logo
South Korea's liberal-led legislature passes bills calling for special probes into Yoon and wife

South Korea's liberal-led legislature passes bills calling for special probes into Yoon and wife

Time of India2 days ago

South Korea's liberal-led legislature passes bills calling for special probes into Yoon and wife (Image: AP)
SEOUL: South Korea's liberal-led legislature on Thursday passed bills to launch special investigations into former President Yoon Suk Yeol's short-lived imposition of martial law in December and criminal allegations against his wife, targeting the ousted conservative a day after his liberal successor took office.
The bills previously were vetoed by Yoon and South Korea's caretaker government after his Dec. 14 impeachment over the martial law debacle.
They are expected to be signed by new President Lee Jae-myung, a Democrat who won Tuesday's snap election triggered by Yoon's formal removal from office in April.
Many members of the conservative People Power Party refused to participate in the votes, which took place after one of the party's lawmakers accused the liberals in a speech of being driven by vendetta.
Lee, who as an opposition leader drove the legislative efforts to impeach and oust Yoon, pinned his presidential campaign on unity, promising not to target conservatives and calling for an end to political polarization.
Yet Lee has vowed a full investigation into Yoon's martial law stunt and the allegations surrounding his wife, moves that could overshadow the new government and inflame tensions as Yoon faces a high-stakes rebellion trial carrying a possible death sentence.
The Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office indicted Yoon in January over his Dec. 3 martial law decree, charging him with masterminding a rebellion and describing his power grab as an illegal bid to seize the legislature and election offices and arrest political opponents.
Liberals have insisted independent investigations into Yoon are essential, saying probes by prosecutors, police and an anti-corruption agency were inadequate and hampered by Yoon's refusal to cooperate.
If Lee approves the launch of independent investigations, special prosecutors could request the transfer of relevant cases for expanded probes, or direct public or military prosecutors to continue handling them under their supervision.
The bills calling for independent investigations into Yoon's martial law decree and criminal allegations involving his wife both passed by a vote of 194 to 3.
Dozens of retired marines, dressed in red shirts, saluted and cheered from an observation box after lawmakers passed the bill for a special prosecutor investigation into the marine's death, which also passed 194 to 3.
Yoon's martial law decree lasted only a few hours after a quorum of lawmakers pushed past a blockade of hundreds of heavily armed soldiers and voted to revoke the measure. Yoon defended the move as a necessary act of governance, accusing the Democrats, whom he labelled "anti-state forces," of abusing their majority to obstruct his agenda and paralyze state affairs.
That same majority now gives Lee a far more favourable path to advance his agenda, though conservatives claim it could grant him virtually unchecked power and allow him to pass laws that shield him from legal trouble.
Yoon's wife, Kim Keon Hee, also faces multiple corruption allegations, including claims that she received luxury items from a Unification Church official seeking business favours, as well as possible involvement in a stock price manipulation scheme. She also is suspected of interfering with PPP's candidate nominations ahead of legislative elections in April last year.
While in office, Yoon repeatedly dismissed calls to investigate his wife, denouncing them as baseless political attacks.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man Mistakenly Deported Under Trump Administration Now Faces US Charges
Man Mistakenly Deported Under Trump Administration Now Faces US Charges

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

Man Mistakenly Deported Under Trump Administration Now Faces US Charges

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the man mistakenly deported from Maryland to El Salvador by the Trump administration, has returned to the United States to face criminal charges of transporting illegal immigrants within the U.S., Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Friday. Abrego Garcia's return marks a turning point in a case that became a broader symbol of criticisms of President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration policies. Critics, including many congressional Democrats, pointed to the case as a sign that the administration was disregarding civil liberties in its push to step up deportations. But the administration insisted that Abrego Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang, an accusation that his lawyers denied. On Friday, administration officials portrayed the indictment of Abrego Garcia by a grand jury in Tennessee as vindication of their approach - even though the charges were filed on May 21, more than two months after Abrego Garcia's March 15 deportation. At a press conference, Bondi said Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele agreed to return Abrego Garcia to the U.S. after U.S. officials presented his government with an arrest warrant. "The grand jury found that over the past nine years, Abrego Garcia has played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring," Bondi said in a press conference. Abrego Garcia will have the chance to enter a plea in court and contest the charges at trial. If he is convicted, he would be deported to El Salvador after serving his sentence, Bondi said. In a statement, Abrego Garcia's lawyer, Andrew Rossman, said it would now be up to the U.S. judicial system to ensure he received due process. "Today's action proves what we've known all along - that the administration had the ability to bring him back and just refused to do so," said Rossman, a partner at law firm Quinn Emanuel. Abrego Garcia was deported to El Salvador, despite an immigration judge's 2019 order granting him protection from deportation to El Salvador after finding he was likely to be persecuted by gangs if returned there, court records show. After his lawyers challenged the basis for his deportation, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return, with liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor saying the government had cited no basis for what she called his "warrantless arrest." U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis has opened a probe into what, if anything, the Trump administration had done to secure his return, after his lawyers accused officials of stonewalling their requests for information. That led to concerns among Trump's critics that his administration would openly defy court orders. Chris Van Hollen, a Democratic senator from Maryland who visited Abrego Garcia in El Salvador, said in a statement on Friday that the Trump administration has "finally relented to our demands for compliance with court orders and the due process rights afforded to everyone in the United States." "This is not about the man, it's about his constitutional rights," Van Hollen said. "The Administration will now have to make its case in the court of law, as it should have all along." The indictment alleges that Abrego Garcia worked with at least five co-conspirators to bring immigrants to the United States illegally, and then transport them from the border to other destinations in the country. Abrego Garcia often picked up migrants in Houston, and made more than 100 trips between Texas and Maryland between 2016 and 2025, the indictment said. The indictment also charges Abrego Garcia and two unidentified co-conspirators with transporting firearms illegally purchased in Texas for resale in Maryland. Abrego Garcia also transported illegal narcotics purchased in Texas for resale in Maryland and was on some occasions accompanied on those trips by members and associates of MS-13, according to the indictment. According to the indictment, one of Abrego Garcia's co-conspirators belonging to the same ring was involved in the transportation of migrants whose tractor trailer overturned in Mexico in 2021, resulting in 50 deaths.

Trump Can Bar Associated Press From Key White House Events For Now: US Court
Trump Can Bar Associated Press From Key White House Events For Now: US Court

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

Trump Can Bar Associated Press From Key White House Events For Now: US Court

United States: President Donald Trump can bar The Associated Press from some White House media events for now, a federal appeals court ruled Friday, pausing a lower court order to give access to the US news agency's journalists. AP journalists and photographers have been barred from the Oval Office and from traveling on Air Force One since mid-February because of the news agency's decision to continue referring to the "Gulf of Mexico" -- and not the "Gulf of America" as decreed by Trump. In April, district court judge Trevor McFadden deemed that move a violation of the First Amendment to the US Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and of the press. But on Friday, a panel of judges with the Washington-based federal appeals court ruled that, pending appeal, the government could go ahead and bar AP from "restricted presidential spaces," which it said did not fall under First Amendment protections. "The White House therefore retains discretion to determine, including on the basis of viewpoint, which journalists will be admitted," the ruling said. "Moreover, without a stay, the government will suffer irreparable harm because the injunction impinges on the President's independence and control over his private workspaces," it said. The AP, a 180-year-old organization that has long been a pillar of US journalism, has so far refused to backtrack on its decision to continue referring to the "Gulf of Mexico." In its style guide, it highlights that the Gulf of Mexico has "carried that name for more than 400 years" and the agency "will refer to it by its original name while acknowledging the new name Trump has chosen." Trump has long had an antagonistic relationship with most mainstream news media, previously describing them as the "enemy of the people." Since his return to the presidency in January, his administration has sought to radically restructure the way the White House is covered, notably by favoring conservative podcasters and influencers. Two weeks after barring the AP, the White House stripped journalists of the nearly century-old power to decide which of the profession's own number will be members of a pool of reporters and photographers covering presidential events. His administration has also pressed to dismantle US government-funded overseas outlets Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Radio Free Asia, and is seeking to starve National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) of federal funds.

‘No idea what he was thinking': Errol Musk on son Elon's Epstein-Trump association claims; urges to let feud 'fizzle out'
‘No idea what he was thinking': Errol Musk on son Elon's Epstein-Trump association claims; urges to let feud 'fizzle out'

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

‘No idea what he was thinking': Errol Musk on son Elon's Epstein-Trump association claims; urges to let feud 'fizzle out'

Errol Musk weighs in on Elon-Trump feud Elon Musk 's father, Errol Musk, weighed on his son's feud with Donald Trump which included reference to Jeffrey Epstein in an attack on US President, calling it 'just a silly mistake' and "not knowing what he (Elon) was thinking". He also urged his son to let the feud 'fizzle out.' In an interview with Al Arabiya English from a lounge in Delhi Airport, Errol Musk downplayed the widely publicised social media clash between the two high-profile figures, characterising it as a momentary flare-up between strong personalities under pressure. 'I have no idea what he was thinking… I can only imagine that's just a silly mistake,' Errol said of Elon's now-viral post alleging Trump's name was in the Epstein files. Musk had, in a post on X, said, 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!'. Errol, attributed his son's actions to stress rather than intent. Referencing scripture, he added, 'Let the innocent person cast the first stone,' suggesting no one is without fault. The elder Musk said he had personally messaged his son to help ease tensions. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Here's The Price for a 1-Day Walk-in Shower In 2025 Homebuddy Learn More Undo 'I did send him a message… telling him, make sure this fizzles out,' he said, confidently predicting that the spat would be short-lived. 'Yes, of course,' he added when asked whether Trump and Elon would reconcile. 'When people have been through a great deal of stress… eventually people reach a point where they lash out,' Errol said. 'Even at the highest levels, people struggle to find common ground.' He suggested Elon's criticisms stemmed from concerns over Democrats' use of financial incentives to push legislation—a dispute that eventually escalated into a social media confrontation. Describing the online standoff as 'elephant bulls or alphas having a go at each other,' Errol Musk brushed off the seriousness of the episode. Reflecting on his recent visit to the US, Errol also claimed overwhelming public support for the former president. 'I would like to say 80 percent, but actually 100 percent [are] behind Trump,' he said. What is the Musk-Trump feud ? The public spat between US President Donald Trump and former adviser Elon Musk has intensified, following Musk's opposition to a significant domestic policy initiative by Trump. Following his 129-day tenure at the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), Musk utilised his platform X to denounce the bill as a "disgusting abomination", adding: "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong." He expressed concerns about the legislation's impact on national debt levels and urged his followers to contact their representatives in opposition to the spending proposal. The conflict between the two wealthy individuals heightened on Thursday as they traded harsh words on their respective social media platforms, indicating the end of their previous collaboration. Trump initiated the exchange by expressing disappointment over Musk's criticism of his administration's primary tax and spending legislation, suggesting this could terminate their formerly positive association. In response, Musk claimed credit for Trump's electoral success, stating: "Without me, Trump would have lost the election". The deterioration in their relationship occurred after Musk's sustained opposition to Trump's spending legislation, which received approval from the US House and awaits Senate consideration.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store