Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke warns of threat to democracy after terror plot against NSW Labor MP
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke has warned that Australia's democracy is under threat following the exposure of a terror plot to kill a New South Wales Labor MP.
A plot to attack Newcastle MP Tim Crakanthorp was allegedly fuelled by the encrypted online extremist network known as Terrorgram.
It comes after Mr Burke was forced to cancel an election campaign event when he was threatened by protesters.
'I don't want Australia to become a country where Members of Parliament can't move around freely and engage with the community,' Mr Burke told Sky News Sunday Agenda.
'It's not good for democracy.'
His remarks were in response to disturbing revelations that 20-year-old Jordan Patten was charged with a terror offence after being apprehended by police in 2024.
NSW Police allege Mr Patten plotted to kill Mr Crakanthorp and was intercepted while carrying a hammer and knives nearby to the Labor MP's office.
Following his arrest, he allegedly uploaded a 205-page manifesto, citing the 2019 Christchurch mosque shooter as an inspiration.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese revealed at the time that the document included direct threats against his own family.
Mr Burke said the incident was a wake-up call for how terrorism is evolving in Australia and how online platforms are now central to extremist activity.
'Terrorgram is different to what most of your viewers would think of when they think of a terrorist organisation,' he said.
'It functions more like a giant chat group on the platform Telegram ... where they're not just spreading a whole lot of racist forms of bigotry.
'They also share how-to guides on how to conduct a terrorist attack, encouraging people to do so.'
Terrorgram has been formally listed as a terrorist organisation under Australian law, and it is an offence to be a member, associate with members or promote the group.
These offences carry maximum penalties of up to 25 years in prison.
'We're not in a situation now where we're waiting for someone to actually try to do something horrific,' Mr Burke said.
'Mere membership of this set involvement in this organisation means we can charge people, and send them to jail.'
The listing follows a series of escalating antisemitic and extremist incidents in Australia, with Terrorgram already proscribed as a terrorist entity by the US and the UK.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
41 minutes ago
- The Age
It's time, Sussan Ley: What Gough Whitlam can teach her about saving a lost party
In 1967, Gough Whitlam was in a strikingly similar position to Sussan Ley today. The newly installed Labor leader was little known to the public. He bore no resemblance to his unpopular predecessor. His objective was to modernise a party that had lost touch with modern Australia. illo from Joe Benke Whitlam came to the leadership after Labor had suffered a devastating electoral rout in 1966 – a massive landslide to Harold Holt's coalition, in which the number of Labor MPs was reduced to half those of the government: almost exactly the same ratio as the opposition today. When Sussan Ley gave her first big speech as opposition leader last Wednesday, Gough Whitlam was probably the furthest thing from her mind. Her speech was as un-Whitlamesque as it is possible to be: humble, self-critical, even apologetic. Frankly acknowledging that 'what we as the Liberal Party presented to the Australian people was comprehensively rejected', Ley went on to say: 'We respect the election outcome with humility. We accept it with contrition.' I doubt we've ever heard such honest self-appraisal from an Australian political leader. Yet, to draw a line under the worst defeat in the Liberal Party's history, that was precisely what the occasion demanded, and Ley hit the mark. It tells you just how far the party had drifted from the political mainstream that the very fact the speech took place at the National Press Club – second only to parliament as the customary venue for important political addresses – was itself a story. By returning to a rostrum boycotted by her predecessor, the new leader sent an unmistakable message: we're no longer in the echo chamber; the Liberal Party is back in the game. Ley used the speech to sketch a path forward for internal reform and future policy development. One of the most important issues she dealt with was the party's future approach to emissions reduction. She announced the establishment of a working group on 'energy and emissions reduction' policy. Led by Dan Tehan – one of the Coalition's most capable politicians, who was the only frontbencher to claim a ministerial scalp in the last parliament – it is tasked with developing policies that ensure a stable energy grid to provide affordable and reliable power, while reducing emissions 'so that we are playing our part in the global effort'. Ley did not specifically mention the 2050 net zero emissions target, which has been Coalition policy since 2021, although her carefully chosen language suggested no appetite to abandon it.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
It's time, Sussan Ley: What Gough Whitlam can teach her about saving a lost party
In 1967, Gough Whitlam was in a strikingly similar position to Sussan Ley today. The newly installed Labor leader was little known to the public. He bore no resemblance to his unpopular predecessor. His objective was to modernise a party that had lost touch with modern Australia. illo from Joe Benke Whitlam came to the leadership after Labor had suffered a devastating electoral rout in 1966 – a massive landslide to Harold Holt's coalition, in which the number of Labor MPs was reduced to half those of the government: almost exactly the same ratio as the opposition today. When Sussan Ley gave her first big speech as opposition leader last Wednesday, Gough Whitlam was probably the furthest thing from her mind. Her speech was as un-Whitlamesque as it is possible to be: humble, self-critical, even apologetic. Frankly acknowledging that 'what we as the Liberal Party presented to the Australian people was comprehensively rejected', Ley went on to say: 'We respect the election outcome with humility. We accept it with contrition.' I doubt we've ever heard such honest self-appraisal from an Australian political leader. Yet, to draw a line under the worst defeat in the Liberal Party's history, that was precisely what the occasion demanded, and Ley hit the mark. It tells you just how far the party had drifted from the political mainstream that the very fact the speech took place at the National Press Club – second only to parliament as the customary venue for important political addresses – was itself a story. By returning to a rostrum boycotted by her predecessor, the new leader sent an unmistakable message: we're no longer in the echo chamber; the Liberal Party is back in the game. Ley used the speech to sketch a path forward for internal reform and future policy development. One of the most important issues she dealt with was the party's future approach to emissions reduction. She announced the establishment of a working group on 'energy and emissions reduction' policy. Led by Dan Tehan – one of the Coalition's most capable politicians, who was the only frontbencher to claim a ministerial scalp in the last parliament – it is tasked with developing policies that ensure a stable energy grid to provide affordable and reliable power, while reducing emissions 'so that we are playing our part in the global effort'. Ley did not specifically mention the 2050 net zero emissions target, which has been Coalition policy since 2021, although her carefully chosen language suggested no appetite to abandon it.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Lift defence spend to show China that Australia means business: Abbott
Australia needs to lift its defence spending so it can be a better ally while pushing back against military actions from China, former prime minister Tony Abbott has urged while expressing hope the economic giant may become the world's most benign superpower. In an address last week to the Australia China Economics Trade and Culture Association, Abbott, who signed the free trade agreement between the two nations just months before losing the prime ministership in 2015, also urged continuing financial links between the countries while cautioning Australia had to broaden its dependence on China. The Albanese government is under pressure from US President Donald Trump to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Such a sharp lift in spending would cost the budget more than $200 billion by 2035-36. Abbott said Australia had to 'protest strongly' after incidents such as the use of sonar by a Chinese warship to deliberately injure Australian navy divers in 2023, backing that action with increased defence expenditure. 'Australia does need to be militarily stronger, with more ships, more planes, more personnel, more drones and more missiles, so that we can be a better ally and stronger friend,' he said. 'If a stronger military is right for China, and for others, it's right for us too. We have to be in a position to be firm, even with a superpower.' Loading Abbott said while retaining its financial and trading links with China, Australia had to broaden its supply chains. China imposed effective bans on Australian goods worth $20 billion under the Morrison government. 'Australia should keep trading; we should keep accepting students, certainly for the humanities; we should keep accepting highly skilled immigrants, and the dependents of Australian citizens,' he said.
