Judge approves $69M class action settlement in UnitedHealth 401(k) litigation
A federal judge in Minneapolis said Thursday he would approve a $69 million settlement in a class action lawsuit alleging UnitedHealth Group depressed the retirement savings of workers for years by selecting poorly performing investment options in the company 401(k) plan.
The litigation alleged 'the fix was in' to retain investment funds managed by California-based Wells Fargo, in order to protect UnitedHealth Group's significant business relationship with the big bank, which was buying employee health insurance from the company's UnitedHealthcare division.
Last year, Judge John Tunheim of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota said the case could move forward after determining 'a reasonable trier of fact could easily find' that Kim Snyder, the lead plaintiff in the case, caught the Eden Prairie-based company 'with its hand in the cookie jar.'
UnitedHealth Group issued a statement Thursday that while it denied any allegation the company failed to act in the best interest of plan participants, 'this settlement allows all parties to put this matter behind them and move on.'
The litigation unearthed a 2018 email in which Chief Financial Officer John Rex complained Wells Fargo was shifting its insurance business away from UnitedHealthcare, even though Rex had 'stepped in front of a freight train' to maintain Wells Fargo as the default retirement investment fund despite recommendations from an internal committee.
Snyder knew none of this when she first brought the case, she said in an interview following Thursday's court hearing for final settlement approval.
After losing her job about four years ago with the company's Optum division, Snyder reviewed her retirement savings, she said, and started questioning why the investments hadn't grown more. A Detroit resident, Snyder, 64, is a nurse who worked remotely for Optum's pharmacy business.
'I think they took the employees' wealth,' Snyder said. 'They took advantage of that, when [workers] were giving them money to invest … and used it for their own purposes. That was the freight train that nobody knew about.'
Wells Fargo sold off its asset management business years ago.
As of Thursday afternoon, Tunheim had not yet issued final paperwork cementing the settlement, but he said from the bench he would sign proposed orders drafted by attorneys without major changes.
The draft called for lawyers to receive one-third of the settlement fund, or $23 million, plus reimbursement of $735,162 in costs. The rest will be distributed among hundreds of thousands of retirement plan holders.
Snyder, as the sole class representative, would also receive a service award of $50,000.
The $69 million settlement represents between 20% and 25% of likely potential recovery had plaintiffs prevailed in court, said Leigh Anne St Charles, a plaintiff attorney in Nashville who represented the class.
Only two out of more than 350,000 class members filed letters of objection to the settlement. Both asked the court to consider an alternate age-weighted distribution formula for payouts, St. Charles said, even though age and length of service already are implied factors in settlement distributions.
Each class member's proportional share will be based in part on the balance they invested in certain Wells Fargo Target Date Funds at any time since April 23, 2015, according to a website with settlement details.
A settlement notice issued in the spring said class members don't need to do anything to receive payment.
Current plan participants will receive their share in the form of a deposit into their plan accounts. Payments to former plan participants will be made directly by check unless they elect to receive funds via rollover to a qualified retirement account.
Snyder first filed her lawsuit in 2021.
In March 2024, Tunheim denied United's push for summary judgment in the case, citing evidence that Rex requested 'balance of trade' ledgers be produced showing how much business UnitedHealth Group conducted with Wells Fargo.
On one side of the ledger, UnitedHealth generated between $50 million and $60 million in revenue over four years as health insurance provider for Wells Fargo. On the other side, Wells provided substantial banking services to UnitedHealth, which was the bank's 'largest client and lifeline' in the market for target-date funds, the judge wrote.
The comparisons showed that, among the firms, UnitedHealth's most profitable relationship was with Wells Fargo.
___
© 2025 The Minnesota Star Tribune.
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
20 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Why Tesla Could Have a Self-Driving Advantage
Tesla may have a leg up on rivals like Waymo in the self-driving market, according to Bloomberg Intelligence's Steve Man. He discusses Tesla's edge with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow on 'Bloomberg Tech.' (Source: Bloomberg)
Forbes
20 minutes ago
- Forbes
Immigration Raids Deepen Construction's $10.8 Billion Labor Crisis
Building walls breaks industry. Protests erupt over President Trump's immigration crackdowns. (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes) President Trump's fortune rose from building glitzy towers brandishing his name. His political star ascended by railing against illegal immigration. But construction, his original cash cow, leans on those immigrants' labor, whether they are documented, or not. Immigrants make up 34% of the construction workforce, according to the Associated General Contractors of America. In states like California, Texas, New Jersey, Florida, Georgia and New York, they account for about half. Construction drives 4.5% of U.S. gross domestic product, making it the country's tenth largest industry. Broaden the view and the impact grows. Residential housing, once you include rent and utility payments, fuels 15 to 18% of GDP, according to the National Association of Home Builders. Add commercial building to the mix and construction rises to the top of the chart. That reliance on foreign born workers is now a growing risk. The trades were already short on workers, with too few young people entering the field to meet demand. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids are making the gap worse. Builders across the country are bracing for deeper shortages, higher costs and delayed projects. The pain will not be spread evenly. Big firms with market clout will find ways to adapt. Small builders and contractors may not. The roots of the construction labor shortage run deep. 'We lost about a million and a half workers during the Great Recession,' says Robert Dietz, chief economist at the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), a trade group that represents builders of single-family and multi-family housing. Many of those workers left the industry and never came back. Since then, fewer young people have entered the trades, with more choosing college instead. Competition from other industries, including a fracking boom in the mid-2010s, pulled more workers away. Meanwhile, productivity growth in construction has lagged far behind the rest of the economy, leaving builders trying to do more with fewer hands. What we've ended up with is 'a persistent shortage of workers,' Dietz says, and longer build times that are, according to a recent Home Builders Institute study, already adding $10.8 billion in costs to the market each year while reducing single family home construction by 19,000 units in 2024 alone. Yet, even as the industry struggles to attract enough workers, construction offers wages that outpace many comparable fields. 'Construction is not low paying compared to other jobs that require the same education or training level,' says Ken Simonson, chief economist at the Associated General Contractors of America. On average, construction workers earn about 19% more than other production and non-supervisory workers, Simonson says, a gap that has widened in recent years as firms compete for scarce labor. High wages, however, do little to ease the disruption caused by worksite ICE raids. Small builders are already feeling the strain. David Knott and Saul Alvarez, co-owners of San Francisco Remodel, said the crackdown has shaken their workforce. Three workers they had hired in the past were recently deported. The fear has spread across their job sites. Some workers now avoid certain tasks or stay home. Knott and Alvarez say they do their best to check paperwork and keep everything above board. But even workers in good standing during the Biden administration are getting swept up. The result is fewer available workers, higher prices and growing delays. 'Mexico is the backbone of construction throughout the U.S.,' Knott says. 'It's impossible to do what we used to do, there's a scarcity in terms of finding guys.' One reason the industry leans so hard on undocumented labor is that there are few legal pathways to bring in foreign workers. But unlike agriculture, which has a well-established visa system for seasonal labor, construction lacks a comparable program. That gap has left the industry exposed. When enforcement ramps up, there are few options for replacing the workers who disappear. This is why the National Association of Home Builders is pushing for immigration reform. The group wants a new visa program for construction workers, with limits set by market demand, not fixed caps. It also supports pathways to legal status for workers already on the job and opposes rules that would make builders liable for the immigration status of their subcontractors' employees. The goal is to secure the border without gutting the workforce needed to build the country's housing. But until then, homeowners and builders alike will be left competing for fewer workers. Some of the trades most likely to show up on your job site rely heavily on immigrant labor. According to the Associated General Contractors of America, 61% of plasterers and stucco masons, 61% of drywall installers and 52% of roofers are foreign born. More than half of painters are too. The numbers drop in more regulated trades. Just 16% of electricians and 18% of plumbers are immigrants, in part because these jobs require licenses. But for much of the work that gives a house its character, the labor pool could shrink fast. The big public single-family homebuilders aren't immune. In response to heightened rhetoric about mass deportations during the 2024 presidential election, three of the largest public homebuilders warned investors about the risk. PulteGroup ($20.9 billion market capitalization), Lennar Corporation ($29.5 billion) and Toll Brothers ($10.9 billion) all added language about immigration enforcement to their most recent annual reports (none of the three responded to requests for comment). Each relies heavily on subcontractors for labor. All three said tighter immigration enforcement could shrink the pool of skilled tradespeople, push up labor costs and slow projects. PulteGroup identified it as a 'material risk.' Lennar flagged the potential for 'widespread deportations' and legal exposure tied to subcontractors. Toll Brothers warned that labor shortages could affect the skilled workers it needs for high-end homes. These warnings are new. None of the companies had included them in prior filings. However, some analysts covering the industry don't see an imminent problem. 'Builders don't actually build the homes. They use subcontractors,' says Jay McCanless, senior vice president of equity research at Wedbush, covering homebuilders and building products. Builders expect subs to follow state rules on verifying workers, but can't guarantee it happens every time. Crews have been raided at sites in California, Florida and elsewhere. Even so, McCanless says today's enforcement is nowhere near the scale seen under the Obama administration in 2009 and 2010. Builders weathered that storm, helped by the collapse in housing demand after the Great Financial Crisis. This time, they may catch another break. The slowdown in multi-family construction is freeing up more crews. The risk may grow, and already the stocks of home builders have suffered. Year-to-date, Lennar's stock is off 17%, Toll Brother's is down 14% and Pulte is down 6%. The S&P 500 has gained 3.3% year to date. They may get another break yet. Even President Trump is hearing from business owners about the risks of losing workers. In a June 12 post on his Truth Social account, Trump acknowledged complaints from farmers and hotel operators who say immigration enforcement is taking away long-time workers and leaving jobs hard to fill. He blamed the Biden administration for letting in 'criminals' who are now applying for those roles, and said, 'Changes are coming.' By the end of the weekend, President Trump was seemingly backing down on the worksite raids targeting those industries, saying that they were 'taking very good, long time workers away from them.' A memo was subsequently sent out to ICE field offices to turn their attention away from such raids and to avoid arresting undocumented workers who aren't suspected of engaging in other crimes like drug dealing or human trafficking. For now, it isn't clear what those changes will mean for construction. But the industry, unlike politics, runs on labor, not slogans. Without workers, no one is pouring concrete in Trump developments or anywhere else. More from Forbes
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Banco Bradesco S.A. (BBD) Is Up 57% In 2025. Here Is Why
Banco Bradesco S.A. (NYSE:BBD) is among the 10 Most Undervalued Stocks to Buy for Under $5. The São Paulo-based company provides banking products and services to individuals and corporations in Brazil and internationally. It is one of the largest financial services groups in Latin America, having been in the market for over 80 years. A customer withdrawing money from an ATM, illustrating the company's widespread availability of accounts. The stock has returned nearly 57% year-to-date on the back of strong earnings, resulting in positive investor sentiment. Last month, Banco Bradesco S.A. (NYSE:BBD) reported financial results for the first quarter of fiscal 2025, with recurring net income growing 39% year-over-year to BRL 5.9 billion, whereas the bank's revenue surged 15% to BRL 32 billion. Recent analyst ratings are also driving positive momentum for Banco Bradesco S.A. (NYSE:BBD). On May 28, Citigroup upgraded the stock's rating to Buy from Neutral, citing an encouraging outlook for the company's ROE in the short and mid-term. Analysts also expect an improvement in the bank's risk-adjusted revenues. This follows HSBC's revision earlier in the year, when it signaled confidence in Banco Bradesco S.A. (NYSE:BBD) by upgrading the stock from Hold to Buy. The bank's low forward P/E ratio and share price also make it an attractive entry point for investors. It is among the most undervalued stocks to buy for under $5. While we acknowledge the potential of BBD as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
