Hegseth defends use of troops to protect immigration raids in Los Angeles
WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth defended his decision to order troops to provide security during federal immigration raids in Los Angeles, telling senators on Wednesday it's about 'maintaining law and order.'
Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., condemned the move as illegal, saying it erodes military readiness and questioning how it is being funded. It was the second day of harsh congressional questioning for Hegseth on the deployment of troops over the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, continued military aid to Ukraine, a deal on a gifted Qatari jet and more.
'The mission in Los Angeles, as you know well, sir, is not about lethality,' Hegseth said in response to questions. 'It's about maintaining law and order on behalf of law enforcement agents who deserve to do their job without being attacked by mobs of people.'
The exchange underscored confusion about the deployment of more than 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to provide security at the immigration protests and operations in Los Angeles. Photos have shown Guard troops setting a security perimeter around agents as they make arrests in the city, moving them closer to law enforcement functions, which by law they are not allowed to do.
About 2,000 of the Guard soldiers are in place in Los Angeles, initially sent to provide security. The Marines are at a nearby base and have not yet been used.
Democrats press Hegseth on use of troops in US cities
Speaking at a Senate defense appropriations subcommittee hearing, Reed said law and order is a civil function, not a job for the U.S. military. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., added that the California deployment, along with President Donald Trump's threat to use force against protesters at the Army's 250th anniversary parade on Saturday, 'should stop every one of us cold.'
She added that 'threatening to use our own troops on our own citizens at such scale is unprecedented. It is unconstitutional. And it is downright un-American.'
Asked later what constitutional authority the department is using to deploy active duty Marines to the protests, Hegseth said he didn't know the specific provision but would provide it.
Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who was testifying alongside Hegseth, was asked whether he sees evidence of 'rebellion' in the U.S. That could be used to invoke the Insurrection Act to use the military for law enforcement functions.
'There are definitely some frustrated folks out there,' Caine said in response.
Answering the same question, Hegseth repeated Trump's argument that 'there has been an invasion' of migrants entering the country without legal permission, and he said the protests in Los Angeles could spread to other areas.
Caine, asked if he believes the U.S. is being invaded by a foreign power, said, 'I don't see any foreign, state-sponsored folks invading, but I'll be mindful of the fact that there have been some border issues.'
Lawmakers raise concerns about continuing US support for Ukraine
Hegseth also faced bipartisan criticism for failing to provide details about the administration's first proposed defense budget and over an array of other decisions he's made during his tenure.
The panel's chairman, Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and other senators expressed frustration that Congress has not yet gotten a full defense budget from the Trump administration and that the current level does not have the U.S. spending enough on defense.
McConnell also noted that the limited budget request that lawmakers have received has no funding for Ukraine security assistance, questioning whether that makes 'lasting peace' more or less likely.
Hegseth, in his opening remarks, said the department needed more time to pull a spending plan together but that he has moved quickly to kill wasteful programs and redirect funding to Trump's priorities.
Hegseth said a negotiated peace in Ukraine makes America look strong, even though Russia is the aggressor. He said the budget includes hard choices and 'reflects the reality that Europe needs to step up more for the defense of its own continent. And President Trump deserves the credit for that."
Hegseth said some U.S. security spending for Ukraine is still in the pipeline, but he provided no details.
Hegseth confirms no deal has been signed for the Qatari jet
Hegseth repeatedly refused to provide details on plans for the Defense Department to accept a 747 jet offered by Qatar for use as Air Force One. He said budgeting and schedules for security upgrades to turn the plane into the president's aircraft are classified.
Hegseth confirmed reports that the Qataris have not come to an agreement with the Trump administration over a memo that would allow the military to take possession of the aircraft.
That also means no contracts have been signed to move forward on overhauling the Qatari jet.
He refused to answer questions on the cost or potential timeframe of that upgrade — even though data on two other 747s being reconditioned by Boeing to serve as Air Force One is public.
'A memorandum of understanding remains to be signed,' Hegseth said.
___
AP writer David Klepper in Washington contributed to this report.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
28 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: House Dem breaks with party on McIver and Padilla incidents
Democrats in Congress have largely closed ranks around Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) and Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) — but centrist Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine) is panning what he calls their "politics as theater." Why it matters: Golden represents a district President Trump won last year and is always walking a careful line between supporting his party and maintaining his independence. On this, he is steering hard away from the party line. "I think that it's never good when a senator or member of Congress gets roughed up by law enforcement," he said in an interview with Axios at the Capitol. But, he added, "I don't think politics as theater is what our job is here." What happened: Padilla was forcibly removed by law enforcement as he tried to confront Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem during a press conference at the Los Angeles FBI Headquarters on Thursday. Officers detained Padilla, held him on the ground and handcuffed him, though the senator was later allowed to meet with Noem. The incident came after McIver was indicted for allegedly assaulting law enforcement during a scuffle with DHS officers outside an ICE facility in her home state last month, which she denies. What he's saying: "Storming into the FBI headquarters and trying to break up a press conference and rushing on a [cabinet] secretary is not really the job of an elected official," Golden said. Of McIver he said: "Where I come from, if you shove a police officer, you're probably getting arrested." Still, he added: "I am not in any way saying that means law enforcement should be slamming people around." The other side: "Everyone is entitled to their respective opinions … For me, the video I saw was clear," Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), a member of Democratic leadership, told Axios when asked about Golden's comments. "He was at his place of work. He works in that building. He went to the press conference, ... he identified himself as a U.S. senator and then they manhandle him to the ground and arrest him," Garcia said. "I think it's crystal clear that that is unacceptable and an incredible overreach and quite dangerous ... and I think the American public is as outraged as the Congress." What to watch: Some Democrats are already talking about investigating the Padilla incident. "We only saw clips of it, so I'd like to find out everything that happened and how that occurred," said Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.), the acting ranking member of the House Oversight Committee. "He was very roughly handled, and it seemed like he was just trying to interject and attend the [press] conference. So, yeah, I think we need to take a good hard look at it."


Axios
28 minutes ago
- Axios
Democrats challenge Trump on immigration enforcement
Democratic state leaders are pushing back against the Trump administration's policies and threats this week. The big picture: As protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids escalate nationwide, particularly in California, lawmakers are seizing the moment to challenge the administration's bluff about not cooperating with Trump's enforcement policies. Trump and members of his administration have threatened to arrest any government officials who stand in the way of the president's policies, especially when it comes to immigration. The president's border czar Tom Homan said he wouldn't rule out arresting Democratic officials who impede law enforcement or harbor undocumented immigrants. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) dared Homan to do so, and Trump suggested the governor indeed be arrested amid an escalating feud. Yes, but: Arrests aren't the only concern facing Democrats. In the latest flareup, Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was physically removed from a Los Angeles press conference held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Thursday as he said he tried to ask a question. Padilla's encounter follows another between three House Democrats from New Jersey and ICE agents last month, which ultimately resulted in the indictment of Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) McIver is charged with three counts of "forcibly impeding and interfering with federal law enforcement officers." The New Jersey Rep. said she plans to plead not guilty and called the charges a "brazen attempt at political intimidation." State of play: President Trump has doubled down on his sweeping immigration crackdown, deploying 4,000 National Guard soldiers and 700 Marines to California this week amid fiery demonstrations against federal immigration raids. Newsom, along with other Democratic city and state leaders, have fiercely opposed the military's deployment to quell protesters. Still, Trump has sent troops into the state. Meanwhile, Trump vowed that protests responding to his multimillion-dollar military parade in D.C. this weekend will be met with "very big force." Zoom in: Democratic lawmakers have for months been challenging the administration's policies — on everything from immigration to tariffs. A coalition of 20 Democratic attorneys general filed a lawsuit against the administration last month over threats to withhold billions of dollars in federal funding if they don't follow his immigration enforcement polices. This week, the focus has been on the administration's hardline immigration policies. During an hours-long congressional hearing Thursday, three governors cast the administration's immigration policies and response to protests as undemocratic while Republican lawmakers grilled them on state-level enforcement. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said Homan could "try" to arrest them over their disconnects on the issue. Zoom out: Congresspeople are not the only ones challenging the administration, with a battle at play between the executive and judiciary. Wisconsin judge Hannah Dugan, who was charged in April by the FBI with allegedly helping an undocumented immigrant avoid arrest, has painted her case as a broader defense of the judiciary's independence from the Trump administration. Meanwhile, LA Mayor Karen Bass and other Democratic regional leaders at a Wednesday briefing called for the ICE raids to end, as demonstrations continued across the country.


The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
Judge invokes monarchy talk while mulling Trump's National Guard deployment
A federal judge warned at a Thursday hearing that accepting the Trump administration's assertion he has no authority to review the president's National Guard deployment in Los Angeles is a slippery slope. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said he hoped to rule later in the day on California Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) request to immediately restrict the troops' power on the ground, suggesting federal law at minimum required Trump to alert the governor. The judge repeatedly emphasized that Trump is exercising presidential authority — not a king's — and the role comes with limitations. 'That's the difference between a constitutional government and King George,' U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said. 'It's not that a leader can simply say something and then it becomes it. It's a question of is a leader, a president or the governor, following the law as set forth in both the Constitution and statutes,' he continued. 'That's what a president, a governor or any leader must act under. Otherwise, they become something other than a constitutional officer.' Breyer seemed willing to agree with Newsom that Trump's deployment was legally defective, but it's still a question as to whether the judge will enjoin the president's directive or give the administration a chance to institute it the proper way. At the same time, Breyer appeared skeptical about blocking at this stage the 700 Marines sent to assist the several thousand guardsmen deployed. The Trump administration argues Breyer has no authority to review Trump's deployment of the National Guard because it is in the president's sole discretion. Justice Department attorney Brett Shumate argued that Trump was not required to seek approval from Newsom in mobilizing the guard, calling the governor 'merely a conduit.' The president does not have to call up a governor and 'invite them to Camp David' for a negotiation summit to call up the National Guard in their state, he said. 'There is one commander-in-chief of the armed forces, and when the president makes a decision, the states are subservient to the president's decision,' Shumate said. Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) contend that Trump was required to receive Newsom's consent before deploying the National Guard. 'They suggest, your honor, that there are no guardrails,' Nicholas Green, a lawyer for the state. Amid the legal battle, Trump said Thursday that he 'doesn't feel like a king.' He was responding to questions about 'No King' demonstrations expected around the country this weekend set to coincide with a military parade marking the U.S. Army's 250th birthday. 'I have to go through hell to get stuff approved,' Trump said. Breyer during the hearing kept returning to monarchy talk, trying to determine how he could side with Trump without giving him unchecked power. 'What makes America great, different, is our Constitution and our robust discussion of views of the citizens,' the judge said.