Senator presses Trump admin on DOGE staffers potentially profiting from Americans' data
If you are concerned about what Elon Musk — or any of the right-wing trolls, bigots and other people he hired at the dubiously titled Department of Government Efficiency — may do with the treasure trove of Americans' data they've accessed, you're not the only one.
Data that can be used for things like training artificial intelligence tools is extremely valuable — it's practically a currency of its own these days. And having written about Musk's data-hungry enterprises, including Tesla and Twitter, I've been worried about DOGE'S widespread access to federal data. Those worries aren't limited to what DOGE staffers could theoretically do with that data, but also what Musk could do with it once he leaves.
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., sent a letter to President Donald Trump on Wednesday urging the administration to require that every 'special government employee' (like Musk) sign a certification that says they agree not to use any governmental data for personal gain.
'I write to request that you require each Special Government Employee (SGE) to sign a certification that the SGE understands and agrees that no SGE may ever use non-public information from the federal government for their own personal benefit, especially after leaving government service,' she said.
Shaheen listed the broad access Musk's team already has:
I make this request because there have been numerous reports of SGEs accessing some of the U.S. government's most sensitive information, including but not limited to data from the Social Security Administration, the Department of the Treasury's Bureau of the Fiscal Service, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Office of Personnel Management and Departments of Commerce, Education, Energy, Labor, Health and Human Services and Transportation.
The letter references The Washington Post's recent reporting about an alarming Trump administration plan to create a centralized system to house Americans' private information as collected by various federal agencies. Shaheen notes that right-wing, pro-Trump influencer Steve Bannon has also expressed concerns about what Musk and his team could do with the data and has called for Musk to sign a certification agreeing not to use the data for personal gain.
Even FBI Director Kash Patel expressed concern, prior to Musk's involvement with the government, about the billionaire's ambition to acquire people's data. Asked about those remarks by Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota during his confirmation hearing, Patel equivocated but didn't attempt to walk them back.
I imagine Trump will ultimately put Shaheen's letter in the same place he's put other strongly worded letters Democrats have sent the administration. Which is to say, I don't imagine a president who has shown no aversion to self-enrichment whatsoever and who vowed during his 2024 campaign to 'make life good' for Musk and other 'smart people' is going to do anything to prevent Musk or DOGE staffers from doing whatever they want with Americans' data.
The point here is that what is to come from DOGE's access to Americans' data should be top of mind for us all. Americans need to familiarize themselves with the concept of 'data dignity' and to internalize the importance of protecting their personal information from those who would use it to influence the public or to profit personally.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
12 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Boulder Attack Victims: What We Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A total of eight people were wounded when a pro-Palestinian attacker threw incendiary devices into a crowd gathered in solidarity with Israeli hostages in Colorado on Sunday. Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, has been charged with first degree murder among other offenses, county jail records show, over the antisemitic attack on a Boulder vigil for hostages held in Gaza. Soliman shouted "Free Palestine" during the attack, which the FBI is investigating as an act of terror. Police have not yet confirmed whether anyone died in the attack. Soliman is also facing felony charges for using explosives or incendiary devices, first degree assault, and causing serious injury to the elderly. He is being held in Boulder County Jail on a $10 million bond. Sunday's victims were aged between 52 and 88, and attending a Run for Their Lives rally, which was raising awareness of the hostages' ongoing plight. The eldest victim was a Holocaust refugee who fled Europe, Rabbi Israel Wilhelm, the Chabad director at the University of Colorado Boulder, told CBS Colorado. Six of the victims were taken to local hospitals for treatment, the Boulder Office of Disaster Management said. Their ages range from 67 to 88. Police offers at the scene of the attack in Boulder, Colorado, on Sunday. Police offers at the scene of the attack in Boulder, Colorado, on Sunday. AP This is a breaking story. More to follow.
Los Angeles Times
13 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
China says U.S. moves on computer chips and student visas ‘seriously violate' tariffs truce
TAIPEI, Taiwan — China criticized the U.S. on Monday over moves it alleged harmed Chinese interests, including issuing AI chip export control guidelines, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and planning to revoke Chinese student visas. 'These practices seriously violate the consensus,' the Commerce Ministry said in a statement, referring to a China-U.S. joint statement in which the United States and China agreed to slash their massive recent tariffs, restarting stalled trade between the world's two biggest economies. But last month's de-escalation in President Trump's trade wars did nothing to resolve underlying differences between Beijing and Washington and Monday's statement showed how easily such agreements can lead to further turbulence. The deal lasts 90 days, creating time for U.S. and Chinese negotiators to reach a more substantive agreement. But the pause also leaves tariffs higher than before Trump started ramping them up last month. And businesses and investors must contend with uncertainty about whether the truce will last. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the U.S. agreed to drop the 145% tax Trump imposed last month to 30%. China agreed to lower its tariff rate on U.S. goods to 10% from 125%. The Commerce Ministry said China held up its end of the deal, canceling or suspending tariffs and non-tariff measures taken against the U.S. 'reciprocal tariffs' following the agreement. 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' while China has stood by its commitments, the statement said. It also threatened unspecified retaliation, saying China will 'continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.' Trump stirred further controversy Friday, saying he will no longer be nice with China on trade, declaring in a social media post that the country had broken an agreement with the United States. Hours later, Trump said in the Oval Office that he will speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping and 'hopefully we'll work that out,' while still insisting China had violated the agreement. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump posted. 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' In response to recent comments by Trump, the Commerce Ministry said of the U.S.: 'Instead of reflecting on itself, it has turned the tables and unreasonably accused China of violating the consensus, which is seriously contrary to the facts.' U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the Chinese were 'just slow rolling the deal' from Geneva. Appearing on Fox News on Sunday, Lutnick said the U.S. was 'taking certain actions to show them what it feels like on the other side of that equation,' adding that Trump would 'work it out' with Xi. The Trump administration also stepped up the clash with China in other ways last week, announcing that it would start revoking visas for Chinese students studying in the U.S. U.S. campuses host more than 275,000 students from China. Both countries are in a race to develop advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, with Washington seeking to curb China's access to the most advanced computer chips. China is also seeking to displace the U.S. as the leading power in the Asia-Pacific, including through gaining control over close U.S. partner and leading tech giant Taiwan. Bodeen writes for the Associated Press.
Chicago Tribune
15 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
China says US moves on computer chips and student visas ‘seriously violate' tariffs truce
TAIPEI, Taiwan — China criticized the U.S. on Monday over moves it alleged harmed Chinese interests, including issuing AI chip export control guidelines, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and planning to revoke Chinese student visas. 'These practices seriously violate the consensus,' the Commerce Ministry said in a statement, referring to a China-U.S. joint statement in which the United States and China agreed to slash their massive recent tariffs, restarting stalled trade between the world's two biggest economies. But last month's de-escalation in President Donald Trump's trade wars did nothing to resolve underlying differences between Beijing and Washington and Monday's statement showed how easily such agreements can lead to further turbulence. The deal lasts 90 days, creating time for U.S. and Chinese negotiators to reach a more substantive agreement. But the pause also leaves tariffs higher than before Trump started ramping them up last month. And businesses and investors must contend with uncertainty about whether the truce will last. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the U.S. agreed to drop the 145% tax Trump imposed last month to 30%. China agreed to lower its tariff rate on U.S. goods to 10% from 125%. The Commerce Ministry said China held up its end of the deal, canceling or suspending tariffs and non-tariff measures taken against the U.S. 'reciprocal tariffs' following the agreement. 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' while China has stood by its commitments, the statement said. It also threatened unspecified retaliation, saying China will 'continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.' Trump stirred further controversy Friday, saying he will no longer be nice with China on trade, declaring in a social media post that the country had broken an agreement with the United States. Hours later, Trump said in the Oval Office that he will speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping and 'hopefully we'll work that out,' while still insisting China had violated the agreement. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump posted. 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' In response to recent comments by Trump, the Commerce Ministry said of the U.S.: 'Instead of reflecting on itself, it has turned the tables and unreasonably accused China of violating the consensus, which is seriously contrary to the facts.' U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the Chinese were 'just slow rolling the deal' from Geneva. Appearing on Fox News on Sunday, Lutnick said the U.S. was 'taking certain actions to show them what it feels like on the other side of that equation,' adding that Trump would 'work it out' with Xi. The Trump administration also stepped up the clash with China in other ways last week, announcing that it would start revoking visas for Chinese students studying in the U.S. U.S. campuses host more than 275,000 students from China. Both countries are in a race to develop advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, with Washington seeking to curb China's access to the most advanced computer chips. China is also seeking to displace the U.S. as the leading power in the Asia-Pacific, including through gaining control over close U.S. partner and leading tech giant Taiwan.
