logo
Airline Chiefs Meet In India Amid Turbulence Of Trump

Airline Chiefs Meet In India Amid Turbulence Of Trump

Airline bosses meet from Sunday in New Delhi at their annual industry conference, battling to mitigate the impact of Donald Trump's policies that have hit travel to the United States and potentially raised costs for aviation.
Trump's bid to impose tariffs on the United States' trading partners have upended commercial flows, with legal challenges against his plan adding to uncertainties.
The tense atmosphere in the United States, from Trump's plans to revoke foreign students' visas to reports of travellers detained at US borders, has also put a dampener on tourism.
"The airline sector is always sensitive to the economic and political climate," Paul Chiambaretto, professor of strategy and marketing at France's Montpellier Business School, told AFP.
"Any form of uncertainty will reduce traffic," he added, noting that "especially" impacted business travellers, the most profitable segment.
The influential International Air Transport Association (IATA) is due to update its traffic and profitability projections as the delegates from the group gathering 350 airlines hold their talks.
In December it forecast a record 5.2 billion air journeys in 2025 -- up 6.7 percent from an already unprecedented 2024. It predicted carriers would generate $36.6 billion in cumulative net profit, on revenue exceeding $1 trillion.
However, the US president's "Liberation Day" tariff blitz and his administration's stance on issues from immigration to education could throw a spanner in the works.
As early as March, the North American air transport market, which represents 23 percent of global traffic, began to decline and several US-based airlines warned they would not meet their financial targets.
A study released this month by the World Travel and Tourism Council and Oxford Economics found that the United States was on track to lose some $12.5 billion in revenue from foreign tourists this year owing to worries about travelling to the country.
The group, made up of leading travel firms, said this "represents a direct blow to the US economy overall, impacting communities, jobs, and businesses from coast to coast".
"While other nations are rolling out the welcome mat, the US government is putting up the 'closed' sign," WTTC president Julia Simpson said.
Didier Brechemier, an airline industry expert at Roland Berger, said: "Today, bookings for the North Atlantic are lower than they were at the same time last year."
IATA Director General Willie Walsh noted on Thursday "some signs of fragility of consumer and business confidence with continued weakness in the US domestic market and a sharp fall in North American premium class travel".
Air transport has for decades benefited from the removal of import taxes, rising living standards -- particularly in Asia -- and open borders, with the number of air trips tripling since 2000.
But the return of protectionism is endangering the industrial model of aircraft manufacturers, whose assembly lines mobilise suppliers worldwide, with costs likely to increase, putting more of a burden on carriers.
There's good news for carriers, though, with oil prices falling owing to an anticipated slowdown in economic growth.
That could help firms reduce their fuel bills -- representing between a quarter and a third of their operational costs -- by hundreds of millions of dollars.
Washington's new Republican administration is also fully supporting the development of fossil fuels, in contrast to that of Democratic former president Joe Biden, who subsidised Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF).
Sustainable development "has largely disappeared from the airline industry's immediate priorities", says Jerome Bouchard, a partner at consultants Oliver Wyman.
Also likely on the agenda for IATA will be the impact of geopolitical tensions on the industry.
India is experiencing explosive growth, with the number of airports and passengers in the world's most populous nation doubling over the past decade, while major airlines IndiGo and Air India have hundreds of aircraft on order.
But the country's recent deadly spat with neighbour Pakistan, which saw the two sides impose airspace bans on each other, highlighted the fragility of civil aviation in the face of such upheavals.
The row poses an additional complication for connections to Asia, as Russia has banned US and EU aircraft overflights in retaliation for sanctions linked to its invasion of Ukraine.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US updates: Trump to double steel tariffs to 50% – DW – 05/31/2025
US updates: Trump to double steel tariffs to 50% – DW – 05/31/2025

DW

time8 hours ago

  • DW

US updates: Trump to double steel tariffs to 50% – DW – 05/31/2025

Skip next section Trump says US will double tariffs on foreign steel to 50% 05/31/2025 May 31, 2025 Trump says US will double tariffs on foreign steel to 50% US President Donald Trump said his administration would double duties on steel imports to 50%. He announced the tariff hike while speaking in Pennsylvania at a US Steel plant, where he also touted a "partnership" between the American steelmaker and Japan's Nippon Steel. "We're going to bring it from 25% to 50%, the tariffs on steel into the United States of America, which will even further secure the steel industry," he said. "Nobody's going to get around that." The move puts further pressure on global steel producers and threatens to deepen Trump's trade war and increase market uncertainty over Trump's disorienting tariff regime.

Trump Promises to Refund Companies Who Already Paid Tariffs If Court Rules Them 'Unlawful'
Trump Promises to Refund Companies Who Already Paid Tariffs If Court Rules Them 'Unlawful'

Int'l Business Times

time12 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Trump Promises to Refund Companies Who Already Paid Tariffs If Court Rules Them 'Unlawful'

President Donald Trump has pledged to refund U.S. companies that have paid tariffs i they are deemed "unlawful" by the courts. The promise was made in court filings amid ongoing legal challenges to tariffs imposed by executive orders. The Trump administration argues that the trade deficit presents a national emergency and thus the president has the authority to institute tariffs. The U.S. Court of International Trade disagreed in a ruling that would require the tariffs to be paused. Lawyers representing the administration quickly filed an appeal, which included a stay request that would allow the tariffs to continue pending appeal. A federal appeals court unanimously ruled to grant the stay. Typically, courts require assurance that the stay will not harm the other side of the case. To fulfill this expectation, Trump's legal team made a promise: Word "Oil" and stock graph are seen through magnifier displayed in this illustration taken September 4, 2022. Reuters CNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell discussed the promise on his show, The Last Word, in a diatribe criticizing Trump's competency and trade policies. He posited that the president may not even be fully aware of what has been promised to business owners impacted by the tariffs, or of the billions he may be required to refund. Pump jacks operate at sunset in an oil field in Midland, Texas U.S. August 22, 2018. Reuters In a play on Trump's "Liberation Day" moniker for the day tariffs were enacted, O'Donnell referred to a potential "Refund Day." "Refund day will be the ultimate humiliation day at the end of Donald Trump's disastrous trade war," he said. The White House has not responded to O'Donnell or commented on the court documented refund promise. The case is stayed until June 9th. Originally published on Latin Times

US court battle over Trump tariffs brings no reprieve for EU – DW – 05/30/2025
US court battle over Trump tariffs brings no reprieve for EU – DW – 05/30/2025

DW

time12 hours ago

  • DW

US court battle over Trump tariffs brings no reprieve for EU – DW – 05/30/2025

The EU could almost have been saved by the bell, at least in part, by a US court ruling suspending many of President Trump's tariffs. But it's more likely to heighten confusion than usher in a breakthrough, experts warn. For a brief moment on Thursday, it looked like the European Union and countries around the globe would get a surprise reprieve from the widest-sweeping tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump. The little-known US Court of International Trade in New York struck down the blanket baseline 10% tariffs on virtually all goods imported into the US, announced two months ago on what Trump dubbed "Liberation Day," along with even higher country-specific rates. The US federal court argued that Trump had overstepped his presidential powers with the radical and sprawling penalties, a central pillar of his isolationist "America First' economic policy, and ordered a halt to the tariffs. 'Liberation Day' kicked off a wave of economic chaos and frantic negotiations Image: Brendan Smialowski/AFP But within hours, there was a fresh plot twist: an appeals court suspended that order too, essentially reinstating the tariffs for the time being. How exactly the battle — which is essentially about how much power over trade policy resides with the president and how much with Congress — plays out within the US judicial system remains to be seen. Back to negotiations For the EU, along with other global trading partners, Thursday's news boiled down to a welcome glimmer of hope that was quickly extinguished, at least for now. In Brussels on Friday, the focus instead was on ongoing negotiations with the US. "Both sides are now working to an accelerated pace with a view to sealing agreements," European Commission spokesperson Olof Gill told DW. The EU executive branch represents the 27 EU countries, which together form the world's largest trade bloc united under a closely integrated single market system, in commerce negotiations with the rest of the world. European Commission Vice President Maros Sefcovic, whose portfolio covers trade, posted on social media platform X after a phone call with US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick. Trump tariffs threaten Italy's pecorino cheese To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "Our time and effort [is] fully invested, as delivering forward-looking solutions remains a top EU priority," Sefcovic wrote. "Staying in permanent contact," he added. As of April, most goods exports from the EU to the US are subject to 10% tariffs, with the bloc having so far avoided higher rates. This came on top of the painful 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum sold to the US, already imposed in March. Stronger hand or just more confusion? The EU was poised to hit back with significant countermeasures on everything from whiskey to motorcycles and prepared a second package, though both have been paused as EU-US negotiations continue. Trump had threatened to hike the baseline rate to 50% in July. But last week, after a call with the US leader, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced that both sides would hold fire for now pending further talks Bernd Lange, the chair of the European Parliament's trade committee, told DW he thought the Court of International Trade ruling could help Brussels. The baseline 10% tariffs hinge on a 1977 law, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. A visit by one of Trump's favorite EU leaders, Italy's Giorgia Meloni, also failed to yield a breakthrough Image: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images "This is really not a legitimate basis for tariffs against almost 100 countries around the world," Lange said. "Republican states and companies close to them have also taken legal action against the president's activities," the German center-left parliamentarian noted. "The position of the European Union is of course also strengthened because the potential for blackmail is reduced," the EU lawmaker argued. But Andre Sapir, an expert from the Brussels economic think tank Bruegel and former advisor to the European Commission, saw things differently. "I think it brings even more uncertainty to the whole process," Sapir told DW by phone. For the business community, one of the worst aspects of the ongoing trade war was the lack of clarity about how things would pan out, he explained. What is the EU's game plan? The EU has offered a "zero-for-zero" tariff trade deal, in essence removing all penalties. This has so far not yielded a major breakthrough. One of Trump's key complaints is that the US imports many more EU goods than the EU does from the US, also known as a trade deficit. In December 2024, the EU exported €45.4 billion ($49.4 billion) worth of goods to the US, while it imported €27.5 billion worth of US goods. However, the EU frequently argues that the US sells far more services to the bloc than the other way round. To assuage Trump, the European Commission has proposed pushing EU companies and countries to buy more natural gas from the US, a shift that is already well under way since it turned away from Russia over the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. How is the strategy going? Faced with threats from Trump, the EU has so far opted for a rather restrained approach compared to China, for example. Bejing has been much quicker and more aggressive in resorting to countermeasures, sending tariffs on both sides sky-high. However, earlier this month, Washington and Beijing announced a truce in the escalation, each side cutting their tariff rate by 115%. So far only the UK has struck a deal with the US, though it has been criticized as incomplete Image: Charly Triballeau/AFP/Getty Images EU lawmaker Bernd Lange said that after the rulings, the basic strategy was unchanged. The bloc has made clear it is trying to address Trump's concerns in the negotiations. "But it is also that if it doesn't work, we will impose measures. The EU is strong enough." For Sapir of think tank Bruegel, Thursday's rulings do not change much. Even if Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs were ultimately found to be based on shaky legal foundations and struck down, the president would likely simply find another way to impose different tariffs, he argued. "I don't think that any country can believe that this ruling is the end of that problem," he said. Edited by: J. Wingard

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store