logo
The loneliest people (and places) in America

The loneliest people (and places) in America

Washington Post21-03-2025

America's purported loneliness epidemic, with its fuzzy definitions and clashing claims, is the type of gnarly challenge that's guaranteed to both attract and destroy data journalists.
So we appreciated the simplicity of D.C. reader Omika Suryawanshi's question on the subject: How many American adults feel lonely?
We didn't have a great answer back in 2022 when Suryawanshi posed this question. But last month, we were rummaging around in the Census Household Pulse survey after the Trump administration briefly took it offline and axed its questions about sexual orientation and gender identity. And we discovered that recent Pulse surveys shed some light on loneliness.
In 2024, the Pulse asked more than half a million American adults how often they felt lonely. For most of us, the answer was rarely (34 percent) or never (26 percent), suggesting that a robust 60 percent of us either never feel lonely or take the occasional twinge of loneliness in stride.
Only 5 percent say they always feel lonely, while 8 percent usually feel that way.
In maps, people who are 'always' lonely tend to live in the Sun Belt, with a particular focus on the belt's defiant Deep South buckle. Mississippi, Louisiana and Georgia lead the pack. As a rule, this extreme loneliness tends to be higher in states with higher poverty rates.
On the other side, the states where people are 'rarely' lonely tend to be in the northern half of the country, peaking in Minnesota, Vermont, Iowa and Utah — though if we include places that aren't states, D.C. tops the list. It relates strongly to other measures of community cohesion: These places also tend to have the highest rates of volunteering and organizational membership.
The states where folks are 'never' lonely follow a similar pattern, but a few oddballs come out on top — notably Florida.
Florida surprised us. We figured loneliness would increase by age, and because Florida has one of the nation's oldest populations, we expected loneliness to run high in the Sunshine State. After all, folks over age 65 are 2½ times as likely to live alone than folks ages 25 to 54. And living alone struck us — perhaps simplistically — as a logical cause of loneliness.
And indeed, our early explorations showed age predicted loneliness quite well. But not in the way we thought.
Among our youngest compatriots (ages 18 to 24), about 28 percent say they always or usually feel lonely. That's four times the rate of retirement-age folks! In fact, retirement-age Americans are about three times as likely to 'never' feel lonely as college-age folks.
Unfortunately, the Household Pulse, which was born from the pandemic, wasn't around when today's retirees were teens, so we can't say whether humans in general become less lonely as they age or — as might seem more likely — today's youngsters are growing up in a more alienating environment.
We also see enormous gaps by household income and education. The more you earn, the less alone you feel. People who don't earn at all are particularly likely to feel lonely — especially if they lost their jobs through layoffs or company closures, are sick or disabled, or can't work because they don't have access to transportation.
Marital status matters too. At any age, single people feel more lonely. And once you account for the fact that younger folks are lonelier, it doesn't seem to make a huge difference whether you're single because you never married, or because you're separated, divorced or widowed.
Looking at people who identify as LGBTQ, the data at first suggested that they tend to be lonelier. But it's largely because self-identified LGBTQ folks tend to be younger. Similarly, race and gender don't seem to have a huge impact — though we do find that men, especially older ones, are much more likely to report that they're never lonely, while women of all ages are more likely to say they're sometimes lonely.
Contrary to the headlines, we see little reason to single out the loneliness of young men. They look an awful lot like young women, except that they're 'never' or 'rarely' lonely at higher rates. Most of the biggest gender gaps actually open as we age.
Why are young people so much lonelier? Could it be related to how much time we spend alone?
Probably not!
The hours per day you spend alone increase steadily with age. (Though the gap isn't as wide as it used to be, as our frenemy John Burn-Murdoch at the Financial Times has reported.)
And the amount of time we spend alone has remained shockingly constant for as long as the Bureau of Labor Statistics has been tracking it in its modern format. In 2003, the average working-age adult (age 25 to 64) spent 4.4 free hours a day by themselves. By 2023, after two decades of reports of epidemic loneliness and solo bowling, that number had inched up to 4.6 hours.
To be sure, you'll notice some verbal asterisks in that previous paragraph.
First, we specify free time. That's because there's one area of our lives in which our time alone has changed substantially: work.
In just a decade, we've gone from spending an average of 1.8 hours alone at work to spending 3.5 hours alone at work. Most of the increase came amid the pandemic-driven remote-work revolution. (If you see reports that Americans are spending more time alone since the pandemic, it's really about remote work.)
Next, we specify working age. That's because younger men have started spending so much time alone, engaged in a single activity, that it throws the numbers off for everybody. That activity is, of course, gaming.
No matter how much time you think young men devote to video games, you're probably underestimating it. Two decades ago, high-school- and college-age males (ages 15 to 24) spent about a quarter of an hour a day alone playing games. Now, that figure has more than quintupled to 1.4 hours a day.
(You may be pondering the political implications of gaming, given young men's rightward shift. But, for the record, YouGov's David Montgomery tells us a poll just last month found that 'Democrats and Republicans show very similar rates of gaming.')
With both activities — gaming and remote working — you can quibble about whether folks are really alone. Many of the work-from-homers are mumbling into Zoom mics while their gamer sons (and, more rarely, gamer daughters) holler into headsets.
But regardless how many digital friends are present, humans are awful at keeping themselves company. We're less happy when we're alone than when we're with almost anyone else. The one exception? Hanging out with work people (including colleagues, bosses, employees and customers) outside of work.
The best company is child relatives who aren't descended from you — e.g., nieces and nephews or younger cousins — followed by hanging out with your partner and children together. (We're happier with both than when we're alone with either a spouse or a child separately.)
Playing games scores okay on happiness. People say it makes them about as happy as cooking or (non-grocery) shopping, a bit happier than yard work and reading and significantly less happy than physical activity, child care or socializing.
However, out of 26 activities for which we have sufficient data over the past two decades, gamers rate gaming as the least meaningful thing they can do with their time. It's not hard to connect a dot or two, then, and assume spending time alone, glaring into a screen, might makes us lonelier.
But in general, loneliness doesn't seem to correlate with time spent alone. People of any age rate alone time similarly on the happiness scale, with the slight exception of retirement-age folks, who are happier than average when alone. (People who have 'achieved' retirement are also less lonely than people with any other employment status, including working, unemployed or disabled.)
Instead, loneliness seems to go hand in hand with a lack of social, economic and community strength. As another Pulse question shows, retirement-age Americans are twice as likely as their young friends to say they always 'get the social and emotional support' they need.
Across the data, nothing we tested relates more strongly to loneliness than a lack of social support. When you ask who's 'always' lonely, more than half of the people who say they never get social support raise their hands.
Hi! The Department of Data still needs good old-fashioned queries! Why are older women much more likely to live with their siblings than are older men? Why are fentanyl deaths suddenly falling? What time of day do kids usually wake up? What are you curious about? Just ask!
If your question appears in a column, we'll send you an official Department of Data button and ID card. This week, we owe one to Omika and to Therese Beauclair in Monterey, California, who asked about maps and demographic breakdowns.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Are dads doing enough? What the data tells us about the state of modern fatherhood.
Are dads doing enough? What the data tells us about the state of modern fatherhood.

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Are dads doing enough? What the data tells us about the state of modern fatherhood.

As Father's Day approaches, American dads insist they're doing a lot more parenting than the men who raised them, according to a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll. Some dads even claim they're doing more than the women they're parenting with. Yet the survey of 1,560 U.S. adults also taps into the complexities and contradictions of contemporary fatherhood, revealing that even the most egalitarian dads might see themselves in ways that don't quite match up with how others see them. Their partners included. I know a little something about this. One of my duties as national correspondent for Yahoo News is to collaborate on our monthly polls with YouGov, a leading public-opinion firm. I write the questions, then analyze and report on the results. At the same time, my wife and I are trying our best to help our two kids — a 9-year-old girl and an 8-year-old boy — grow up to be good people. Like many other millennial parents — I just turned 43 — we aspire to contribute equally to that effort. And so I figured Father's Day would be as good a time as any to ask my fellow dads some of the questions I'm always asking myself. How much are we really doing these days? And is it enough? Gender roles are a perennial topic in the parenting world, and the general consensus is that even though more opposite-sex couples than ever believe in 50/50 parenting — and even though dads have become more involved over the years — moms still do most of the domestic labor. According to a 2023 study by the Pew Research Center, for example, wives in so-called egalitarian marriages — that is, couples where each partner earns about the same amount of money — still spend more than twice as much time on housework than their husbands, and almost two hours more per week on caregiving, including tending to children. 'Egalitarian' husbands, meanwhile, spend three-and-a-half more hours per week on 'leisure activities' than their wives. Yet there may be more to the data than meets the eye, at least based on the results of the new Yahoo News/YouGov poll. For one thing, nearly two-thirds of American dads (63%) now say they spend more time with their kids than their fathers spent with them — and a full 37% describe that generational difference as 'significant.' Dads feel like they're putting in the hours and making progress. What's more surprising, however, is that a third of fathers (34%) also say they carry more than half of their family's "mental load," while another four in 10 (39%) say they shoulder about half. Combined, that's roughly three-quarters of dads who believe the balance is either 50/50 or skewed in their direction. In contrast, just 28% of dads admit to bearing less than half (14%) or none (4%) of their family's mental load. It's fair to say those numbers contradict what researchers have found — and what most moms would tell us if we asked them the same questions about the fathers in their lives. When I shared the poll with my wife and asked how she would answer for me, we agreed on everything — except mental load. And when I told her how many dads seem to believe they shoulder at least half the mental load, she scoffed. My sense is that this disparity reveals a lot about the state of dads today. For the record, I don't really think I take on more of the mental load than my wife — not as the term is typically defined. But I also think the tasks we typically define as 'mental load' fail to fully capture what dads tend to contribute. Here's how the poll put it: 'Mental load refers to the cognitive and emotional effort involved in managing and coordinating household tasks, responsibilities and relationships. As a father, how much of your family's mental load do you believe you carry?' Again, nearly three out of four dads say they do half or more of this invisible labor — these hidden forms of care. Yet when asked which specific parenting responsibilities they 'regularly take on,' relatively few fathers with children aged 18 or younger pick things like 'make the kids' doctor appointments' (36%), 'sign up the kids for camps/school activities/lessons' (26%), 'schedule playdates with the kids' friends' (18%), 'volunteer for school activities' (15%) or 'book babysitters/child care' (10%) — i.e., the classic mental load stuff. Instead, these dads are much more inclined to say they "play with the kids" (72%), "help with homework" (54%), "take the kids on outings" (52%), 'put the kids to bed' (44%) and 'make dinner' (42%). So it's not like dads are deluded. When asked point-blank about their role — Who are your kids closer to? Who spends more time parenting? Who would your kids' school call first? — a majority of fathers answer either 'me' or 'it's about equal.' But an even larger majority answer either 'it's about equal' or 'their mother.' In other words, dads understand that the parenting scales still aren't perfectly balanced. Why, then, do so many dads seem to think that we're carrying more of the mental load than we get credit for? My guess is that we consider that category to be a little more capacious than our partners do. For the initial draft of the Yahoo News/YouGov Father Day's poll, my editors — both moms — floated a fairly narrow set of options for the 'parenting responsibilities' question: booking babysitters, volunteering at school, making doctor appointments and so on. I responded with some additional choices that 'might capture more of what most dads do': playing with the kids, going on outings, cleaning up after dinner, etc. I also told my editors that 'in general, I think mental load conversations miss things like this (even if they are more about household management than parenting, per se): take care of the house, take care of the yard, take care of the car, take care of the garbage, take care of the finances. We didn't end up asking dads about those duties. But looking back, I can't help but wonder if they would have polled even higher than, say, playing with the kids — and if they were the kinds of responsibilities our dad respondents had in mind when assessing their own share of the mental load. For me, I think the answer is yes. In 2010, I wrote an essay for Newsweek explaining why marriage mattered so much to me; it was a direct rebuttal to a piece by two of my female colleagues about why the institution is 'quite simply, no longer necessary." I agreed with my coworkers that all of marriage's 'antiquated ancillary benefits — its grubby socioeconomic justifications' — no longer really applied. But that, I argued, was 'the point.' 'Dustin and I are not 'getting anything' out of this deal,' I explained. 'Or at least we're not getting what previous generations of men and women were conditioned to expect. I'm not getting a cooking, cleaning, child-rearing machine. She's not getting a bringer-home of the bacon. I clean. Both of us cook. Sometimes, Dustin earns more money than I do. Sometimes she doesn't. We both go to work every day. We both have careers. And when we have children, we'll both take turns staying home to raise them. 'In other words,' I continued, 'our roles within the relationship are not defined by gender. They're defined by who we are as people. … In a world where the practical reasons for marriage no longer apply, the only reason left is love.' Fifteen years and two kids later, nearly every word of that essay still rings true to me. I do all of the laundry — and almost all of the cleaning. She packs lunches; I make dinner. She works longer hours. I drop off the kids at school in the morning, then pick them up in the afternoon. I coach their soccer teams. She plays with them more. We both read books at bedtime. But if I'm being honest with myself, our 'roles within the relationship' are still somewhat 'defined by gender.' As my wife was quick to point out when I shared the mental load results with her, she's the one who makes the doctor appointments, schedules the playdates, books the babysitters and signs up for summer camps. 'OK,' I said. 'But what about all the 'invisible labor' I do?' I mentioned the finances, the house, the yard, the car, the garbage. 'That doesn't have anything to do with parenting,' she responded. 'It's household management,' I responded. 'Someone has to do it.' 'But someone would have to do it even if we didn't have kids,' she said. I think we both have a point here. I feel like I'm doing about half of the hands-on parenting, plus a bunch of hidden work that keeps our lives running smoothly. She feels like she's doing about half of the hands-on parenting, plus a bunch of hidden work that keeps our kids' lives running smoothly. We've gravitated toward these roles — mine indirectly related to parenting, hers directly — because of gender. Or, more specifically, because of gender expectations. The truth is, I don't feel judged for not volunteering at school, or not packing a particularly healthy lunch, or not hosting a playdate. My wife does. She even judges herself. As a dad, I tend to feel OK about how much I do. As a mom, she tends to feel guilty for not doing more. We've inherited and internalized different standards of what it means to be a parent — and hers are higher. That's hard to shake. Egalitarian dads might think they're shouldering half of the mental load, or more. But as hard as we're lifting, most of us still don't know what that feels like. __________________ The Yahoo News survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,560 U.S. adults interviewed online from May 22-27, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 2.9%.

Love dipping sauces? Try these weird food combinations
Love dipping sauces? Try these weird food combinations

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Love dipping sauces? Try these weird food combinations

French fries with tartar sauce, scrambled eggs and barbecue sauce and pickles with buffalo sauce were found to be some of the weirdest combinations Americans love to eat. The study of 2,000 Americans divided respondents by how much they love a good sauce and how dedicated they are to making it a part of as many meals as possible. Respondents shared their other creations like Worcestershire sauce on macaroni, pita bread with honey mustard and ranch dressing in ramen noodles. Of those who enjoy eating sauce with their food regularly — even with their culinary concoctions — 79% said they're proud sauce lovers. Conducted by Talker Research for Sweet Baby Ray's, the survey found that their love for sauce shows that two-thirds of respondents shared that they've chosen a meal specifically based on what sauce they were craving (67%). Americans have a strong dedication to their sauces, a study shows. Prostock-studio – According to those surveyed, sauce always belongs on french fries (73%), chicken nuggets (67%) and hot dogs (61%). For chicken wings, barbecue sauce (27%) and honey barbecue (20%) are some of the most popular. Chicken wings (59%), cheeseburgers (55%) and tacos (53%) ranked high on what respondents simply won't eat without sauce. Some foods are seen as just a vehicle to eat sauce, like french fries (68%), chicken nuggets (66%) and chicken wings (60%). Americans take their sauce so seriously that eight in 10 even agree that sauce has the power to make or break a meal (78%). Barbecue sauce is among America's top favorite sauces, with 729 respondents ranking it in their top five. When voting on their favorite sauces for different foods, barbecue sauce (30%) was found to be a must for chicken nuggets, followed by ranch (30%) and honey mustard (25%). Ketchup is easily the crowd favorite for french fries (81%), while marinara is the clear winner for mozzarella sticks (47%) — although others enjoy them with ranch (23%) or ketchup (10%). While a third of respondents agree that chicken wings belong with ranch as the best sauce (32%), 27% enjoy them with barbecue sauce as the best sauce. 'Whether it's BBQ sauce, hot sauce, or ketchup, to name a few, Americans love sauce,' said Dan Gollinger, brand manager at Sweet Baby Ray's. 'According to the recent survey, 78% of people say sauce can make or break a meal. We understand this mindset and are shining a light on it.' 78% of people say sauce can make or break a meal. ¿¿¿¿¿ ¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿ – Currently, the average person surveyed has eight different kinds of sauce in their fridge. The survey also looked at personality differences between those who call themselves 'sauce people' (61%) and those who don't. 'Sauce people' are more likely to be Type A (28% vs. 22%), while those who prefer their food sauceless are more likely to be Type B (52% vs. 48%). Despite their meticulous personality type, one in five sauce lovers consider themselves to be impulsive, and are likelier to be more adventurous (73% vs. 47%). Those who eat more sauce also tend to be more likely to smile (32% vs. 28%) and laugh (23% vs. 16%) more than 10 times a day. More 'sauce people' are also likelier to say they are generally 'very happy' (35% vs. 28%), although non-sauce lovers tend to be likelier to have at least 25 'good days' in an average month (35% vs. 29%). The stars may also dictate your preferences, as water signs swept for the most likely to say that they're 'sauce people,' while Leos (10%) and Virgos (10%) are more averse to sauces on their food. 'People are building entire meals around their favorite sauce. Ultimately, sauce deserves more credit,' said Gollinger. 'A sweet, tangy BBQ sauce can add depth to grilled meats, while a bold hot sauce can completely wake up a sandwich or salad. We like to say people should 'think sauce first.'' FOODS AMERICANS USUALLY ADD SAUCE TO French fries — 73% Chicken nuggets — 67% Hot dogs — 61% Chicken wings — 59% Cheeseburgers — 55% Tacos — 53% Nachos — 50% Deli sandwiches — 36% Pizza — 31% Vegetables — 29% Survey methodology: Talker Research surveyed 2,000 general population Americans; the survey was commissioned by Sweet Baby Ray's and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between May 15 and May 19, 2025.

Why is Gen Z getting more religious? We asked them.
Why is Gen Z getting more religious? We asked them.

Vox

time2 hours ago

  • Vox

Why is Gen Z getting more religious? We asked them.

is the host of Explain It to Me, your hotline for all your unanswered questions. She joined Vox in 2022 as a senior producer and then as host of The Weeds, Vox's policy podcast. A parishioner prays during a visit to the Holy Name Cathedral in Chicago on May 8, 2025, after learning that Pope Leo XIV, who was born in Chicago, had been named as first American leader of the Catholic Church.A couple weeks ago, I did something I try to do at least once a month: I went to the church I'm a member of in person instead of online. Growing up, church was a regular part of my life, and not just on Sundays. My father is a pastor, so it was common to spend a weekday evening doing my homework in my dad's office, music from choir rehearsal pouring in as I finished whatever worksheet was due the next day. It's an institution that shaped me: It's where I made a lot of friends, it gave me my first taste of public speaking, and since pastors in my denomination are moved from church to church, it also determined what city I lived in and where I went to school. When I was a kid, attendance was obviously less in my control. If I didn't go to church on Sunday, that meant no hanging with friends the following week. 'If you can't make time for the Lord, how can you make time for something else?' was my mother's refrain. The choice is mine now. I enjoy hearing the songs that were the soundtrack for so much of my childhood. I like saying hello to the people I see week after week. I like the Black liberation theology interpretation of the Bible that I hear every Sunday. And my experience, it turns out, is not unique. As we discussed in the most recent episode of Explain It to Me, Vox's call-in podcast, Gen Z has been finding religion these last few years. It's a phenomenon that reverses some recent trends — and one for which experts are trying to find an explanation. The changing face of religion in America It's a development that Ryan Burge has been keeping his eye on. He was a Baptist pastor for 20 years, and now he's an associate professor of political science at Eastern Illinois University. Burge stepped away from ministry because the attendance in his church was declining: Members were aging, and there weren't a lot of young people to keep it alive. 'It's almost like every year, you expect [the share of Christians in the country] to be one point lower than the prior year, or two points lower than the prior year,' Burge told me. 'Every generation is less Christian than the prior generation, going all the way back to the early 1900s. And what's fascinating is that the drop is very consistent.' According to Burge, Catholicism is seeing a huge rise in young men. Now, though, Burge says that not only is that decline tapering off, but 'on some metrics, this data says that young people are actually more likely to be weekly religious attenders than millennials are. This is huge — we've never seen that before. We always assumed religion's going to continue to decline, and it doesn't look like that decline is continuing.' When we asked Explain It to Me listeners about their own experiences with spirituality, we got a wide array of responses. 'I did not grow up going to church. My family never went to church when I was younger, but I always had questions and felt like something bigger was out there,' one listener told us. 'So as soon as I could drive myself, I went to church and started looking for those answers.' Another — a self-described 'cradle Catholic' who has made her way back to religion — called in to say that, 'I understand why a lot of young people are actually going back to religion. It's because there's no other place to turn to in order to see what's wrong with life.' Why is religion making a comeback? So what's behind this uptick? The hypotheses are legion. 'To be a young person is to rebel against your parents,' Burge says. 'In my generation it was like, 'Oh, I grew up very hardcore Catholic or evangelical and so I became an atheist.' That was the most rebellious thing you can do. But imagine if you are a second-generation atheist or third-generation atheist. You know what the most rebellious thing you can do? It's to be Orthodox Christian or be Catholic.' Gender could also be at play. Through the years, more women have been regular church attendees than men, but we're not seeing that with Gen Z. According to Burge, Catholicism is seeing a huge rise in young men. 'I wonder if politics might be driving this religious divide among young people. Women had Time's Up and Me Too. … I think a lot of men feel like they're being overlooked. And if you go to a Catholic church, it's one of the few places in society where men have a privileged position in that hierarchy.' That's a sentiment that was echoed recently during a young adult group at St. Dominic's Catholic Church in San Francisco. In the group, men outnumber women. Father Patrick Verney, who runs the group, acknowledges the shift. 'This is very different from how it's always been in the past. In the past it's always been more women than men,' he said. 'This particular trend that you're talking about is unique in the history of humanity in a certain respect, certainly in the history of Christianity.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store