
Lawmaker wants Maine to help farmers hurt by federal funding freeze
Feb. 28—A state lawmaker has submitted an after-deadline bill to create a state-funded, no-interest loan program to help Maine farmers struggling to survive a federal funding freeze that has left them on the hook for at least $1 million in unreimbursed expenses.
Sen. Stacy Brenner, D-Scarborough, says Maine farmers shouldn't face financial ruin for believing the U.S. Department of Agriculture would honor long-term contracts through agricultural programs that have enjoyed bipartisan support, some of which date to the Dust Bowl era.
Maine can't afford to lose any more farms, said Brenner, who is herself a flower farmer. Famous for its potato and wild blueberry crops, Maine had lost 500 farms and 80,000 acres of farmland from 2017-22, according to the last agricultural census.
"The best way to protect farmland is to keep it in production," said Brenner, who was named president of the Maine Farmland Trust in December. "Our farms operate on very slim margins. We can't expect them to absorb the kinds of losses caused by the federal funding freeze."
A diverse group of farmers from across Maine gathered at Fork Food Lab in South Portland, to protest these federal funding losses. The group included novices and veterans, flower and food growers, and those who tended farms as small as an acre to some who run full-scale dairies.
One by one, they stepped up to a podium above a small green sign that read "honor the contracts, pay the farmers!" to detail their anxiety and anger about the Trump administration's impoundment of promised reimbursements from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Alyssa Adkins, a third-year Freeport farmer, said her partner had just decided to leave his day job to work full-time at Farthest Field Farm. They fear one USDA conservation grant will be canceled and don't know if they'll be reimbursed for tens of thousands already spent on two other grants.
"Starting a farm is very expensive," said Adkins, who could be facing up to $30,000 in losses. "This hampers our efficiency and ability to scale up, which can be crippling for small farms like us. Without help getting off the ground, the number of farms will inevitably shrink over time."
The Milkhouse Farm & Creamery in Monmouth is awaiting reimbursement for money spent installing a 27-kilowatt solar array to offset the cost of electricity needed to operate the 250-acre dairy, beef and hog farm, said co-owner Caitlin Frame. Among other markets, it supplies yogurt to eight school districts.
"Unless this is quickly remedied, it will no doubt put some small farms out of business," Frame said. "Maine dairy farmers are not members of the financially insulated millionaires and billionaires class. Even if these funds are eventually released, the delays alone will be financially catastrophic."
'WHY AM I EVEN DOING THIS?'
Michael Levine, a novice farmer who tends a half-acre of organic vegetables in Hollis, said the freeze has left him feeling disheartened. Without grants, its hard for a beginning farmer to justify expensive conservation practices even though they know the long-term benefits.
"Without subsidies, it takes away the incentive to do it," Levine said. "Honestly, it takes away the motivation to be a farmer when you think your government isn't going to help you out at all. ... Some days you wake up in the morning and you think, 'Why am I even doing this? What's the point?'"
In time, funding cuts and farm closures will lead to higher food prices for Maine residents, farmers said.
"It's something that will creep up," said Kevin Leavitt, an organic vegetable farmer in West Gardiner waiting on a $45,000 reimbursement check for a newly installed solar array. "If we don't have faith in what we're going to have for income, obviously we're going to have to increase prices."
They are among thousands of U.S. farmers, including Mainers, hit hard by President Donald Trump's cost-cutting directives, including an executive order that froze funds from the Inflation Reduction Act, which, among other things, paid farmers to conserve soil and water and adopt renewable energy.
Nearly every farmer works with the USDA in some way, usually on an everyday basis, through technical assistance programs or loans and grants to expand their business, drill wells or adopt conservation methods, said Sarah Alexander of the Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association, which organized the event in South Portland.
Most USDA grant programs require farmers to sign a government contract detailing conditions to be met to get reimbursed for costs of approved projects. But last month, the USDA joined other federal agencies in announcing it was freezing funds — even those already promised — while it reviewed its programs.
The funding freeze was announced on Jan. 27 when the Office of Management and Budget sent a memo requiring agencies to identify and pause funding to programs that violated Trump's executive orders on topics ranging from foreign aid to "woke ideology" and the "green new deal."
YET TO BE PAID
A federal judge has ordered those federal funds to be released, and the USDA has said it plans to comply, but Alexander said Friday that Maine farmers have yet to be paid — and the amount of unreimbursed expenses for projects already approved by signed USDA contracts exceeds $1 million.
That is just a fraction of the amount owed Maine farmers in these multiyear USDA contracts, Alexander said. One conservation program alone distributed $12 million to Maine farmers in 2024, she said. When all is considered, the contractual losses likely exceed $100 million in Maine alone.
Brenner said her proposed bill won't solve all of these farmers' problems, but, if approved and funded by the Legislature, it might help the farmers survive until the Trump administration finishes its program review and the USDA abides by a court order to disburse its contractually obligated funds.
The bill is so new that it has yet to be printed. Because it was submitted after the Jan. 10 deadline for new legislation, the bill needs approval from the Legislative Council before it can be presented to the Legislature for likely referral to the Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry Committee.
Even if allowed in, there are still a lot of details in the bill to be worked out, including how it would be funded, if the loans would be forgiven if the federal funds are never released and who is eligible to apply, those promised USDA grants or only those who have already spent contractually obligated funds.
Copy the Story Link

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
WhyHunger marks 50 years of fighting for food security, a point of 'pride and shame'
NEW YORK (AP) — WhyHunger would have liked to be out of service by now. Singer-songwriter Harry Chapin and radio DJ Bill Ayres founded the grassroots support organization in 1975 with the idea they could eradicate hunger at its root by leveraging their music industry connections to fund community groups advancing economic and food security. And, yet, the global nonprofit is hitting the half-century mark this year — an anniversary that reflects the sobering need for continued food assistance. 'It is pride and shame in equal measure,' said Jen Chapin, the daughter of Harry Chapin and a WhyHunger board member, at the nonprofit's gala Wednesday night. 'That this organization is still relevant when hunger is a completely solvable problem — it's embarrassing.' Established amid transformative expansions of federal food programs just before the United States significantly cut social welfare, WhyHunger marks its 50-year milestone at a time of worsening food insecurity worldwide when some of the wealthiest countries are decreasing their humanitarian commitments. As part of the Trump administration's swift scaling back of the federal government, funding streams are being shut off for many in the nonprofit's network that help millions of hungry people access nutritious food. Chapin said the immense need, and 'that the political conversation has gone backward,' would be 'infuriating' to her late father. 'But he wouldn't pause to rant,' she said. 'He'd be like, 'OK, what can we do?'' The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates more than 47 million people, including nearly 14 million children, lived in food-insecure households in 2023 — a crisis WhyHunger blames on 'deeper systemic issues' of rising inflation, the rollback of pandemic relief and poor wages. Those statistics were 'ridiculous' to Grammy award-winning rockers Pat Benatar and Neil Giraldo. The couple, which performed its hit 'Love Is a Battlefield,' was recognized Wednesday with the ASCAP Harry Chapin Humanitarian Award, given to artists who use their influence to foster social justice. Giraldo said they've been involved with WhyHunger for 30 years. The support began with their relationship to Harry Chapin and his family, as well as their advocacy for children's causes. 'Music brings so many people together,' Benatar told the Associated Press. 'I think it's just always a good start.' 'If we can help in any way, that's what we're trying to do: just be helpers,' Giraldo added. The annual awards gala, hosted by Jazz at Lincoln Center's Frederick P. Rose Hall, raised more than $125,000 on Wednesday night alone. The proceeds directly supported WhyHunger's programs in the U.S. and 24 other countries. The nonprofit aims to not only feed people but create systems-level change by training local farmers, connecting people to government benefits, promoting indigenous food sovereignty and defending food workers' rights. 'It's not enough to feed people for a day,' Jen Chapin said. "It's not even enough to teach a man to fish so that he can get his own food. You have to also create the social movement so that there is a food system that enables that farmer, that fisherperson, to get a fair price for their work, feed their local community.' Among the benefactors were WhyHunger Board of Directors Chair Cindy Secunda and billionaire Bloomberg L.P. co-founder Tom Secunda, whose family foundation has contributed over $8 million to WhyHunger since 2020. Like many WhyHunger supporters, Cindy said she was first introduced to their work during Harry Chapin concerts in college. She would donate $10 or so, per his end-of-show requests. But she said she didn't ramp up her giving until more recently when she was invited to see the work of WhyHunger's partners up close. 'They get so much more done with such a small staff," she said. "I've never seen anything like it.' The nonprofit has not increased its staff totals much over its 50 years to 'stay nimble and serve those who are serving,' according to Chapin. The biggest change has been the philanthropic sector's overall approach to fighting food insecurity, staff say. Paternalistic, top-down attitudes toward aid were more dominant when the organization was founded. The idea that hunger is connected to issues of racism and climate was not as widespread then, according to Debbie DePoala, WhyHunger's senior director of communications The nonprofit has long centered public policy in conversations about hunger, according to Jan Poppendieck, a former board member and CUNY professor who has studied the history of food assistance. She hopes the outlook isn't lost. 'What they have done best is assist local innovative progressive organizations," Poppendieck said. 'Assist them financially because of this ability, as I say, to extract moolah from the entertainment industry, and assist them with sharing best practices, introducing them to each other, bringing them together so that people can learn from each other.' ___ Associated Press coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. For all of AP's philanthropy coverage, visit Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Shapiro files lawsuit against USDA for ending food assistance program's funding
Gov. Josh Shapiro's administration has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture for its decision to stop funding a food assistance program. The Local Food Purchasing Assistance Program provides Pennsylvania with $13 million to purchase local food, supporting 189 farms and supplying 14 food banks in the state. Shapiro's administration previously tried to appeal the USDA's decision to end its agreement with Pennsylvania. RELATED COVERAGE >>> Pittsburgh food bank seeing increase in need as Gov. Shapiro appeals federal funding cut The legal action was announced during a meeting in Philadelphia with farmers and Pennsylvania Agriculture Secretary Russell Redding. 'Pennsylvania farmers do the noble work of putting food on our tables, and for the last three years, they've been paid to provide fresh, local food to food banks across our Commonwealth as part of a successful federal initiative,' Shapiro said. 'When the USDA abruptly terminated our agreement without cause, they ripped away a reliable source of income for 189 Pennsylvania farms and cut off funding that would have helped provide over 4.4 million meals to families across the Commonwealth. That's not just bad policy, it's a broken promise. A deal is a deal, and I've taken legal action today to ensure the federal government honors its commitment to Pennsylvania.' Download the FREE WPXI News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Channel 11 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch WPXI NOW
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Shapiro sues Trump administration over canceled farm and food bank funds
Gov. Josh Shapiro announced his administration has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) over its cancellation of millions of dollars in federal funding to farmers who supply food banks throughout the state. (Commonwealth Media Services) PHILADELPHIA — Gov. Josh Shapiro announced his administration has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) over its cancellation of millions of dollars in federal funding to farmers who supply food banks throughout the state. 'I'm tired of waiting for someone to stand up for our farmers and our food banks. That task falls to us,' Shapiro said Wednesday in Philadelphia. 'The USDA and the Trump administration ignored our farmers, and they ignored folks who are hungry here in Pennsylvania.' Shapiro said his administration filed a lawsuit Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Harrisburg asking a judge to reverse the USDA's decision to cancel its contract with the commonwealth. The program, known as the Local Food Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (LFPA), was established by President Joe Biden's administration in response to concerns over the coronavirus pandemic in 2021. In December, Biden's administration renewed the contract with Pennsylvania for three years and $13 million. In March, the Trump administration announced that the program was ending. 'This lawsuit calls on the USDA to simply honor its commitment to our farmers, to honor its commitment to folks who are hungry and to simply follow the contract that they signed,' Shapiro said In Pennsylvania, LFPA provides funding that supports 189 farms and 14 food banks. Shapiro said it represented between 10% and 15% of the annual market share for many of the farmers participating in the program. The back-and-forth between Shapiro and the Trump administration over the matter has spanned multiple months. In March, Shapiro held a press conference at a food bank in Harrisburg sounding an alarm on the program's cancellation. He said his administration appealed to get the money and wrote a letter to Trump's administration in late March. In April, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins made a trip to multiple central Pennsylvania farms where she claimed the money for food banks was, in fact, available. She said Shapiro and other officials either didn't 'have their facts right,' or were playing political 'games.' Shapiro disputed the claim at the time and re-upped his criticism of Rollins' explanation Wednesday in Philadelphia. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE The LFPA initiative works as a reimbursement program, Shapiro said, so the state doesn't get the money until after it pays farmers and provides receipts. A USDA spokesperson told the Capital-Star that they 'do not comment on pending litigation,' and directed inquiries to the U.S. Department of Justice. George Maysik, executive director of Share Food Program in Philadelphia, said the food bank serves more than 500,000 people per month in the greater Philadelphia area and demand has risen over 120% in the last three years. 'The LFPA program was designed to provide some level of relief for the 14 food banks like us across the commonwealth who are serving that rising need,' Maysik said. He addressed Trump directly, criticizing his administration's decision to cancel the program. 'You had a deal with food banks serving 67 counties trying to alleviate poverty,' Maysik said. 'And above all, Mr. President, you had a deal with the American people and you broke your word.' 'The art of the deal,' he scoffed. Julie McCabe, executive director of Pennypack Farm & Education Center, explained her 13 acre vegetable farm in Montgomery County participated in the LFPA program to provide products to local food banks. 'Our produce giving program has grown tremendously,' McCabe said. 'From just over 8,000 pounds donated in 2017 to more than 26,000 pounds given in 2024.' While Shapiro said his administration has increased investments to connect farmers with hungry people, he said the state doesn't have the money to backfill the federal cuts, if the lawsuit is unsuccessful. Still, Shapiro said he has reasons to be optimistic that he would succeed. 'I've got a pretty good track record when I take Donald Trump to court,' said Shapiro, who served as the state's attorney general during Trump's first term. 'We're going to win this, and we're going to get our money back for the good people of Pennsylvania.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX