logo
Verdict due in Depardieu sexual assault case

Verdict due in Depardieu sexual assault case

Local France13-05-2025

The actor is facing a possible 18-month suspended prison sentence for the alleged sexual assault of two women on a 2021 movie set -- charges he denied during the closely watched trial.
Depardieu, who has acted in more than 200 films and television series, is the highest-profile figure caught up in France's response to the #MeToo movement.
Around 20 women have accused the actor of assault or inappropriate behaviour, but this is the first case to come to court.
The trial relates to charges of sexual assault during the filming in 2021 of "Les Volets Verts" ("The Green Shutters") by director Jean Becker.
The plaintiffs are a set dresser, 54, identified only as Amelie, and a 34-year-old assistant director, who accuse the actor of sexual assault. Of the two, only Amelie is expected to be present for the verdict.
Depardieu, who is currently filming a movie in Portugal, will also attend, his lawyer Jeremie Assous told broadcaster Franceinfo.
The Paris Criminal Court will deliver its verdict from 10:00 am.
'Lack of remorse'
In March, lead prosecutor Laurent Guy recommended an 18-month suspended jail term for Depardieu, arguing that the sentence "takes into account the total lack of remorse" shown by the defendant.
He said Depardieu should also be ordered to undergo psychological treatment and be added to France's sex offender registry.
Amelie testified that Depardieu pinned her down in 2021 on set, saying, "he was very strong" and "groped" her.
She also said Depardieu made "obscene remarks" and suggestions, boasting he could "give women an orgasm without touching them".
Advertisement
The 34-year-old plaintiff said Depardieu initially assaulted her when she accompanied him from his dressing room to the set.
"It was nighttime... he put his hand on my buttocks," she said, adding that the actor assaulted her on two other occasions.
Depardieu, 76, has denied sexually assaulting the women.
"I'm vulgar, rude, foul-mouthed, I'll accept that," he told the court, but he added: "I don't touch."
"I adore women and femininity," he also said, while describing the #MeToo movement as a "reign of terror".
Throughout the trial, Depardieu has been supported by his daughter Roxane, his ex-partner Karine Silla and actor Vincent Perez.
And on Monday, he won public backing from French film star Brigitte Bardot.
"Those who have talent and put their hands on a girl's bottom are thrown in the gutter," Bardot said.
"We could at least let them get on with their lives. They can't live anymore."
Advertisement
'Sexism and misogyny'
Lawyers for the two plaintiffs denounced the approach of Depardieu's defence team.
The actor's lawyer Jeremie Assous called the two women "liars" and "hysterical", arguing they were working for the cause of "rabid feminism".
Claude Vincent, the assistant director's lawyer, said: "What we witnessed was not a defence strategy" but "an apology for sexism".
In an open letter, nearly 200 French lawyers urged the judiciary to fight what they called courtroom sexism.
Depardieu's lawyer had "used sexism and misogyny to his heart's delight" to discredit the plaintiffs and their legal team, they said.
Depardieu has also been indicted in another case following a rape complaint filed by actor Charlotte Arnould, 29. Prosecutors have requested a trial.
In April, French MPs criticised "endemic" abuse in the entertainment industry after a six-month inquiry.
Depardieu became a star in France from the 1980s, winning the Best Actor award in 1990 for his performance in "Cyrano de Bergerac".

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Dulcie September case exposes France's troubling ties with South Africa during apartheid
The Dulcie September case exposes France's troubling ties with South Africa during apartheid

LeMonde

time4 hours ago

  • LeMonde

The Dulcie September case exposes France's troubling ties with South Africa during apartheid

Five bullets to the head, fired point-blank. A .22 caliber pistol fitted with a silencer. And a pool of blood staining the landing on the fourth floor of a Parisian building. On the morning of March 29, 1988, a woman collapsed at 28 Rue des Petites-Ecuries. Dulcie September, 52, was the African National Congress (ANC) representative in the city, the face of the anti-apartheid movement there. She had just put her key in the lock of her office door when the killers struck. It was a professional job. Thirty-seven years on, her murder remains a mystery. On Tuesday, June 10, the court of appeal rejected the activist family's complaint against the French state for "denial of justice" and "gross negligence." "Impunity seems to have prevailed," said September's family lawyer, Yves Laurin, who criticized what he called a "botched investigation" after her death. In 2019, the family had already tried to have the case reopened by filing a complaint for "apartheid crime," which is not subject to a statute of limitations. That attempt failed as well.

French antiques expert who duped Versailles sentenced to jail
French antiques expert who duped Versailles sentenced to jail

France 24

time12 hours ago

  • France 24

French antiques expert who duped Versailles sentenced to jail

The ruling from the court in Pontoise, north of Paris, caps one of the biggest forgery scandals to rock the rarified world of France's top museums. Bill Pallot, 61, along with five other people as well as a prominent gallery, stood trial in the spring. Pallot and woodcarver Bruno Desnoues were convicted of having produced and authenticated chairs they sold, which they passed off as historic pieces that once adorned the rooms of the likes of Madame du Barry, the mistress of Louis XV, or of Queen Marie-Antoinette. Customers duped by the pieces included the Palace of Versailles and wealthy collectors including a member of the Qatari royal family. Pallot was sentenced to a four-year term including four months behind bars, fined 200,000 euros ($230,000) and handed a five-year ban on working as an expert. He will not go to jail having spent time in detention after his arrest. Known for his distinctive long hair and three-piece suits, Pallot has been described by magazine Vanity Fair as "the world's leading expert on the works of 18th-century France." Paris Match branded him "the Bernard Madoff of art", referring to the late American financier who devised a notorious pyramid scheme. - 'A little harsh' - Pallot said the sentence was "a little harsh financially," although he was satisfied that his apartment would not be seized, contrary to the prosecutor's demand. "We thought we'd do it for fun, to see if the art market would notice or not," Pallot has told the court. "It went without a hitch," he added. Desnoues, a prominent woodcarver, was sentenced to a three-year term including four months behind bars, and fined 100,000 euros. In court, he presented himself as a humble artisan uninterested in money and motivated only by his love of art and "the pleasure of working, of making beautiful things". A lawyer for the Palace of Versailles implied the men got away too easily, denouncing "the particularly diabolical manoeuvres" of the two main defendants and pointing to "clean, white-collar trafficking." "When you are caught red-handed, you are not sentenced to very long prison terms," said Corinne Hershkovitch. "We feel that we are not protected for the future," she added. 'Pallot's blessing' The pair pocketed nearly 1.2 million euros in commissions. Galleries and auction houses made even more, selling fake furniture pieces to the Palace of Versailles and billionaire collectors. After the French Revolution, the Palace of Versailles was completely emptied, with thousands of royal furniture pieces and other items dispersed at revolutionary sales. Nearly half of Pallot and Desnoues' fakes were acquired through various channels by the Palace of Versailles, which has since the 1950s sought to refurnish the former home of French royalty. "Indeed, Versailles's decision to purchase the chairs hinged on Pallot's blessing," Vanity Fair said in 2018. "And based on Pallot's imprimatur, the government classified two of his fake lots as national treasures." Accused of failing to carry out sufficient checks, the prestigious Kraemer antique gallery was acquitted. The public prosecutor had sought a fine of 700,000 euros. Intermediaries between the forgers and the final buyers believed they had been misled by Pallot's reputation, and charges for most of them were dismissed during the eight-year-long investigation. Unnoticed for years, the scam caused an estimated 4.5 million euros in damage. The fraud was discovered by accident during an investigation into the lavish lifestyle of a Portuguese couple who were laundering Desnoues' money. When the scandal erupted in 2016, the ministry of culture swiftly ordered an audit of Versailles's acquisitions policy.

French teen suspect in deadly stabbing said he wanted to kill 'any' school monitor
French teen suspect in deadly stabbing said he wanted to kill 'any' school monitor

France 24

time13 hours ago

  • France 24

French teen suspect in deadly stabbing said he wanted to kill 'any' school monitor

A 14-year-old French pupil detained over the killing of a teaching assistant said he had wanted to attack "any" adult school monitor after he was reprimanded for kissing his girlfriend, a prosecutor said Wednesday. "He said he acted in such a manner because he could no longer stand the behaviour of monitors in general," the prosecutor in the northeastern town of Chaumont, Denis Devallois, told reporters after the stabbing on Tuesday. Devallois said the teenager did not appear to suffer from any "mental disorder", but added the self-described fan of "violent video games" appeared "detached" and expressed "no regret" during questioning. "He said there was perhaps a link with the fact he was told off by a monitor on Friday, June 6, as he was kissing his girlfriend on school grounds. He said this monitor was not the one that became a victim on Tuesday." "He stated that he had, as early as the next day, Saturday, mulled over a plan to kill a monitor, in his own words, 'any one of them'," the prosecutor added. "He said that on Tuesday morning after breakfast he grabbed the largest knife in his home to, in his words, 'cause the most damage'".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store