'Minnesota has a fraud problem': Eden Prairie couple indicted in $15 million scheme
An Eden Prairie couple has been indicted in a $15 million medical billing fraud scheme they allegedly orchestrated.
The United States Department of Justice said Gabriel Alexander Luthor, a.k.a Gabriel Alexander Langford, 39, and Elizabeth Christine Brown, 42, allegedly engaged in the scheme that defrauded Medicare, Medicaid and other insurers by overbilling for neurofeedback therapy.
Luthor and Brown are each charged with six counts of wire fraud and one count of money laundering.
According to federal court documents, the two allegedly started the scheme in 2018, overbilling medical insurance companies provided through Golden Victory Medical, LLC (GVM). The couple founded GVM that same year together.
One of the main medical services the company claimed to provide was neurofeedback therapy, which involves the medical provider placing sensors on a patient's scalp to obtain images of the patient's brain waves "for the purpose of indicating the effects of interventions meant to treat mental-health conditions," according to court documents.
However, the indictment states that Luthor and Brown fraudulently overbilled insurers by using numerous, inapplicable medical codes.
In total, the couple submitted "hundreds of thousands" of fake claims to insurers, many of which the insurers paid. Millions of dollars in fraudulent proceeds were transferred from separate bank accounts and ultimately kept by Luthor and Brown.
The funds were allegedly used to purchase a mansion in Eden Prairie and pay off their living expenses and other expenses of Luther's other girlfriends, who lived with the couple and also assisted in the fraud scheme, authorities say.
'Minnesota has a fraud problem,' said Acting U.S. Attorney Lisa D. Kirkpatrick. 'This case is yet another example of defendants defrauding government programs out of millions. This type of widespread fraud is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.'
The couple made their initial appearances in U.S. District Court earlier last week and were officially indicted on Thursday.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Newest FTC Data Reveals Americans Lost Billions to Fraud in 2024 — Here Were the Most Expensive Scams
Scams and fraud impact millions of people every year, and falling for a scam can mean losing thousands of dollars. Be Aware: Try This: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) reported that in 2024, 2.6 million U.S. consumers reported a whopping $12.5 billion as lost to fraud — a figure 25% higher than in 2023. To protect yourself, it helps to know how to spot a scam. Data from the FTC indicated that the two most damaging types of fraud last year came in the form of investment and imposter scams. Read Next: Investment scams outpaced any other category of fraud targeting U.S. consumers in 2024, with reports of $5.7 billion in losses — an uptick of 24% in total value lost from 2023. These sorts of scams typically see fraudsters enticing victims to invest money into fraudulent assets, and when the transfer is complete, the cash disappears — along with the criminal who defrauded the victim. Imposter scams, on the other hand, accounted for $2.95 billion in losses coming from American checkbooks. These scams involve a fraudster pretending to be someone trustworthy or an authority figure, like a representative of a bank or government. They use this feigned authority and the urgency of dire consequences to convince victims to give them personal information, like a Social Security Number, or send them money. One striking fact: Last year, consumers reported losing more money to scams wherein they paid off the fraudsters with bank transfers or cryptocurrency than all other payment methods combined. And a second: While the FTC took in fraud reports from 2.6 million consumers in 2024 — and that number nearly matches the figure from 2023 — the total sum of money lost was much larger. Further, growth in particular subsets of scams was in evidence. Government imposter scams, a scenario in which a fraudster pretends to be a government official seeking monetary restitution or payment of some sort, saw consumer losses total $789 million, or about $171 million higher than in 2023. Business and job opportunity fraud, where hopefuls might pay false recruiters or hiring agencies for a way into their desired careers, accounted for $750.6 million in losses — up $250 million from 2023's figure. Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, said, 'Scammers' tactics are constantly evolving. … The FTC is monitoring those trends closely and working hard to protect the American people from fraud.' The pace of these reports does not appear to be slowing, either. A separate FTC data sheet indicated that for 2025, year-to-date, 75,458 reports of government imposter scams have been recorded. The scammers represent themselves as collecting tolls or representing the Social Security Administration, Medicare or even the FTC themselves. Most payments this year have been made by gift card — never a valid payment method for government-owed debt — and most scammers called their victims via phone. More From GOBankingRates The New Retirement Problem Boomers Are Facing 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses This article originally appeared on Newest FTC Data Reveals Americans Lost Billions to Fraud in 2024 — Here Were the Most Expensive Scams Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Intercept
5 hours ago
- The Intercept
Trump Puts Lives at Risk by Revoking Emergency Abortion Guidelines for Hospitals
The Trump administration rescinded Biden-era guidance that explicitly required emergency rooms to provide abortions to pregnant patients if such care would save their lives. Medical experts expect the policy shift to sow chaos in hospitals and endanger pregnant people throughout the U.S. In the aftermath of the Supreme Court's move to overturn Roe v. Wade, the Biden administration issued guidance related to the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, or EMTALA, a federal law that requires health care providers that take Medicare to provide 'stabilizing' medical treatment to all patients experiencing medical emergencies. In a 2022 letter to health care providers, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Beccerra wrote that if a doctor believes a pregnant patient at an emergency room 'is experiencing an emergency medical condition as defined by EMTALA, and that abortion is the stabilizing treatment necessary to resolve that condition, the physician must provide that treatment.' The memo also clarified that EMTALA preempts state law in cases where abortion is illegal with exceptions narrower than those in EMTALA. In a press release Tuesday, the Trump administration rescinded the older guidance, stating that the previous rules 'do not reflect the policy of this Administration.' The release noted that Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 'will work to rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration's actions.' 'In places where doctors and hospitals are being threatened with both criminal and civil penalties for providing abortion care, it will cause a delay.' Abortion providers and experts in reproductive health argue that the vagueness of the new guidance will create uncertainty in emergency rooms, denying pregnant people equal access to care and putting lives at risk in states that have restricted or banned abortion. 'The Trump Administration would rather women die in emergency rooms than receive life-saving abortions,' said Nancy Northup, President and CEO at the Center for Reproductive Rights. 'In pulling back guidance, this administration is feeding the fear and confusion that already exists at hospitals in every state where abortion is banned. Hospitals need more guidance right now, not less.' The Trump administration told The Intercept that the idea that the new guidance puts lives at risk is 'false.' 'CMS will continue to enforce EMTALA, which protects all individuals who present to a hospital emergency department seeking examination or treatment, including for identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy,' Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson Andrew Nixon wrote in a statement to The Intercept. Even before the Trump administration rescinded the Biden-era guidance, dozens of pregnant women reported being turned away for emergency medical care since the fall of Roe. A ProPublica report found that at least five women have died as a result of abortion bans since Roe v. Wade was overturned. Most reproductive health care experts believe the number is far higher than what's been reported. 'We already know that women have died because physicians didn't act because of fear surrounding what they or couldn't do under certain state bans,' said Dana Sussman, senior vice president at Pregnancy Justice, a non-profit reproductive justice organization. 'We know that women have died because they have been scared to get care, because they self managed abortions. We know that more women will die, and we and there are probably women who have died, and we will never know their names.' Sussman said that the new guidance will only make it harder for hospitals to feel comfortable providing lifesaving care to pregnant people. 'I think inevitably it will create many more challenges when it comes to what hospitals are advising their physicians, what physicians feel comfortable doing in different states and and I do think that it's putting more lives,' she said. Last year, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case brought by the Biden Administration challenging Idaho's abortion ban on the grounds that it violated EMTALA by prohibiting abortion care in too many circumstances. The court ultimately punted — refusing to add clarity — but allowing emergency abortions to go forward in the state. The Trump Department of Justice declined to continue prosecuting the Idaho case, an early signal that it planned to rescind the Biden guidance. Jamilla Perritt, an OB-GYN and abortion provider in Washington who is also president of the nonprofit Physicians for Reproductive Health, said it's important to clarify that EMTALA still stands, even if the administration has tried to muddy the waters. 'This does not change [providers] legal obligation to provide life saving care for people when they report to emergency rooms,' Perritt said. 'The other thing is that it does not change their moral and ethical obligation to do so.' The confusion caused by this announcement, however, will carry risks, argued Perritt. 'In places where doctors and hospitals are being threatened with both criminal and civil penalties for providing abortion care,' she said. 'It will cause a delay. It will give them pause.' It's striking, Perrit said, to see such policy come from an administration that has been masquerading as supportive of families. 'The federal government gets to decide who lives and who dies during pregnancy complications, during emergency events,' she said. 'The hypocrisy is really glaring, because this is the exact same government that's claiming to support children and families that want people to have more babies, but instead it is dismantling the system that protects the lives of pregnant people and their families.'
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Harrisburg Police officer on paid leave after being charged in domestic incident
YORK COUNTY, Pa. (WHTM) — A Harrisburg Police officer is on paid leave after being charged in a domestic incident Sunday at his York County home, charging documents show. Lee Brown, 39, of Mount Wolf, is accused of grabbing and yanking a woman off a couch and injuring her, while they were at home, along Market Street in East Manchester Township, charging documents filed by York County Regional Police Department state. Harrisburg Police confirmed that Brown is an officer with them and that he was placed on paid leave following the incident. Police said the victim was able to text someone, 'please help me, call the police,' after Brown allegedly grabbed her. The woman came running out of the house after police arrived just after 12:30 a.m. She was soaking wet, crying and reported that she didn't feel safe. Police said they took her to a community park nearby to talk about the alleged incident. Charging docs show the victim related how Brown allegedly told her that if police got involved, there would be a shootout. Brown and the woman were out drinking at a members-only bar. While on their way home, police said, they reportedly started to argue. Police said when they got home, the woman went to lie down on the couch, and that's when Brown allegedly squirted her with a water gun and poured water on her. When she tried to get him to stop, that is when he allegedly grabbed her and pulled her off the living room couch, police said. The victim had scrapes on her leg, ribs and shoulder. Police said in the charges, she reported getting those marks from a coffee table made out of a slab of a large tree that still has bark on the edges. State Trooper injured after fleeing driver 'intentionally rammed' cruiser during I-81 chase Brown said he was 'just messing' around with the victim when he was squirting her with the water gun, and allegedly denied getting physical, but claimed that he was struck in the mouth. The charges state Brown showed officers a video he took on his phone that showed the woman crying and trying to cover her face while he was allegedly antagonizing her. Brown then reportedly told police to arrest both of them 'because he knows how domestic violence incidents get handled,' charging docs show. Arrangements were made for the alleged victim to stay elsewhere, and while she was packing her bags, she found that her underwear was all cut up, and her Apple watch was shoved in the trash can. Brown allegedly denied any involvement in that. A report from WellSpan Health showed the woman sustained multiple abrasions and a contusion to her left rib from the incident, police said. Brown faces a misdemeanor charge of simple assault and summary charges of harassment and criminal mischief. Brown was arraigned in front of Magisterial District Judge Thomas Reilly, who set unsecured bail at $15,000, which he posted. His preliminary hearing is set for July 30. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.