters on June 10 in Columbus, Ohio. The PSL is an old-style communist party that will seize on any crises to try to dismantle the United States. It says that 'the United States today is a dictatorship of the capitalist class. This reality will not change without a socialist revolution.' It is funded indirectly by donations from Neville Roy Singham, an American millionaire with close ties to the CCP who lives in Shanghai. Advertisement Elias Rodriguez, the terrorist who shot and killed the couple at the Jewish Museum in Washington, DC, in late May, was a member of both the PSL and ANSWER. Another group involved in organizing the LA riots is the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), a radical leftist American union with extensive overseas ties. It is a regular attendee at the conferences and workshops held by the Foro de Sao Paulo, a hemispheric network of Marxist parties founded by Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and Brazilian President Inazio Lula da Silva. Advertisement The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights LA (CHIRLA), also an organizer, received $33 million in government grants in FY2023. Then there are the 'charities' helping the rioters, such as Mutual Aid Los Angeles Network, Operation Healthy Hearts, LA Poverty Department, and Mutual Aid/Social Therapy. These riots are sure to expand in the days to come, which means that it is a good thing that some congressmen are looking to investigate who these groups are, and why they are seeking to destabilize our streets. Mike Gonzalez is a senior fellow at The Heritage Foundation and co-author of 'NextGen Marxism: What It Is and How to Combat It.'

Colombia's Petro threatens labor reform by referendum as congressional deadline looms
Colombia's Petro threatens labor reform by referendum as congressional deadline looms

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Colombia's Petro threatens labor reform by referendum as congressional deadline looms

BOGOTA (Reuters) -Colombia's leftist President Gustavo Petro on Wednesday signed a decree to hold a referendum on labor reforms, an attempt to force the Senate to vote on a proposal on the matter before their session wraps up later this month. The referendum proposal seeks to limit the working day, increase the surcharge for Sunday and holiday work from 75% to 100% and require social security payments for delivery app drivers. The Senate is currently debating a modified labor reform, after in May rejecting a 12-question version of the referendum in a tight 49 to 47 vote, which Petro later alleged was fraudulent. The legislature's current session ends on June 20. Petro and his interior minister, Armando Benedetti, said that if the reform passed, the referendum would be called off. If the referendum were to be held, each measure would need to be approved by the majority of at least 13.5 million voters, a third of Colombia's electoral roll, to be valid. Opposition parties have said Petro's decree is tantamount to a coup, violates the country's constitution and destroys the separation of powers of Colombia's three branches of government. Analysts have warned, meanwhile, that the decree could face legal challenges, including in the Constitutional Court. A majority of the social and economic reforms promised by Petro - who was elected in 2022 on pledges to right centuries of inequality in the Andean country - have been rejected by lawmakers. Colombia will hold legislative and presidential elections in the first half of 2026.

Trump's defending civilization, beware US drone vulnerabilities and other commentary
Trump's defending civilization, beware US drone vulnerabilities and other commentary

New York Post

time24 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump's defending civilization, beware US drone vulnerabilities and other commentary

From the right: Trump's Defending Civilization President Trump's order mobilizing the National Guard in Los Angeles, cheers City Journal's Heather Mac Donald, 'was clarifying and precise: 'To the extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion' ' against the US government. Trump is delivering on his campaign vow to end 'the era of enabling endemic immigration lawlessness,' enflaming Democrats with 'rage.' 'Apologists for the chaos' claim Trump's response caused the violence, but the 'violence preceded the mobilization.' And 'standing by during violence only allows it to spread.' Violence meant to 'inhibit the execution of the laws' is 'a death knell for civilization.' The prez's 'unapologetic defense of the law this weekend represented liberation from a poisonous set of lies.' Defense beat: Beware US Drone Vulnerabilities Advertisement 'Drones have completely upended the economics of air warfare,' but most US 'defenses remain focused on traditional threats like ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and hostile aircraft,' warns Jon Gruen at The Wall Street Journal. 'Today's most immediate threats fly much lower. The skies above our stadiums, airports and substations are essentially undefended at ground level.' And 'federal law would slow our response' to such an attack, as 'local law enforcement is largely powerless to act against a known drone threat' — a problem 'bipartisan legislation in Congress' is looking to address. Yet 'even if we solve the authority problem, we face a second vulnerability: the lack of industrial capacity to make these drones.' Beware: 'We're unprepared for the next war, and the next war won't wait until we're ready.' Media watch: In the Tank for Hamas The IDF last month 'struck the tunnel under the European Hospital in an attempt to eliminate Muhammad Sinwar, the leader of Hamas,' notes Commentary's Seth Mandel. But 'news agencies insisted Israel was lying about the presence of Hamas leadership or an underground bunker.' And when Israel's account proved 100% true, 'journalists complained that Israel was keeping journalists out of the war zone, a kind of veiled justification for why they keep making up stories. Israel responded by giving journalists a tour of the underground bunker itself.' Sigh. That produced a tendentious New York Times story — 'The Tunnel That Leads Underneath a Hospital in Southern Gaza: To Israelis, the location of an underground passageway highlights Hamas's abuse of civilians. To Palestinians, Israel's decision to target it highlights Israel's own disregard for civilian life.' Advertisement Eye on Connecticut: Pension 'Spiking' Abuse 'Some public sector union abuses' in Connecticut are 'more egregious than ever,' grumbles Red Jahncke at The Hill. 'State employees are retiring with pension benefits higher than their last salary,' thanks to the practice as 'spiking,' where they 'work enormous hours of overtime just before retirement' to boost their benefits. A study of the state Department of Correction ID'd workers 'with the highest overtime pay' the last five years; those who've retired scored pensions paying 138% of their final salary. A 'wage freeze' and overtime reform would help. Gov. Ned Lamont (D) needs to 'face down the unions' and 'actually manage the workforce and clamp down on overtime spiking.' Libertarian: A Dubious Case for AI Regulation Advertisement 'Skepticism is warranted whenever the head of an incumbent firm calls for more regulation,' and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's case against the House-proposed 10-year moratorium on state AI regulation 'is no different,' argues Reason's Jack Nicastro. In a New York Times op-ed, Amodei argued for state-level regulation by raising 'tangible concerns,' such as AI being used to help people carry out cyberattacks or to produce biological weapons. 'But there's nothing new about that,' since both organic and artificial intelligence 'can be used to cause problems as well as to solve them.' The regulations Amodei wants would 'be burdensome' and could make AI models worse. 'Beware of calls for AI regulation that will . . . protect incumbent firms' profits from being bid away by competitors.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store