logo
'Construction firms won't let me work because I'm a girl'

'Construction firms won't let me work because I'm a girl'

Yahooa day ago

A stonemasonry student said companies had told her she could not join the profession "because she's a girl".
Alice, who is 17, was one of the students who took part in a competition for apprentices at Moulton College in Northampton on Thursday.
Industry experts have said 19,750 extra construction workers are needed in the East of England by 2028 to meet government housebuilding targets.
However, some students, like Alice, said they still faced barriers which made it difficult to pursue a career in construction.
The SkillBuild competition, organised by the Construction Industry Training Board (CITB), tested apprentices and trainees in a variety of tasks, from furniture making to tiling.
Alice, from Weston Favell in Northamptonshire, inherited her interest in architecture from her grandfather and wanted to work on some of the UK's greatest stone buildings - cathedrals.
But she said her journey had not been easy.
"I've tried to contact some companies to get onto that kind of work, but it hasn't really worked out," she told the BBC.
"The main thing is that I'm a woman and a lot of companies have told me 'you can't do this because you're a girl - you're not strong enough, you won't be able to do the heavy labour'."
Another competitor, Maizie from Bury St Edmonds in Suffolk, wanted to encourage more women to join the industry.
The 17-year-old goes to college in Colchester and said: "In my class it's actually a pretty good mix, but in the industry as a whole, it's definitely a big imbalance.
"People need to realise the value of these industries, and we need to push more young people to go into it. It can be a bit inaccessible at the beginning, especially for young people, since working in these workshop environments can be quite dangerous."
The first obstacle in the competition for Rugby man Sean, 18, was having to "scavenge" for the right tools to make a porch roof, having brought the wrong ones.
The bigger issue for him, generally, was the lack of opportunities for young people.
He said: "There's not enough apprenticeships - it took me two years to get here, and I feel like that's one of the biggest problems.
"The amount of houses they're trying to build; they definitely need more apprenticeships."
A CITB report published this month said 19,750 new workers were needed in the region.
Robert Smith, from the CITB, said "we really need to make that attractive so that they know there are jobs for the future, secure opportunities and great career pathways".
The figures suggest there is a long way to go before there is a gender balance in the industry.
According to The Office for National Statistics, women comprise just 15.8% of the construction workforce and only 2% of workers onsite.
There is some hope, though, with the number of women as a proportion of the overall construction workforce increasing by 36.9% since 2012.
The government said construction would be one area to benefit from a "record-breaking £3bn apprenticeship budget".
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
'I went from studying fine art to tiling floors'
Trainee brickie urges more women to consider trade
Calls for gender balance in construction industry
Moulton College
Construction Industry Training Board

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Chagos Islands: Starmer's 'lousy deal'
The Chagos Islands: Starmer's 'lousy deal'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The Chagos Islands: Starmer's 'lousy deal'

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. "Keir Starmer has secured his legacy," said The Daily Telegraph: his "shameful surrender of the Chagos Islands will go down as this nation's foreign policy nadir". Last week, the PM signed a long-dreaded treaty that officially hands control of the Indian Ocean archipelago to Mauritius – effectively ceding a strategically vital territory that sits in an area of interest for China. To add insult to injury, once the treaty is ratified by MPs, we will pay Mauritius £101 million a year for the next 99 years to rent back a key UK-US military base on the largest island, Diego Garcia. "This lousy deal essentially amounts to a massive gift from British taxpayers to the Mauritian government," said Andrew Tettenborn in The Spectator. So why sign it? The answer, I'm afraid, "is legalism": the UN's top court had issued a non-binding ruling calling on the UK to give up control of Chagos – and the PM, ever the lawyer, eagerly bowed to international law. Perhaps he was hoping to set a "shining example" to other countries; instead, they will "regard us with contempt for being a pushover". The deal looks "odd" on the face of it, said James Landale on BBC News. But there were plenty of "practical" reasons to sign the treaty. Multiple UN bodies have ruled that the islands belong to Mauritius; had the UK continued to ignore those rulings, the operation of the base could have become "unworkable". Diego Garcia's satellite communications would have been threatened because the UK relies on a UN agency in Geneva to maintain access to a particular electromagnetic spectrum; aircraft might not be able to fly in or out, for fear of breaching international law. As for national security, said Sean O'Grady in The Independent, without this deal, Mauritius could have lawfully granted China permission to establish a military base on another of the islands, sparking a serious crisis. The deal specifically forbids it. This is all true in theory, said John Rentoul in the same paper. But in reality, Mauritius' claim to the islands was "weak" – Chagos has never been part of its territory – and UN courts have "no powers of enforcement". The base wasn't threatened in any meaningful way. And yet Starmer's government doubled down on a deal that will outrage the British public, given the nation's dire finances. I suspect the biggest driver of this decision was "postcolonial guilt", said Matthew Syed in The Sunday Times – that sense that, as a nation, we must self-flagellate to atone for the sins of the empire. But Starmer's conscience-cleansing comes at "extravagant expense" – and will help "no one but our rivals".

Donald Trump vs. Bruce Springsteen
Donald Trump vs. Bruce Springsteen

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Donald Trump vs. Bruce Springsteen

Opening his 'Land of Hope and Dreams' tour in Manchester, England, New Jersey rocker Bruce Springsteen called the Trump administration 'corrupt, incompetent and treasonous.' To be fair, Europeans are used to these kinds of leaders. President Trump fired back, calling Mr. Springsteen 'a pushy, obnoxious JERK, who fervently supported Crooked Joe Biden' and a 'dried out 'prune' of a rocker.' A billionaire slap-fest! I'm claiming authority on this matter, as I did shots of Old Grand-Dad with Mr. Springsteen on his 35th birthday at Big Man's West in Red Bank, N.J. As with this feud, I wasn't invited. I just happened to be there. Sure, both men think they're the boss, but it's more than that. Truth be told, Mr. Trump has been playing to Mr. Springsteen's original audience for quite a while. Think downtrodden, desperate, struggling, working class—though Springsteen fans are more likely middle-aged folks absolving their guilt through music, thankful they didn't grow up that way. 'Workin' in the field / You get your back burned / Workin' 'neath the wheels / You get your facts learned.' Anyway, the psyche fits the MAGA crowd, minus 50 years. No wonder these guys are feuding. Mr. Springsteen had the perfect invented persona in the 1970s and '80s—as we emerged with fits and starts from an industrial era to a digital age, Slate called him an 'endearing Jersey wharf rat.' His music was rebellious. Nonconformist. 'I hid in the clouded wrath of the crowd / But when they said, 'Sit down,' I stood up.' Have problems? Just jump in your 'chrome-wheeled, fuel-injected' Chevy and roar down the highway 'jammed with broken heroes.' No one actually did this, but it felt good to think about. Now we doom-scroll instead.

Lisa Hogan reveals why Jeremy Clarkson hasn't proposed to her yet
Lisa Hogan reveals why Jeremy Clarkson hasn't proposed to her yet

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Lisa Hogan reveals why Jeremy Clarkson hasn't proposed to her yet

Lisa Hogan has revealed why Jeremy Clarkson hasn't proposed to her yet. The pair star on Prime Video hit show Clarkson's Farm which showcases life on Diddly Squat farm in Chadlington Oxfordshire. Former Top Gear and The Grand Tour host Jeremy Clarkson has owned the spot since 2008 with four series of the programme to date. The fourth of these is currently mid-release with six episodes available to stream on Prime Video and two further to be released on Friday (June 6). READ MORE: Jeremy Clarkson pays Richard Hammond £20,000 in TV reunion Ms Hogan began dating Mr Clarkson in 2017 after the pair met at a party and she features in the show. "It was quite a long courtship, as I didn't know where he was in his life," she previously told The Times. "And I wasn't ready to start dating again; didn't want to go out with anyone. "He had to court me for three months." Despite being in a relationship for nine years, the couple are yet to get married with no proposal from the TV host as of yet. READ MORE: Emma Watson joins Oxford University rowing team and loses three races Jeremy Clarkson and Lisa Hogan have been together since 2017. (Image: Andrew Matthews / PA) Both have been married in the past with Mr Clarkson with Alexandra James from 1989 to 1990 and then Frances Cain from 1993 to 2014. Ms Hogan was with Steven Bentinck from the 1990s to 2005. They have three children each from these past relationships too with Mr Clarkon dad to daughters Emily and Katya, and son Finlo, Ms Hogan also has two daughters and a son, called Elizabeth, Alice and Wolfe. In a new interview with the Daily Mail, the 51-year-old hints that she's not truly "bothered" that her boyfriend has not yet proposed. READ MORE: Taylor Swift 'books £3.3m Oxfordshire cottage' in the Cotswolds The couple star on Prime Video show, Clarkson's Farm. (Image: Prime Video) Instead, she says that they both seem content with "being together 24/7" and adds that their children get on well. In the past when talking about marriage to Mr Clarkson, the topic has been dismissed such as in a previous report by Belfast Live. Lisa previously addressed the issue of marriage when questioned by Fabulous Magazine earlier this year. "Mrs Clarkson? No, thank you, I like Lisa Hogan," she said. READ MORE: Billie Piper becomes new Doctor Who after Ncuti Gatwa regeneration Flash Sale Alert! 🌟 Dive deeper into the stories that shape Oxfordshire with Oxford Mail. Unlimited local news, an ad-free app, and a digital replica of our print edition—all with 80 per cent fewer ads on our site. 🗞️ 👇#StayInformed — Oxford Mail (@TheOxfordMail) May 26, 2025 "We decided not to have children together. We're at a stage where we are not going to have kids. "I'm just happy pootling along. I think because of our age, it's much easier. You go: 'God, is it you I end up with? OK, that's it.' "But it's relaxing knowing you are not going to be with anybody else. It gives you a certain amount of liberation." Mr Clarkson revealed last year that a fifth series of Clarkson's Farm has been confirmed for which filming has already started.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store