Hebburn's Durham Court demolition decision to be reviewed by council
A decision to demolish an 18-storey tower block and rehouse its elderly residents is to be reconsidered. South Tyneside Council's Labour cabinet had unanimously voted to pull down Durham Court, in Hebburn, which was built in 1974. However, the local authority's scrutiny committee has decided to reconsider the move, after an outcry from residents, and voted in favour of the issue going back to the cabinet for further discussions. Resident Colin Rosner, who attended the meeting, said he hoped to live in the tower for the rest of his life.
The block, which is the last remaining residential high-rise building in the town, was deemed to have outlived its "original intended lifespan" of 50 years and carrying out repairs, costing an estimated £12m, were not worth it. The request for a call-in of the demolition decision was recently signed by opposing councillors from across the political board, including South Tyneside Alliance Group (STAG) representatives, independents and one Green Group councillor.
STAG's Andrew Guy previously said the demolition would be an "appalling mistake"."This is about proper accountability," he said."Decisions of this scale shouldn't be signed off without full and open consideration of the long-term impact on residents, services and public investment."It was previously revealed that if the demolition went ahead, residents would face the upheaval of being rehoused over a possible five-year period. However, the council promised tenants it would find new homes for them in Hebburn.Speaking after the meeting, Labour chair of the scrutiny committee, John Gerard McCabe, said: "The cabinet can look at that decision again, review it and come up with hopefully a good solution."
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Leaving oil in the ground an ‘act of national self-harm', says Findlay
It would be a 'complete act of national self-harm' not to continue drilling for oil and gas in the North Sea, the leader of the Scottish Conservatives has said. Speaking as his party's conference got under way in Edinburgh, Russell Findlay said Scotland should use its own oil, rather than relying on foreign imports. He also continued his attacks on the Scottish Government's target to reach net zero by 2045, describing the goal as 'completely unrealistic'. UK Tory leader Kemi Badenoch is expected to tell the Scottish conference on Friday that the windfall tax on oil and gas companies, and the ban on new licences in the North Sea, should be scrapped. Appearing on BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland programme, Mr Findlay said Scots will need oil and gas 'for decades to come'. He said: 'We are the party who completely support the North Sea oil and gas industry. 'The SNP in Edinburgh are completely hostile to any form of new exploration, and it's exactly the same with Sir Keir Starmer and Ed Miliband in London. 'They want to leave this oil and gas in the North Sea and import oil and gas from further afield. It makes absolutely no sense.' He warned it would be a mistake not to drill for more oil in Scotland. 'We, as a country, are going to need oil and gas for decades. 'The SNP's net zero target of 2045 is completely unrealistic on the basis of what we know the cost that it will inflict on the paying public. 'Even if net zero is achieved within a timescale, any kind of timescale like that, we're still going to need that oil and gas. 'It's a complete act of national self-harm to leave this natural resource in the ground and then just rely on foreign imports.' Mr Findlay said there should be a 'mix' of energy production in Scotland, including nuclear energy – something opposed by the Scottish Government. In her keynote speech to the conference at Murrayfield, Ms Badenoch will accuse the UK Government of 'killing' the North Sea oil and gas sector. She will say the current windfall tax on energy firms – first introduced by the last Conservative government and extended by Labour – would mean that by 2030, there would be no oil and gas industry to tax.'We must scrap the ban on new licences,' she will say. 'We must overturn the ban on supporting oil and gas technology exports. 'And we must champion our own industry.' Dame Jackie Baillie, the deputy leader of Scottish Labour, said the Tories are on the side of oil and gas companies 'rather than working Scots'. She added: 'With Kemi Badenoch desperately attempting to rally the few remaining Scottish Tories, it seems like it won't be long until they can fit all of their MSPs in a single taxi.' The SNP has been approached for comment.
BBC News
35 minutes ago
- BBC News
Ex-Leeds mayor loses home after High Court battle
The home of a former lord mayor of Leeds has been seized by the UK law enforcement agency responsible for tackling organised crime and drug National Crime Agency (NCA) won a High Court battle with Abigail Marshall Katung over the rights to the house on Sandmoor Drive in house had been previously owned by a businessman who was suspected of money laundering offences. He handed it over in 2020 as part of a deal with the councillor Mrs Katung, who was not aware of the accusations made against the home's former owner, said she would appeal against the decision. During the court hearing, Mrs Katung said she had entered into an agreement with the previous owner to buy the house in 2015. Mrs Katung said she had paid him about £400,000 of the contracted £1m purchase price, but the remaining sum was never court heard the majority of the funds were sent from Nigeria, where Mrs Katung was born, to the UK using an informal money transfer service which she described as the "black market", although she said it was not 6 June the High Court ruled, despite the payments, Mrs Katung had no legitimate interest or right to the property, which will now be transferred to the his ruling Mr Justice Jay said there were "telling omissions" from Mrs Katung's evidence, adding that he was "not satisfied that she was a particularly reliable witness".In a statement Mrs Katung said her account was "consistent". The NCA will be entitled to damages for Mrs Katung's use of the house since 2020, as well as to its Burgess, head of asset denial at the NCA, said a "substantial sum would be returned to the public purse" following the Katung said she had made "full disclosure" of the ruling prior to it becoming public knowledge, adding: "Whilst this is dreadfully upsetting to me and my family, I have not sought to hide away. "I want to continue to represent my constituents, it is the most satisfying task I have ever undertaken and it is a complete privilege to be able to do so. "I recognise that enquiries will have to be undertaken in order to preserve public confidence in the political system in which I operate. I will cooperate with that process fully and unreservedly."Mrs Katung became Leeds' first lord mayor of African descent when she took over the ceremonial role for a 12-month term in May has lived in the city since she came to the UK to study at the University of Leeds in 2000 and has represented the Little London and Woodhouse ward since being elected in 2019.A spokesperson for the Labour Party said an internal investigation into Mrs Katung was taking place.A Leeds City Council spokesperson said they were unaware of case, adding: "We are currently examining the High Court judgement and are unable to comment further at this time." Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
Private schools lose High Court battle against Starmer's VAT raid
A group of private schools, pupils and their parents have lost a High Court challenge over Labour's imposition of VAT on fees. It comes after six families last year launched a legal challenge against the government's controversial tax raid, claiming the tax raid is discriminatory against certain pupils. The legal challenge claimed the policy - which imposes 20 per cent VAT on private schools - causes unnecessary harm to certain categories of children, such as those with special needs. The families were therefore seeking a declaration of incompatibility under section 4 of the Human Rights Act, saying the new tax is incompatible with ECHR rights. While the legal challenge would not have been able to halt the VAT policy in its tracks or reverse it even if successful, it would have been a major blow to ministers and piled pressure on them to consider further exemptions. The government has estimated the tax raid will raise £1.7bn per year by 2029-30, money which ministers said would be used to fund 6,500 new teachers for state schools. So far, private school pupil numbers have fallen by more than 11,000 in England following the tax hike, Department for Education data showed. In January 2025, there were around 582,500 pupils at English private schools, down from 593,500 at the same point last year. When the policy was introduced, Treasury impact assessments estimated that private school fees would increase by around 10 per cent as a result of the introduction of VAT, But in May, ISC figures showed that fees have increased by 22.6 per cent in the last year, with parents now paying out more than £22,000 a year on average. On average, the Treasury predicts that 35,000 pupils would move into UK state schools 'in the long-term steady state'. A further 2,000 children would leave private schools, the department estimated, consisting of international pupils who do not move into the UK state system or domestic pupils who move into homeschooling.
