Terrifying new giant railgun unveiled by Japanese Navy as futuristic hypersonic weapon uses magnets to fire at 5,600mph
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
THE Japanese Navy has unveiled a terrifying new giant railgun that uses magnets to fire at 5,600mph.
The futuristic hypersonic weapon was spotted on board the JS Asuka warship, as Japan accelerates its defences amid mounting tensions in the region.
2
The Japanese Navy has unveiled a terrifying new giant railgun
Credit: Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force
2
Leaked images from 2018 show a Chinese warship complete with a railgun prototype
Credit: X/XINFENGCAO
The railgun was pictured by Japan's Maritime Self Defense Force (JMSDF) undergoing some advanced testing.
JMSDF confirmed that the commander of its Self Defense Fleet Vice Admiral Omachi Katsushi had visited the warship 'to observe the latest status of the railgun'.
The mega-weapon weighs a hefty eight tonnes and has a barrel length of 20ft.
Using electromagnets, it unleashes 40mm steel projectiles weighing 320g at targets such as ships, missiles, and aircraft - at 6.5 times the speed of sound.
Railguns could revolutionise the way wars are fought as they have the potential to wipe out incoming hypersonic ballistic missiles
A railgun is a type of weapon that uses powerful electromagnets to accelerate projectiles to very high speeds.
Conventional weapons typically use explosives or propellant to launch ammunition, but electromagnetic forces make it possible for a railgun to achieve a much higher "muzzle velocity".
While a normal gun might manage a projectile speed of around 4,000mph, a railgun could blast out projectiles faster than 5,600mph.
This also means you don't need to transport explosive propellants or warheads - making a railgun-toting warship much safer than traditional vessels.
The unveiling of the new weapon system comes as threats have increased in the region - from China, Russia and North Korea.
Moment world's first railgun to be fired at SEA shoots steel round at unstoppable 6,000mph…6.5 times the speed of sound
And the railgun 'supports the development of Japan's future combat readiness and national defence posture,' according to JMSDF.
Research into the new weapon system started in 2016 and it carried out its first onboard firing test in October 2023.
Incredible footage from the firing test showed the 44mm-calibre weapon shoot a number of rounds into the ocean from a ship
But Japan is not the only country developing a railgun - China has been working on its own version for years in secret.
In 2018, leaked images showed Chinese warship Haiyang Shan - a landing craft, equipped with a prototype electromagnetic railgun.
The images were leaked online by an analyst called Dafeng Cao, who observes China's People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN).
Cao sourced a number of images of a PLAN Type 072III-class warship from China's social media site Weibo, apparently showing a railgun on board.
The US has been unsuccessful in its attempts to build a railgun system thus far.
Several contractors attempted to build a system for US ships for years, including BAE Systems, which created a prototype.
The gun was mooted to shoot projectiles at speeds of more than Mach 7 over a range of 100 miles.
But the project was eventually scrapped after ten years in 2021 due to budget issues and a lack of interest.
The project cost a whopping $500million.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
15 hours ago
- Daily Record
US drones earmarked for Royal Navy aircraft carriers in UK military first
MQ-9 unmanned aerial system found to have the capability to be modified for operations from the Queen-Elizabeth-class fleet following a formal inquiry Royal Navy aircraft carriers could soon be equipped with US-made drones capable of early threat detection. The MQ-9 unmanned aerial system (UAS), developed by American firm General Atomics, has been found to have the potential to be adapted for operations from the Queen Elizabeth-class fleet following a formal investigation. Consequently, it's being considered as a contender to meet the navy's future Carrier Strike Airborne Early Warning (AEW) requirement, currently fulfilled by the Merlin HM2 helicopter fitted with the Crownest system. Developed by AgustaWestland, the Merlin HM2 is widely seen as a sophisticated and versatile maritime helicopter used extensively for anti-submarine warfare, surface surveillance, and search and rescue missions. Although it's equipped with the Thales Searchwater 2000 radar, which provides airborne surveillance, target tracking and battlespace management for the UK's carriers, the Crownest system and the host aircraft are gradually becoming 'obsolete', reports the Express. As a result, the Ministry of Defence has decided they need to find a more modern and sustainable alternative able to meet the demands of future naval warfare. Transitioning from that rotary-wing system to the unmanned fixed-wing of the MQ-9 would deliver a number of strategic advantages. These include significantly increased operational endurance, the ability to maintain surveillance over wider maritime areas, reduced risk to the crew and lower operating costs. The MQ-9 is a medium-altitude, long endurance (MALE) drone that boasts versatility for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance use. Sporting a wingspan of over 20 metres and the capacity to fly for more than 27 hours, the system can carry advanced sensors, communication systems and mission payloads. It comes in several variants, with the British Royal Air Force adopting the MQ-9A Reaper and gradually transitioning to the MQ-9B SkyGuardian, indicating the MQ-9 already has a solid foundation in British military to be built upon for naval use. General Atomics notably showcased the MQ-9B Mojave's short takeoff and landing capabilities aboard HMS Prince of Wales in 2023. If chosen, the deployment of the MQ-9 would signify a game-changing shift in naval warfare.
The National
3 days ago
- The National
Humanoid robots pose an ethical dilemma we've long prepared for
Earlier this week, an Edinburgh University lab exemplified the second option. Looking like a toad made from rubbery stickle bricks, it's a 'soft robot' – one that can (with a whiff of air pressure) walk out of its own 3D-manufacturing unit. They'll be useful for nuclear decommissioning, biomedicine and space exploration, says the lab. Great! Robots as curiously shaped facilitators of a cleaner, healthier, more ambitious world. Safely in the background. READ MORE: I've voiced ScotRail trains for 20 years and was replaced with AI without being told And then there are the humanoid robots (or HRs), currently cavorting all over your news feed. They're landing punches as Thai boxers in Hangzhou, China. They're playing badminton (admittedly with an extra two legs) in Zurich, Switzerland. A BMW factory, in the improbably named American town of Spartanburg, already has humanoid bipedal robots assembling parts on the production line (they're also starting in a Hyundai plant later this year). Chinese state-run warehouses in Shanghai have human operators manipulating HRs, getting them to fold T-shirts, make sandwiches and open doors, over and over again. All generating data they can learn from, to act effectively in the near future. Those who keep half an eye on radical technology may be a bit perplexed. Wasn't there some relief in the utter klutziness of robots, as they attempted to negotiate a few stairs, or turn a door knob? Didn't we share their pratfalls gleefully on social media – the bathos (if not hubris) that kept us relatively sane, in these accelerating times? Computers might thrash us at most cognitive tasks. But tying shoelaces, making pizza, wiping a child's nose? Not yet, and maybe not ever. Hail the embodied human, and their evolved physical capabilities! Well, there's a different track opening up. It's partly driven by the sci-fi imagination of the tech bros, East and West: most of these humanoid robots look like the rebellious droids in the 2004 movie I, Robot. But it's also an assumption that the new, actively-learning models of artificial intelligence can do for humanoid robots what they've done for language, visuals and coding. Which is to generate plausible and coherent behaviour in the physical world, as they generate the same for prose or images. Just to state the obvious: there's economic interest here. The target of these companies is a unit that can learn skills as required, flipping from task to task like a human worker. 'You can imagine a supply store has one, and that robot can be in the backroom depalletizing, cleaning, stocking shelves, checking inventory, just a huge range of things,' says Jonathan Hurst, co-founder and chief robot officer at Agility Robotics. Working 24/7, only stopping to be charged: 'That's where the real value comes in', concludes Hurst. READ MORE: Union slams Scottish companies using voice data without consent for new AI announcers The point of a humanoid-like machine seems obvious to most of these entrepreneurs. The world is already designed for humans, and maximum profitability will come from robots stepping competently and confidently into this environment. As the big business consultancies are predicting, the price for a working humanoid might descend to as low as $15,000 within the next few years, certainly lower as production scales up. That starts to become a viable business case for many enterprises – if the devices deliver on the performance promises currently being made. Let's assume (and it may be a major assumption) that physical robotics is on the same exponential curve as the computations of AI (and indeed directly rides on the latter's ascent). What that instantly opens up is a vast archive of myths and tropes about the fearful prospect of creating artificial humans, and how they'll live among us. We've been preparing for this ... READ MORE: From the editor: We're all sick of Farage. But we can't 'just ignore him' Greek mythology had Hephaestus making automatons – self-moving golden handmaidens with 'intelligence in their hearts'. Pygmalion the sculptor fell in love with his statue Galatea; Talos, a giant bronze automaton powered by ichor, guarded Crete. Across ancient India and China, still more defensive robots were imagined: the Buddhist text of Lokapannatti describes mechanical warriors that protected relics in subterranean cities. Back in Europe, the golem was raised to defend the Jewish ghettos. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein directly addresses our capacity to make humanoid subjects, and the ethics of the life we might share with them. And we mustn't forget that the term 'robot' itself comes from the Czech genius Karel Čapek, and his 1920 play R.U.R. (Rossum's Universal Robots) – 'robota' being Czech for forced labour. So right at the core of this domain's name sits the main anxiety we have about it. What does it mean for us to create an entity that we intend will work (or fight) entirely on our behalf? It's one of the deeper, more civilisational arguments against a humanoid robot. Which is that it revives a master-slave framing from the worst of our past. An original cruelty of power that generates many others. The great auteur of human weirdness, filmmaker Stanley Kubrick, articulated this well in his final movie, A.I. (posthumously realised by Steven Spielberg). The robot boy David – and we shouldn't forget the underlying Pinnochio reference – is eventually discarded: he was a substitute for a real boy, who eventually revives from his coma. Kubrick/Spielberg show how distorted human relations become – how resentful, harsh and violent – when these ever-more-perfect humanoid entities move among them. Their various roles of servitude do not protect them. The end of the movie delivers a severe judgement on human morality. The robot boy is rediscovered, by beautifully communal 'mechas', on an utterly drowned and terminated Earth. On David's request, the mechs revive a clone of the human 'mother' who pushed him out into the forest. They are able to share one last, gentle day together. READ MORE: How much has your MP claimed in expenses? See the full Scottish list here The movie never fails to break my heart. But given the ethical dilemma it presents – do we really want to be masters in a society of slaves, again? – we might hope that the humanoids keep failing to turn that doorknob. We really don't know what's coming. From the AI side, will developments in computation generate artificial consciousness, as well as artificial intelligence? By consciousness, I mean an entity which knows that it exists, experiences the world, has goals and desires and values. If that intentionality and interiority appears, and begins to talk with us, we may anticipate one of its explicit interests: the rights of robots, operating under conditions of servitude. How might we respond? I'd suggest A.I. the movie shows us how we shouldn't. Perhaps I'm operating in a very Western framework. As many scholars note, animist religions (whether Japanese or Chinese) do not sharply divide between the animate and inanimate. The robot in Japan is not necessarily monstrous, but can possess 'kokoro' (heart/mind). Osamu Tezuka's Astro Boy, flying about the comic strips of a traumatised Japan in the 1950s, was a great example of this. A moral child-robot with atomic powers, seeking justice. I duly note that the most-watched Netflix production this week is The Wild Robot. The machine ROZZUM (Unit 7134) lands on an island teeming with wildlife, to which it slowly begins to relate and co-exist with. Kept in a bubble from marauding, egoistic humans, Roz is able to establish a kinship with these fundamentally different entities, evoking the most profound ecological themes. Our sense of kinship with non-human animals should be obvious: the bass note of our responsibility to protect and honour the natural world. But should we prepare for kinship with these artificial entities? And should we ask whether casting them in humanoid form lays in more trouble than it's worth? Edinburgh's stickle brick frog is made from gel, wobbly but ready for its limited tasks. It may be a more tractable robot than the gleaming Optimals marching – or we may still hope, shuffling – out of Silicon Valley.
Economist
5 days ago
- Economist
Europe fantasises about an 'Airbus of everything!' Can it fly?
What do fertilisers, artificial intelligence, small cars, microchips, vaccines, nuclear plants, streaming platforms, cloud computing, satellites and green technology all have in common? Trick question, to which the answer is not that the European Union would like to regulate them to oblivion (though there may be that, too). What links them together is that they are all sectors some in Europe think could be transformed by One Neat Trick: to create an 'Airbus of'. Merging lots of subscale European companies so they stopped competing against each other and took on Boeing instead worked wonders in the 1970s; from a standing start Airbus went on to outsell its jetmaking American rival. Could the same strategy be used to help Europe in the 2020s take on the likes of Google, Nvidia, SpaceX and Chinese carmakers? Politicians in Brussels and beyond want to believe. As the pilot of a wayward Airbus might exclaim: 'Brace for impact!'
