Rail safety advocate Lara Jensen appeals to PM to enact mandatory train illumination standards
Passionate rail safety advocate and Improve Train Lighting and Level Crossing Safety spokeswoman Lara Jensen is appealing to the Prime Minister to legislate mandatory train illumination standards across Australia.
In a letter to the Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Ms Jensen, a Murchison pastoralist, said requests for safety measures at 'notorious' regional level crossings have been 'ignored by federal and state governments over many decades'.
Dated May 17, the letter marks what would have been Christian Jensen's 45th birthday.
Mr Jensen, along with his two friends Jessica-Lea Broad and Hilary Smith, died after their vehicle was hit by a train at Yarramony Crossing on July 8, 2000.
'I did not choose to be a rail safety advocate, rather through unthinkable tragedy I have found myself part of a fraternity that nobody wants to belong to — a group of families who have all lost loved ones to completely preventable rail crashes and who are fighting for decades-overdue rail safety reform in Australia,' Ms Jensen said in her letter.
' . . . I am writing to you to appeal to you for leadership on this protracted safety issue that has disproportionately affected rural communities for decades too long.'
In her letter to Mr Albanese, Ms Jensen said the safety issue had 'disproportionately affected rural communities for decades too long'.
She asked him to not forget about regional Australians and legislate mandatory train illumination standards across Australia.
'Coroner Hope recommended that all locomotives be fitted with external auxiliary lighting in addition to ditch lighting to effectively warn motorists of oncoming trains,' she wrote.
'These recommendations were completely ignored by state and federal governments and the rail industry and remain un-acted on to this day.
The Federal Government's 2023-2032 National Level Crossing Safety Strategy outlines 39 fatalities, 322 collisions, 49 serious injuries, and 7839 near hits at level crossings across Australia between July 2014 and December 2022.
Ahead of the WA State election in March, the WA Nationals pledged to implement lighting regulations, including rotating beacons, side lighting, and enhanced reflectors, for all trains and rolling stock operating across the state.
The WA Liberals did not match the Nationals' pledge but said the party would call for legally mandated train lighting, while WA Labor did not make any train lighting commitment.
State Coroner Alastair Hope made a recommendation in the 2001 coronial inquest into Mr Jensen, Ms Broad, and Ms Smith's deaths that trains be fitted with lights to provide 'effective warning' to road users 'as soon as practicable'.
In her bid to have lights installed at regional level crossings Ms Jensen wrote to the WA Coroner's Court in December to request to speak to the now-retired State Coroner in relation to the inquest, but her request was denied.
Acting principal registrar Sarah Tyler responded to Ms Jensen's inquiry, stating the 1996 Coroners Act does not empower the State Coroner to 'compel any party to implement or action those recommendations'.
'It would most unfortunate if regulatory authorities did not undertake careful consideration of the State Coroner's recommendation in this case, but there is no power for the State Coroner to force action to be taken,' Ms Tyler said.
Ms Tyler said the Coroner's Court would investigate and 'closely scrutinise' the response of regulatory authorities to the 2001 safety recommendation if it were 'relevant to any future death'.
Mr Hope said in the 2001-2002 State Coroners' Annual Report there 'would appear to be no good reason for failing to have some form of lighting illuminating the side of trains at night'.
The Prime Minister's office has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Australians must not follow Trump's road to ruin
It would appear as through Parnell McGuinness (' JD Vance chastised Europeans on free speech. He wasn't wrong ', June 8) and similar-minded conservative commentators such as Sky News After Dark, are continuing on their ideologically driven warpaths oblivious to the voice of the Australian people as expressed in the May 3 election. While these media darlings of the right still want to rant and rave and feed each other's egos with negativity, doom and gloom, the great mass of Australians are getting on with life, comfortable with their government which is safe, stable, secure and focused on traditional Australian positive values of a fair go, kindness and friendliness. To become relevant again and play a meaningful role in modern Australia, the right-wing media needs to jettison these antagonistic Trump-like approaches which were clearly rejected by the Australian people. Warren Marks, Richmond (Tas) Parnell Palme McGuinness warns against the suppression of ideas, quoting the US vice president's controversial advice to the Munich Security Conference in February that 'governments must listen to and respect their citizens'. However, she, like JD Vance, can't resist cherry-picking just which ideas and citizen groups are worthy of respect. She uses the case of the phrase 'identified as' being currently questioned and 'no longer [deemed] acceptable' by some activists, as an example of 'groups trying to control public conversation'. But is this really a 'kind of slippery censorship', or just the progression of an idea so it more accurately conveys the lived experience of a group? Wasn't JD Vance's speech realistically more of an attempt to control? It's a shame Palme McGuinness sabotages her own argument, adopts the culture war cover, and portrays progressive ideas as threats. Everyone counts, Parnell. Kerrie Wehbe, Blacktown EVs not for me After 60 years of driving, I recently explored the hybrid option (' The sweet spot: How to get the most out of your super and the pension', June 8). I currently drive a diesel SUV, and being a self-funded retiree, I receive no government pension. I spend about $100 per fortnight on fuel. The hybrid currently comes with no spare wheel and no tow-bar, which I need to tow my boat. The changeover figure is $12,000 in the dealer's favour. The cost of a one-off tow-bar is an extra $2000, and a spare wheel costs a couple of hundred more. That equates to about six years' driving if I continue to use diesel. There is no government incentive for me to change. Free rego for all EV-driving retirees might sway me. I think I will stay with my diesel as I am not that green. David Sayers, Gwandalan Undeserved reward This just brings discredit to the whole honours system (' Politicians, scientists and costume designer feature in King's awards ', June 8). The highest honours go to those who have already achieved a higher role in society, often just for doing what that job requires. Isn't achieving that position (and the salary that goes with it) reward enough? Meanwhile, those who make a real sacrifice and give true service to others might receive a lower honour (when nominated), if any at all. In the case of the honour given to Scott Morrison, one hopes that it is primarily because most ex-PMs have historically received a similar award. Otherwise, it wouldn't seem to be merited. The citation says it's for 'his leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic and his key role in the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal'. Doesn't that come with the job of being PM? His role in the pandemic overlooks the refusal to require those already wealthy to pay back JobKeeper payments for which they were ultimately found to be ineligible, the 'stroll-out' of vaccines, and the needless antagonism of China over the pandemic's origins (which damaged Australia's trade). And the value of the AUKUS deal remains questionable. And then there are the multiple ministries, robo-debt, claims to not hold a hose, and statements that women protesters were lucky not to be shot. I predict that this will prompt many other letters to the editor.
Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
NSW Nationals vote to dump net zero emissions by 2050 target, putting pressure on federal Coalition
The NSW Nationals have made the decision to abandon support for the net zero emissions by 2050 policy. Members of the party voted resoundingly in favour of dumping the commitment during a state conference in Coffs Harbour. The motion passed "with applause", a party member told The Daily Telegraph. The state Nationals committed to the policy in 2021, but members of the party didn't always see eye-to-eye on the issue. In response to the vote, NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said the net zero target would still remain Coalition policy. 'In 2016 the previous NSW Coalition Government adopted a net zero by 2050 target for NSW,' he said. 'That remains our policy, with the bipartisan NSW Electricity Infrastructure Roadmap adopted under our government to help achieve it. 'In government we also adopted interim 2030 and 2035 targets for NSW. Subsequently in opposition we voted to support legislating those interim targets.' Net zero has been a major talking point at a federal level, particularly over the last few months in the election run-in and in the Coalition's post-mortem following their heavy defeat. The Liberal Party and National Party split after the election initially, following the breakdown of negotiations over policy, before forming a Coalition once more. Their combined stance on net zero however, is still unclear, and the move from the NSW Nationals could put more pressure on Opposition Leader Sussan Ley to discuss with federal Nationals leader David Littleproud whether the Coalition will keep or withdraw support for the policy. Mr Littleproud last week said Australia's goal to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 is not possible without nuclear energy and other "pragmatic approaches" as he criticised Labor's "all renewables approach" and suggested it would bring a "far more harsher" experience for Australians than just energy bills going up. 'We're living with the physical consequence of our prime agricultural land being ripped up with transmission lines, solar panels and wind turbines, and the actual natural environment's also being destroyed in trying to achieve this,' he said.
Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Bad policy': Former ACTU President Bill Kelty condemns Chalmers super, unrealised gains tax as rancour mounts within Labor ranks
Well-known figure of the Australian Labor movement Bill Kelty has unloaded on the Albanese government, revealing his distaste at the proposed super, unrealised gains tax whilst railing against the excessive levies imposed on small businesses. Labor's plan to double the tax rate from 15 to 30 per cent on super accounts over $3 million is set to dominate the political arena when parliament resumes in late July. The policy, which includes targeting unrealised capital gains has sparked widespread furore from industry magnates, former Treasury and RBA officials and senior economists who have railed against the unprecedented nature of the move. Experts have expressed fierce disapproval of Labor's insistence to target unrealised capital gains, of which are often fleeting and illusory and have stated the policy will undermine confidence in the superannuation industry. Mr Kelty, who served as the President of the Australian Council of Trade Unions from 1983 to 2000 lashed the move as 'bad policy' and said taxing gains that a person had not yet realised in their own accounts was flawed. 'I don't mind taxing people but not unrealised earnings,' Mr Kelty told The Australian. Mr Kelty, who was an influential force in legislating compulsory superannuation alongside former Labor Prime Minister Paul Keating said pursuing unrealised gains would establish a dangerous precedent and undermine the entire concept of super. 'I think taxing unrealised capital gains is bad policy. It distorts the effective tax. Changes your income flows, and if it was on superannuation generally, there would be a revolution about it. It would destroy super.' The ex-trade union boss also attacked Treasurer Jim Chalmers' argument that the changes would only impact 0.5 per cent of superannuants, and argued the policy itself was fundamentally errored in principle. 'If you want to tax rich people in this way, why wouldn't you actually reform the tax system?' Mr Kelty questioned. "This is a circuitous revolution against the rich, is it? It seems a strange thing to do. Bad policy is bad policy – for rich or poor.' Mr Kelty called on the government to instead turn its attention to reforming the mounting tax burden lumped on small businesses and said that operators faced an impossible system to navigate. 'You have got to keep records of this, records of that. You have got to go to your accountant to get depreciation scales for this and that. You have got to keep logbooks for your car. You have got to employ people to collect and maintain all your records. You have got to go to your accountant. You're making $100,000 a year, and $10,000 of that is to try and operate your tax system. Labor has also resisted repeated calls to index the $3 million threshold, with experts despairing that younger Australians would fall victim to the tax due to CPI and wage shifts over the coming decades. The contentious policy is expected to pass both houses of parliament unopposed, with the Greens set to join forces with Labor in the Senate.
