logo
All noisy on the Western solar panel front

All noisy on the Western solar panel front

Politico2 days ago

Presented by the Stop the Oil Shakedown Coalition.
With help from Alex Nieves and Timothy Cama
SOLAR WARS: There's enough heat behind California's long-simmering rooftop solar fight that it's boiling over on two fronts this week.
On Wednesday, the California Supreme Court will hear arguments from both sides on whether regulators broke the law when they slashed rooftop solar credits for new customers in 2022. At the same time, assemblymembers have a Friday deadline to pass (or not) a controversial legislative proposal to reduce the payments for legacy rooftop solar customers.
The multipronged fight shows just how entrenched the two camps are — with rooftop solar advocates allying with builders and real estate agents on one side and utilities with labor unions and ratepayer advocates on the other — and just how willing they are to take their arguments to as many venues as possible.
It's a fight that's likely to continue, given that the Supreme Court appears poised to rule narrowly — and perhaps not even on the policy debate itself.
Instead, the Supreme Court's clerk and executive officer, Jorge Navarrete, asked lawyers last month to focus on how much the judicial branch should give deference to the California Public Utilities Commission when reviewing its various decisions. A lower court had previously cited deference to the CPUC — one of the rare state agencies created by the California Constitution itself — to reject a lawsuit by environmental groups that sought to restore the rooftop solar subsidies.
For the environmental groups, the focus on deference is now an opportunity to take their fight to the agency itself, which some see as too cozy with the investor-owned utilities it regulates.
'Already, there's a gap in checks and balances on the commission,' said Roger Lin, an attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity, which is bringing the lawsuit against the CPUC. 'The implications of this case stretch beyond rooftop solar.'
The investor-owned utilities, who otherwise argued in support of the CPUC's decision, declined to weigh in on how much the court should defer to the agency in a filing earlier this year. But Attorney General Rob Bonta's office is defending the agency, arguing in a brief that the CPUC deserves deference because of precedent, because of the agency's expertise and because the Legislature has 'repeatedly tasked the Commission with studying the effects of the NEM tariff and revising it as appropriate.'
It's timely, then, to point out that the Legislature is currently considering doing part of the commission's work itself. Assemblymember Lisa Calderon's AB 942 would slash the payments to longstanding rooftop solar customers who got spared by the CPUC's 2022 decision to reduce payments solely for new customers.
Calderon agreed this week to exempt farms and schools, which is eliminating opposition from farming groups close to some moderate Democrats. She also picked up support from the CPUC's Public Advocates Office, which said the measure could reduce costs for ratepayers without rooftop solar. But it'll come down to the wire: Some progressive Democrats have already peeled off from the bill in committee votes, citing concerns from their constituents with rooftop solar that the bill would break existing contracts.
The Supreme Court will start hearing arguments at 9 a.m. on Wednesday (and it will be livestreamed if you want to follow along). AB 942 has until Friday to pass off the Assembly floor. — CvK
Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here!
MUSK MANIA: Elon Musk has finally returned to his roots — and Democrats are loving it.
Musk's departure from the White House, where he was once among Trump's top advisers, took an explosive turn Tuesday as the Tesla CEO ripped Republicans' budget megabill on X, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' that will raise the national debt.
As we've noted, Musk's company never stopped stumping for California policies like the low-carbon fuel standard, even as Trump promised to unravel the state's regulations and Republicans blamed state officials for high gas prices.
The eccentric billionaire was always expected to eventually butt heads with an administration poised to throttle the electric vehicle transition and eliminate clean energy incentives his company has profited greatly from.
While the episode shocked Republicans and drew pushback from House Speaker Mike Johnson, Democrats could barely hide their excitement, Timothy Cama reports for POLITICO's E&E News.
'I haven't spoke to Elon Musk, I'm not sure what the reasons are for this extraordinary statement, but we're in complete agreement,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said. — AN
WE HAVE A BEE PROBLEM: California lawmakers are coming to the rescue of one of nature's most important insects: honeybees.
The Assembly unanimously approved Assemblymember Rhodesia Ransom's bill today to launch a program within the California Department of Food and Agriculture to monitor the health of honeybee populations. AB 1042 would allow the department, when extra funding is available, to provide incentives and grants for health intervention projects to support the state's managed honeybee population.
The critical species is responsible for pollinating crops like fruits and tree nuts that underpin the state's agriculture sector and maintaining natural ecosystems, but are dying in large numbers due to climate change, habitat loss, pesticides and other factors.
Commercial beekeepers reported an average loss of 62 percent of their bee colonies between June 2024 and February of this year, according to a national survey by Project Apis m. (honeybees' Latin name). — AN
RECYCLE THE REDO: Gov. Gavin Newsom told CalRecycle to redo its plastic waste reduction rules in the name of affordability. Now, the lawmakers that passed the law behind the rules say the redo goes against their intent — and that they were the ones who wanted to make recycling affordable to begin with.
Twenty-two lawmakers joined Sen. Ben Allen, the author of 2022's SB 54, in a letter to Newsom, CalEPA Secretary Yana Garcia and CalRecycle Director Zoe Heller last week. Their goal all along, they write, was to lower costs to cities and ratepayers by making manufacturers responsible for recycling their products. The new rules, they argue, stray from their intent by exempting too much food and medication packaging and not preventing hazardous recycling technologies.
A coalition of environmental groups including Oceana and Californians Against Waste also blasted the new rules Monday. 'Getting this right is about more than checking a legislative box,' the letter reads. 'California has an opportunity to lead in the global effort to tackle plastic pollution, but not if vague, watered-down language subverts that very goal.'
Who is happy: the California Chamber of Commerce, which is arguing that the new rules are more achievable. Spokesperson John Myers shared a takeaway: 'By fostering a regulatory environment that balances ecological responsibility with economic viability, the state sets a precedent for sustainable innovation of a circular economy.' — CvK
TWO STRIKES: It's been a bad week for Sable Offshore Corp.'s oil drilling ambitions.
Santa Barbara Superior Court Judge Donna Geck issued an order Tuesday blocking a waiver granted by the state fire marshal that would allow the Texas-based oil company to restart a crude pipeline off Santa Barbara.
That decision comes just days after a different Santa Barbara judge sided with the California Coastal Commission and stopped repairs on the 124-mile pipeline that leaked over 100,000 gallons in 2015.
Linda Krop, chief counsel for the Environmental Defense Center, which sued the fire marshal and Sable, cheered the rulings and used the moment to call out Newsom, who has stayed relatively quiet on the issue.
'At the very least, Governor Newsom should demand that his agencies follow the law and do everything possible to prevent another ecological and economic disaster in our state,' she said. — AN
— Former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has a message for climate activists worried about the White House: roll up your sleeves and "stop whining.'
— Southern California is being hit with a triple whammy of thunderstorms, dry lightning and rip tides.
— Underground water supplies in the Colorado River basin are depleting even faster than the river itself, according to a new study based on NASA satellite data.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

High court blocks Hamas victims' try to reopen case against Lebanese bank
High court blocks Hamas victims' try to reopen case against Lebanese bank

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

High court blocks Hamas victims' try to reopen case against Lebanese bank

WASHINGTON, June 5 (UPI) -- The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled unanimously that it would not allow relatives of victims and survivors of Hamas attacks from 2001 to 2003 to reopen a case in which they accused a Lebanese bank of providing financial services to Hamas-affiliated clients. The court ruled in BLOM Bank SAL vs. Michal Honickman, in an opinion delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas, that the plaintiffs did not meet the requirements of extraordinary circumstances for reopening the case. When the case was originally tried in 2019, the relatives and victims lost because they failed to prove the bank knowingly took on clients affiliated with Hamas. The victims and relatives then wanted to offer evidence to which they claimed they had access later. They cited as precedent Rule 60(b), which outlines the reasons why a case could be reopened after a judgement has been issued, such as a mistake in the judgement or evidence unavailable to the plaintiffs during their original case. "It is Rule 60(b)'s standard -- and only Rule 60(b0's standard -- that applies when a party seeks relief from final judgement. A party seeking Rule 60(b) relief must always demonstrate 'extraordinary circumstances' justifying relief," the court wrote. Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson delivered a concurring opinion in which she parted from her colleagues, warning that courts should not deny requests to reopen cases simply because the requesting party was given a chance to amend a case while it was ongoing. "In particular, I think the district court was wrong to fault plaintiffs for making a 'deliberate choice' to appeal the dismissal of their complaint in lieu of accepting various pre-dismissal opportunities to cure purported pleading deficiencies." Brown wrote. The victims and families accused the Lebanese bank of aiding and abetting attacks from 2001 to 2003 by providing financial services to Hamas-affiliated clients. In 2019, the families attempted to sue the bank, but the judge dismissed the suit for not providing evidence that the bank knowingly provided financial services to Hamas-affiliated clients. The court even asked the survivors and families' lawyer if they wanted to amend the case, but they declined. They later found evidence they said proves that the bank knowingly engaged with Hamas affiliates, so they went back to court to reopen their case. Their lawyer, Michael Radine, criticized the Supreme Court's decision. Radine said in a statement to UPI that the district court would not allow his clients to retry the case unless they could meet "the erroneous and essentially unmeetable pleading standards raised by the defendant and adopted by the district court." He added that the district court required evidence such as acts or statements from bank employees proving affiliations with Hamas before discovery. "Few plaintiffs will have access to a defendant's internal communications before discovery, which is why the [2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals] tossed that pleading standard as 'too exacting,'" Radine said in the statement. During the original case, the families appealed to the 2nd Circuit and were turned down again, so they returned to the lower courts and asked to retry the case and submit evidence proving that the bank knowingly provided financial services to Hamas-affiliated individuals. They were told their case did not meet the requirement to be reopened, so the plaintiffs appealed that decision to the 2nd Circuit again. "Indeed, today's decision could empower district courts to prevent plaintiffs from amending their complaints whenever the state of the applicable law is unclear," Radine said. BLOM Bank SAL's lawyer Michael Hugh McGinley didn't respond to a request for comment.

Cartwright says he's not running for Congress
Cartwright says he's not running for Congress

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cartwright says he's not running for Congress

MOOSIC — Former Democratic Congressman Matt Cartwright won't run to regain the seat in the House of Representatives he lost last year to Republican Rob Bresnahan, the Luzerne County businessman now representing the 8th Congressional District in the GOP-controlled House. 'I've decided it's time to give it a rest,' Cartwright said Thursday after months of weighing whether to run again. 'I've worked 80-hour weeks for the last 12 years. It's time to give somebody else a chance to do this job.' Cartwright, who rose in Democratic leadership over his six terms in Congress, announced his decision not to run at a press conference held in the shadow of a new emergency services building under construction in Moosic — a facility he helped secure $3 million in federal funds to support. It's a decision that makes easier the path for other potential Democratic candidates who may seek to challenge Bresnahan in 2026, when Democrats hope voters discontented with Republican President Donald Trump and his GOP allies emerge as a blue wave that sweeps their party back into the House majority. Former Democratic Congressman Matt Cartwright announces he won't run to regain the seat in the House of Representatives he lost last year to Republican Rob Bresnahan. The former representative of the 8th Congressional District, accompanied by his wife Marion, made the announcement at Greenwood Hose Company on Thursday. (CHAD SEBRING/STAFF PHOTO) Bresnahan narrowly defeated Cartwright in November, earning 195,663 votes to the incumbent Democrat's 189,411 in the district that includes all of Lackawanna, Wayne and Pike counties and parts of Luzerne and Monroe counties. It was one of the most tightly contested and closely watched races in the country. As of late April, the independent and nonpartisan Cook Political Report's 2026 House race ratings listed Pennsylvania's 8th Congressional District as leaning Republican. Races that lean one way or another are considered competitive, but where one party, in this case the GOP, has an advantage. CPR had listed the 2024 Cartwright/Bresnahan race as one of 25 House toss-ups across the country, the most competitive races where either party had a good chance of winning. Who might ultimately run against Bresnahan next year remains unclear, and Cartwright did not endorse any potential candidates Thursday. But after noting his gratitude to the people of Northeast Pennsylvania for allowing him to represent them for 12 years and apologizing to anyone disappointed by his decision not to run, Cartwright said 'it's time to hand over the reins to new blood.' He also said he'll have more to say about that as time goes on. 'We're going to see how the process shakes itself out,' Cartwright said. 'One of the wonderful things about serving in this position is you get to know all of the politicians with a heartbeat in Northeastern Pennsylvania and I did, and I have to say we have a deep, deep bench on my side of the aisle. We have … what they call an embarrassment of riches. There are a lot of people who could step right into my shoes, and I'm sure you'll be hearing from them fairly shortly.' Sources told The Times-Tribune that Democratic state Rep. Bridget Kosierowski of Waverly Twp., Democratic Pittston Mayor Michael Lombardo and Democratic state Sen. Marty Flynn of Dunmore are considering potential runs. Democratic Lackawanna County Commissioner Bill Gaughan said Thursday he won't run. Democratic Scranton Mayor Paige Gebhardt Cognetti, who's seeking reelection this year, said 'I'm running for mayor of Scranton.' Efforts to reach Lombardo and Flynn were not immediately successful; Kosierowski responded to the newspaper's inquiry in a statement. 'As both a nurse and a state representative, I share the deep frustration so many in PA-08 are feeling about what's happening at the federal level,' she said. 'Congressman Cartwright has been a strong advocate for this region, and I'm grateful for his service. Right now, I'm focused on continuing to deliver for the people I represent, and as things evolve, I'll keep listening and considering where I can make the greatest impact.' Former Democratic Congressman Matt Cartwright announces he won't run to regain the seat in the House of Representatives he lost last year to Republican Rob Bresnahan. The former representative of the 8th Congressional District, accompanied by his wife Marion, made the announcement at Greenwood Hose Company on Thursday. (CHAD SEBRING/STAFF PHOTO) Cartwright spent some of Thursday's press conference reflecting on his impact, including as one of a dozen subcommittee chairs, colloquially called 'Cardinals,' of the powerful House Appropriations Committee. 'And that helped me bring a lot of tax dollars, our tax dollars, back home to work in our local economy — about $100 million on my own signature in the last four years,' he said, noting the federal funding for the Moosic emergency services building as an example. 'In our congressional office we placed a premium on working for economic development.' Cartwright also said 16 bills he wrote became law during his time in Congress, including bills that help veterans and military spouses. He mentioned the Camp Lejeune Justice Act, describing it as a legislative effort 'to remove a blot on our national integrity that came about from our government's poisoning hundreds of thousands of U.S. Marines, their families and the employees at Camp Lejeune with carcinogens in their drinking water.' He also expressed pride in his work as a chief elected advocate of restoring passenger rail service between Scranton and New York City, describing the Amtrak project as 'all systems go.' As proposed, the project would see Amtrak passenger trains run between Scranton and Manhattan's Penn Station with stops in Mount Pocono and East Stroudsburg, and Blairstown, Dover, Morristown, Montclair and Newark, N.J. An Amtrak study released in March 2023 found that restoring such a service would generate $84 million in new economic activity annually, creating jobs on both sides of the Pennsylvania/New Jersey border. Lackawanna County commissioners appointed Cartwright in January to a term on the Pennsylvania Northeast Regional Railroad Authority board, where he continues to advocate for the project. He also credited and thanked Bresnahan on Thursday for endorsing the Amtrak initiative. 'On the other hand some of his votes leave a lot to be desired and I don't want to go further into it today,' Cartwright said of his Republican successor. In a statement Thursday, the National Republican Congressional Committee said Bresnahan has accomplished more for Pennsylvania in five months than Cartwright did in more than a decade. 'Rep. Bresnahan is delivering, and Cartwright is sending a message to Democrats that this race is over before it starts,' the statement from NRCC spokeswoman Maureen O'Toole said. Cartwright's remarks Thursday included something of a soliloquy on politics where he suggested voters not simply vote for the change candidate, 'because half the time the change they offer is not for the better.' He also warned against voting for 'extremist candidates' offering simple solutions to complicated problems or for candidates 'who scapegoat the least of our brothers and sisters,' adding that 'targeting their lives is not going to fix yours.' 'Do your own research from reputable sources and vote for candidates that have concrete plans that will actually help you and the people you care about,' he said. 'Vote for leaders who will fight for things that really matter in your lives, like people's health care; like for police and first responders; like for fair pharmaceutical prices; for veterans' care; for seniors' benefits; for workers' rights; for civil rights; for voting rights, civil justice, clean air, clean water, tax fairness and sensible economic policies and for public education.' 'These are the things that I fought for for 12 years down in Washington, D.C.,' he said. 'I was proud to do it and I'm proud to say I went down swinging for these things.' Cartwright didn't rule out a potential run in future cycles after 2026. 'The door is open,' he said.

Lawmakers Need to Get Back Into the Game on Trade
Lawmakers Need to Get Back Into the Game on Trade

Wall Street Journal

time33 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Lawmakers Need to Get Back Into the Game on Trade

In an unambiguous and unanimous ruling, the U.S. Court of International Trade held that President Trump's 'reciprocal tariffs' and fentanyl tariff actions exceeded his constitutional and statutory authority. We believe the ruling will stand up under Supreme Court review. While chronic trade imbalances remain, the administration now must deploy other trade strategies and authorities to address global overreliance on the U.S. to support the longstanding economic order. Congress can help by reclaiming its Constitutional authority to direct trade. The trade court's ruling states that the International Economic Emergency Powers Act, or IEEPA, can't authorize sweeping tariffs without violating what is known as the nondelegation doctrine. A three-judge panel ruled that IEEPA doesn't grant unlimited, unreviewable authority for the president to declare national emergencies unilaterally or impose tariffs arbitrarily. The ruling cited foundational Supreme Court cases such as Youngstown Sheet&Tube v. Sawyer, as well as more recent decisions such as Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, on improper delegation of authority from Congress to the executive branch. The court also invoked the 'major questions doctrine' of the Roberts court as part of the argument against Mr. Trump's claim of broad trade authority. In its argument before the trade court, the administration heavily relied on U.S. v. Yoshida International, a 1974 Supreme Court decision that upheld President Nixon's brief imposition of a 10% across-the-board tariff aimed at addressing a trade deficit spike. But that reliance ultimately undermines the administration's case for three key reasons. First, Yoshida involved presidential authority under the Trading with the Enemy Act, a statute that was later expressly amended to curtail executive power. Second, the Yoshida opinion emphasized the narrow and temporary scope of Nixon's tariffs, which stands in contrast to Mr. Trump's broader measures. Finally, following Nixon's actions, Congress enacted Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, granting the president more narrowly defined authority to respond to trade imbalances.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store