Tucker Carlson and Ted Cruz's fiery interview saw the pair clash over antisemitism, Iran and the Bible
Tucker Carlson's extended interview with Texas Senator Ted Cruz proved every bit as explosive as its preview clip had promised, with the two conservatives going head-to-head over the prospect of President Donald Trump leading the U.S. into war with Iran.
The complete two-hour cut of The Tucker Carlson Show sitdown with Cruz appeared on Wednesday, a day after a brief excerpt circulated in advance, in which the host could be seen taking the senator to task for not knowing the population of Iran.
That proved to be a mere appetizer, as the two men, perched in opposing chairs beneath an oil painting of Ronald Reagan, repeatedly clashed.
The interview appeared at a pivotal moment, with President Trump weighing joining in Israel's Operation Rising Lion offensive against Tehran, having reportedly already approved attack plans.
It also served to expose the deep divisions within the president's MAGA movement over the necessity of intervention, a split that has already seen Trump fall out with Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and the likes of Carlson and Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene speaking out against the possibility of war.
Here's a look at some of Tucker and Ted's key exchanges.
In one of their most tense interactions, Carlson accused Cruz of accepting campaign donations from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which the host argued was a lobby group seeking to influence the U.S. government on behalf of a foreign country.
'It's a very weird thing, the obsession with Israel,' Cruz responded.
'You're not talking about Chinese, you're not talking about Japanese, you're not talking about the Brits, you're not talking about the French. The question is: 'What about the Jews? What about the Jews?''
Carlson was angered by the insinuation: 'Oh, so I'm an antisemite now?!'
Cruz denied that he had been attempting to 'derail' his line of questioning by implying that Carlson was prejudiced.
'Of course you are, and rather than be honorable enough to say it right to my face, you are, in a sleazy feline way, implying it,' Carlson retorted.
'I don't see a lawmaker's job as defending the interest of a foreign government. Period. That does not make me an antisemite, and shame on you for suggesting otherwise!'
Their most viral exchange saw the host ask the senator: 'How many people live in Iran, by the way?'
When Cruz admitted he did not know, Carlson became incredulous: 'You don't know the population you seek to topple?'
When the senator referred the question back to Carlson, he answered smartly that 92 million people live there, prompting Cruz to dismiss the significance of the point, saying huffily that he does not 'sit around memorizing population tables' in his free time.
Carlson, approaching hysteria, pressed Cruz on the ethnic mix of the Iranian population instead, which the senator initially attempted to answer before stopping short and again insisting the question was irrelevant.
'You're a senator who's calling for an overthrow of the government, and you don't know anything about the country!' Carlson squawked with glee.
Later, Cruz almost blundered into declaring war by inadvertently admitting the Trump administration's complicity when he said: 'We're carrying out military strikes today.'
At Carlson's prompting, he raced to clarify that it was Israel carrying out the strikes 'with our help.'
'Well, you're breaking news here, because the U.S. government last night denied – National Security Council Spokesman Alex Pfeiffer denied, on behalf of Trump – that we were acting on Israel's behalf in any offensive capacity,' Carlson interrupted.
'This is high stakes, you're a senator, if you're saying the United States government is at war with Iran right now, people are listening!'
The former Fox News anchor was clearly annoyed by the Texan's frequent attempts to invoke the Bible to justify his hawkish stance on Iran.
'Growing up in Sunday school, I was taught from the Bible that those who bless Israel will be blessed and those who curse Israel will be cursed. And from my perspective, I wanna be on the blessing side of things,' the senator said.
Again challenged by Carlson, Cruz could not name which book of the Bible the passage he quoted derived from, and was informed the answer was Genesis.
The host's scoffing resumed: 'So you're quoting a Bible phrase. You don't have context for it, and you don't know where in the Bible it is, but that's, like, your theology? I'm confused. What does that even mean?'
Cruz reversed and tried again: 'Where does my support for Israel come from? Number one, because Biblically, we are commanded to support Israel, but number two…'
Carlson again interrupted, demanding that the senator define what he meant by Israel, prompting Cruz to erupt: 'Define Israel?! Do you not know what Israel is? That would be the country you've asked like 49 questions about.'
Carlson made headlines around the world last year when he made a surprise visit to Russia to interview Vladimir Putin.
He brought up the Ukraine war again with Cruz, pushing the Republican to renounce his past support for Volodymyr Zelensky's resistance effort.
'We were unable to beat Russia in the war that you supported against Russia!' the host ranted. 'You've been spending the last three years telling us that Vladimir Putin is evil and we're gonna beat him with other people's children. And a million of those kids are now dead! You've never apologized for that. That was a full failure!'
'The number of falsehoods you lay out in one statement is rather stunning!' Cruz volleyed back, before admitting that the war had been 'an absolute disaster' for all concerned and then digging in his heels by saying: 'I'm not going to engage in the demanding of apologies!'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP tax bill: 2 major developments & 2 key deadlines
While global headlines fixate on Iran, Republicans on Capitol Hill are racing to finalize their sweeping tax package. Yahoo Finance Washington Correspondent Ben Werschkul joins Market Domination to explain the bill's two key deadlines and two big developments that were likely overshadowed by recent news about Iran, including how the bill's projected cost has climbed to $4.2 trillion. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination here. But while the world's attention is on Iran, President Trump's one big beautiful bill is getting more expensive. For more on the upcoming tax bill decision, let's welcome in here, Yahoo Finance's Ben Verschle. Ben. Yeah, hey Josh. So, so nothing can slow down the Republican push for, um, for tax cuts, it appears. What we had over the last few days is a series of developments, clearly overshadowed by what was happening in Iran, um, on this big beautiful bill that, that changed the shape of it and, and taught us more about it. The first one actually came on Saturday evening, or about the same time as the attacks, which was a new report from the Joint Committee on Taxation that gave us a new price tag for this overall package. It's now expected, once you untangle some, some accounting maneuvers that the Senate is doing, that this bill is going to cost $4.2 trillion. It's going to add that to the debt over the next decade. That's a higher price tag than we've had before, and is already getting pushback from fiscal hawks, who are, who are already kind of wary of this bill and are now reupping their, their criticisms of it. Whether they vote no in the end remains to be seen. The second is the, uh, what's, what's called a Byrd bath. It's, the Senate parliamentarian is going through the bill line by line to, to make sure it appeals to Senate rules. And she's striking a number of things out. There's, we've already seen cuts to the provision that, that, um, would have limited funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, um, cutting that out, um, changes, changes to a number, a lot of tax savings too, as well as the food stamp program. So those are, those are significant changes and will, will change the price tag further. The couple signposts for folks to watch in the couple of days, the Senate is pushing for this, to vote on this, to get this through the Senate by the end of the week. The first shoe to drop could happen this afternoon or tomorrow morning. That's the parliamentarian going over these, the Senate's Finance Committee's portion. This, these are the big ticket items. These are the tax portion. These are the Medicaid cuts. These are the clean energy credits. All of these things are going to be under review. So there could be a lot of headlines either tonight or tomorrow morning about whether those are changing or staying in the bill. And then of course, we're heading towards a vote by the end of the week. John Thune, um, is the Senate majority leader, and he talked about how when the Senate is a lot, senators are back today, and they're not leaving in his words until they pass this. And he's, he suggested the first votes could start on Thursday and then stretch for as long after that as they needed. So, a lot, a lot of focus, obviously, on Iran, but the Capitol Hill is clearly focused on getting this bill to the finish line to their ultimate goal of July 4th by, to the president's desk. Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How rising US oil production boosts US's geopolitics leverage
Decades of US oil (CL=F, BZ=F) drilling have turned the country into a major exporter, reducing reliance on Middle East imports. Yahoo Finance Washington Correspondent Ben Werschkul joins Market Domination to explain how fracking and increased production have given the US more economic leverage. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination here. Well, decades of expansion in US oil drilling significantly impacted the Trump administration's ability to manage Iranian hostilities. This expansion bolstered US energy independence, shifting the country from being heavily reliant on Middle East oil imports to becoming a major exporter. This given the US some leverage, but it's not without its geopolitical challenges. Our Washington correspondent, Ben Worsko during a Santa, put this history into some context. Ben. Yeah, Josh. So this, this, as you've been talking about in the previous segment, this oil story is kind of the story that wasn't over this conflict so far. Oil prices are now down below where they were 12 days ago when this conflict got underway. And this is because of these historical trends you're talking about, which is that US oil production has grown tremendously. It's almost, it's nearly tripled over about the last 15 years. This is a trend that's spanned Democratic and Republican administrations, and has been driven by the fracking boom. A stat I learned sort of reporting for the story today is that about two-thirds of US crude oil production is in part due to fracking. So fracking is what's driving this and it's what's driving this expansion. And as you've mentioned, this really does change some of the geopolitical calculations that we've seen. A lot of analysts have been out front to say this shows that the US economy is more buffered from oil price shocks going up and down than it has been in the past. And kind of gives the president, like President Trump, more leverage to weather these. Doug Holtz-Eakin of the American Action Forum has made this point strongly. And there's also really interesting academic literature about how the just increased number of people that work in the oil industry in the US means that oil prices are good for them, and it kind of balances things out macroeconomically, at least in the US economy when oil prices rise to a modest amount. Obviously, there's real limits to that. And we saw some commentary from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell before Congress today, saying, sort of underlining how the limits are here, which is what you've been talking about, which is that oil prices make their oil companies make their own decisions about drilling. Trump likes to say he can watch companies and ask them to keep oil prices down or drill new wells, but they make their own decisions. And as Powell says today, this sort of a shock absorber, there's some questions about how durable this will be going forward, but it's clearly a change from what we saw even 15 years ago. All right. Thank you, Ben. Appreciate it. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
Parliamentarian cuts some energy provisions from GOP bill
The Big Story The Senate parliamentarian has removed Republican attempts to sell off public lands and exempt oil and gas drilling from environmental reviews in the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill.' ©© iStock To get their major policy bill across the finish line without any Democratic support, Republicans are using a process known as budget reconciliation that has strict rules about which policies can be included. In a ruling announced late Monday, the parliamentarian, which acts as an arbiter of the upper chamber's rules, blocked several provisions from the bill. They include measures that would: The provisions all come from the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. The parliamentarian is still reviewing additional provisions put forward by that committee, including those requiring oil and gas lease sales in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska and speeding up approvals for coal mining. Read more at Welcome to The Hill's Energy & Environment newsletter, I'm Rachel Frazin — keeping you up to speed on the policies impacting everything from oil and gas to new supply chains. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect the energy and environment sectors now and in the future: Lee revises plan to sell public lands as parliamentarian excludes it from GOP policy bill Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said he will revise his plan for selling off public lands after the Senate's parliamentarian ruled it cannot move forward as part of the Republican tax and spending bill. Trump administration to remove protections on 59 million acres of National Forest lands The Trump administration will strip protections that prevent logging on nearly 59 million acres of National Forest System lands, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced Monday. House Freedom Caucus chair pans Senate GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.), the chair of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, is staking opposition to the Senate's version of the 'big, beautiful bill,' spelling trouble for the legislation's chances of clearing the House down the road. What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets touching on energy issues, the environment and other topics: Wisconsin Supreme Court rules spills law applies to PFAS (Wisconsin Examiner) On Tap Upcoming news themes and events we're watching: What Others are Reading Two key stories on The Hill right now: Democrat tells RFK Jr.: 'You lied to Sen. Cassidy' Rep. Kim Schrier (D-Wash.) accused Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of lying to Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) when he told the senator he would maintain a key federal vaccine advisory committee 'without changes.' Read more House torpedoes Rep. Al Green's effort to impeach Trump over Iran strikes The House on Tuesday overwhelmingly torpedoed an effort by Rep. Al Green (D-Texas) to impeach President Trump over the U.S. strikes on Iran, underscoring how little appetite Democrats have to try and oust the president despite their frustration with the weekend attack. Read more You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here