Explosions heard in Iran's capital as Israel claims preemptive strikes
Explosions were heard in the Iranian capital, Tehran, as Israel claimed it was attacking the country. Iranian state media reported explosions in the northeastern parts of the city.
The attack comes as tensions have reached new heights over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear programme. The Board of Governors at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for the first time in 20 years on Thursday censured Iran over it not working with its inspectors.
Iran immediately announced it would establish a third enrichment site in the country and swap out some centrifuges for more-advanced ones.
Israel for years has warned it will not allow Iran to build a nuclear weapon, something Tehran insists it doesn't want — though official there have repeatedly warned it could.
Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz announced a 'special situation' in the country following the attacks. He said schools would be closed nationwide on Friday, adding that an Iranian retaliation of missiles and drones are to be expected in the 'immediate future'.
There was no immediate word from Israeli officials on what was struck or was being targeted.
A US media outlet says US President Donald Trump has reportedly convened his cabinet for an emergency meeting following the Israeli attack.
The White House did not officially address the attack.
As the explosions in Tehran started, Trump was on the lawn of the White House mingling with members of Congress. It was unclear if he had been informed but the president continued shaking hands and posing for pictures for several minutes.
In the days leading up to the attacks, Washington has made clear that it will not participate in any Israeli attacks on Iran. Trump had urged Israel to refrain from striking Tehran, and to seek diplomatic solutions, but acknowledged that an Israeli strike could very well happen.
The US has been preparing for something to happen, already pulling some diplomats from Iraq's capital, Baghdad, and offering voluntary evacuations for the families of US troops in the wider Middle East region.
Our journalists are working on this story and will update it as soon as more information becomes available.
Egypt blocked activists planning to take part in a march to Gaza on Thursday, halting their attempt to reach the border and challenge Israel's blockade of humanitarian aid to the enclave before the march could begin.
Egyptian authorities and activists both said that dozens of people planning to march across the Sinai Peninsula were deported, but organisers said they had no plans to cancel the event.
To draw attention to the humanitarian crisis afflicting people in Gaza, marchers have for months planned to trek about 50 kilometres from the city of Arish to Egypt's border with Gaza on Sunday to "create international moral and media pressure" to open the crossing at Rafah and lift a blockade that has prevented aid from entering.
They said they had tried to coordinate with Egyptian embassies in the various countries from which the participants came, but authorities said they had not obtained authorisation for the march.
Authorities deported more than three dozen activists, mostly carrying European passports, upon their arrival at Cairo International Airport in the past two days, an Egyptian official said on Thursday.
The official said the activists aimed to travel to Northern Sinai "without obtaining required authorisations."
The standoff has put pressure on the activists' home countries, which are wary of seeing their citizens detained.
A French diplomatic official said France is in "close contact" with Egyptian authorities about French nationals who were refused entry in Egypt or detained to ensure "consular protection."
The participants risked arrest for unauthorised demonstrations in sensitive areas like the Sinai Peninsula, the official added.
The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to speak publicly on the sensitive diplomatic matter.
Egypt has publicly denounced the restrictions on aid entering Gaza and repeatedly called for an end to the war.
It has said that the Egyptian side of the Rafah crossing remains open, but access to the Strip has been blocked since Israel seized the Palestinian side of the border as part of its war with Hamas that began in October 2023.
However, authorities have for years clamped down on dissidents and activists when their criticism touches on Cairo's political and economic ties with Israel, a sensitive issue in neighbouring countries where governments maintain diplomatic relations with Israel despite broad public sympathy for Palestinians.
Egypt had earlier warned that only those who received authorisation would be allowed to travel the planned march route, acknowledging it had received "numerous requests and inquiries."
"Egypt holds the right to take all necessary measures to preserve its national security, including the regulation of the entry and movement of individuals within its territory, especially in sensitive border areas," its foreign ministry said in a statement on Wednesday.
Israel Katz, the Israeli defence minister, yesterday referred to the protestors as "jihadists" and called on Egypt to prevent them from reaching the border with Gaza.
He said they "endanger the Egyptian regime and constitute a threat to all moderate Arab regimes in the region."
The march was set to begin just days after a large convoy, which organisers said included thousands of activists, travelled overland across North Africa to Egypt.
Activists and attorneys said airport detentions and deportations began on Wednesday with no explicit reason given by Egyptian authorities to detainees.
Algerian attorney Fatima Rouibi wrote on Facebook that Algerians, including three lawyers, were detained at the airport on Wednesday before being released and ultimately deported back to Algiers on Thursday.
Bilal Nieh, a Tunisian activist who lives in Germany, said he was deported along with seven others from northern Africa who also hold European passports.
Organisers said in a statement that they had received reports that at least 170 participants had been delayed or detained in Cairo.
They said they had followed the protocols laid out by Egyptian authorities, met with them and urged them to let march participants into the country.
"We look forward to providing any additional information the Egyptian authorities require to ensure the march continues peacefully as planned to the Rafah border," they said in a statement.
The Global March to Gaza is the latest civil society effort pressing for the entry of food, fuel, medical supplies and other aid into Gaza.
Israel imposed a total blockade in March in an attempt to pressure Hamas to disarm and to release hostages taken in the 7 October 2023 attack that sparked the current war in Gaza.
It slightly eased restrictions last month, allowing limited aid in, but experts warn the measures fall far short.
Food security experts warn the Gaza Strip will likely fall into famine if Israel doesn't lift its blockade and stop its military campaign.
Nearly half a million Palestinians are facing possible starvation and 1 million others can barely get enough food, according to findings by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a leading international authority.
Israel has rejected the findings, saying the IPC's previous forecasts had proven unfounded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Wrongly deported Salvadoran migrant pleads not guilty to smuggling charges
Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, 29, was summarily deported by the Trump administration to El Salvador in March and brought back to the United States last week. He was immediately arrested on his return and charged in Nashville, Tennessee, with smuggling undocumented migrants around the United States between 2016 and 2025. Abrego Garcia entered a plea of not guilty to the criminal charges on Friday before a federal district judge, US media reported. The US Supreme Court had ordered the Trump administration to "facilitate" the return of Abrego Garcia after he was mistakenly deported to a notorious maximum security prison in El Salvador. Abrego Garcia was flown back to the United States on June 6 but Attorney General Pam Bondi insisted to reporters that his return resulted from an arrest warrant presented to Salvadoran authorities. Abrego Garcia was living in the eastern state of Maryland until he became one of more than 200 people sent to the CECOT prison in El Salvador as part of Trump's crackdown on undocumented migrants. Most of the migrants who were summarily deported were alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, which the Trump administration has declared a foreign terrorist organization. Justice Department lawyers later admitted that Abrego Garcia -- who is married to a US citizen -- was wrongly deported due to an "administrative error." Abrego Garcia had been living in the United States under protected legal status since 2019, when a judge ruled he should not be deported because he could be harmed in his home country. Bondi alleged that Abrego Garcia "played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring" and was a smuggler of "children and women" as well as members of the Salvadoran gang MS-13. She said Abrego Garcia would be returned to El Salvador upon completion of any prison sentence in the United States.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Iranian missile sites: What the images of the Israeli air strikes show us
At 3:47am on June 13, Benjamin Netanyahu posted a video on his X account. "Moments ago, Israel launched Operation 'Rising Lion', a targeted military operation to roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival," the Israeli prime minister stated. In his statement, Netanyahu listed the targets of this operation, which aims to weaken military leadership, damage Iran's nuclear facilities, and target military sites for ballistic missile storage and launch. Israel "struck at the heart of Iran's ballistic missile programme", the Israeli prime minister stated. Several experts believe this objective is likely to severely limit the scope of Iranian retaliation. Most of these ballistic missiles have a range of 2,000 kilometres and are capable of targeting Israeli territory. 'The Israeli army considered an immediate Iranian missile retaliation as definitive, so they chose to pre-empt Iran by going after the launch capabilities so as to minimise the risks of Iranian retaliation,' said Farzin Nadimi, a research fellow at the Washington Institute and an expert on Iranian weaponry. Few images of targeted sites so far In a statement published on Telegram in the afternoon of June 13, the Israeli army stated it had destroyed "dozens of launchers, surface-to-surface missile storage facilities, and additional military sites'. It released a map showing all the sites it reportedly attacked, though these strikes have not been independently verified. The Israeli military also shared a graphic purportedly showing a strike on a launch site of surface-to-surface missiles in western Iran. The images show warehouses that the Israelis say contain surface-to-surface missiles, though this cannot be independently confirmed. The site in the video, which we have geolocated, is about ten kilometres from Borujerd, in western Iran. However, the FRANCE 24 Observers team was unable to independently verify that this site had been hit by the military. According to the map from the Israeli military, surface-to-surface missile sites in northwestern Iran, particularly around the city of Tabriz, were reportedly hit. However, while images of strikes have been geolocated near Tabriz, it's currently impossible to confirm that missile bases were actually struck. But Nadimi says it would be logical for such military sites, like the one in Tabriz, to be targeted by the Israeli army: "This base is one of the main missile bases of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, which was tasked with striking Israel during Operations Promise I and II.' The Iranian army launched a total of more than 300 ballistic missiles during these two operations conducted in April and October 2024. The Israeli military released further images, which our team has not been able to verify or geolocate. The images purportedly show a strike against a truck transporting a missile, as well as a Transporter Erector Launcher (TEL), a vehicle that can launch missiles. 'Even with their extensive underground missile bases, they still need to take their launchers with the missiles on them outside, prepare them, and erect them for launch in the open air," Nadimi said. These missiles are "most vulnerable" when they are being transported by these Transporter Erector Launchers (TELs), he added. "They do have the capabilities to launch from inside these bases because they have silos. They have launch holes and loaders that, technically or theoretically, should allow missiles to be launched without pulling them out of the base," Nadimi continued. "However, those might have also been targeted by Israeli missiles in order to disrupt Iran's covert launch operations," he added, also noting the need for "satellite imagery to confirm that these parts of the missile bases were indeed targeted". Underground base hit in Kermanshah Furthermore, there are indications that a missile base near Kermanshah, in the western part of the country, may have been hit. A video filmed from a car shows several plumes of smoke rising into the air. The video has been geolocated to the east of Kermanshah. It's impossible to say exactly what was hit. However, a base identified as a suspected missile deployment site in a 2021 report by the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), a British international relations research institute, is located close to the affected areas. "Kermanshah missile base hit by the Israelis," Fabian Hinz, a military expert at the IISS and author of the aforementioned report, wrote on X. Sources also reportedly told the Lebanese media outlet al-Mayadeen, which is affiliated with Iran-backed Hezbollah, that "several missile bases near Tehran and in the city of Kermanshah" were attacked. Satellite images shared by the Open Source Center and captured by Airbus show damage to the roofs of several warehouses and the presumed entrance of an underground tunnel at the base. Iran's high command decimated In the operation, the Israeli military also killed top Iranian officials "while they were gathered in their underground headquarters". This included armed forces chief of staff Mohammad Bagheri, and the head of the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Hossein Salami. Most leaders of the Revolutionary Guard's aerospace force, including Major General Amirali Hadjizadeh, were also killed, according to the Israeli Ministry of Defence. These significant losses may explain Iran's remarkably subdued response so far, according to analyst Nadimi. "We haven't seen a single ballistic missile launched at Israel," Nadimi said. "We should definitely consider the fact that the chain of command has been severely disrupted. This is the most likely reason [for the lack of military response], in addition to a very systematic Israeli attempt to take out launchers.' At the time of this article's publication, the Iranian military's retaliation had been limited to launching 136 drones and cruise missiles towards Israel, none of which reportedly reached Israeli territory.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
What is Iran likely to hit back with after Israel's strikes?
Israel's strikes against the Iranian capital of Tehran and targets around the country on sites claimed to be linked to its nuclear programme reportedly killed several top military officials as well as nuclear scientists. Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian warned in a televised address on Friday that a 'strong' response to Israel would be coming, in addition to the 100 drones already launched. 'The Islamic Republic of Iran will give a severe, wise, and strong answer to the occupier regime,' he said, referring to Israel. Euronews Next takes a look at what options Iran could use to strike back against Israel in light of this most recent escalation in their shadow war. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, said this targeted military operation was launched against Iran to keep the country from producing a nuclear weapon. Hours before Israel's attack, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) concluded that Iran was not complying with nonproliferation obligations. According to experts, one of Iran's options in the wake of the strikes could be to continue developing nuclear weapons that Israel sees as an 'existential threat'. 'Israel has opened a Pandora's box: the worst Iranian response might also be the most likely, a decision to withdraw from its arms control commitments and build nuclear weapons in earnest,' according to an analysis from Kenneth Pollack, vice-president for policy at the Middle East Institute in Washington. The outrage at the Israeli attack could mean that Iran can 'no longer sit on the proverbial nuclear fence and that it has to rush for a bomb or risk never having one,' according to an analysis from Jonathan Panikoff, director of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative. 'For many Iranian leaders, an Iran without a nuclear weapon (or the potential to have one) is an existential threat to the survival of the regime itself,' Panikoff continued. A recent IAEA report found that Iran enriched uranium up to 60 per cent, which is a short technical step away from weapons-grade levels (which is often considered by the IAEA to be 90 per cent uranium). The agency said it couldn't verify the country's total uranium supply since 2021 but estimates it would be around 9,247 kg as of May 17, 2025. The amount of enriched uranium to 60 per cent is 408.6 kg the report continued. However, estimates from Washington's Institute for Science and International Safety in 2022 believed that it's 'well with Iran's capabilities' to modify nuclear weapons to get them to work with 60 per cent uranium. Israeli state officials claimed in the Times of Israel on Friday that Iran now has enough uranium for nine nuclear weapons and is taking steps to 'weaponisation' or build a nuclear bomb. According to reporting by The Associated Press, Iranian officials have long insisted that their nuclear proliferation programme is peaceful. A nuclear Iranian response would play out over the long term, Pollack added, with a possible Tehran withdrawal from the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty and the country's 2015 nuclear agreement. The best strategy, according to Pollack, is an 'aggressive pursuit' of a new nuclear deal with Tehran, but it's unlikely any deal will happen now, 'when Iran's leadership will be least interested in one, given their likely outrage at the Israeli attack'. Without a new deal, Pollack argues Israel has inflicted a short-term setback to Iran's nuclear programme, but to ensure a nuclear threat 'not long thereafter'. American and Iranian negotiators were due to meet in Oman for a sixth round of talks regarding Iran's nuclear programme on Sunday, according to the Associated Press. Any future deal with Iran should also include missile restrictions, according to an analysis by Farzin Nadimi from the Washington Institute for Near-East Policy. There are other options that Iran could take to retaliate against Israel, including a drone or missile offensive, experts added, though the country could be outmatched by Israel's defence system, dubbed the 'Iron Dome'. The US Office of the Director of National Intelligence said in 2024 that Iran possesses the Middle East's 'largest ballistic missile arsenal,' and continues to 'emphasize improving the accuracy, lethality, and reliability of these systems'. A recent threat assessment from the US military found that Iran fields a 'large quantity' of ballistic, cruise missiles and drones that can strike throughout the region. The country's defense industry has a 'robust development and manufacturing capacity,' for low-cost weapons like drones, the report continued. US General Kenneth Mackenzie told a Senate committee hearing in 2022 that the Iranians have over 3,000 ballistic missiles of various types that could reach Tel Aviv. Mackenzie also said the Iranians had made 'remarkable advances' on their ballistic missiles despite 'a very significant sanction regime'. This arsenal includes medium-range systems that could reach Israel, the Arabian Peninsula, or southeastern Europe, Nadimi added. His analysis added that these missiles are believed to boast hypersonic velocities, manoeuvring warheads, decoys, and penetration aids. For example, state media reports claim Iran has used the Fattah-1 hypersonic missile against Israel in the past. It has been described by analysts to CNN as having a warhead with a manoeuverable reentry vehicle, which means it can avoid missile defenses by making small adjustments during its flight. Last month, Iranian media reported that officials debuted a new domestically-produced solid-fuel missile called the Qasem Basir. Aziz Nasirzadeh, Iran's defense minister brigadier general, claimed in local media that the missile had a range of at least 1,200 km and is designed to evade systems like the US-made Patriot system. The missile can also identify specific targets among decoys and is immune to electronic warfare, he added. Iran also has advanced in 'solid-propellant technology' which facilitates quicker rocket launches to dispatch satellites, something that could be adapted to intercontinental missiles, Nadimi added. Israel's most recent attack also targeted ballistic missile and drone installations, making it more complicated for Iran to respond, according to Rachel Whitlark with the Atlantic Council. Pollack said that Iran could also mount a cyber offensive against Israel, because there is a record of it doing so successfully in 2023, when it shut down electricity in some Israeli hospitals. Still, Pollack wrote that there are 'uncertainties' about the cyber capabilities of both Israel and Iran. 'It's not entirely clear what cyber weapons Iran has up its sleeve or what vulnerabilities it may have discovered in Israel's infrastructure,' he said. Meta is making a $14.3 billion (€12.4 billion) investment in artificial intelligence (AI) company Scale and recruiting its CEO Alexandr Wang to join a team developing "superintelligence" at the tech giant. The deal announced Thursday reflects a push by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to revive AI efforts at the parent company of Facebook and Instagram as it faces tough competition from rivals such as Google and OpenAI. Meta announced what it called a "strategic partnership and investment" with Scale late Thursday. Scale said the $14.3 billion investment puts its market value at over $29 billion (€25 billion). Scale said it will remain an independent company, but the agreement will "substantially expand Scale and Meta's commercial relationship". Meta will hold a 49 per cent stake in the start-up. Wang, though leaving for Meta with a small group of other Scale employees, will remain on Scale's board of directors. Replacing him is a new interim Scale CEO Jason Droege, who was previously the company's chief strategy officer and had past executive roles at Uber Eats and Axon. Zuckerberg's increasing focus on the abstract idea of "superintelligence" - which rival companies call artificial general intelligence, or AGI - is the latest pivot for a tech leader who in 2021 went all-in on the idea of the metaverse, changing the company's name and investing billions into advancing virtual reality and related technology. It won't be the first time since ChatGPT's 2022 debut sparked an AI arms race that a big tech company has gobbled up talent and products at innovative AI startups without formally acquiring them. Microsoft hired key staff from startup Inflection AI, including co-founder and CEO Mustafa Suleyman, who now runs Microsoft's AI division. Google pulled in the leaders of AI chatbot company while Amazon made a deal with San Francisco-based Adept that sent its CEO and key employees to the e-commerce giant. Amazon also got a license to Adept's AI systems and datasets. Wang was a 19-year-old student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) when he and co-founder Lucy Guo started Scale in 2016. They won influential backing that summer from the startup incubator Y Combinator, which was led at the time by Sam Altman, now the CEO of OpenAI. Wang dropped out of MIT, following a trajectory similar to that of Zuckerberg, who quit Harvard University to start Facebook more than a decade earlier. Scale's pitch was to supply the human labour needed to improve AI systems, hiring workers to draw boxes around a pedestrian or a dog in a street photo so that self-driving cars could better predict what's in front of them. General Motors and Toyota have been among Scale's customers. What Scale offered to AI developers was a more tailored version of Amazon's Mechanical Turk, which had long been a go-to service for matching freelance workers with temporary online jobs. More recently, the growing commercialisation of AI large language models - the technology behind OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and Meta's Llama - brought a new market for Scale's annotation teams. The company claims to service "every leading large language model," including those from Anthropic, OpenAI, Meta, and Microsoft, by helping to fine-tune their training data and test their performance. It's not clear what the Meta deal will mean for Scale's other customers. Wang has also sought to build close relationships with the U.S. government, winning military contracts to supply AI tools to the Pentagon and attending President Donald Trump's inauguration. The head of Trump's science and technology office, Michael Kratsios, was an executive at Scale for the four years between Trump's first and second terms. Meta has also begun providing AI services to the federal government. Meta has taken a different approach to AI than many of its rivals, releasing its flagship Llama system for free as an open weight product that enables people to use and modify some of its key components. Meta says more than a billion people use its AI products each month, but it's also widely seen as lagging behind competitors such as OpenAI and Google in encouraging consumer use of large language models, also known as LLMs. It hasn't yet released its purportedly most advanced model, Llama 4 Behemoth, despite previewing it in April as "one of the smartest LLMs in the world and our most powerful yet". Meta's chief AI scientist Yann LeCun, who in 2019 was a winner of computer science's top prize for his pioneering AI work, has expressed scepticism about the tech industry's current focus on LLMs. "How do we build AI systems that understand the physical world, that have persistent memory, that can reason and can plan?" LeCun asked at a French tech conference last year. These are all characteristics of intelligent behaviour that large language models "basically cannot do, or they can only do them in a very superficial, approximate way," LeCun said. Instead, he emphasised Meta's interest in "tracing a path towards human-level AI systems, or perhaps even superhuman". When he returned to France's annual VivaTech conference again on Wednesday, LeCun dodged a question about the pending Scale deal but said his AI research team's plan has "always been to reach human intelligence and go beyond it". "It's just that now we have a clearer vision for how to accomplish this," he said. LeCun co-founded Meta's AI research division more than a decade ago with Rob Fergus, a fellow professor at New York University. Fergus later left for Google but returned to Meta last month after a 5-year absence to run the research lab, replacing longtime director Joelle Pineau. Fergus wrote on LinkedIn last month that Meta's commitment to long-term AI research "remains unwavering" and described the work as "building human-level experiences that transform the way we interact with technology".
