Do not take risk of importing divisive politics, Swinney tells Hamilton voters
First Minister John Swinney has warned voters in Hamilton not to 'take the risk' on voting for Reform in a 'critical' by-election this week.
Voters are due to go to the polls in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse on Thursday, with the SNP, Labour and Reform vying to send an MSP to Holyrood.
The tone in the campaign has regularly turned nasty as the two leading parties try to fend off the threat of Reform, with the Nigel Farage-led party being accused of racism following an attack ad on Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar.
Speaking to journalists during a visit to a children's soft play charity in Hamilton, South Lanarkshire, the First Minister was asked what he would say to people who were fed up with politics and politicians to the point where Reform becomes a viable option.
'I'd say to those people, first of all, I understand how they're feeling, because standards of living have not improved in the way that people would have had reasonable expectations,' he said.
'Why is that the case? It's because of Brexit – and Nigel Farage is the author of Brexit.
'I would say to those people, don't go to the guy for a solution who gave you the problem in the first place.'
He added: 'I would also say, don't take the risk of importing divisive politics into our country, because it's far too important for all of us to stick together.'
The First Minister also stressed the importance of the by-election to his own party, who at last year's general election haemorrhaged MPs, dropping from 48 to just nine just weeks after Mr Swinney took over as leader.
'It's very important, I view it as critical,' he said.
'I've been here a lot and we've fought a big campaign here.'
He said the party has fought so hard in the constituency in honour of former minister Christina McKelvie, whose death sparked the contest, as well as it being a 'big political test for us'.
'A year ago, we suffered a huge defeat in the Westminster general election,' he said.
'We've learned lessons from that, we've gathered ourselves, we've addressed different priorities, we've focused very much on the concerns of the public.
'I set out, when I became First Minister a year ago, that I had to rebuild the relationship between the public and the Scottish National Party and the Scottish Government, and that's what I'll do.'
Meanwhile, Mr Farage is due to visit Hamilton on Monday during a visit to Scotland after addressing the media in Aberdeen.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is also in Scotland, announcing the outcome of the UK Government's strategic defence review, but he is not expected to campaign in the seat.
Speaking at a shipyard in the Govan area of Glasgow, the Prime Minister said on Monday morning: 'I can't imagine anybody who seriously wants to be prime minister of this country coming to Scotland and saying that the first priority is not the safety and security of Scotland, consider the consequences of somebody as prime minister saying that.
'And remind ourselves that at this time of renewed threat and instability across Europe the SNP's position is to get rid of our nuclear deterrent, the single most important part of our capability that has kept Scotland and the United Kingdom safe for many, many years.'
Reform, he said, 'want to spend tens of billions of pounds but won't say where the money is coming from, completely unfunded, uncosted – that is what Liz Truss did, that's what blew up the economy'.
Asked why he was not campaigning on the doorstep in the by-election contest, he said: 'My firm belief is only Labour can beat the SNP in Hamilton.
'My firm belief is that my job as Prime Minister is to deliver for the whole of Scotland, including Hamilton and everybody involved in that by-election.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
In emergency appeal, Trump asks Supreme Court to let him gut Education Department
WASHINGTON − The Trump administration on June 6 asked the Supreme Court to let it dismantle the Education Department and fire hundreds of its workers. President Donald Trump is trying to fulfil his campaign promise to end the Education Department and move school policy to the states. In an emergency appeal, the administration said the court should lift a judge's order blocking Trump from carrying out those moves while they're being challenged by Democratic-led states, school districts and teachers' unions. "The Constitution vests the Executive Branch, not district courts, with the authority to make judgments about how many employees are needed to carry out an agency's statutory functions, and whom they should be," Solicitor General John Sauer told the Supreme Court. U.S. District Judge Myong Joun said the White House's decision to fire more than 1,300 workers in March has prevented the federal government from effectively implementing legally required programs and services. Such changes can't be made without the approval of Congress, which created the department in 1979, Joun ruled. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals backed that decision. The court said the administration provided no evidence to counter Joun's "record-based findings about the disabling impact" of the mass firings and the transfer of some functions to other agencies. "What is at stake in this case, the District Court found, was whether a nearly half-century-old cabinet department would be permitted to carry out its statutorily assigned functions or prevented from doing so by a mass termination of employees aimed at implementing the effective closure of that department," Judge David Barron wrote for the panel of three circuit judges. An executive order Trump signed in March directed Education Secretary Linda McMahon to "facilitate the closure of the Department of Education." Republicans have long accused the federal government of holding too much power over local and state education policy, even though the federal government has no control over school curriculum. McMahon announced roughly half the agency's workforce would be eliminated through a combination of mass layoffs and voluntary buyouts. That would have reduced the staff from 4,133 workers when Trump began his second term in January to 2,183 workers. The administration also wants the Small Business Administration to take over student loans and move special education services to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. More: Trump can't erase the Education Department with an executive order. Here's why. Joun's order blocked the administration from transferring those functions and required the department to reinstate fired workers. The appeals court said Trump doesn't have to have as many Education Department employees as the previous administration but can't cut so many that the agency can't function as Congress intended. The Justice Department told the Supreme Court that the harms to the government from having to rehire the workers as the litigation continues are greater than any harms the challengers said they'll suffer from diminished department services. More: What will happen at my school if Trump closes the Department of Education? The Education Department is legally required to ensure that students and teachers with disabilities are treated fairly and that low-income schools get the resources they need to keep pace with more affluent ones. The agency also issues regulations for colleges to hold them accountable for preparing graduates for well-paying jobs. And it functions like a giant bank, doling out billions of dollars to help people pay for college. Even if the Education Department were reorganized, which would take an act of Congress, its obligations under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 would have to continue elsewhere. The law passed during the Johnson administration requires the government to administer student loan programs, issue grants and ensure that schools receiving federal money don't discriminate against students. Contributing: Zachary Schermele This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump asks Supreme Court to let him gut Education Department


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Carney to Fast-Track ‘Nation-Building' Projects Through Bill
Prime Minister Mark Carney announced legislation on Friday to fast-track 'nation-building' projects in Canada and remove internal barriers to trade in an effort to shore up the country's economy from the US tariff barrage. The bill that aims to build 'one Canadian economy' targets projects that may include ports, railways, highways, critical-mineral mines, oil pipelines and electricity transmission systems. The government's overall goal is to speed up approvals to two years.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump asks Supreme Court to green light Education Department firings
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to give the go-ahead to carry out a plan to fire almost 40 percent of the Education Department's workforce. In an emergency appeal filed Friday morning, Solicitor General John Sauer asked the high court to lift a preliminary injunction a federal judge in Boston issued last month after determining that such sweeping staffing cuts would cripple the agency's ability to carry out functions assigned to it by Congress. While Trump has vowed to eliminate the Education Department, Sauer insisted that the proposed, wide-ranging reductions in force target 'inefficiency' and are not an attempt to kneecap the agency as the president advocates for its demise. Sauer said Boston-based U.S. District Judge Myong Joun's order was part of a pattern of federal judges overstepping their proper role and second-guessing executive branch decisions. The Constitution 'does not empower district courts to presume that all 1,400 employees must be reinstated to their previous jobs and functions based on anecdotal speculation about impairment of some of the Department's services,' Sauer wrote, adding: 'The Department remains committed to implementing its statutorily mandated functions.' Joun issued the injunction May 22 in connection with lawsuits brought by Democratic-led states, the Somerville, Massachusetts, public school system and several labor unions. Noting that Trump has repeatedly vowed to shutter the Education Department 'immediately,' the Biden appointee concluded that the layoffs amounted to 'an attempt … to shut down the Department without Congressional approval.' The 1st Circuit Court of Appeals refused to block Joun's order, although the administration's appeal remains pending. In April, the Supreme Court stepped in at the administration's request to block an order Joun issued in a separate lawsuit involving the Education Department. That directive required the agency to keep funding certain teaching-related grants that Trump appointees had sought to terminate. Four of the high court's nine justices dissented from the stay blocking Joun's order in that case. In an emergency appeal already pending at the Supreme Court, the Trump administration is trying to lift a block a federal judge in San Francisco issued on tens of thousands of layoffs at all major federal agencies except for the Education Department.