Danish prime minister visits Greenland as Trump seeks control of the Arctic territory
NUUK, Greenland (AP) — Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen is in Greenland for a three-day trip aimed at building trust and cooperation with Greenlandic officials at a time when the Trump administration is seeking control of the vast Arctic territory.
Frederiksen announced plans for her visit after U.S. Vice President JD Vance visited a U.S. air base in Greenland last week and accused Denmark of underinvesting in the territory.
Greenland is a mineral-rich, strategically critical island that is becoming more accessible because of climate change. Trump has said that the landmass is critical to U.S. security. It's geographically part of North America, but is a semiautonomous territory belonging to the Kingdom of Denmark.
After her arrival Wednesday, Frederiksen walked the streets of the capital, Nuuk, with the incoming Greenlandic leader, Jens-Frederik Nielsen. She is also to meet with the future Naalakkersuisut, the Cabinet, in a visit due to last through Friday.
'It has my deepest respect how the Greenlandic people and the Greenlandic politicians handle the great pressure that is on Greenland," she said in government statement announcing the visit.
On the agenda are talks with Nielsen about cooperation between Greenland and Denmark.
Nielsen has said in recent days that he welcomes the visit, and that Greenland would resist any U.S. attempt to annex the territory.
'We must listen when others talk about us. But we must not be shaken. President Trump says the United States is 'getting Greenland.' Let me make this clear: The U.S. is not getting that. We don't belong to anyone else. We decide our own future,' he wrote Sunday on Facebook.
'We must not act out of fear. We must respond with peace, dignity and unity. And it is through these values that we must clearly, clearly and calmly show the American president that Greenland is ours.'
For years, the people of Greenland, with a population of about 57,000, have been working toward eventual independence from Denmark.
The Trump administration's threats to take control of the island one way or the other, possibly even with military force, have angered many in Greenland and Denmark. The incoming government chosen in last month's election wants to take a slower approach on the question of eventual independence.
The political group in Greenland most sympathetic to the U.S. president, the Naleraq party that advocates a swift path toward independence, was excluded from coalition talks to form the next government.
Peter Viggo Jakobsen, associate professor at the Danish Defense Academy, said last week that the Trump administration's aspirations for Greenland could backfire and push the more mild parties closer to Denmark.
He said that 'Trump has scared most Greenlanders away from this idea about a close relationship to the United States because they don't trust him.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
38 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
The Latest: Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase hush money conviction
Federal appellate judges will hear President Donald Trump's quest to erase his criminal conviction on Wednesday — one of the ways he's trying to get last year's hush money verdict overturned. A three-judge panel is set to consider Trump's efforts to get the New York case moved from state court to federal court, where he could then try to have the verdict thrown out on presidential immunity grounds. Billionaire Elon Musk stepped back from his explosive feud with Trump, writing on X that he regrets that some of his posts went 'too far.' An appeals court is allowing Trump tariffs to continue pending court challenges, extending a similar ruling made after another federal court ruled that he overstepped his presidential authority. And the Justice Department says Trump he has the authority to abolish national monuments meant to protect historical and archaeological sites across broad landscapes, including two in California created by his predecessor at the request of Native American tribes. Here's the latest: Trump hails appeals court ruling in favor of his tariffs as a 'great' win for the US Trump commented on the ruling on Wednesday on his social media site, saying, 'A Federal Appeals Court has just ruled that the United States can use TARIFFS to protect itself against other countries. A great and important win for the U.S.,' he wrote. Veterans are divided over the Army's big parade, being held on Trump's birthday Until recently, the Army's long-planned birthday celebration did not include a big parade. Trump's addition, featuring hundreds of military vehicles and aircraft and thousands of soldiers, has divided veterans. Some liken it to the military chest-pounding commonly seen in North Korea, a step toward authoritarianism or a perverse birthday party for Trump. Others see it as a once-in-a-lifetime accounting of the Army's achievements and the military service of millions of soldiers over centuries. The parade is not about Trump, they say, but the public seeing the faces of soldiers when so few Americans serve. The Army expects up to 200,000 people could attend and says the parade will cost an estimated $25 million to $45 million. Trump, speaking at Fort Bragg this week, said Saturday would be 'a big day' and noted 'we want to show off a little bit.' Appeals court lets Trump administration keep collecting tariffs while challenges continue The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit extends a similar ruling it made after another federal court struck down the tariffs May 28, saying Trump had overstepped his authority. The case involves 10% tariffs the president imposed on almost every country in April and bigger ones he imposed and then suspended on countries with which the United States runs trade deficits. It also involves tariffs Trump plastered on imports from China, Canada and Mexico to pressure them to do more to stop the illegal flow of immigrants and synthetic opioids across the U.S. border. In declaring the tariffs, Trump had invoked emergency powers under a 1977 law. But a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled he had exceeded his power. The tariffs upended global trade, paralyzed businesses and spooked financial markets. Elon Musk backs off from feud with Trump, saying he regrets social media posts that 'went too far' Early Wednesday morning, he posted 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far.' Musk's break with a president whom he spent hundreds of millions of dollars to elect appeared to put an end to his influence in the White House and prompted concerns about effects on his companies. As a major government contractor, Musk's businesses could be particularly vulnerable to retribution, and Trump has already threatened to cut Musk's contracts. Musk earlier deleted a post in which he claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the president's association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Meanwhile, other posts that irritated Trump, including ones in which Musk called the spending bill an 'abomination' and claimed credit for Trump's election victory, remained live. On Sunday, Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker that he has no desire to repair their relationship and warned that Musk could face ' serious consequences ' if he tries to help Democrats in upcoming elections. A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase his hush money conviction Trump's quest to erase his criminal conviction heads to a federal appeals court Wednesday. It's one way he's trying to get last year's hush money verdict overturned. A three-judge panel is set to hear arguments in Trump's long-running fight to get the New York case moved from state court to federal court, where he could then try to have the verdict thrown out on presidential immunity grounds. The Republican is asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene after a lower-court judge twice rejected the move. As part of the request, Trump wants the federal appeals court to seize control of the criminal case and then ultimately decide his appeal of the verdict, which is now pending in a state appellate court. The Manhattan district attorney's office, which prosecuted Trump's case, wants it to stay in state court.
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
Denmark's lawmakers approve bill to allow U.S. military bases on Danish soil as Trump eyes Greenland
COPENHAGEN, Denmark (AP) — Denmark's Parliament on Wednesday approved a bill to allow the United States to have military bases on Danish soil, a move that comes as U.S. President Donald Trump seeks to take control of the kingdom's semi-autonomous territory of Greenland. Critics say the vote ceded Danish sovereignty to the U.S. The legislation widens a previous military agreement, made in 2023 with the Biden administration, where U.S. troops had broad access to Danish airbases in the Scandinavian country.
Japan Forward
an hour ago
- Japan Forward
Trump vs Harvard: The Battle Beyond the Headlines
Harvard University, a leading American research institution, has lately been making headlines for less-than-glamorous reasons. President Donald Trump and his team have unleashed a barrage of allegations against the school, from racial discrimination to anti-Semitism, and its alleged dubious ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Among the moves are efforts to curtail Harvard's intake of international students altogether. Faced with external pressures, Harvard is fighting back. Unlike some schools, the university is mounting legal challenges to block federal funding cuts and immigration restrictions, and has even notched some victories. But beneath the daily drama and media theatrics looms a bigger question: What's really driving this showdown? Perhaps the most contentious aspect of Trump's policies involves drastically reducing the number of international students beyond Harvard. Proposals under consideration include capping foreign student enrollment, revoking existing visas, and ending work authorization after graduation. While these measures have invited considerable criticism, they are resonating with a growing segment of the American population. "MAGA voters who supported Trump are largely those who did not attend these elite, leftist universities," said one professor at a top American university, speaking on condition of anonymity. "But it's the lower and middle class and even upper middle class who can't get their children into these universities who are subsidizing them (including international students) through their tax dollars." Supporters posing after a rally for US President-elect Donald Trump, January 19, Washington. (©Kyodo) At a recent Financial Times forum, former White House strategist Steve Bannon argued that curbing foreign competition was essential to give American graduates a fair shot at jobs. "To protect African Americans, Hispanics, working-class and middle-class people, we ought to halt all visas into the country, at least temporarily," he said. Reinforcing Bannon's stance, another professor at an Ivy League University said, "Foreign students should be required to return home immediately after graduation and face tighter restrictions on political activism while in the US." "Working Americans should be educating the sons and daughters of American citizens, not of foreigners," the academic added, also speaking on condition of anonymity. Another key issue driving the administration's crackdown is Beijing's growing influence in American academe. Federal investigators have flagged undisclosed payments, covert research ties, and intellectual property theft linked to Chinese institutions and individuals. A recent article in The Wall Street Journal provides an account of Harvard's extensive relationship with the CCP. With Chinese students constituting a significant portion of its international cohort, Harvard has emerged as a central figure in the debate over foreign influence on American campuses. Campus of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in April. (©Reuters via Kyodo) South Korean attorney and Harvard Law alumnus, Kang Yong-suk, shares these concerns. "Beijing's infiltration of academic institutions is a global problem," he said. "The risks to national security and technological competitiveness are very real." Kang pointed to a June 2024 incident in which South Korean authorities arrested three Chinese students closely tied to the CCP for secretly recording military sites at Busan port. Lawmaker Kim Min-jeon shares a photo of an alleged Chinese student wearing a Tsinghua University jacket participating in an anti-Yoon rally in South Korea. (©Kim Min-jeon FB) Chinese nationals and students were also reported to have participated in political rallies during President Yoon Suk-yeol's impeachment, prompting the Chinese embassy to issue a formal warning. This came as Yoon took a notably hawkish stance toward Beijing during his tenure, aligning his country closely with the West. "Such incidents reflect a broader trend, with countries uncovering similar cases of covert surveillance involving Chinese students," Kang added. "Given China's deep-seated sway at institutions like Harvard, Trump's policies appear inevitable." For years, critics have accused elite American universities of veering sharply to the left and stifling intellectual diversity on campus. Even Harvard's own president, Alan Garber, recently acknowledged his school's noticeable ideological tilt. The Harvard Crimson's 2023 survey is a telling indicator. In its annual poll of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, 77% of respondents identified as either liberal or very liberal, while fewer than 3% identified as conservative. J. Mark Ramseyer, a tenured Harvard Law professor, attests to this imbalance. "The humanities and some social sciences have become extremely intolerant," he said. "A few of us are trying to strengthen intellectual freedom, but progress remains slow." Ramseyer himself faced backlash in 2021 after publishing an 8-page hot-button paper on Japanese history. Hundreds of students and faculty at his university and beyond signed petitions demanding an apology and calling for the withdrawal of his work. The article ultimately survived the controversy. Part of the Trump administration's strategy is to rein in universities perceived as ideologically rigid and academically unaccountable. "University activities, even in science and medicine, have become so corrupted by 'woke' ideology that meaningful change is unlikely without decisive action," said the same Ivy League professor, speaking on condition of anonymity. "Given the iron grip of far left faculty and administrators, the only real hope is to use the leverage of withdrawing government funding." By cutting federal funding, the Trump administration seeks to course correct institutions increasingly viewed as out of touch with the larger American public and core academic principles. So, can Trump prevail over Harvard? Perhaps not in the immediate term. Harvard, like many of its elite peers, is fortified by massive endowments, legal autonomy, and institutional inertia. That said, the cultural tide seems to be shifting. Already, some top-tier universities are questioning sacred cows and rethinking their entrenched practices and norms. Even if Trump's policies fall short of remaking the ivory tower, some academics and experts agree they have succeeded in forcing long-suppressed debates into the global limelight. Among them, of course, are equity in admissions, national interest, and the core mission of higher education. Author: Kenji Yoshida
