NASA's autopsy of planet swallowed by a star gives astronomers a surprise
When many stars reach billions of years in age and run out of fuel, they become dying stars known as red giants. The stars expand and can engulf nearby planets, effectively incinerating them.
In approximately five billion years, Earth's own sun will turn into a red giant and engulf planets, including our blue marble.
While astronomers have identified many of these red giant stars, it was only recently that the process of eating a planet had been directly observed.
Astronomers have identified many red giant stars and suspected that in some cases they consume nearby planets, but the phenomenon had never been directly observed before. In 2023, scientists discovered a star nearing the end of its life had swelled and absorbed a planet that is likely about the size of Jupiter.
Now, with additional observations from the James Webb Space Telescope, they say there's been a 'surprising twist.' Instead of eating the planet, Webb's observations show the planet's orbit shrank over millions of years, pulling the celestial body closer to its demise until it was fully engulfed.
'Because this is such a novel event, we didn't quite know what to expect when we decided to point this telescope in its direction,' Ryan Lau, an astronomer at the National Science Foundation National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory in Tucson, Arizona, said in a statement. 'With its high-resolution look in the infrared, we are learning valuable insights about the final fates of planetary systems, possibly including our own.'
Lau is the lead author of a new paper published Thursday in The Astrophysical Journal.
Using the telescope's Mid-Infrared Instrument and Near-Infrared Spectrograph, the researchers examined the Milky Way galaxy scene about 12,000 light-years away from Earth.
While the sun had been recognized as more like our sun, a measurement from the Mid-Infrared Instrument found the star was not as bright as it should have been if it had evolved into a red giant. The finding indicated to researchers that there was no swelling to engulf the planet, as once believed.
'The planet eventually started to graze the star's atmosphere. Then it was a runaway process of falling in faster from that moment,' team member Morgan MacLeod of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, explained. 'The planet, as it's falling in, started to sort of smear around the star.'
The planet would have blasted gas away from the outer layers of the star.
The Near-Infrared Spectrograph revealed a hot disk of molecular gas surrounding the star, where carbon monoxide was detected.
'With such a transformative telescope like Webb, it was hard for me to have any expectations of what we'd find in the immediate surroundings of the star,' said Vassar College's Colette Salyk, an exoplanet researcher and a co-author of the new paper. 'I will say, I could not have expected seeing what has the characteristics of a planet-forming region, even though planets are not forming here, in the aftermath of an engulfment.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
4 days ago
- Metro
Scientists have a new way that we can find out if aliens exist
'Are we alone in the universe?' is a question humanity has long asked. But a team of scientists has created a new way to answer whether aliens exist. Daniel Apai, an astrophysicist and astrobiologist at the University of Arizona, studies exoplanets – worlds that orbit other stars. Figuring out if exoplanets are habitable is tricky, as they're too far out of reach to properly research. Instead, stargazers and space officials narrow the list of habitable planets down by whether they have water. Apai and his colleagues developed a model that shows how Earth organisms would fare on alien worlds by considering factors beyond water, like temperature or a creature's metabolism. Not every planet is a blue marble like Earth: 'Hot Jupiters' are gas giants that orbit blisteringly close to their stars, 'super-Earths' are our planet's big older brothers and loner rogue planets drift through space. So rather than asking what all life needs, Apai instead asked: 'Would the conditions in the habitat – as we know them – allow a specific (known or yet unknown) species or ecosystem to survive?' He wrote in The Conversation. 'Even on Earth, organisms require different conditions to survive – there are no camels in Antarctica. By talking about specific organisms, we made the question easier to answer.' Take the camel, Apai said. Under his team's 'quantitative habitability framework', they first look at what conditions the animal needs to live beyond water, such as a hot, dry climate. Next, they look at the habitat, with Antarctica being an icy wasteland, it 'would correctly predict a near-zero probability that Antarctica is a good habitat for camels'. To test the model, published on arXiv, the researchers looked at if methanogens, one of the oldest forms of life, could make it on the exoplanet TRAPPIST-1e-like. The model said the 'habitat suitability' for these one-celled organisms would be 69%, making it a good candidate for astronomers to examine. Closer to home, the model said the suitability for methanogens just below the surface of Mars or the oceans of Jupiter's moon, Europa, is at most 55% and 50%, respectively. TRAPPIST-1e-like also has a habitat suitability of between 13% and 80% for cyanobacteria, commonly known as blue-green algae. More Trending Evidence of alien life in the universe right now is next to none, and with all the space in the universe, scientists only have so much time and resources to work out if a planet or moon could host extraterrestrials. Apai hopes the model will help scientists think outside the box when it comes to what life can look like and know where best to look for it. The researchers will make a massive database of critters that live in extreme environments, such as insects that live in the Himalayas or microorganisms that live in hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor. Apai said: 'If scientists do detect a potential signature of life, this approach can help assess if the environment where it is detected can actually support the type of life that leads to the signature detected.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Map shows where northern lights will be visible tonight in the US MORE: 70,000,000-year-old dinosaur could unlock key cancer discoveries MORE: Major health update on astronauts who were stranded in space for nine months
NBC News
4 days ago
- NBC News
Planet Nine? Not quite, but some astronomers think they've spotted a new dwarf planet
A possible new dwarf planet has been discovered at the edge of our solar system, so far-flung that it takes around 25,000 years to complete one orbit around the sun. The object, known as 2017 OF201, was found by researchers at the Institute for Advanced Study and Princeton University who were searching for 'Planet Nine,' a hypothetical planet larger than Earth that is thought to orbit beyond Neptune. Some astronomers theorize that a mysterious ninth planet, which so far remains undetected, could explain an unusual clustering of objects and other anomalies observed in the outer solar system. In searching for the elusive Planet Nine, researchers instead turned up a different resident in our cosmic backyard. 'It's not very different from how Pluto was discovered,' said Sihao Cheng, a member at the Institute for Advanced Study who led the research team. 'This project was really an adventure.' If confirmed, the newfound dwarf planet would be what Cheng calls an 'extreme cousin' of Pluto. The findings were published on the preprint website arXiv and have not yet been peer-reviewed. Cheng and his colleagues estimate that 2017 OF201 measures about 435 miles across — significantly smaller than Pluto, which measures nearly 1,500 miles across. A dwarf planet is classified as a celestial body that orbits the sun that has enough mass and gravity to be mostly round, but unlike other planets, has not cleared its orbital path of asteroids and other objects. Eritas Yang, one of the study's co-authors and a graduate student at Princeton University, said that one of 2017 OF201's most interesting features is its extremely elongated orbit. At its farthest point from the sun, the object is more than 1,600 times more distant than the Earth is to the sun. The researchers found the dwarf planet candidate by meticulously sifting through a huge data set from a telescope in Chile that was scanning the universe for evidence of dark energy. By cobbling together observations over time, the researchers identified a moving object with migrations that followed a clear pattern. 2017 OF201 is likely one of the most distant visible objects in the solar system, but its discovery suggests there could be other dwarf planets populating that region of space. 'We were using public data that has been there for a long time,' said Jiaxuan Li, a study co-author and a graduate student at Princeton University. 'It was just hidden there.' Li said the object is close to the sun at the moment, which means the researchers need to wait about a month before they can conduct follow-up observations using ground-based telescopes. The scientists are also hopeful that they can eventually secure some time to study the object with the Hubble Space Telescope or the James Webb Space Telescope. In the meantime, Cheng said he hasn't given up searching for Planet Nine. The new discovery, however, may throw a wrench into some long-standing theories of the planet's existence. The hypothesis behind Planet Nine is that a planet several times the size of Earth in the outer solar system could explain why a group of icy objects seem to have unusually clustered orbits. 'Under the influence of Planet Nine, all objects that do not have this specific orbital geometry will eventually become unstable and get kicked out of the solar system,' Yang said. 2017 OF201's elongated orbit makes it an outlier from the clustered objects, but Yang's calculations suggest that the orbit of 2017 OF201 should remain stable over roughly the next billion years. In other words, 2017 OF201 likely would not be able to remain if Planet Nine does exist. But Yang said more research is needed, and the discovery of the new dwarf planet candidate is not necessarily a death knell for Planet Nine. For one, the simulations only used one specific location for Planet Nine, but scientists don't all agree on where the hypothetical planet lurks — if it's there at all. Konstantin Batygin, a professor of planetary science at the California Institute of Technology, proposed the existence of Planet Nine in a study published with his Caltech colleague Mike Brown in 2016. He said the discovery of 2017 OF201 doesn't prove or disprove the theory. The objects in the outer solar system that are likely to show a footprint of Planet Nine's gravity, Batygin said, are the ones where the closest points on their orbits around the sun are still distant enough that they don't strongly interact with Neptune. 'This one, unfortunately, does not fall into that category,' Batygin told NBC News. 'This object is on a chaotic orbit, and so when it comes to the question of 'What does it really mean for Planet Nine?' The answer is not very much, because it's chaotic.' Batygin said he was excited to see the new study because it adds more context to how objects came to be in the outer solar system, and he called the researchers' efforts mining public data sets 'heroic.' Cheng, for his part, said he hasn't abandoned hope of finding Planet Nine. 'This whole project started as a search for Planet Nine, and I'm still in that mode,' he said. 'But this is an interesting story for scientific discovery. Who knows if Planet Nine exists, but it can be interesting if you're willing to take some risks.'
Metro
4 days ago
- Metro
A passing star could fling the Earth out of the Sun's orbit
The Earth may one day be pulled out of its perfect position by a passing star, a new study has revealed. And Mercury will also play a part. The smallest planet has an oval-shaped orbit, which can sometimes wobble due to Jupiter's huge gravitational influence as the solar system's largest planet. A passing star could exacerbate this affect, with significant consequences on the planet we call home... (Picture: Getty) Dr Nathan Kaib, an astronomer at the Planetary Science Institute, who is based in Iowa, and Dr Sean Raymond, an astronomer at the University of Bordeaux in France, published their findings in the journal Icarus after they created simulations of what would happen when our solar system passes nearby stars over the next several billion years (Picture: Getty) The researchers said the gravity of a passing star could hurl us into space - predicting a probability that this could happen of 1 in 500 or 0.2%. However, that is not the only thing that could happen. The sheer gravitational force could also throw all the planets out of whack, and could even send one of them smashing into Earth (Picture: Getty) What could happen is that Mercury would go off path, and collide with either the Sun or Venus. Then, this could lead either Venus or Mars to crash into Earth or the Earth to crash into the Sun. Another scenario is that Venus and Mars could fling out toward Jupiter, with the planet's gravity throwing Earth out of the Solar System altogether (Picture: Getty) Dr Kaib, who was the lead author, wrote: 'Our simulations indicate that isolated models of the solar system can underestimate the degree of our giant planets' future secular orbital changes by over an order of magnitude.' The work shows that astronomers may be overlooking the influence of distant objects and how our solar system interacts with the rest of the universe (Picture: Getty) Speaking to Science News, Dr Kaib revealed that there's about a 5% chance that over the next five billion years that a wayward star could come within 100 astronomical units of our solar system. This is around 100 times the distance between the Earth and the Sun. But, there's no need to worry (Picture: Getty) Dr Kaib said to the site that 'none of these things are probable.' However, in the paper he writes: 'Nonetheless, this probability of Earth orbital change is hundreds of times larger than prior estimates.' They also note, that stars which move slowly, at less than 10 kilometers per second relative to the Sun, are risky as they will prolong their gravitational tugs on our planet (Picture: Getty)
