Voting will soon begin for Penn State alumni-elected trustees. Who's on the ballot?
Penn State alumni can vote in the alumni trustee election beginning Monday as 17 candidates seek election to one of three open seats.
Voting begins at 9 a.m. Monday and alumni have until 9 a.m. May 8 to cast their vote. University alumni will receive a ballot to the email address on file with the university. Alumni can also access the ballot at pennstatevotes.com. If they can't access the ballot there, they can contact YesElections at PennStateVotes@yeselections.com or call 855-224-0832.
There are nine trustees elected by alumni and the terms are staggered so three expire each year. This election will have one incumbent on the ballot.
In the 2024 alumni election, 24,060 people out of 732,219 eligible voters participated in the election, according to the demographics report.
The election cycle hasn't come without its own controversies. A judge recently ruled that current trustee Barry Fenchak may not appear on the ballot, upholding a decision the board's nominating subcommittee made earlier this year to deem him unqualified and ineligible to run. Fenchak, class of 1984, has since announced he will run a write-in campaign.
Below are the candidates who will appear on the ballot, in alphabetical order, along with information provided as part of their position statements. More information on the candidates can be found at https://trustees.psu.edu/candidate-materials-2025.
Jeffrey Ballou's family had to sacrifice a lot so he could attend Penn State Greater Allegheny, he said in his position statement. But the 'leadership neglect' at the university has put the campuses and the opportunity for students to attend Penn State at risk, he said.
His listed priorities are to reinvigorate academic excellence, reimagine commonwealth campuses and provide trusted, proactive leadership. As someone who attended a commonwealth campus, he said it's crucial to have that viewpoint on the board.
He emphasized the importance of leadership and experience, as well.
'With higher education's challenges, it matters to have someone entrusted with representing multi-billion-dollar brands, facilitated difficult discussions with global leaders and will use seasoned strategic planning experience alongside deep board service,' he said.
His campaign website is allinforthesoulofpennstate.com.
Robert Bowsher plans to bring a fresh set of eyes to the board to help 'rein in wasteful spending,' he wrote in his position statement. Money management at Penn State should reflect the difficult economic times people are facing, he said, and would support efforts to make the university more affordable without compromising academics.
He listed financial viability of the commonwealth campuses and growing Penn State's endowment as priorities, while emphasizing open and transparent board leadership.
'We must pursue every available avenue that maintains the financial viability of Penn State's Commonwealth Campuses. I will advocate for the University to maximize alternative revenue sources, including the Hershey Medical Center and the World Campus,' he said. 'Growing the University's endowment will also be a top priority. Now more than ever, we need to appeal to generous donors who can build an endowment that rivals every school in our recently expanded Big Ten Conference.'
Joseph DeRenzo will focus on improving Penn State's standing in areas critical to its success, like strategic planning, financial health, student and alumni advocacy, and educational oversight, he wrote in his position statement.
Healthcare professionals are underrepresented on the board, which highlights the need to strengthen the healthcare-related programs, he said.
'My experience leading multidisciplinary teams in clinical care and operations positions me to support these programs and drive innovation. My background working on integrative committees over the past 20 years, endeavoring to achieve consensus in establishing protocols for patient care and clinical operations, translates well to the necessary group dynamics needed within the Penn State Board of Trustees,' he said.
If elected, he'll make sure all voices are heard and respected, and will use his leadership experience to collaborate and bring diverse perspectives together, he said.
Jolie Elder knows she's an 'unorthodox' choice for the board, she wrote in her position statement, but she said her brilliant mind, 15 years of nonprofit government experience and perspective makes her a good candidate.
She listed many questions about the university's finances, including why the cost of higher education outpaces inflation, why Penn State's allocation from the state has remained flat for years, the university's debt and enrollment of Pennsylvanians at University Park.
She's supportive of a performance-based funding model and, if elected, would like to work with that.
'If crafted thoughtfully without loopholes, those guidelines could move our university in a sustainable direction toward generational success. As late adopters, we can learn from others states' experiences. Increasing Penn State's land-grant impact is a goal of our strategic plan,' she said.
In his position statement, Trevor Hale wrote: 'I am running for election to the Penn State Board of Trustees to help ensure the long term positioning of Penn State as a world leader in higher education, seminal research, and service to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Full stop. We have been, we are, and we need to continue to be needle movers.'
Karen Keller said in her position statement that her passion for Penn State and her experiences, values and abilities will help the university move in the correct direction.
She listed four areas of priorities, including student success and well-being, world-class research and faculty, developing leaders of tomorrow, and food insecurity. She noted the university needs to have a support system and educational opportunities in place to help students who are facing 'unprecedented challenges.'
Additionally, higher education is facing faculty burnout and attrition, she said.
'Researchers are dealing with fewer funding opportunities and the lack of new faculty positions are leading to a reduction in innovative additions to departments. Cross- collaboration in teaching and research as well as proper stewardship of intellectual property is paramount to being efficient and effective,' Keller said.
The university already has a number of ways to be at the forefront of fighting food insecurity, between the agriculture school, commonwealth campuses and extension programs, she said. More interaction with farmers, ag and environmental industries, and government agencies will be crucial, she said.
Kelley Lynch has a simple but important reason for wanting to serve Penn State, she said in her position statement. She wants to make sure students continue to have the 'transformative' experiences, which she said is what Penn State students deserve.
'We are in a challenging yet exciting time for higher education. Penn State must be a leader in shaping its future, balance tradition with innovation to remain relevant and valuable. As we navigate these times, our approach must be rooted in building trust, being transparent, involving all stakeholders, and reimagining our land-grant mission,' Lynch said.
She said focusing on net tuition revenue is crucial and also said resources must be built to offer lower-income students the opportunity to attend. As higher education evolves, she said Penn State needs to ensure its faculty are leaders in their fields, and the programs and degrees offered are valuable in the marketplace. That way, graduates are prepared to have successful careers.
David Morgan plans to be a practical-minded board member and a good steward for all that Penn State stands for, he wrote in his position statement. He said he believes in a well-rounded and complete education, and keeping Penn State affordable, diverse, inclusive and safe.
'I understand that Penn State Health has encountered some challenges and that there are many concerns with the Commonwealth Campuses,' he said. 'To the Board, I bring no hidden agenda and will be a team player who is able to work through tough and perhaps at times contentious decisions still treating all viewpoints with the respect that they deserve.'
His core values center around integrity, he said.
'My late father used to say 'Dave, nobody can ever fault your for doing the right thing' and 'the less said, the better.' I think both statements apply well to the possibility of being on the Penn State Board of Trustees. While never perfect, if one is trying to do what is right and not talking just to be heard, they are heading in the right direction,' he said.
Uma Moriarity is seeking election to the board with Penn State Forward, and listed four key policy focus areas in her position statement to advance academic and institutional excellence: climate action, educational equity, governance reform and workers' rights.
'Moriarity has spent her career building the business case for sustainable capital allocation,' her position statement reads. 'She built her firm's ESG practice, which has grown into $2b in assets under management. She is ready to fix Penn State's budget deficit while securing institutional resilience with responsible investment policies and capital allocation practices. And through her Penn State service, she supports the faculty and students who make Penn State a climate leader — work she's excited to continue as a Trustee.'
If elected trustee, she will promote equal opportunity and champion policies that would promote affordability for off-campus housing as an example.
She believes collaborative decision-making ensures the university's direction is aligned with its mission and values, and if elected will be committed to ensuring all voices are heard.
Jordan Mott's mission as a trustee candidate is to champion a culture of collaboration and transparency, he wrote in his position statement, and is committed to increasing enrollment and making Penn State accessible and affordable.
As trustee, he said he would advocate for adopting advanced technologies to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of university operations so Penn State can stay at the forefront of innovation in higher ed.
'My vision extends beyond campus borders, focusing on strengthening the Penn State community both locally and globally, fostering a network of support, pride, and shared purpose. I am dedicated to ensuring that our university attracts and retains the highest caliber of talent — faculty, staff, current students, and prospective students — who embody excellence and a passion for growth,' he wrote.
J. Gregory Pilewicz will bring an independent mindset to the board if elected, he wrote in his position statement, and is committed to Penn State being world class in education, research and student life.
He's a C-level executive with success in building companies, improving operations and managing change, he said. He would leverage his knowledge in operations, strategic planning, financial management and more to support Penn State's mission and values.
'If elected, I will bring an independent mindset and be a well-informed contributor to the role of Trustee. I am committed to Penn State being world class in the areas of education, research, and student life. I prefer not to see increases in tuition, capital projects that challenge the university's financial well-being, or a fractured governance. These items, along with our branch campus system's success are high priorities for me. Lastly, I am also an enthusiastic proponent of the student-run organizations, clubs, leadership programs, Greek-life, and athletics that make PSU such a special and memorable experience,' he said.
Dale Predmore listed three priorities he'd have if elected trustee in his position statement: cost containment, defining focus and alumni engagement.
Penn State needs to be attainable and economically feasible for students, he wrote, and the best way to do that is through reduced expenses and increased efficiency in operations and administration — not tuition increases.
Obstacles that students and alumni face are 'self-imposed by the university,' Predmore said, and Penn State needs to develop and sustain a culture of service toward students and alumni.
'I do not advocate for reduced academic rigor. I advocate for reduced administrative complexity. Our students and alumni should face three defining traits when dealing with the University — Ease … Access … Yes. Our alumni proudly proclaim We Are. Our University should proudly proclaim We Can,' he said.
Pat Romano Jr.'s position statement states he will uphold the fiduciary duties as trustee.
He wrote: 'I will honor the vows and agreements of the board while exercising sound financial oversight and engage fellow board members to reach goals. I believe that goals can be reached with transparency and accountability as we provide strategic direction for the near and long-term future.'
Laurie Anne Stanell will show up, stand up and speak out to make sure Penn State remains a world-class academic institution, she said in her position statement. She listed several focus areas, including tuition control, board transparency and size, Greek life, presence in Harrisburg and meeting with students and faculty at University Park and commonwealth campuses.
Penn State needs to find ways to keep costs down while dealing with state funding cuts, she said. When she was previously on the board, she said she voted against raising tuition and unnecessary spending.
She's also in favor of decreasing the size of the board of trustees, saying: 'Trustees must be treated equally, since we are all equally accountable for the Board's actions. A smaller board means more highly engaged Trustees.'
In terms of Greek life, she said Penn State has to 'affirm the laudable history' and contributions of the Greek life system.
Her campaign page is facebook.com/groups/Stanell4PennStateTrustee.
Steven Wagman's priorities as a trustee include affordability, the well-being and safety of students, and modernizing campus facilities while being fiscally responsible, he wrote in his position statement.
Wagman, who previously served on the board, worked to cut millions in costs to minimize tuition increases, he said, especially for lower-income and commonwealth campus students.
'I am a strong advocate of the CWC system, focused on revitalization, community connection, and enrollment growth. World Campus, and the CWC 2+2 programs, are an affordability and opportunity lever for Pennsylvania residents. Addressing demographic and campus gaps in degree completion requires innovative solutions beyond what is available currently,' he said.
More needs to be done to ensure everyone feels a sense of belonging and can thrive at Penn State, he said, and pointed to food and housing insecurity, as well as mental health, as concerns and obstructions to degree completion.
His LinkedIn page is linkedin.com/in/steven-wagman-47083b4.
Katherine Wheatle is seeking election to the board with Penn State Forward, and listed four key policy focus areas in her position statement to advance academic and institutional excellence: educational equity, workers' rights, governance reform and climate action.
If elected trustee, she will use data and structural solutions to guarantee affordable education for all.
'Growing up, Wheatle attended public schools and received free/reduced lunch,' her position statement reads. 'She still owes student loan debt. Financial aid made her Penn State education possible. As a trustee, she will lead data-driven and structural solutions to guarantee an affordable education for all Penn Staters, including public University budget review and responsible endowment management so savings may be reallocated towards decreasing tuition and providing direct aid.'
In terms of workers rights, as trustee she will fight for policies for labor union recognition, living wages and policies against harassment. An example listed for governance reform is to advocate for requiring the board review community recommendations publicly.
Daniel Zahn is seeking election to the board with Penn State Forward, and listed four key policy focus areas in his position statement to advance academic and institutional excellence: governance reform, educational equity, workers' rights and climate action.
Zahn has spent years improving the student conduct process, academic freedom and student rights, his statement reads, and will continue that as trustee. He would support policies that protect Penn Staters who voice concerns about decision-making from retaliation.
Penn Staters should have a safe environment that pushes them to grow, his statement reads, but that can't happen if they have to focus on high tuition payments, housing or food insecurity, or other obstacles like violence or prejudice.
'Zahn attended Penn State because a scholarship made it his most affordable option,' his position statement reads. 'He worked part time, struggled to find affordable housing, faced antisemitism and homophobia, and is currently paying off student debt. He will advance policies to break down the barriers preventing Penn Staters from achieving their full potential.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Will Penn State trustees remove Barry Fenchak from board? Special meeting scheduled
The Penn State board of trustees scheduled a special meeting for Monday to vote on removing one of its most outspoken board members. The board will meet virtually at 3 p.m. Monday, June 16 to consider a proposal recommending removing trustee Barry Fenchak from the board. A vote in favor of doing so would make Fenchak permanently ineligible to serve on the board again. Fenchak is an alumni-elected trustee whose three-year term expires June 30. He submitted materials and garnered enough signatures to appear on the trustee election ballot to run for a second term, but the board ruled he was unqualified and ineligible to appear on the ballot. He ran an unsuccessful write-in campaign. The board previously tried to permanently remove Fenchak from the board in the fall because of an incident that occurred after the board's July 2024 meeting. Fenchak loosely repeated a quote from the PG-rated movie 'A League of Their Own' in which Tom Hanks' character told a baseball umpire he looked like a 'penis with a little hat on' to a female staff member. A board subcommittee found it to be a code of conduct violation and unanimously recommended his removal. When the board tried to remove him, the issue went to court as part of a lawsuit Fenchak filed against the board. The judge blocked the board from removing him as trustee a day before the vote was scheduled, finding Fenchak had provided 'uncontradicted evidence of a broad pattern of retaliatory behavior' by the board. But the judge, Brian Marshall, lifted that preliminary injunction in May — paving way for his removal — after finding the basis for it had since become moot. He granted the injunction in the fall after Fenchak showed the board was trying to remove him in retaliation for his repeated requests for information, namely the university's approximately $4.57 billion endowment and a reportedly $1 billion athletic department contract with a ticketing and fan engagement agency. But in the seven months since, Fenchak was given 510 pages of information related to the endowment and a complete, unredacted copy of the contract with Elevate. He can no longer claim he is subject to removal from the board because of those specific requests, Marshall wrote in his ruling. Reporter Bret Pallotto contributed to this report.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Penn State trustees agree to legal training, improved transparency in settlement with Spotlight PA
This story was produced by the State College regional bureau of Spotlight PA, an independent, nonpartisan newsroom dedicated to investigative and public-service journalism for Pennsylvania. Sign up for Talk of the Town, a weekly newsletter of local stories that dig deep, events, and more from north-central PA, at Penn State University's Board of Trustees will complete a training on the state's open meetings law and disclose more information about its closed-door gatherings as part of a settlement with Spotlight PA. The agreement, signed last week, ends a case the newsroom, in partnership with the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, brought against the board in December 2023 for alleged violations of the Sunshine Act, the state law mandating transparency from governing bodies. 'The settlement ensures that one of Pennsylvania's most influential institutions will conduct its business with the transparency that taxpayers, students, faculty, and staff deserve,' said Christopher Baxter, CEO and president of Spotlight PA. 'The university's most recent decision to close seven campuses — and the effect it will have on communities across the state — underscores the need for these important reforms.' Neither Penn State nor board leadership responded to a request for comment for this story. Spotlight PA has documented the board's decadelong use of private meetings and practices that may have run afoul of the state's transparency law, including that university leadership met privately with trustees to discuss Penn State's multimillion-dollar budget deficit and to consider naming the football field after former coach Joe Paterno. Internal board communications, previously obtained by the newsroom, revealed that board leadership directed trustees to ask questions during a private session rather than at a public meeting, a request a media law attorney described as a 'gigantic red flag.' Penn State has already altered some of its practices to increase transparency. In October, a committee of top university officials held its first public meeting since 2011. Under the new settlement agreement, every meeting of the executive committee must be publicized on the board's website, and the board must continue to publish the group's meeting agendas. Additionally, according to the settlement, the board will hold a Sunshine Act training for trustees and publicly report which members completed the session. The Pennsylvania Office of Open Records is scheduled to provide the training on Sept. 11, according to the agency's calendar. Incoming trustees will be offered the training starting in 2026. Liz Wagenseller, executive director of the Office of Open Records, said in a statement that the state's open meetings law 'plays a vital role in ensuring the public can see how tax dollars are spent and how government entities operate. The Office of Open Records values every invitation to assist agencies and others subject to the law in better understanding their obligations regarding public meetings. We look forward to working with the Penn State Board of Trustees to help uphold the transparency and accountability the Act is designed to promote.' For years, the Penn State board has met behind closed doors with university officials in 'conference,' a practice allowed under the law for 'any training program or seminar, or any session arranged by State or Federal agencies for local agencies, organized and conducted for the sole purpose of providing information to agency members on matters directly related to their official responsibilities.' The public had limited insight into these gatherings. Under the agreement, the board will disclose the person providing the training and the topic. Similarly, when the trustees hold an executive session, the board will publicly say the reason why and cite the legal exemption that allows for the private meeting. The terms of the settlement will last for five years. Read the full agreement here. 'This is such an important win for transparency in the Commonwealth,' said Paula Knudsen Burke, the Pennsylvania attorney for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press who represented Spotlight PA in the case. 'The university and its board of trustees are ultimately accountable to the people of Pennsylvania, and their business is the public's business. This agreement, which explicitly includes Sunshine Act compliance training, sets a clear expectation that they can no longer hide behind closed doors and executive sessions.' The settlement ends more than 18 months of legal arguments in local court. In October 2023, Spotlight PA and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press sent the board a letter requesting the trustees 'immediately cease holding improper executive sessions and conferences, advertise and record meeting minutes for all public meetings, and halt the practice of deliberating in secret.' The university's vice president and general counsel, Tabitha Oman, responded that she was 'confident that the Board has taken its official actions and conducted its deliberations in compliance' with the law. During the board's November 2023 meetings in University Park, Spotlight PA witnessed what it believed were potential violations of the open meetings law, prompting the lawsuit in Centre County Court of Common Pleas. After the board's February and May 2024 meetings, the lawsuit was amended to include additional allegations. Throughout the legal process, Penn State argued its trustees followed the law. 'Penn State is a more transparent institution than it was a year and a half ago thanks to Spotlight PA and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press,' said Sarah Rafacz, managing editor of Spotlight PA's State College bureau. 'With this agreement in place, we will see more public disclosures about the business of the trustees than ever before. Our push for transparency will also continue through our tenacious accountability reporting on the university.' In September, Commonwealth Court will tentatively hear arguments in an ongoing case between Penn State and the state Department of Education against Spotlight PA to decide whether university documents the Office of Open Records previously deemed public should be turned over to the newsroom. and help us reinvigorate local news in north-central Pennsylvania at Spotlight PA is funded by foundations and readers like you who are committed to accountability and public-service journalism that gets results. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Boston Globe
04-06-2025
- Boston Globe
What is Fusarium graminearum, the fungus US authorities say was smuggled in from China?
Advertisement Toxic plant pathogens that a Chinese scientist entered the US last year stashed in his backpack. Uncredited/Associated Press What is Fusarium head blight? Fusarium graminearum causes a disease called Fusarium head blight that can wipe out cereal crops such as wheat, barley and maize and rice — it inflicts $1 billion in losses annually on U.S. wheat and barley crops, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up It isn't the only fungus to cause Fusarium head blight, but it's the most common culprit in the U.S. The fungus infects plants early in the growing season, shriveling wheat grains and blanching crop heads a whitish-tan color. It also causes a toxin to accumulate in wheat kernels that can make them unsafe for people and livestock to eat. Nicknamed 'vomitoxin' because it's most known for causing livestock to throw up, it can also cause diarrhea, abdominal pain, headache and fever in animals and people. Advertisement Wheat and other grain crops are screened for various toxins, including Fusarium graminearum, before they can be used to feed animals and humans. Farmers have to throw out any infected grains, which can cause devastating losses. 'It's one of the many problems that farmers have to deal with that risks their livelihood,' said David Geiser, a Fusarium expert at Penn State. A colonization of Fusarium head blight, a costly fungal disease, growing on field-grown hemp in Kentucky on Sept. 29, 2020. Uncredited/Associated Press What are the accusations? Although Jian and Liu are accused of smuggling Fusarium graminearum into the country, the fungus is already prevalent in the U.S. — particularly in the east and Upper Midwest — and scientists have been studying it for decades. Researchers often bring foreign plants, animals and even strains of fungi to the U.S. to study them, but they must file certain permits before moving anything across state or national borders. Studying the genes of a foreign fungus strain, for example, can help scientists learn how it tolerates heat, resists pesticides or mutates. 'We look at variations among individuals just like we do humans,' said Nicole Gauthier, a plant pathologist at the University of Kentucky who studies Fusarium. That said, it's unclear why the Chinese researchers might have wanted to bring that strain of Fusarium graminearum into the U.S. and why they didn't fill out the proper paperwork to do so.