
Why Donald Trump is only beginning his pursuit of the ‘enemy within'
It is a fraught moment to stage a military parade in America's capital. The display of tanks, aircraft and march-bys on Saturday will coincide with the US Army's 250th anniversary and
Donald Trump's
79th.
It will also come a week after Trump
put the National Guard on the streets
of
Los Angeles
– the first time in 60 years a president has done so in defiance of the state governor.
The two situations are poles apart. In 1965, Lyndon B Johnson deployed troops to protect civil rights marchers from Alabama's trigger-happy local police. In 2025, Trump's declared aim is to protect federal agents and buildings from local protesters.
Unlike LBJ's, Trump's mission is open-ended. Johnson was sealing his desegregation of the south. Trump, on the other hand, is only beginning his pursuit of America's 'enemy from within'.
READ MORE
That the protests are local is irrelevant. Neither California nor LA are mentioned in Trump's executive order that cites an obscure law to justify intervening anywhere. Think of LA as Trump's first beachhead in a national campaign.
'We're going to have troops everywhere,' he said.
His order would also allow the federal army to be deployed on US streets. Trump's campaign of mass deportation is getting under way.
[
Los Angeles protests: US deploys Marines as Trump backs arrest of California governor
Opens in new window
]
Trump has two advantages in his clearest step so far towards authoritarianism. The first is that he can claim a mandate. Throughout the campaign, he vowed to deport millions of migrants – with the help of the US military if necessary.
In theory, public opinion is marginally on his side. Second, Trump knows there are enough masked Mexican flag-wavers among the protesters to supply him with the pretext to escalate. That is the point. Every rock hurled lands like a penny in Trump's wishing well.
America's left should recall that Martin Luther King's protests were scrupulously peaceful. The goal of racist local sheriffs was to provoke violence. Though most LA protesters are peaceful, the infamous ICE – Immigration and Customs Enforcement – is having an easier job of it.
To underline, Trump's claim is that the left is antinational, extremist and violent.
The protesters, in turn, are defending due process, including for the millions of immigrants in Trump's sights. The US republic's future could hinge on which side is identified with the rule of law.
[
Explainer: is it legal for Trump to use US troops to suppress protests?
Opens in new window
]
Who would bet against Trump in the battle for public opinion? Less than 200 days into his second term, he has trampled over more laws and ripped up more precedents than any leader in US history.
He has enriched himself and his family with overseas crypto sales and golf resort deals, launched a war on leading universities and medical institutions, ignored serial court orders to give deportees legal rights, declared, paused and partially resumed economic war on the world, and targeted his enemies with investigations and stripped them of security protection.
Trump's assault on democratic norms has been breathtaking in scale and speed. Yet his approval rating is still at 45 per cent.
The
Democrats
have been helping Trump along. The party is split on how strongly it should fight Trump's deportations. The principled stance would be to do whatever it takes to uphold the rule of law. Deportations should happen if due process is followed.
By contrast, putting troops on America's streets poses a mortal threat to federal democracy. That America's left speaks with many tongues is helpful to Trump, whose party listens only to his.
Did you witness Republican outrage over Trump's threat of targeting Elon Musk's business empire? Neither did I. Ditto for his assault on America's leading law firms, foreign students, media conglomerates and scientific research.
Here is where the LA situation is likely to lead. ICE is Trump's crack agency. Its agents are raiding restaurants, law courts, retail centres and day labour assembly points across the country.
Trump's 'big, beautiful [budget] bill' will earmark $185 billion (€167 billion) for immigration enforcement, including ICE, which is more than the annual military spending of the UK and France combined. Wherever ICE raids trigger protests, Trump can send in the troops.
Expect Chicago, San Francisco, Denver and other cities to feature soon.
Do not expect Trump to back down. Stephen Miller, his militant henchman and deputy chief of staff, wants 3,000 immigrants a day deported and brands opposition to ICE raids as 'insurrection'.
Expelling that many people will require a lot of armed manpower. The economic bill will show up in the form of higher food prices and home-construction costs. The toll on the US rule of law and social stability will be incalculably higher. – The Financial Times Limited 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Irish Sun
12 minutes ago
- The Irish Sun
Trump doesn't rule out arresting California Gov Gavin Newsom over LA riot chaos and says he had to save city from mob
DONALD Trump refused to rule out arresting California Governor Gavin Newsom over his handling of the Los Angeles riots. The pair have been trading blows since Newsom slammed Trump's decision to send federal troops into the city to 8 Trump and Newsom have publicly fought over the President's decision to send federal troops to LA Credit: Getty 8 A Waymo vehicle burns amid the warzone scenes Credit: AFP 8 Trump refused to rule out arresting California Governor Gavin Newsom Credit: PodForce1 / Youtube 8 Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during an address on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. (Office of California Governor via AP) Credit: AP Trump has sent around 4,000 of the National Guard and 700 Marines into LA, where they have The Governor accused Trump of manufacturing the flare-ups, saying his actions were "akin to authoritarian regimes" - and was dismissed as "incompetent" in return. He vowed his state is "suing Donald Trump" for "creating fear and terror to [...] violate the US constitution". Trump has previously toyed with the idea of arresting Newsom, and refused to rule it out in an interview with the read more on los angeles Trump's border czar Tom Homan had warned that anyone, including public officials, would be arrested if they obstructed federal law enforcement. On Sunday, Newsom goaded Trump over the threats, saying in a MSNBC interview: "Come after me, arrest me. Let's just get it over with, tough guy." Asked directly if he is going to arrest and charge Gavin Newsom, Trump said: "Well, he's not doing a good job. "In theory you could, I guess. It's almost like a dissipation of duties. Nobody's ever seen anything like it." Most read in The US Sun Before Wednesday's interview, Newsom shared his thoughts on the arrest threats. He said: "The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. Anti-ICE raid protest carnage spreads across US as Texas deploys National Guard & LA declares curfew after riots "This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism." Trump follow up with a brutal takedown of Newsom's record in office - which included blaming him for Trump said: "First he had his wildfires that burned down half the place [...] I told them water, get the water from the pacific north west [...] I got the water to go down. "They were using environmental as a reason not to give water. They were protecting a certain type of fish - which by the way has not done well. "He should have done it [redirected the water supply] in my first term. You wouldn't have had the fires." 8 There are approximately 4,700 federal troops in LA at Trump's orders Credit: EPA 8 The rioters are protesting against Trump's crackdown on undocumented migrants Credit: Reuters 8 The Marines and National Guard have been sent to assist local police Credit: The Mega Agency Interviewer Miranda Devine then asked about a much-disputed phone call between Trump and Newsom - with each swearing to a different version of events. The President claimed he rang to discuss sending in National Guardsmen - but Newsom branded him a "stone-cold liar". Newsom insists he "kept trying to bring up" the situation in LA, but that Trump veered onto other subjects. However, Trump doubled down today and said: "Of course I did [talk about it]. The phone call was to deploy the troops. "I said: 'You're city is burning down, your state is in bad trouble.' "All I want is him to do a good job [...] he's doing a poor job." In an effort to checkmate Newsom, Trump brandished a screenshot showing a 16-minute call between the two at 1:23am on June 7. Newsom does not dispute that the call happened - but maintains that Trump "never once brought up the National Guard". Trump landed other personal jibes, mocking the California High-Speed Rail project which has run over budget and claiming that, without him, Newsom "wouldn't have LA". He said: "Between the fires and the riots, there would be nothing left. You have a governor that's incompetent, a mayor that's highly incompetent." 8


Irish Times
18 minutes ago
- Irish Times
RFK Jr names new vaccine panel members after firing previous ones
US health secretary Robert Kennedy Jr on Wednesday named new members to serve on a key panel of vaccine advisers after abruptly firing all 17 sitting members of the independent panel of experts, according to a post on X. The eight new members of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices are: Joseph R Hibbeln, Martin Kulldorff, Retsef Levi, Robert W Malone, Cody Meissner, James Pagano, Vicky Pebsworth and Michael A Ross. 'All of these individuals are committed to evidence-based medicine, gold-standard science, and common sense,' Mr Kennedy said in a post on X. The panel is part of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Mr Kennedy said the new members are committed to demanding definitive safety and efficacy data before making any new vaccine recommendations. READ MORE Mr Kennedy, a longtime vaccine skeptic, has alleged that the prior panel members, many of whom were appointed by former president Joe Biden, had conflicts of interest, without providing evidence of specific members' conflicts, and said the move was necessary 'to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science'. Numerous physician groups have expressed concern and suspicion over Mr Kennedy's unprecedented removal of all the panel's prior members. The American Medical Association, the nation's largest physician group, has called for a Senate investigation into their dismissal and sent Mr Kennedy a letter calling for an immediate reversal of the changes. —Reuters


Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the US/Iran talks: difficult compromises lie ahead
Many actors are in play and a great deal is at stake in the latest round of talks between the United States and Iran on that country's nuclear enrichment programme. Israel is threatening to attack Iranian nuclear plants if the US fails to act, European powers accuse Iran of breaching agreed inspections, while Gulf powers exert a powerful influence on President Donald Trump to avoid a dangerous war by compromises that would open up large economic opportunities for the US. These bilateral talks, and the parallel nuclear negotiations in Vienna, which could open up a new round of United Nations sanctions, hinge largely on whether Iran can continue its nuclear enrichment programme or must close it down. Iran flatly refuses to stop enrichment, a demand spearheaded by Israel and supported by a strong lobby within Trump's entourage. He has recently shifted his position towards no enrichment, but if that remains unacceptable to the Iranians he faces a fateful choice between finding a compromise and opening a path towards possible war. Trump's first overseas state visit to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar last month exposed him to their immense wealth and newfound regional power, both of which he values. Their desire for more stable relations with Iran cuts right across Israeli leader Binyamin Netanyahu's push for military action against Iran's enrichment. That feeds into the intense debates around Trump's administration on whether such a war would derail his presidency. There is scope for diplomatic progress if the political will is there. One suggestion from the US negotiator Steve Witkoff is that Iran's enrichment for energy and other peaceful uses be tied into a wider regional programme that would create security and economic incentives all round. Iran's refusal of that option could shift if it sees UN sanctions as a real possibility and chooses to avoid that. France, Germany and the UK should channel such pressure towards finding such a path to regional security as part of their wider critique of Netanyahu's war in Gaza. READ MORE