logo
Is Canadian Immigration A Possible Refuge For U.S. Migrants On Parole?

Is Canadian Immigration A Possible Refuge For U.S. Migrants On Parole?

Forbes17-04-2025

As American immigration policies tighten, hundreds of thousands of migrants who once found shelter under humanitarian parole or Temporary Protected Status (TPS) now face a legal cliff. Whether fleeing war, persecution, or natural disasters—from Venezuela, Haiti, Sudan, Nicaragua, or Ukraine—many are running out of time and options. While recently a Massachusetts federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from ending the parole status of nearly half a million immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, stating that the government's early termination of the parole programs was likely arbitrary and capricious, no one can predict whether this ruling will hold once appeals are launched. Thus, with parole extensions uncertain and TPS subject to political winds, a growing number are asking where they can escape to. At least some of these migrants are considering Canadian immigration from the U.S. as a way out.
So is it?
The quick answer is not really, except for a very few.
Here's why.
Canada's immigration system, although historically generous, is now constrained. There are very few quick legal entry options for migrants currently residing in the U.S., and the process of obtaining permanent residence in Canada is complex, narrow, and selective. Nevertheless, with strategic planning and policy changes, some avenues may still be available.
For many, the first challenge is to apply for a Canadian entry visa as a potential bridge to permanent solutions. Virtually all migrants in the U.S. on parole or under TPS status would require a visa to enter Canada. To obtain such a visa- whether as a visitor, student, or temporary worker- the migrant must convince Canadian visa officers at a consulate, such as those in New York or Los Angeles, that they will return home after their visit—a nearly impossible task for individuals who cannot safely return to their countries of origin, especially without permanent U.S. status. This is essentially a mission impossible. Refusals are common, even with financial support or family invitations.
Canada's refugee system will not apply to most migrants arriving from the U.S. This is because, under the Canada–U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA), refugee (asylum) claims at official land border crossings are barred. However, there are some narrow exceptions—such as having a spouse, parent, or sibling in Canada, or being an unaccompanied minor. If a migrant falls into that exceptional category, they will be allowed to enter the country with proof of the exception.
Otherwise, even irregular border crossings like those that were once made at Roxham Road are no longer viable. Since 2023, STCA rules apply countrywide, including to those entering outside formal ports of entry. Anyone trying to cross the border without a visa will be apprehended and returned to the United States pursuant to the STCA agreement. However, if a migrant enters Canada irregularly and then remains undetected for 14 days after their entry, they can make a refugee claim—but this is a risky and legally precarious option. This is not a great choice for most.
Some migrants may already be Canadian citizens without realizing it. Those with Canadian-born parents might qualify for Canadian citizenship by descent. Applying for a citizenship certificate can open the door to full legal status, employment, and access to healthcare in Canada. Given Canada's global diaspora—including among Haitians, Ukrainians, and others—this pathway deserves greater attention. It could be a fortunate opportunity for some
For those excluded from nonimmigrant options like visitor visas, student permits, and temporary work visas because they cannot demonstrate an intention to leave at the end of their authorized stay, or from refugee pathways due to restrictions imposed by the STCA agreement, only permanent residence options remain. However, obtaining permanent residence is challenging. Furthermore, timing becomes an issue since there is no immediate way to enter Canada while being compelled to leave the United States.
Nonetheless, we can explore permanent resident options with the aim of eventually getting to Canada one way or another. If the migrant cannot immediately reach Canada, perhaps something could be arranged, even after a deportation, to make such an option feasible.
Canada's Express Entry system prioritizes young, educated, and French-speaking applicants through a points-based model. Recent cutoffs have exceeded 500 points, making it virtually inaccessible for most applicants without at least a master's degree, work experience, or exceptional credentials and the ability to speak English. French speakers have a lower threshold to meet and may qualify with a points score in the 400s or possibly even lower. The processing time is about a year or so.
Provincial Nominee Programs (PNPs) offer another route, particularly for those with job offers. However, in 2025, Canada reduced its PNP intake by 50%, and most provinces now prioritize applicants who are already living or working there. French speakers, healthcare workers, and tradespeople may have an advantage; however, without Canadian job offers or residency, most displaced migrants will not qualify. They are worth reviewing to ensure there are no opportunities, nonetheless.
Migrants in the U.S. with Canadian spouses or common-law partners may be eligible for family sponsorship—a straightforward path to permanent residence, typically without income requirements. Processing is relatively fast, and approvals are frequent. Currently, spousal sponsorships from outside Canada are taking about 10 months for processing. Applications from within Canada for the same purpose are taking twice as long to be approved. However, for virtually all migrants from the U.S., the question remains: how can one wait for 10 months outside Canada if they are being driven out by the host country? They may have to return to their home country to await approvals.
Other family pathways, such as sponsoring parents or adult children, are slower and more restrictive, often limited to small annual quotas or lotteries. Nevertheless, where eligible relatives exist in Canada, sponsorship remains the most promising option.
Canada offers some specialized permanent residence programs, but few are accessible to displaced populations. The federal Self-Employed Persons Program—for artists, athletes, or cultural workers—is paused until 2026. This pause was implemented to address a backlog of applications and improve processing times, as stated by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC). During this pause, IRCC is continuing to process existing applications and is exploring ways to reform the program in the long term. Quebec offers a similar stream, but with strict French-language and financial requirements, which makes it potentially worth exploring. Entrepreneurs may apply under the Start-Up Visa Program if backed by a Canadian incubator, but it's highly selective. Investor visas require $ 100,000 or more in capital, making them impractical for almost all displaced migrants. Still, those who have such capital may want to explore this program.
Currently, Canada provides no dedicated pathway for migrants in the U.S. losing humanitarian or TPS status. Advocates have suggested exempting these individuals from the STCA, creating a specific resettlement program, or permitting private sponsorships. Thus far, no such policies have been enacted. The Canadian government has concentrated on short-term visa programs instead of long-term protection. However, with deportations in the U.S. on the horizon, this stance could shift due to public and political pressure. Nevertheless, the potential disruptions to migrants in the U.S. may generate a wave of interest that exceeds Canada's capacity to accommodate.
Canada has a legacy of helping the displaced—from Hungarians in 1956 to Vietnamese in the 1970s, Syrians in 2015, and Ukrainians more recently. As indicated, while legal pathways for Canadian immigration from the U.S. remain narrow, they are not entirely closed. For now, migrants in the U.S. looking to go northward must rely on this patchwork of limited options. For the rest, the future depends on advocacy, reform, and Canada's willingness to lead once more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scoop: DNC rents taco truck to mock Trump on 'TACO' slogan
Scoop: DNC rents taco truck to mock Trump on 'TACO' slogan

Axios

time33 minutes ago

  • Axios

Scoop: DNC rents taco truck to mock Trump on 'TACO' slogan

The Democratic National Committee is commandeering a taco truck to mock Trump's apparent fury at the slogan " Trump Always Chickens Out," or "TACO," Axios has learned. Why it matters: Democrats clearly think they have found a way to get under the president's skin. Trump was asked about the mantra — used by Wall Street traders to predict his response to tariff-induced market dips — at a press conference Wednesday, and he lashed out in response. "Don't ever say what you said. That's a nasty question," the president replied. Driving the news: The DNC will park a taco truck outside the Republican National Committee's headquarters on Capitol Hill with a graphic of Trump in a chicken suit and the "Trump Always Chickens Out" slogan. The truck will be there between noon and 2pm on Tuesday and will actually serve free tacos, a DNC spokesperson told Axios. What they're saying: "With his idiotic trade policy, he talks a big game, caves, and then leaves working families and small businesses to deal with the fallout," DNC chair Ken Martin said in a statement. "Trump always chickens out — we're just bringing the tacos to match." The other side: "LMFAO. A taco truck? Are they going to be giving out free vasectomies again too?" RNC spokesperson Zach Parkinson said in a statement, citing a past DNC pro-abortion initiative.

Opinion - Trump's ‘return to office' crusade smothers its pronatalist promise
Opinion - Trump's ‘return to office' crusade smothers its pronatalist promise

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Trump's ‘return to office' crusade smothers its pronatalist promise

The White House trumpets a 'baby bonus' — $5,000 wired days after delivery — to reverse America's record-low 1.6 fertility rate, documented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Vital Statistics Reports. In the same breath, it orders every federal employee back to the office five days a week. But Stanford's new 'Working from Home in 2025' survey of 16,422 professionals upends that logic: women with children desire 2.66 remote days each week, higher than any other demographic. The administration vows to grow families while vaporizing the flexibility that makes new children feasible, creating a collision that risks empty cribs and hollow offices alike. Time rules parenthood. The average American commute consumes 55 minutes round-trip, meaning a traditional five-day schedule eats up almost another five hours of free time each week. Those hours fuel bedtime routines, homework patrol and marriage maintenance; without them, parental stress spikes. Stanford's survey shows parents steer toward hybrid work precisely because several home days help restore that bandwidth. Parents still collaborate on site yet dodge traffic's cortisol surge. The federal badge doctrine yanks that option, forcing caregivers back into rush-hour gridlock and shredding the very capacity the 'baby bonus' seeks to reward. The White House defends the order as a downtown-revitalization plan, yet empty playgrounds undermine long-term urban vitality far more than shuttered salad bars. The response has been swift — over 260,000 civil-service resignations, buyouts or early retirements since the mandate, a wave led by mid-career women. These departures bleed institutional knowledge, spike contractor costs and prove that rigid schedules push out precisely the workers the baby-bonus scheme aims to empower. Direct payments headline well, yet history shows money alone seldom moves fertility. France, Hungary and South Korea all dangled cash but saw sustained birth-rate gains only after they paired subsidies with affordable childcare and generous leave. We've seen the same skepticism here, with women calling the $5,000 proposal 'meager' without schedule support. In fact, policymakers still debate whether a bonus would move the needle at all. Child-care tuition already tops mortgage payments in many metro areas, and the gas, parking and wardrobe costs tied to full-time commutes burn up the bonus long before a first birthday. Rigid attendance therefore turns the 'baby bonus' into a consolation prize for exhaustion. The persistent declines in births stem from soaring childcare costs, student debt and delayed milestones such as homeownership — all problems amplified by longer daily commutes. When the administration mandates five badge scans a week, it inflates every hidden parenting expense the subsidy intends to ease. The result is policy whiplash: a check in one envelope, a time audit in the next. The Stanford survey reinforces that economic calculus: women with children value schedule control more than any other employment perk, ranking it higher than pay or promotion prospects. Force them back, and many abandon growth plans — at work and at home. The administration's own ranks testify. Treasury's internal return-to-office guidance, issued in February, acknowledges 'heightened retention risk' among caregivers, yet it still enforces five days on-site. Pronatalism that ignores workplace physics turns into press-release theater. One pivot resolves the clash: Replace the blanket five-day decree with a disciplined three-day anchor model for roles that do not handle classified hardware or wet-lab equipment. Stanford's Steven Davis and Nicholas Bloom show firms keep productivity steady — or lift it — under such hybrid rules, while recruitment costs fall because talent pools widen geographically. Eighty percent of Fortune 500 companies now run some version of this model, proof that flexibility and performance coexist. Hybrid schedules also cut vehicle miles, handing the administration an unwritten climate victory without another regulation, as remote-work research from Hoover Institution scholars confirms. Congress can hard-wire the alignment. Tie the enlarged Child Tax Credit now under debate to employer certification of at least two voluntary home days per week, nudging private firms toward family-friendly norms. House negotiators already weigh credit expansion as part of a broader pronatalist push. Add lease subsidies for offices that include on-site childcare and stroller storage, and the commute becomes a support node, not a hurdle. Stanford's evidence stands clear: caregivers who will deliver tomorrow's taxpayers want 2.66 remote days each week, yet the badge order throttles that desire and drains the very talent the government hopes to retain. Align workplace structure with family aspirations, and the baby bonus transforms from political gimmick to demographic catalyst. Ignore the contradiction, and America exchanges rattles for resignation letters — a trade no nation can afford. Flexibility, not fiat, is the linchpin that lets families, careers and the country thrive together. Gleb Tsipursky, Ph.D., serves as the CEO of the hybrid work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts and authored the best-seller Returning to the Office and Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Newark mayor sues New Jersey's top federal prosecutor after arrest at immigration detention site
Newark mayor sues New Jersey's top federal prosecutor after arrest at immigration detention site

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Newark mayor sues New Jersey's top federal prosecutor after arrest at immigration detention site

NEWARK, N.J. (AP) — Newark Mayor Ras Baraka sued New Jersey's top federal prosecutor on Tuesday over his arrest on a trespassing charge at a federal immigration detention facility, saying the Trump-appointed attorney had pursued the case out of political spite. Baraka, who leads New Jersey's biggest city, is a candidate in a crowded primary field for the Democratic nomination for governor next Tuesday. The lawsuit against interim U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba coincided with the day early in-person voting began. The lawsuit seeks damages for 'false arrest and malicious prosecution,' and also accuses Habba of defamation for comments she made about his case, which was later dropped. Citing a post on X in which Habba said Baraka 'committed trespass,' the lawsuit says Habba issued a 'defamatory statement' and authorized his 'false arrest' despite 'clear evidence that Mayor Baraka had not committed the petty offense of 'defiant trespass.'' The suit also names Ricky Patel, the Homeland Security Investigations agent in charge in Newark. 'This is not about revenge,' Baraka said during a news conference. 'Ultimately, it's about them taking accountability for what they did.' Emails seeking comment were left Tuesday with Habba's office and the Homeland Security Department, where Patel works. The episode outside the Delaney Hall federal immigration detention center has had dramatic fallout. It began on May 9 when Baraka tried to join three Democratic members of Congress — Rob Menendez, LaMonica McIver and Bonnie Watson Coleman — who went to the facility for an oversight tour, something authorized under federal law. Baraka, an outspoken critic of Trump's immigration crackdown and the detention center, was denied entry. Video from the event showed him walking from the facility side of the fence to the street side, where other people had been protesting, and then uniformed officials came to arrest him. As they did, people could be heard in the video saying to protect the mayor. The video shows a crowd forming and pushing as officials led off a handcuffed Baraka. He was initially charged with trespass, but Habba dropped that charge last month and charged McIver with two counts of assaulting officers stemming from her role in the skirmish at the facility's gate. U.S. Magistrate Judge Andre Espinosa rebuked Habba's office after moving to dismiss the charges. 'The hasty arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, followed swiftly by the dismissal of these trespassing charges a mere 13 days later, suggests a worrisome misstep by your Office,' he wrote. McIver decried the charges and signaled she plans to fight them. A preliminary hearing is scheduled later this month. Delaney Hall, a 1,000-bed facility, opened earlier this year as a federal immigration detention facility. Florida-based Geo Group Inc., which owns and operates the property, was awarded a 15-year contract valued at $1 billion in February. The announcement was part of the president's plans to sharply increase detention beds nationwide from a budget of about 41,000 beds this year. Baraka sued Geo soon after that deal was announced. Then, on May 23, the Trump Justice Department filed a suit against Newark and three other New Jersey cities over their so-called sanctuary policies. There is no legal definition for sanctuary city policies, but they generally limit cooperation by local law enforcement with federal immigration officers. New Jersey's attorney general has a statewide directive in place prohibiting local police from collaborating in federal civil immigration matters. The policies are aimed at barring cooperation on civil enforcement matters, not at blocking cooperation on criminal matters. They specifically carve out exceptions for when Immigration and Customs Enforcement supplies police with a judicial criminal warrant. The Justice Department said, though, the cities won't notify ICE when they've made criminal arrests, according to the suit. It's unclear whether Baraka's role in these fights with the Trump administration is having an effect on his campaign for governor. He's one of six candidates seeking the Democratic nomination in the June 10 election to succeed term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy. In a video ad in the election's final weeks, Baraka has embraced a theme his rivals are also pushing: affordability. He says he'll cut taxes. While some of the images show him standing in front of what appears to be Delaney Hall, he doesn't mention immigration or the arrest specifically, saying: 'I'll keep Trump out of your homes and out of your lives.' Trump has endorsed Jack Ciattarelli, one of several Republicans running in the gubernatorial primary. Ciattarelli has said if he's elected, his first executive order would be to end any sanctuary policies for immigrants in the country illegally. ___ Associated Press writer Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store