How smart leaders balance urgency with curiosity
Modern business operates under a dangerous paradox. The same forces that make curiosity essential—rapid change, complexity, and uncertainty—are the ones that systematically suppress it. While organizations desperately need the innovation and adaptability that comes from asking better questions, the relentless pressure for speed creates an environment where curiosity dies.
Pressure Points
This isn't theoretical. The consequences play out in boardrooms and headlines daily. Three pressure points consistently strangle organizational curiosity:
Always-On Urgency transforms work into endless reaction cycles. Volkswagen's emissions scandal emerged when employees, under pressure to quickly meet environmental regulations, defaulted to shortcuts rather than pausing to ask whether their approach was ethical or sustainable. The constant demand for immediate responses eliminates space for the fundamental question: 'Is this the right approach?'
Pressure to React Immediately equates speed with competence while framing thoughtful questioning as hesitation. During the Deepwater Horizon crisis, BP executives rushed to provide public reassurances rather than taking time to fully assess the damage. This premature response not only eroded public trust but led to operational missteps that worsened the disaster. When leaders feel compelled to have answers immediately, they abandon the inquiry that leads to better solutions.
Speed-Obsessed Work Culture makes 'move fast and break things' the dominant operating principle. Theranos epitomized this danger—under immense pressure to deliver revolutionary blood-testing technology, leadership ignored scientific red flags and silenced employees who questioned feasibility. The rush to market created a fraudulent enterprise that collapsed under scrutiny.
It's the combination of these pressures that puts organizations at risk. Diane Hamilton, author of Curiosity Unleashed and creator of the Curiosity Code Index, researched what inhibits curiosity in the workplace to help leaders break out of stagnant patterns. According to her findings, when environments squeeze out curiosity, 'People start holding back ideas, skipping conversations, and sticking to what feels safe. That's when curiosity shuts down and organizations cling to past ways of doing things that no longer work.'
Speed Bumps
The solution isn't choosing between speed and curiosity—it's installing 'strategic speed bumps' which create just enough pause for better questions to emerge. Leaders need speed bumps at three levels: interpersonal, team, and organizational.
Interpersonal. Curiosity often gets squelched in one-on-one dialogues, but the most powerful speed bump is deceptively simple: pause during heated discussions to state what you heard and ask if you understood correctly.
Instead of rapid-fire debate, try: 'I'm gathering that you're worried about this direction because it might alienate our longest-standing clients. Is that an accurate understanding of your concern?'
This technique significantly increases accurate listening while slowing potentially tense exchanges. It creates room for questions and deepens relationships by signaling that you value others' perspectives enough to ensure you've heard them correctly. When leaders model this behavior, it spreads throughout the organization.
Team-Level. Teams need built-in moments that interrupt the execution mindset. The most effective approach involves structured quiet time before critical discussions or decisions. Allocate a few minutes for everyone to write down thoughts, questions, or concerns before opening discussion.
Use question-oriented brainstorming techniques with creative constraints, such as: 'Generate five 'what if' questions about our marketing strategy in the next two minutes.' This approach maximizes diverse perspectives while ensuring introverts have processing time and extroverts can refine initial thoughts.
These pauses aren't about halting team progress—they're about widening the lens to identify hidden opportunities and blind spots.
Organizational. The highest-leverage organizational speed bump involves reframing acute problems as opportunities for systemic improvement rather than issues requiring quick fixes. When urgent issues arise, resist the default response of immediate patches. Instead, pause to examine underlying causes and explore broader solutions.
Great Ormond Street Hospital demonstrates this approach brilliantly. Facing critical errors during patient transfers between operating rooms and intensive care, hospital leaders could have simply demanded faster, better execution of existing procedures. Instead, they paused to seek inspiration elsewhere.
After observing Formula One pit crews, they invited Ferrari's team to analyze their patient handover process. The racing experts identified fundamental structural problems: unclear roles, overlapping conversations, and unpredictable leadership transitions. By applying pit crew principles—defined roles, synchronized actions, and systematic error tracking—the hospital reduced technical errors by nearly half while improving information transfer. The breakthrough came not from moving faster, but from pausing to intentionally redesign the system.
The Roadmap
Start immediately with these three steps:
This week: Implement 'paraphrase and check' in your next three important conversations. Notice how it changes the dynamic and information quality.
This month: Introduce two-minute question-oriented brainstorming sessions before your team's most critical decisions. Track whether this generates insights you would have missed.
This quarter: Identify your organization's next acute problem as an opportunity for strategic learning rather than quick fixes. Ask what other industries or approaches might offer unexpected solutions.
Organizations don't need to choose between speed and learning—they need both. Strategic speed bumps maintain momentum while ensuring critical thinking and innovation never get sacrificed. The most successful organizations don't just move fast—they move wisely.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
44 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
America's Last Mall King Is Still in Charge, Even After a Deadly Diagnosis
David Simon had to step in to rescue the family business when he was 29 years old. Now, more than three decades later, America's last mall king is thinking about whether his own son will be ready to take the helm. The chief executive of Simon Property Group SPG -1.19%decrease; red down pointing triangle is battling a deadly cancer but isn't ready to step aside. Even as he scales back his working hours to deal with his health, the notorious micromanager has never been good about giving up control.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
America's Last Mall King Is Still in Charge, Even After a Deadly Diagnosis
David Simon, the CEO of Simon Property Group, is battling cancer but has never been one to give up control.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Why Great Leaders Learn To Sit With Uncertainty
In a business culture that prizes quick wins and decisive action, comfort is often mistaken for competence. We idolize clarity, reward speed, and celebrate leaders who appear unflappable. However, in today's volatile world, this mindset may be holding us back, uncertainty and discomfort can be our friends. Leader with Uncertainty What if discomfort—intellectual, emotional, even interpersonal—is not a threat to be managed but a resource to be mined? What if leaning into uncertainty is exactly what allows the best ideas, deepest collaboration, and most authentic leadership to emerge? Leadership today is less about having the right answer and more about asking the right question—and being willing to sit with it. While traditional management models emphasize control and confidence, the leaders shaping the future are those who can hold space for ambiguity. This concept has long been explored in Zen practice through 'koans'—seemingly paradoxical riddles like 'What is the sound of one hand clapping?' Their purpose isn't to be solved, but to disrupt linear thinking and provoke deeper insight. Frustration is part of the process—and part of the breakthrough. This is elaborated on by Manfred Kets de Vries in The Path to Authentic Leadership. Whether navigating an evolving market, managing team resistance, or wrestling with internal doubt, the impulse is often to resolve tension immediately. But discomfort, when handled with intention, can be a gateway to reflection, innovation, and stronger relationships. Walk towards uncertainty Breakthroughs don't come from what we already know. They come from venturing into unfamiliar terrain—and resisting the urge to fill the silence too soon. A growing body of research supports this idea. A meta-analysis published in the Journal of Management (Frazier et al., 2017) found that psychological safety—the feeling that it's safe to speak up, ask questions, and make mistakes—is a key driver of team learning and innovation. In short: It's not about having the answer. It's about staying with the question. Top-down directives rarely inspire real commitment. Employees don't want to be told what to do—they want to be part of something they believe in. This is where discomfort becomes strategic. Leaders who resist the temptation to dictate, and instead create space for dialogue, build buy-in through co-creation. Psychologists Edward Deci and Richard Ryan, creators of self-determination theory, emphasize that people are most engaged when they experience autonomy, competence, and connection—not compliance. Meaningful participation begins when people are invited into the tension of decision-making, not shielded from it. Some of my clients feel the need to lead by example and show the way rather than including their team in the process, which misses the opportunity to align and discover together. Vulnerability Builds Credibility There's a persistent myth that leadership means always knowing the way forward. In reality, pretending to have all the answers can undermine trust. When leaders acknowledge complexity—and admit they're still exploring—they signal strength, not weakness. Writing in Harvard Business Review, Herminia Ibarra and Anne Scoular argue that modern leadership is increasingly about coaching rather than commanding. The most effective leaders today are those who guide through inquiry, learning, and empathy—not through charisma alone. People don't need perfect leaders. They need real ones. Staying in the Tension In a world of complex challenges—climate disruption, AI-driven change, geopolitical instability—there are no easy fixes. The pressure to move fast is real. But speed without clarity leads to shallow solutions. The leaders who will thrive in the years ahead are those willing to linger in discomfort long enough to let complexity reveal its deeper truths. This doesn't mean paralysis. It means choosing curiosity over reactivity, humility over bravado. It means recognizing that discomfort isn't a failure of leadership—it's often the first sign you're leading in the right direction. The takeaway… If you're a leader facing uncertainty, don't rush to resolve it. Ask better questions. Create space for others to engage. Trust that discomfort, managed wisely, is not a weakness to overcome—but the very crucible in which real leadership is forged.
