logo
Why is No 10 tight-lipped about welcoming reparation campaigner?

Why is No 10 tight-lipped about welcoming reparation campaigner?

Yahoo16-04-2025

It was back in February when the Telegraph, citing Caribbean sources, reported that the Foreign Office was to open talks on slavery reparations with Caribbean officials, who were demanding trillions of pounds from the UK in compensation for its role in the slave trade.
In his piece, my colleague Craig Simpson reported that members of the Reparations Commission of the Caribbean Community (Caricom), a political grouping of 15 states who have led on calls for compensation from former colonial powers, were planning a visit to London in April with a specific aim to restate demands for payments.
We were even told that the 'trip has been overseen by Mia Mottley, Barbados's prime minister,' who famously pushed for reparations to be on the agenda at the Commonwealth Heads of Government summit in Samoa last year.
To say the demands are ambitious would be an understatement. In no conceivable way could the nation's taxpayers and its finances afford the bill.
'Ms Mottley has stated that Britain owes her country £3.9 trillion,' this paper had reported, 'while a 2023 report put the figure owed to former Caribbean colonies overall at £18 trillion.'
A Foreign Office spokesman at that time had denied that there were any plans for a ministerial meeting, claiming no date had been set for a UK-Caricom meeting.
Imagine my surprise then to come across a press release on 4th April - issued not by the Foreign Office but by No 10 - that Sir Keir had welcomed Prime Minister Mia Mottley of Barbados to Downing Street that morning.
When was this meeting scheduled, I asked the Downing Street Press Office. Were any payments to Barbados discussed at the meeting? My questions were refused, with the spokesman instead directing me back to the rather bare-boned press release, which would only provide the following information:'The leaders reflected on the strength of the relationship between the UK and Barbados, and the shared challenges faced by the two countries, including growth, climate change and global instability.'The Prime Minister also thanked Prime Minister Mottley for the action taken by Barbados against the Russian shadow fleet.'A standard news agency report on the meeting offered some interesting details.'We've known each other many, many years as good colleagues and now as leaders who work together, think alike', Sir Keir said of his guest, a fellow King's Counsel who was educated at the London School of Economics.In her response, Ms Mottley said, '[w]e've had the opportunity to meet a number of times since you've assumed office.' We know that at least one of those times - at the Commonwealth Head of Governments summit - the matter of reparations has certainly been discussed. How many other discussions have there been on the subject, given Ms Mottley's focused, high profile and long-running campaign for compensation?
There are other reasons to be wary of a ruinous bill being presented to Parliament as a fait accompli, much in the same way as the Mauritius payment, not the least because it is the same international judge from Jamaica who ruled against the UK on the Chagos Islands who has called for Britain to pay more than £18 trillion in reparations for slavery, declaring even that amount to be an 'underestimation' of the damage caused.
While calls for reparations are longstanding, in recent years they have been reportedly gaining momentum worldwide, 'particularly among Caricom [of which Ms Mottley is the current Chair] and the African Union', whose joint theme for 2025 is 'Justice for Africans and the People of African Descent through reparations.'
These organisations enjoy the support of both the European Union and the United Nations leadership - indeed, Ms Mottley is widely viewed as a potential candidate to succeed Antonio Guterres as the next UN secretary-general - who appear to be increasingly willing to entertain compensation claims.
Speakers at a session of the United Nations Permanent Forum on African Descent in New York declared only yesterday that 'the calls for reparatory justice can no longer be ignored'. These calls at the Forum are being led by Ms Mottley's Caricom colleague, Dr Hilary Brown.
International campaigners are also encouraged by what they view as a British government sympathetic to their cause after 14 years of Conservative-led refusal to discuss compensation claims. Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Attorney General Lord Hermer have both previously voiced their support for reparations, hitherto a political position only championed by edgier backbenchers such as Bell Ribeiro-Addy and Dawn Butler.
While the Government has steadfastly refused to allow the word reparations to enter its formal communiqué, it has been more comfortable using expressions such as addressing 'wrongs of the past' when discussing payments to former colonies, as we've seen in the case of the Mauritius deal.
In the case of Barbados and other Caribbean nations, if Ms Mottley is successful in her campaign, the bill presented to the taxpayer would likely be framed as payments towards the climate crisis, rather than reparations.
But of course, reparation by any other name is still reparation. As, of course, is bankruptcy.
Please share share examples of public spending in your personal and professional lives which you consider to be a waste of taxpayers' money. You can email us your stories – either in writing or as voice notes – at wastewatch@telegraph.co.uk
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zelensky urges 'stronger' EU sanctions on Russia, lower oil price cap
Zelensky urges 'stronger' EU sanctions on Russia, lower oil price cap

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Zelensky urges 'stronger' EU sanctions on Russia, lower oil price cap

President Volodymyr Zelensky on June 11 called on the European Union to impose tougher sanctions against Russia, arguing that stronger financial pressure is necessary to curb Moscow's war effort. Speaking at the Ukraine-Southeast Europe Summit in Odesa, Zelensky said the upcoming 18th EU sanctions package "could be stronger," especially in targeting Russian oil tankers and the financial sector. He urged the EU to further reduce the price cap on Russian oil exports. "A ceiling of $45 per barrel of oil is better than $60, that's clear, that's true. But real peace will come with a ceiling of $30," he said. "That's the level that will really change the mindset in Moscow." After the 17th package of sanctions against Russia took effect on May 20, Ukraine's allies announced the following day that another round of restrictions was already in the works. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced on June 10 that the EU is considering lowering the oil price cap from $60 to $45 per barrel — a measure that will be discussed at the upcoming G7 summit in Canada on June 15–17. The Kremlin's budget is increasingly strained by soaring military expenditures, with Russia's Finance Ministry relying heavily on energy revenues to fund the war against Ukraine. The push for tighter sanctions comes as Russia continues to reject ceasefire proposals and presses forward with military operations. Zelensky warned that Odesa remains one of Russia's "main targets," with plans to push beyond it toward the borders with Romania and Moldova. "Russia wants to destroy it, as it has done with countless cities and villages in the occupied territories," he said. "Russian military plans point to this region — Odesa — and then to the border with Moldova and Romania." Odesa is a major port city in southern Ukraine, located on the northwestern coast of the Black Sea. The president warned of possible destabilization efforts in the broader region, comparing the Kremlin's strategy to its previous interference in the Balkans. "We saw this before in the Balkans, where Russia intensified interethnic friction, carried out sabotage, and even attempted coups," Zelensky said. The Odesa summit was attended by several southeastern European leaders, including Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic and Romania's newly elected President Nicusor Dan. Vucic's trip marked his first official visit to Ukraine since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion. Read also: Ukrainian drones strike targets in Russia, including gunpowder plant, General Staff says We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

Ukraine bracing for 'painful' reduction in US military aid after Hegseth announces cuts
Ukraine bracing for 'painful' reduction in US military aid after Hegseth announces cuts

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ukraine bracing for 'painful' reduction in US military aid after Hegseth announces cuts

Editor's note: For security reasons, the real names of the soldiers mentioned in this story have not been used. A reduction in U.S. military aid to Ukraine would be "painful" and could have potentially "dire consequences" for the global order, Ukrainian lawmakers and soldiers have told the Kyiv Independent. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on June 10 signalled the move is almost certain to happen as he discussed Washington's defense budget for 2026 during a congressional hearing. Highlighting the Trump administration's "very different view" of the war in Ukraine compared to that of Joe Biden's, Hegseth insisted a "negotiated peaceful settlement is in the best interest of both parties and our nation's interests." Though he didn't reveal specific details of the cuts, Ukraine is already bracing for its effects and looking for options to fill the likely sizable gap in support, lawmaker Iryna Friz, a parliamentary committee member on national security, defense, and intelligence, told the Kyiv Independent. Friz said there is a "whole range" of military aid that Ukraine simply cannot obtain from other Western allies, and any reduction in these capabilities will be "painful." "But I am convinced that instead of being emotionally affected by such statements (from Hegseth) or frustrated, Ukraine must demonstrate its readiness to strengthen its defense capabilities and increase communication with its partners to continue to defend its sovereignty," Friz added. With U.S. President Donald Trump's return to the White House, Washington has sharply shifted its policy toward Ukraine. Even though Ukraine still receives military aid approved by the Biden administration, and intelligence continues to flow, Trump has already temporarily halted both once, and no new aid packages have been announced in the almost five months of Trump's presidency. Ukraine continues to hold the line against Russia's grinding and slow advances, but any reduction in U.S. aid will likely affect Kyiv's ability to fight back against Moscow's forces, as well as undermining ongoing U.S.-led peace efforts. "This reduction of military support might undermine our defensive capabilities, which, in turn, might translate into more casualties both among our soldiers and civilians," lawmaker Oleksandr Merezhko, the chair of the parliament's foreign affairs policy, told the Kyiv Independent. "When (Russian President Vladimir) Putin is preparing for a summer offensive, according to some sources, it sends the wrong signal, because Putin might take it as encouragement to double down on the war efforts," Merezhko added. Read also: Ukraine's SBU releases fresh video of Operation Spiderweb, teases 'new surprises' Since the start of the full-scale invasion, the U.S. has given Ukraine around $74 billion in military aid, and has provided weapons that have changed the course of events both on the front line and in cities hundreds of kilometers away from it. Washington has sent Ukraine several million rounds of ammunition, tanks, armored vehicles, long-range ATACMS missiles, HIMARS, and cutting-edge Patriot air defense systems that are Ukraine's only effective defense against Russian ballistic missiles. But under the Trump administration, as well as not receiving new military aid packages, some weapons that were intended for Ukrainian troops have been diverted elsewhere. According to Zelensky, while then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin was in the office, the U.S. pledged to give Ukraine 20,000 missiles to defend against Shahed-type drones, which Russia launches almost every night against Ukrainian cities. "It was inexpensive, but it is a special technology. We were counting on these 20,000 missiles," Zelensky said in an interview with ABC published on June 8. "This morning, my defense minister told me that the U.S. has moved them to the Middle East." Ukrainian soldiers interviewed by The Kyiv Independent criticized Washington's recent moves but were not surprised. "Trump and his entire team are ridiculous cowards. They want to make a deal with (Vladimir) Putin on his terms and sacrifice part of Ukraine. It is more profitable for them," Bart, a Special Forces sniper fighting in Ukraine's East, said. "Reducing American aid is bad for the front line. We depend on it, on their intelligence," he added. Ihor, a Ukrainian soldier who also serves on the eastern front, echoed Bart's stance, adding the new U.S. policies will have "dire consequences" for the global order. "The U.S. is positioning itself as weak, which will allow dictatorships worldwide to increase pressure (on other countries), and America will not interfere," he said. In light of the U.S,'s shifting stance, Ukraine's European allies have pledged to step up military support but countries on the continent are dogged by a decades-long underinvestment in defense production capability. Ukraine is therefore looking for other options, such as developing its own domestic military production and purchasing American weapons with the help of European partners. In early June, a Ukrainian delegation led by Presidential Office head Andriy Yermak visited the U.S. to discuss further support for Ukraine's defense and potential purchases of American weapons. "We are ready to buy some of it, especially missile defense equipment. The congressmen understand (the issue) and want to move forward with providing Ukraine with everything it needs," Yermak said on June 6 on national television. However, following the Ukrainian delegation's visit, there has been no further action or response from Washington on potential arms supplies or weapons sales to Ukraine and its allies. Natalia Yermak contributed to this story. Read also: America's weak strongman We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

U.S. to Withdraw Diplomats from Iraq Amid Iran Tensions
U.S. to Withdraw Diplomats from Iraq Amid Iran Tensions

New York Times

time37 minutes ago

  • New York Times

U.S. to Withdraw Diplomats from Iraq Amid Iran Tensions

The State Department has decided to reduce its diplomatic presence in Iraq, the department said in a statement on Wednesday, as tensions spike amid signs that nuclear diplomacy between the United States and Iran may be deadlocked. Word of the U.S. decision, along with a warning from the United Kingdom about new threats to Middle East commercial shipping, came hours after President Trump said in a podcast released Wednesday that he has grown 'less confident' about the prospects for a deal with Iran that would limit its ability to develop nuclear weapons. American and Iranian negotiators have been planning to meet later this week for another round of talks, although Mr. Trump told reporters on Monday that Iran had adopted an 'unacceptable' negotiating position. The British warning came from the country's maritime trade agency, which issued a public advisory saying that it had 'been made aware of increased tensions within the region which could lead to an escalation of military activity having a direct impact on mariners.' The advisory urged commercial vessels transiting the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and the Strait of Hormuz to use heightened caution. The sense of alarm was heightened by comments from Iran's defense minister, General Aziz Nasirzadeh, who warned on Wednesday that in the event of a conflict following failed nuclear talks, the United States would suffer heavy losses from Iranian attacks on U.S. bases in the Middle East. His comments were reported by Iran's Islamic Republic News Agency. The State Department did not provide details on how many personnel would be removed from Iraq, or why. The Associated Press reported on Wednesday that nonessential U.S. personnel would be withdrawn from Baghdad, and that nonessential personnel and family members of diplomats had been authorized to depart from U.S. embassies in Bahrain and Kuwait.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store