
Flag Day feels different this year, but it doesn't have to
Saturday is Flag Day. In previous years, June 14 came and went for most people without a second thought. But this year, Flag Day is making a lot of waves — not only because of the Washington, D.C., military parade for the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary or because it coincides with President Donald Trump's birthday, but also because of the nationwide protests planned. 'No Kings' protests are scheduled across the country as a response to Trump's military parade.
Recently, it seems like there have been a lot of protests, not just those held last weekend in Los Angeles, but also outside Tesla dealerships, the May Day rallies, the Hands Off protest in April and others. While I appreciate and respect the First Amendment right to protest and exercise free speech, something that doesn't sit right with me is watching protesters fly the flag upside down.
The upside American flag was used in the past to signal a ship in distress, but both the left and the right also have employed it as a way to show dissent.
I understand that people want to protest Trump's policies, and many may feel these are dire circumstances deserving of the strongest response. But do we all still remember the outrage when Trump supporters flew the flag upside down after his conviction on 34 felonies last summer?
Upside down flag
Before recent events, I had never seen the American flag fly upside down. But it has happened before. After President Harry Truman fired General Douglas MacArthur in the middle of the Korean War, Americans turned their flags upside down in protest. According to the American Legion, the flag should only be flown upside when there is extreme danger to life or property.
In Spence v. Washington, a 1974 Supreme Court decision, the court found that desecrating the flag, including flying it upside down as a symbol of protest, is protected speech under the First Amendment. Nevertheless, it's sad to see Old Glory upside down — especially at the recent May Day protest in Miami. The protests were in response to the administration's actions against immigrants and federal workers in the first 100 days of Trump in office.
What is most troubling here is what the recent embrace of using the flag as a protest symbol reveals about where we are as a nation.
When both sides wave an upside down American flag, it signals that a lot of us believe democracy is in peril. They may be right, but have we lost sight of what the flag is meant to represent?
Stars and stripes
The flag has long been a symbol of what unites us as a nation — 13 stripes for the original colonies and 50 stars for each state. Despite our differences, the flag has served as reminder that we are united in one nation, even when we disagree.
On this Flag Day, whether that means parades or protests, take a moment and think about what the American flag has stood for in history. During the War of 1812, Francis Scott Key wrote the Star Spangled Banner, as the British attacked Fort McHenry, about the flag continuing to wave over 'the land of the free and the home of the brave.'
Old Glory has weathered wars, terror attacks, the Great Depression and elections. It has covered the coffins of service members who died while defending our rights, including the right to protest. It has been a beacon of hope for many and stood tall in our nation's darkest hours.
On Saturday, let us remember what it stands for.
Mary Anna Mancuso is a member of the Miami Herald Editorial Board. Her email: mmancuso@miamiherald.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New York Civil Liberties Union slams DOJ over ICE lawsuit
MANHATTAN (PIX11) — The New York Civil Liberties Union is slamming the U.S. Department of Justice for its lawsuit against New York's Protect Our Courts Act. 'The Trump administration's attack on the Protect Our Courts Act is a blatant assault on justice that would turn New York's courthouses into traps,' Executive Director Donna Lieberman said. 'Our legal system cannot function when people are too scared to step through courthouse doors. Without the Protect Our Courts Act, immigrant New Yorkers may not defend themselves against charges, avoid seeking protective orders, miss custody hearings, and stop fighting unlawful wage theft or eviction. No one is better off when justice is denied.' More Local News New York State Assemblywoman Michaelle Solages, who sponsored the Protect Our Courts Act, told PIX 11 News 'This lawsuit is a shameful display of federal overreach and political cruelty. They're using taxpayer dollars to uphold a law that upholds due process and the human rights of people and I think its really despicable.' Attorney General Pamela Bondi said, 'Lawless sanctuary city policies are the root cause of the violence that Americans have seen in California, and New York State is similarly employing sanctuary city policies to prevent illegal aliens from apprehension.' Bondi added, 'This latest lawsuit in a series of sanctuary city litigation underscores the Department of Justice's commitment to keeping Americans safe and aggressively enforcing the law.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Bloomberg
28 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Israel Disregards Trump With Major Attack on Iran Nuclear Sites
By and Natalia Drozdiak Save President Donald Trump had repeatedly urged Israel not to strike Iran's nuclear sites. It didn't work.


Boston Globe
29 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Israeli strikes on Iran lead to new test of Trump's ability to deliver on ‘America first' agenda
Advertisement 'Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense,' Rubio said in a statement. 'President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners. Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up As Israel stepped up planning for strikes in recent weeks, however, Iran, had signaled that the United States would be held responsible in the event of an Israeli attack. The warning was issued by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi even as he engaged in talks with Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. On Thursday, just hours before the strikes, Trump made the case that there was still time for diplomacy — but it was running out. The White House had even planned to dispatch Witkoff to Oman on Sunday for the next round of talks with Araghchi. It wasn't immediately clear how the strikes would affect plans for those discussions. Advertisement Trump is set to meet with his National Security Council in the Situation Room on Friday to discuss the tricky path ahead. Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., offered rare words of Democratic praise for the Trump administration after the attack 'for prioritizing diplomacy' and 'refraining from participating in tonight's actions.' But he also expressed deep concern about what the Israeli strikes could mean for U.S. personnel in the region. Iranian officials made clear that they intended to retaliate with decisive action after the Israeli strikes targeted Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz and the country's ballistic missile program, as well as top nuclear scientists and officials. 'I cannot understand why Israel would launch a preemptive strike at this juncture, knowing high level diplomatic discussions between the United States and Iran are scheduled for this weekend,' Kaine said. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said the U.S. Senate 'stands ready to work with President Trump and with our allies in Israel to restore peace in the region and, first and foremost, to defend the American people from Iranian aggression, especially our troops and civilians serving overseas.' Trump in the hours before the attack still appeared hopeful that there would be more time for diplomacy. The president, in an exchange with reporters, again urged Iran to negotiate a deal. He warned that a 'massive conflict' could occur in the Middle East without it. He later took to social media to emphasize that his 'entire Administration has been directed to negotiate with Iran.' Advertisement As long as there was a chance for an agreement, Trump said of Israel, 'I don't want them going in because I think it would blow it.' But it was clear to the administration that Israel was edging toward taking military action against Iran. The State Department on Wednesday directed a voluntary evacuation of nonessential personnel and their families from some U.S. diplomatic outposts in the Middle East. 'I don't want to be the one that didn't give any warning, and missiles are flying into their buildings. It's possible. So I had to do it,' Trump explained. Before Israel launched the strikes, some of Trump's strongest supporters were raising concerns about what another expansive conflict in the Mideast could mean for the Republican president who ran on a promise to quickly end the brutal wars in Gaza and Ukraine. Trump has struggled to find an endgame to either of those conflicts and to make good on two of his biggest foreign policy campaign promises. And after criticizing President Joe Biden during last year's campaign for preventing Israel from carrying out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Trump found himself making the case to the Israelis to give diplomacy a chance. The push by the Trump administration to persuade Tehran to give up its nuclear program came after the U.S. and other world powers in 2015 reached a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. But Trump unilaterally withdrew the U.S. from the Obama-administration brokered agreement in 2018, calling it the 'worst deal ever.' The way forward is even more clouded now. Advertisement 'No issue currently divides the right as much as foreign policy,' Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA and an ally of the Trump White House, posted on X Thursday. 'I'm very concerned based on (everything) I've seen in the grassroots the last few months that this will cause a massive schism in MAGA and potentially disrupt our momentum and our insanely successful Presidency.' Jack Posobiec, another prominent Trump supporter, warned a 'direct strike on Iran right now would disastrously split the Trump coalition.' 'Trump smartly ran against starting new wars, this is what the swing states voted for — the midterms are not far and Congress' majority is already razor-thin,' Posobiec added in a posting on X. Rosemary Kelanic, director of the Middle East program at Defense Priorities, said the job ahead for Trump and his team is to protect U.S. forces who are highly vulnerable to Iranian retaliation. 'Israel's strike on Iran must not become the United States' war,' Kelanic said. 'The U.S. public overwhelmingly opposes another military engagement in the Middle East for good reason — an open-ended military campaign in Iran would risk repeating the catastrophic mistakes of the 2003 war in Iraq, which inadvertently strengthened Tehran's influence there.' ___ AP Congressional Correspondent Lisa Mascaro contributed reporting.