logo
Peace Deal Declared to End '12‑Day War'

Peace Deal Declared to End '12‑Day War'

Arabian Post3 hours ago

Arabian Post Staff -Dubai
Donald Trump proclaimed a full ceasefire between Israel and Iran on Monday, marking what he described as the end of a '12‑day war' that forced millions from Tehran and sparked grave fears of escalation. He posted on Truth Social that Iran would halt its operations at midnight ET, followed by Israel twelve hours later, culminating in a 24‑hour cessation of hostilities.
Trump touted the move as a diplomatic breakthrough, congratulating 'both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end' the conflict. He asserted that the agreement was brokered in discussions with Prime Minister Netanyahu and through U.S. envoys in dialogue with Tehran, with Qatar playing a key intermediary role.
ADVERTISEMENT
Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, echoed that Tehran's forces stood down at 4 a.m. Tehran time if Israel ceased its attacks by then, though he clarified that a final decision on halting military operations was pending. Israel's military has yet to formally acknowledge the ceasefire, and missile alerts and strikes were still reported over Tel Aviv, Beersheba and the Golan Heights in the hours following the announcement.
The conflict began on 13 June when Israel launched airstrikes on Iran's nuclear and military infrastructure, including sites near Natanz, Isfahan and Tehran. That response, which Israeli authorities described as necessary to counter an alleged Iranian march towards nuclear weapons capability, included the destruction of centrifuge material and the deaths of senior Iranian military figures and nuclear scientists. Iran retaliated with waves of missiles and drones aimed at Israeli territory; Israel intercepted many of them, but civilian casualties were reported in Beersheba and Tel Aviv.
The conflict widened when the United States joined with bunker‑buster strikes on Iranian underground nuclear facilities over the weekend, prompting Iran to retaliate by targeting the U.S. air base at Al Udeid in Qatar. The attack caused no casualties, and Trump later thanked Iran for the 'early notice,' calling it a 'very weak response'.
Though Trump dismissed European diplomatic efforts as ineffective, he warned that U.S. involvement remained a distinct possibility if Iran escalated further, positioning American strikes solely against nuclear targets. Internal Israeli pressure also rose; Prime Minister Netanyahu reportedly instructed ministers to refrain from public commentary as military activity approached a pause.
Humanitarian fallout during this period has been acute. Over 650 Iranians have died, according to Iranian health data, including civilians, and over 200 Israeli military and civilian fatalities have been reported. Tehran saw large-scale evacuations as power and internet access faltered.
International bodies raised alarms over the bombardment of nuclear facilities. The International Atomic Energy Agency cautioned against striking enrichment sites due to risks of radiological contamination. Legal experts also voiced concerns that the strikes on civilian infrastructure—including hospitals and residential neighborhoods—could constitute violations under international humanitarian law.
Despite the ceasefire declaration, uncertainty remains. Iran's foreign minister warned that if Israeli attacks persisted past 4 a.m. Tehran time, hostilities could resume. Similarly, Israeli officials reported continued launcher of missiles from Iran, demonstrating that the ceasefire may be fragile.
Regional and global reactions have been varied. Qatar's prime minister was credited with facilitating Iran's acceptance of the U.S.-proposed ceasefire. European negotiators, meanwhile, expressed frustration that efforts in Geneva had produced little movement before hostilities intensified. Both Russia and China urged restraint and urged full de‑escalation.
Markets responded positively to the ceasefire announcement, reflecting investor hopes for regional stability, yet the humanitarian toll and legal implications—the destruction of nuclear infrastructure, civilian casualties, and potential violations of international law—leave an ambiguous legacy for a war that surged in intensity over just under two weeks. The path ahead now hinges on whether both nations uphold the phased withdrawal and open room for diplomatic resolution amid deep mistrust.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Even the climate agenda has been affected by US strikes on Iran
Even the climate agenda has been affected by US strikes on Iran

The National

time23 minutes ago

  • The National

Even the climate agenda has been affected by US strikes on Iran

The topic of the moment at the ongoing Climate Action Week in London is to get ready for the next global climate summit at Belem in Brazil. But it is happening at a time when the climate change agenda has slipped markedly under the radar. One speaker said it was like living in a 'good news, bad news' world. The radical optimists are still to be found, but the naysayers who foresee a future of a lemming-like collapse from the cliff are in stronger voice. The US strikes on Iran over the weekend represent a radical moment not just for the global political balance, but also the environmental movement, which has an uneasy relationship with nuclear power. Its emotional heart is not in favour of atomic energy, but administrators who need to deliver on net-zero goals by the mid-century see no alternative. The B2 bombers that carried out the raids on Iran's Fordow were clearly running the risk of contamination from the nuclear facility. So far, the reporting from the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN's nuclear body, is that there have been no leaks that would pose a danger to the region. The area may be mountainous and arid, but it is close to multiple countries and thus the ultimate threats exist far wider afield than just in the host nation. It is clear how badly Iran fell short in its nuclear adventure Iran has invested much of its resources in mastering atomic technology. Decades of underground research and the building of refining facilities have come about despite the international community expressing doubts over the programme. The IAEA has been the principal forum in which this contested activity was carried out, with reference regularly to the UN Security Council, and now finally culminating in a bombing intervention by the US. I say 'finally', but there is no certainty that the raid will cap Iran's nuclear programme. This is even as Israeli officials claimed over the weekend that the war they have waged, combined with Washington's intervention, has set Tehran several years back from weaponisation of this programme. What is the link between climate change and Iran's nuclear programme, you may ask. The short answer is that the climate change agenda could have taken Iran down a different path. Because around the world, there is more and more investment in nuclear capability. As mentioned above, it is crucial to net-zero goals. There is no denying that Iran meets several metrics for how a nation can benefit from nuclear energy. It is a vast country with a rapidly expanding population that has great manufacturing potential. As it asserts, it has the right under international law to develop an indigenous nuclear programme. And yet, in failing to recognise the wider political context of its claims, it has lost sight of its own national needs for clean and sustainable energy output. Tim Gould, the chief economist of the International Energy Agency (which is not affiliated with the IAEA), told the City of London's Net Zero Delivery Summit on Monday that nuclear energy was at the heart of a new age of electricity. Power generation is needed to meet an increasing share of the world's rising demand. One of the components of this push for more electricity directly stems from climate change and rising global temperatures. Mr Gould says there is more demand for electricity for cooling systems so that humans can live normally in the changed climate. Iran is one of the countries bearing the brunt of this trend. For a country like Iran, electricity offers the 'most readily available' set of advantages, ranging from falling costs to more efficient clean technologies. Worldwide, despite the headlines around countries like India returning to coal generation, more than 80 per cent of new electricity capacity is coming from low-emission sources. Mr Gould makes the point that countries also like to have homegrown energy security, which can be derived from renewables. Energy transition is vital to the future of the Earth. It is essential for us to survive and make our habitats more liveable. And contamination in any part of the planet from a nuclear facility that is in the middle of a confrontation amounts to the greatest failure to meet the challenge of climate change. But even at this moment, with the brink of disaster in front of us, there is progress being reported. According to Mr Gould, the Cop28 goal that was announced by the UAE presidency of tripling renewable energy is being met. With innovation like carbon capture and storage, there is an opportunity to increase energy efficiency and to line up enough capital to back big-ticket sustainable energy systems, including nuclear. That is where the global agenda is really at, with just months to go before Brazil hosts the next UN climate summit. It is, therefore, important that progress not be blown off course by cataclysm in the Middle East. Seen through the lens of climate change, it is clear how badly Iran fell short in its nuclear adventure. It is just as hard to know when it will start back on the international path.

Israel rescuers say 7 dead in multi-wave Iran missile attacks
Israel rescuers say 7 dead in multi-wave Iran missile attacks

Al Etihad

time30 minutes ago

  • Al Etihad

Israel rescuers say 7 dead in multi-wave Iran missile attacks

24 June 2025 10:24 Beersheba, Israel (AFP/AP) At least seven people were killed in Israel in a multi-wave Iranian missile attack Tuesday shortly before a staggered ceasefire announced by US President Donald Trump was meant to enter force, emergency services and the army on X, the Magen David Adom rescue service said three people were pronounced dead at the scene of a strike in southern Beersheba while a fourth was added in an update to its three people were "moderately injured" while 20 were treated for minor injuries and anxiety, it footage from the scene showed rescue teams combing through the rubble and mangled slabs of concrete looking for metal jutted out of the top of the multi-storey block, which was partially collapsed down one rang out across Israel for around two hours from dawn as Iran fired six waves of missiles according to statements released by Israel's around 8:00 am (0500 GMT), the military said the public could leave areas near full extent of damage after 12 days of war is not known due to military censorship rules, but at least 50 impacts have been acknowledged nationwide and the official death toll stood at 24 before Tuesday's ceasefire agreement, as outlined by Trump on social media in a surprise late-night post, would see the arch-enemies stop firing in staggered phases. According to Trump, Iran would unilaterally halt all operations beginning 0400 GMT Tuesday, with Israel following suit 12 hours later. Israel-Iran Conflict Continue full coverage

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store