Good riddance to The Pit
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'Anybody who went in there, regardless of their political persuasion, their race, their sexual persuasion, it didn't matter. Everybody was welcomed. Even kids that were a little bit odd and outside the mainstream felt welcomed there,' Denise Jillson, the executive director of the Harvard Square Business Association,
Advertisement
I don't mean to argue with people who have happy memories of their time in The Pit. And it's certainly true that The Pit in the daytime was a less menacing place than it was at night.
But anyone tempted to romanticize The Pit and all it supposedly represented should read about Nachtwey's death. The Pit 'community' didn't welcome her. It quite literally killed her. Described as sweet and naive, Nachtwey was raped, stabbed by another Pit regular, finished off with a nunchuck blow to the head, and then dumped into the Charles River.
Former Suffolk District Attorney Dan Conley, who prosecuted hundreds of homicides in 17 years in office, said Nachtwey's killing was 'one of the most horrific, horrifying murders in my time as DA.'
'This young woman was truly an innocent kid,' he told me. Four people were
Advertisement
It was not the only crime associated with The Pit. As
You think?
There are, obviously, crimes in every setting. But the rose-tinted nostalgia for the era of The Pit kids strikes me as deeply misplaced, and a continuation of the willful indifference by many Cantabrigians to The Pit's 'dark side' that set the stage for Nachtwey's death in the first place.
Many of the kids who slept in and around The Pit needed help, and maybe they would have received it if more people in Cambridge had viewed The Pit as a problem and not as a perverse source of pride. Cambridge wore its willingness to let Pit kids sleep on the street as some kind of badge of countercultural honor. Embracing The Pit flattered Cambridge's self-image as a Bohemian enclave; it also left the kids themselves in danger.
'The street is a very dangerous place, it's a dangerous environment for anybody,' Conley said.
What does it matter? The Pit kids are long gone, and now so is The Pit itself. But there's still plenty of homelessness, and plenty of dispute over what to do about it. So mourn the end of an era if you must — you can even buy a brick salvaged from The Pit, with the proceeds going to a charity that supports homeless youth. But hopefully the next time some vulnerable young person like Nachtwey ends up here, there's no pit quite so deep waiting for them.
Advertisement
Alan Wirzbicki is Globe deputy editor for editorials. He can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
Musk's D.C. departure may not shield him from the courts' accountability
Musk himself has indicated that he was leaving Washington but intended to still do work for DOGE Both statements support claims in dozens of ongoing legal challenges against Musk and the agency that Trump declared to be Musk's ' Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Just two days before his farewell press conference at the White House, a federal court in Washington ruled that a challenge brought by Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell and her counterparts in 13 other states against DOGE and Musk Advertisement The government defends its actions by claiming that DOGE was merely a reorganization of an existing office and that Musk was a 'special government employee,' limited to working 130 days in a 365-day period, under federal law. The press conference was, not coincidentally, held on the 130th day of Musk's tenure. Advertisement But Trump's said the quiet part out loud: Musk still holds sway in a way that undermines the administration's claim that he was only a temporary governmental employee who didn't need Senate confirmation. And in an order two days earlier allowing the states' suit to proceed, Washington-based US District Judge Tanya Chutkan wrote that even if Musk left DOGE, 'that does not defeat an Appointments Clause claim.' 'President Trump may instruct another individual to lead DOGE and, if he does, States' Appointments Clause claim may also lie against that individual,' In allowing the claim that Trump exceeded his authority in creating DOGE without an act of Congress, Chutkan wrote: 'The President's power to act, and in turn executive power wielded by officers on behalf of the President, must stem either from an act of Congress or from the Constitution itself.' The states' suit is just one of dozens challenging the actions by Musk and DOGE, including upward of Advertisement But if Campbell and other attorneys general are successful in their claim that Musk and DOGE exceeded their authority, it would cut to the very heart of DOGE's existence and render the actions it has taken null and void. Now, what is the likelihood that the Supreme Court will rule against Musk and DOGE? Perhaps greater than you think. In a March 5 order, the court declined to intervene after a district court issued a temporary restraining order blocking DOGE's efforts to cancel previously-approved USAID funding. Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh, dissented. 'Does a single district-court judge who likely lacks jurisdiction have the unchecked power to compel the Government of the United States to pay out (and probably lose forever) 2 billion taxpayer dollars?' Alito wrote in dissent. 'The answer to that question should be an emphatic 'No,' but a majority of this Court apparently thinks otherwise. I am stunned.' But it is worth noting that Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and Justice Amy Coney Barrett, also members of the court's conservative supermajority, joined the court's more liberal justices in ruling against the administration. While that move alone is no clear indicator that the court will come to the much broader conclusion that Musk and DOGE have no legal or constitutional authority, it's an important tea leaf. Of course, even if the states succeed, no court can fully undo the damage DOGE and Musk have done. The loss of federal jobs and benefits, the ripple effect those job losses will have Advertisement But Musk's farewell doesn't mean he waves goodbye to potential accountability by the courts. If the Supreme Court follows the Constitution and the rule of law, its long arm should reach him wherever he is. Kimberly Atkins Stohr is a columnist for the Globe. She may be reached at
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
Marcelo Gomes da Silva should be freed
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up The arrest came as part of stepped-up Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity in Massachusetts over the past few months. The agency seems to have boosted its arrest numbers by widening its net. Of the roughly 1,500 people that Operation Patriot apprehended in Massachusetts, 790, or barely over half, had prior charges or convictions. The government's own tally implies that another estimated 710 community members had no criminal records at all. Advertisement Among them is Gomes, an honors student from Milford who officials say was a 'collateral arrest' — their name for arrests of people who are undocumented but have no criminal records, encountered by immigration agents in the community. Advertisement The Trump administration has argued that collateral arrests are more likely in places where local police don't cooperate with immigration authorities. If agents could just pick up criminals from courthouses or police stations, the argument goes, they wouldn't have to venture into the community where they're bound to run into other undocumented people. But the argument doesn't hold up under scrutiny — in the Gomes case and in general. The teenager was driving a vehicle belonging to his father, who officials say was the real target of the operation. But there is nothing publicly known that would suggest that the father was free because of anything the state of Massachusetts did, or that state officials could have turned him over to federal immigration even if they'd wanted to. Reporting by The Boston Globe found that the elder Gomes had faced traffic violations two years ago, which were later dismissed. But even if the state of Massachusetts had failed to cooperate with the feds to detain the father, the idea that immigration agents therefore simply had no choice but to arrest 'collaterals' it encountered while looking for him is false. Immigration officers didn't have to arrest Gomes; they chose to. If collateral arrests were really more common in so-called sanctuary jurisdictions, one would expect to see fewer of them in places that do cooperate with immigration enforcement. But that doesn't seem to be the case. See Operation Tidal Wave in April, which apprehended 1,120 undocumented immigrants across Florida. Only 63 percent of those detained had prior criminal arrests or convictions. The problem may be that arresting noncriminals could be the only way to reach the deportation numbers the Trump administration wants. The Trump administration recently imposed a new target of 3,000 arrests a day, but contrary to the president's rhetoric, there just aren't enough actual immigrant criminals to meet those numbers. Advertisement Meanwhile, the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees immigration, is clinging to anecdotal and often misleading cases to justify its tactics. In a Two of these men were 'arrested' while in custody at state prisons — where the justice system was already punishing them. A third man had been arrested by a New York police department, not federal agents. And the fourth man was a lawful permanent resident, not an 'illegal alien,' as the release claimed. We didn't need to deeply analyze this particular press release to find these gaping errors — the Trump administration simply published information that was in direct contradiction to its own claims. It's scary that people this sloppy with the facts also have the power to make life-changing arrests. Its high-profile blunders also include mistakenly If there's any method to this madness, it may be that the Trump administration thinks it can use arrests of people like Gomes to pressure local governments into aiding with its immigration agenda — to raise the costs for cities and states that don't cooperate. Advertisement But if Gomes's plight is an indictment of the Trump administration, it's also an indictment of Congress. Proposals to normalize the status of young people like Gomes have widespread support but have stalled in Congress for years. If lawmakers had acted, thousands of kids and young adults would no longer fear being deported to a country they may barely know because their parents chose to break immigration laws. Lawmakers should get serious about protecting those young people. Meanwhile, immigration officials should focus on actual safety threats — and Gomes should be back in our community. Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Judge halts deportation of Venezuelan migrant under Alien Enemies Act
A federal judge on Monday blocked the Trump administration from deporting a Venezuelan migrant under the Alien Enemies Act, saying it hasn't provided adequate notice or due process for it to be challenged. U.S. District Court Judge John Holcomb, a Trump appointee, ruled that those subject to deportation under the Alien Enemies Act have to be given a chance to challenge the move. "The Government is hereby preliminarily ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from removing or transferring out of this district any member of the putative class pursuant to the Proclamation pending further Order of this Court regarding the amount of notice and process that is due prior to removal," Holcomb wrote. In a win for Trump, Holcomb also said the president has "unlimited" authority to invoke the AEA, which is being challenged separately. Monday's ruling came amid a complaint by Darwin Antonio Arevalo Millan, a Venezuelan citizen being held at the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Adelanto, California. Trump Asks Scotus To Strip Protected Status For Hundreds Of Thousands Of Venezuelan Migrants Read On The Fox News App In his lawsuit, Arevalo said he is a "vocal dissident" of the Venezuelan government who was granted a permit authorizing him to work and reside in the U.S. pending the review of his asylum application. He was arrested after he reported for a scheduled ICE check-in, his lawsuit states. The arrest was premised upon his status as a Venezuelan with allegedly basketball-related tattoos, which could indicate that Arevalo is affiliated with the notorious Venezuelan Tren de Aragua (TdA) gang, it said. Arevalo's complaint was filed on behalf of himself and other Venezuelan citizens subjected to Trump's AEA executive order proclamation. He is asking a judge to require the government to provide at least 30 days' notice before any removal or transfer. Supreme Court Blocks New Deportations Of Venezuelans In Texas Under 18Th Century Alien Enemies Act Monday's ruling came days after the Supreme Court handed Trump a win by staying a lower court order that blocked the administration from deporting roughly 500,000 migrants from Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela. The order stays the lower court ruling that halted Trump's plans to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) protections for some migrants living in the U.S. TPS allow certain individuals to live and work in the U.S. legally if they cannot work safely in their home country due to a disaster, armed conflict or other "extraordinary and temporary conditions." The TPS program is typically extended to migrants in 18-month increments, most recently under the Biden administration toward the end of his presidency. However, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in February attempted to end protections for a specific group of Venezuelan citizens, saying they were not in the national interest. Fox News Digital's Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report. Original article source: Judge halts deportation of Venezuelan migrant under Alien Enemies Act
