Mistaken vote advances key education bill in Alaska House, highlighting tight margin
Speaker of the House Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham, House Minority Leader Mia Costello, R-Anchorage, and House Rules Committee Chair Louise Stutes, R-Kodiak, talk on the floor of the Alaska House on Wednesday, Feb. 19, 2025. (Photo by James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)
A voting error by one Alaska House of Representatives minority-caucus member on Wednesday moved a public-school funding increase one step closer to passage through the Alaska House of Representatives. But it also exposed the weakness of the House's majority caucus.
Rep. Mike Prax, R-North Pole, joined 20 members of the House majority in voting to move House Bill 69 from the House Education Committee to the House Finance Committee.
If signed into law, HB 69 would permanently increase the state's per-student public school funding formula. The finance committee is the final stop before a vote of the full House.
Prax opposes the bill and has said he wants to see broader changes to the state's public school system, but on Wednesday, he erroneously voted to advance the measure and did not change his vote when prompted by Speaker of the House Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham.
Prax said afterward that he didn't realize he had voted to advance HB 69. After he realized his mistake, he made a motion to reverse the vote. That motion to rescind action failed, 19-20.
Under ordinary circumstances, Prax and the rest of the Alaska House wouldn't have had to consider HB 69 on Wednesday.
But for more than a week, Rep. Maxine Dibert, D-Fairbanks, has been absent from the Capitol, hospitalized for what her office called a 'respiratory issue.'
Dibert is a member of the House's education committee, and without her presence, the committee hasn't had the votes to advance HB 69.
While minority-caucus Republicans have said they didn't have enough of a chance to weigh in on the bill in committee, majority members say they had ample chances to do so before the bill was ready to move onward.
On Feb. 10, the committee paused its regular meeting, and Chair Rebecca Himschoot, I-Sitka and the author of HB 69, asked if one or more committee members from the minority caucus would be willing to help move the bill onward.
'I was there, and you did say, 'I'd like to move this bill today. Are you ready to move it?' And the minority said no. And so you held the bill,' said Rep. Andi Story, D-Fairbanks, speaking to reporters alongside Himschoot on Wednesday.
The issue wasn't brought up again.
'Nobody asked us again after the seriousness of her illness became apparent. We were not asked about whether we would move it out,' House Minority Leader Mia Costello, R-Anchorage, said on Wednesday.
HB 69 has been the top priority of the House's coalition majority, and lawmakers had been set on passing it through the House by mid-March.
That timing would allow the increased K-12 funding to be incorporated into the state budget, and school districts — whose budgets are generally finalized in the spring for the coming year — would have an early indication about the Legislature's intentions.
But Dibert's absence made that schedule impossible. For more than a week, HB 69 has been stalled in the education committee.
To break the impasse, the majority caucus used a technique normally employed by members of the minority caucus — they called for a 'discharge motion' on the House floor, effectively asking the whole House to vote on advancing the bill from one committee to the next.
There was no guarantee of success.
The Alaska House is split between a 19-member Republican minority caucus and a 21-member multipartisan majority that includes two Republicans, five independents and 14 Democrats.
With Dibert's absence, the majority had just 20 lawmakers present, one short of what was needed to advance the bill.
Nevertheless, Edgmon said afterward, the majority felt that it needed to take a vote.
The education committee had heard more than a month of testimony, overwhelmingly in favor of the bill.
'In deference to what we're being asked by our school districts to do, and by the majority of the state, we had to take action today,' he said.
Though the vote succeeded, it aggravated members of the minority, who spoke for more than an hour afterward on the House floor, objecting to the process and saying they felt unheard by the majority.
'I would hope that all of our members' voices are taken seriously,' Costello said later.
Wednesday's vote could foreshadow more to come in the closely divided House. As long as Dibert remains absent, the majority will have only 20 votes, one short of what is needed to pass legislation.
'Twenty-one is a challenging enough number, right?' Edgmon said. 'Like I've said from Day One, and I'll say it again: I think there's enough common ground. We just had a nice chat with the minority leader on the way out of the chamber, and you know, we know we need to work together, and there'll be other opportunities to work together.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
31 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Medicaid enrollees fear losing health coverage if Congress enacts work requirements
It took Crystal Strickland years to qualify for Medicaid, which she needs for a heart condition. Strickland, who's unable to work due to her condition, chafed when she learned that the U.S. House has passed a bill that would impose a work requirement for many able-bodied people to get health insurance coverage through the low-cost, government-run plan for lower-income people. 'What sense does that make?' she asked. 'What about the people who can't work but can't afford a doctor?' The measure is part of the version of President Trump's 'Big Beautiful' bill that cleared the House last month and is now up for consideration in the Senate. Trump is seeking to have it passed by July 4. The bill as it stands would cut taxes and government spending — and also upend portions of the nation's social safety net. For proponents, the ideas behind the work requirement are simple: Crack down on fraud and stand on the principle that taxpayer-provided health coverage isn't for those who can work but aren't. The measure includes exceptions for those who are under 19 or over 64, those with disabilities, pregnant women, main caregivers for young children, people recently released from prisons or jails — or during certain emergencies. It would apply only to adults who receive Medicaid through expansions that 40 states chose to undertake as part of the 2010 health insurance overhaul. Many details of how the changes would work would be developed later, leaving several unknowns and causing anxiety among recipients who worry that their illnesses might not be enough to exempt them. Advocates and sick and disabled enrollees worry — based largely on their past experience — that even those who might be exempted from work requirements under the law could still lose benefits because of increased or hard-to-meet paperwork mandates. Strickland, a 44-year-old former server, cook and construction worker who lives in Fairmont, North Carolina, said she could not afford to go to a doctor for years because she wasn't able to work. She finally received a letter this month saying she would receive Medicaid coverage, she said. 'It's already kind of tough to get on Medicaid,' said Strickland, who has lived in a tent and times and subsisted on nonperishable food thrown out by stores. 'If they make it harder to get on, they're not going to be helping.' Steve Furman is concerned that his 43-year-old son, who has autism, could lose coverage. The bill the House adopted would require Medicaid enrollees to show that they work, volunteer or go to school at least 80 hours a month to continue to qualify. A disability exception would likely apply to Furman's son, who previously worked in an eyeglasses plant in Illinois for 15 years despite behavioral issues that may have gotten him fired elsewhere. Furman said government bureaucracies are already impossible for his son to navigate, even with help. It took him a year to help get his son onto Arizona's Medicaid system when they moved to Scottsdale in 2022, and it took time to set up food benefits. But he and his wife, who are retired, say they don't have the means to support his son fully. 'Should I expect the government to take care of him?' he asked. 'I don't know, but I do expect them to have humanity.' About 71 million adults are enrolled in Medicaid now. And most of them — around 92% — are working, caregiving, attending school or disabled. Earlier estimates of the budget bill from the Congressional Budget Office found that about 5 million people stand to lose coverage. A KFF tracking poll conducted in May found that the enrollees come from across the political spectrum. About one-fourth are Republicans; roughly one-third are Democrats. The poll found that about 7 in 10 adults are worried that federal spending reductions on Medicaid will lead to more uninsured people and would strain health care providers in their area. About half said they were worried reductions would hurt the ability of them or their family to get and pay for health care. Amaya Diana, an analyst at KFF, points to work requirements launched in Arkansas and Georgia as keeping people off Medicaid without increasing employment. Amber Bellazaire, a policy analyst at the Michigan League for Public Policy, said the process to verify that Medicaid enrollees meet the work requirements could be a key reason people would be denied or lose eligibility. 'Massive coverage losses just due to an administrative burden rather than ineligibility is a significant concern,' she said. One KFF poll respondent, Virginia Bell, a retiree in Starkville, Mississippi, said she's seen sick family members struggle to get onto Medicaid, including one who died recently without coverage. She said she doesn't mind a work requirement for those who are able — but worries about how that would be sorted out. 'It's kind of hard to determine who needs it and who doesn't need it,' she said. Lexy Mealing, 54 of Westbury, New York, who was first diagnosed with breast cancer in 2021 and underwent a double mastectomy and reconstruction surgeries, said she fears she may lose the medical benefits she has come to rely on, though people with 'serious or complex' medical conditions could be granted exceptions. She now works about 15 hours a week in 'gig' jobs but isn't sure she can work more as she deals with the physical and mental toll of the cancer. Mealing, who used to work as a medical receptionist in a pediatric neurosurgeon's office before her diagnosis and now volunteers for the American Cancer Society, went on Medicaid after going on short-term disability. 'I can't even imagine going through treatments right now and surgeries and the uncertainty of just not being able to work and not have health insurance,' she said. Felix White, who has Type I diabetes, first qualified for Medicaid after losing his job as a computer programmer several years ago. The Oreland, Pennsylvania, man has been looking for a job, but finds that at 61, it's hard to land one. Medicaid, meanwhile, pays for a continuous glucose monitor and insulin and funded foot surgeries last year, including one that kept him in the hospital for 12 days. 'There's no way I could have afforded that,' he said. 'I would have lost my foot and probably died.' Mulvihill writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Susan Haigh in Hartford, Conn., contributed to this report.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iranian National TV Headquarters Hit By Israeli Airstrike During Live Broadcast
The headquarters of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting in Tehran was hit by an Israeli airstrike during a live broadcast Monday, setting the building on fire and knocking the network off the air for a short time. Footage shows a female anchor speaking on-air on the state-run broadcaster as the bomb from an Israeli fighter jet struck. A loud boom was heard, shaking the camera and knocking out the stage lights as the anchor hurriedly left the desk. More from Deadline What To Know About Saturday's Army Parade, Donald Trump's Birthday And The No Kings Protests Networks Return To Special Reports On Iran's Retaliatory Strikes On Israel - Update House Votes To Rescind PBS, NPR And Public Broadcasting Station Funding - Update Israel's defense minister confirmed the attack on the building, which houses Iran's state TV operations, calling the IRIB a 'propaganda and incitement broadcasting authority' in a post on X. Al Jazeera is reporting the anchor on the air at the time of the attack is Sahar Emami, referring to her 'one of the most famous state TV presenters in the country.' The IRIB said in a statement that 'live programs were briefly halted at the IRIB News Network but returned to normal a few minutes afterwards.' It added that 'it was not immediately clear if and how many personnel had been wounded or killed.' Video online showed the building on fire. Israeli officials and Iranian journalists on the ground confirmed there were evacuation warnings issued for that part of Tehran ahead of the strikes, which come on the fourth day of an Israeli offensive across Iran in response to intelligence that warned of Iran's increasing nuclear capability. The two countries have been trading bombing attacks using aircraft, ballistic missiles and drones since Sunday, with air raid sirens heard across Israel and civilians fleeing Tehran. Best of Deadline 'Bachelor in Paradise' Cast Announcement: See Who Is Headed To The Beach For Season 10 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery
The Hill
37 minutes ago
- The Hill
Speaker Johnson postpones speech before Knesset amid Israel-Iran conflict
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is postponing his trip to Israel this weekend, when he was supposed to address the Knesset, as the conflict between Jerusalem and Tehran escalates. Johnson was scheduled to appear before the Knesset, located in Jerusalem, on Sunday, where he would become the third ever Speaker of the House to address Israel's lawmaking body. But the Speaker is delaying his plans after Israel launched what it called a pre-emptive strike in Iran, prompting back-and-forth volley of missiles between the two countries. 'Due to the complex situation currently unfolding in Iran and Israel, Speaker Ohana and I have made the decision to postpone the special session of the Knesset,' Johnson wrote in a statement on Monday. 'We look forward to rescheduling the address in the near future and send our prayers to the people of Israel and the Middle East.' It remains unclear when Johnson plans to make the trip in the future. Johnson announced his trip to the Knesset last week, amid a wave of antisemitic attacks in the U.S., which the Speaker has strongly condemned. He would have followed former Speakers Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) and Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) in delivering remarks to the Israeli governing body. When announcing the trip, Johnson said speaking before the Knesset would be 'one of the highest honors of my life.' The decision to postpone the trip and speech came days after Israel late last week launched its pre-emptive strike targeting Tehran's nuclear, missile and military complex. Iran retaliated, and the two countries have been trading fire since. Israel and other countries — including the U.S. — have tried to limit Iran's nuclear abilities. The Trump administration has said the U.S. was not involved in the offensive. The Speaker expressed support for Israel after the initial strike, writing: 'Israel and the United States have been united, including in our shared insistence that Iran must never obtain a nuclear weapon.' 'President Trump and his Administration have worked tirelessly to ensure that outcome. Unfortunately, Iran has refused to agree and even declared yesterday its intent to build a new enrichment facility,' he wrote on X. 'Israel decided it needed to take action to defend itself. They were clearly within their right to do so. Iran will face grave consequences if it responds by unjustifiably targeting U.S. interests.'
