
We're Faith Leaders Calling for Conscience in the U.S. Senate
As pastors and spiritual leaders, we sit with families in tears, fearing they will be separated from their children. From El Paso to Miami, Catholic parishes to Southern Baptist churches and beyond, our faith communities are filled with long-settled immigrant families now living in fear.
Without creating panic, we must acknowledge that these fears are real—and act now to prevent lasting harm.
The Trump administration's efforts to end temporary protected status and humanitarian parole for approximately two million people have put many immigrants with legal status at risk of becoming undocumented. At the same time, ICE is targeting individuals and families who have lived peacefully in our communities for years, often decades, for detention and deportation.
The budget reconciliation bill passed by the House and now before the Senate could drastically escalate these harms. It includes $45 billion for the construction of new detention centers, over $25 billion to support stepped-up enforcement and deportation operations, and unprecedented fees—including a combined $8,500 before a family member or other safe sponsor could begin to care for an unaccompanied child. This bill would effectively triple annual spending on ICE detention facilities and could lead to the indefinite detention of families, as well as the expedited removal of unaccompanied children without any access to legal assistance. We find these aspects of the bill—which pave the way for separating, arresting, detaining, deporting, and penalizing vulnerable immigrant children and families—to be morally objectionable.
These measures do not reflect the values we uphold as Christians or as Americans. Detention centers are no place for children. They expose young people to unsafe conditions, inadequate medical care, limited access to education, and psychological trauma. At least nine people have died in ICE custody in 2025—a chilling reminder of the dangers these facilities can pose.
PASADENA, CALIFORNIA - JUNE 18: People gather at a protest and vigil after a morning ICE raid in Pasadena on June 18, 2025 in Pasadena, California.
PASADENA, CALIFORNIA - JUNE 18: People gather at a protest and vigil after a morning ICE raid in Pasadena on June 18, 2025 in Pasadena, California.We do not oppose the legitimate goals of promoting public safety and regulating immigration. However, despite claims that immigration enforcement would focus on individuals who have criminal records, the reality has been different. Between January 26 and March 23, the number of people without criminal convictions or charges arrested by ICE increased fivefold. With border crossings at historic lows, families with deep community roots will increasingly become the focus of enforcement.
Our faith calls us to protect children and families, treat migrants and refugees with compassion, and uphold the dignity of every person because each of us is made in the image of God. These are not partisan positions—they are Christian imperatives. A recent report, "One Part of the Body: The Potential Impact of Deportations on American Christian Families," makes this truth clear: "If even a fraction of those vulnerable to deportation are actually deported, the ramifications are profound—for those individuals, of course, but also for their U.S.-citizen family members and, because when one part of the body suffers, every part suffers with it, for all Christians."
We call on senators of both parties to exercise moral courage, and to consider how well these important policy decisions respect human life and dignity, rather than political expediency. Reject the current enforcement-only approach to immigration that will lead to family separation and deny communities the vital contributions of immigrants. Ensure that the final budget reconciliation bill does not include new funding that could be used by ICE to make families the focus of immigration enforcement and subject them to inhumane detention conditions. Eliminate the unjust fees proposed that would hinder family reunification and undermine our legal immigration system.
George Washington is said to have described the Senate as a saucer that "cools" the hot tea of the House. In this moment, the Senate must live up to that calling—not just as a check on rash legislation, but as a defender of the common good.
Most Rev. Mark J. Seitz is bishop of El Paso, Texas and chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' Committee on Migration. Dr. Keny Felix is senior pastor of Bethel Evangelical Baptist Church in Miami Gardens, Florida and president of the Southern Baptist Convention National Haitian Fellowship.
The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
Federal prosecutors tell judge they will deport Kilmar Abrego Garcia to a third country after detention
Federal prosecutors on Thursday told a judge that the Trump administration will begin removal proceedings against Kilmar Abrego Garcia to deport him a country other than his native El Salvador if he is released from a Tennessee jail. When U.S. Magistrate Judge Paula Xinis asked about the timing of the removal: "30 seconds or 30 days or 30 months…," a federal prosecutor answered that he could only say the removal was not "imminent." Xinis has scheduled a hearing on the matter for July 7. At issue is whether the judge has the jurisdiction to order Kilmar Abrego Garcia's return to Maryland. Abrego Garcia's attorneys want Xinis to order the government to return their client to Maryland and to bar U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials from deporting him while his criminal case in Tennessee proceeds. Abrego Garcia is currently in federal custody and has been indicted on human smuggling charges, which he denies. The lawyers for Abrego Garcia filed an emergency motion on Thursday asking a judge to order his return to Maryland, and to block immigration officials from deporting him while his criminal case in Tennessee continues to play out. They told Judge Xinis that they have concerns "that the government may try to remove Mr. Gregor Garcia quickly over the weekend." Another federal judge in Nashville has ruled that Abrego Garcia has a right to be released while awaiting trial. However, on Wednesday, she decided to keep him in custody for at least a few more days over concerns that U.S. immigration officials would swiftly try to deport him again. "If this Court does not act swiftly, then the Government is likely to whisk Abrego Garcia away to some place far from Maryland," Abrego Garcia's attorneys wrote in their request to Xinis in Greenbelt, Md. Abrego Garcia was living in Maryland with his American wife and children when he was deported to El Slavador in what the Trump administration called an administrative error. He had been in the United States for over a decade. Meanwhile, the Trump administration maintains that Abrego Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang, an accusation that he denies. In addition, his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, filed a protective order against her husband in August 2020. The order said their shared son and stepchildren needed protection from Abrego Garcia, accusing him of verbal and physical abuse against her and mental abuse against her children. Earlier this month, Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty to smuggling charges.


New York Times
28 minutes ago
- New York Times
General Caine Faces His First Big Test Under Trump
In President Trump's view, generals are chest-thumping, tough-talking cheerleaders for the military and the operations he, as commander in chief, orders them to carry out. It's a view that often puts the senior military officers who serve under him in an impossible position. On Thursday morning, it fell to Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to meet Mr. Trump's expectations without politicizing the institution he serves. He did it by painting an earnest, at times florid, picture of the men and women involved in the attack this weekend on Iran's nuclear site at Fordo, and largely sidestepping the question of how successful the strike had been. General Caine's first big test began with a preliminary report from the Defense Intelligence Agency this week suggesting that the attack at the site and two others in Iran had set back the country's nuclear program by only a few months, according to officials familiar with the findings. News about that report infuriated Mr. Trump, who described the strikes in social media posts as 'legendary' and insisted that Iran's nuclear sites had been 'obliterated.' At the Pentagon on Thursday, Mr. Hegseth spent 10 minutes excoriating reporters as unpatriotic and 'irresponsible.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Boston Globe
31 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Centrifuges at Fordo ‘no longer operational,' UN nuclear watchdog head says
He said, however, that it would be 'too much' to assert that Iran's nuclear program had been 'wiped out' after the Israeli and American bombing campaign. Grossi noted that not all of Iran's nuclear sites had been struck and said Iranian officials had told him that they would take 'protective measures' for the uranium they had already enriched. Advertisement Still, he said, the nuclear program has definitely suffered 'enormous damage.' He declined to say how far Iran's nuclear program had been set back. 'Perhaps decades, depending on the type of activity or objective,' Grossi said, echoing comments made by President Trump this week at a NATO summit in the Netherlands. Advertisement 'It's true that with these reduced capacities,' he added, 'it will be much more difficult for Iran to continue at the same pace as before.' The comments from Grossi, director-general of the atomic agency, came amid questions over the effectiveness of the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. Trump has insisted that the bombing 'obliterated' the Fordo site, a position that some in his administration have On Thursday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and General Dan Caine, the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, gave more details about the planning and execution of the strikes. But they offered no new assessments of the damage inflicted on the sites or on the state of Iran's nuclear program. One of the main purposes of the UN watchdog is to monitor nuclear activity in Iran and other countries, including those who have signed on to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. But the agency's relations with Iran were at a low point even before Israel attacked the country June 13. UN inspectors remained in Iran throughout the war but were not able to gain access to the nuclear sites amid the fighting. And it was not clear when or even if they would be allowed to do so again now that a cease-fire has taken hold. On Thursday, Iran's Guardian Council, which has veto power over legislation in the country, approved a bill passed by parliament that suspends cooperation with the UN watchdog and bars its inspectors from the country. Advertisement But the fate of the new law — which would effectively block the international community from having oversight of Iran's nuclear program — was still unclear. The decision to enact it lies with Iran's moderate president, Masoud Pezeshkian, who was elected on campaign promises to engage with the West and who has publicly signaled his willingness to return to the negotiating table. As a signatory of the nonproliferation treaty, Iran is 'required to have an inspection system,' Grossi noted in the interview. He urged Iranian authorities not to 'unilaterally' reject inspections 'because otherwise we'd be on the brink of another major crisis.' Grossi, who said Iran's cooperation with the UN watchdog before the war was 'limited,' said that he had reached out to Iran's foreign minister to discuss a potential return of agency inspectors to Iranian nuclear sites but had yet to receive a response. This article originally appeared in .