logo
All you need to know as the assisted dying Bill returns to Parliament

All you need to know as the assisted dying Bill returns to Parliament

Glasgow Times16-05-2025

Here, the PA news agency takes a look at the Bill and how the process might work.
– What is in the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill?
The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has since been amended by a committee (Stefan Rousseau/PA)
The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death.
This would be subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.
The terminally ill person would take an approved substance, provided by a doctor but administered only by the person themselves.
– When would assisted dying be available if the Bill became law?
Kim Leadbeater is the MP behind the Bill (Jordan Pettitt/PA)
The implementation period has been doubled to a maximum of four years from royal assent, rather than the initially-suggested two years.
If the Bill was to pass later this year that would mean it might not be until 2029, potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's parliament, that assisted dying was being offered.
Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who is the parliamentarian behind the Bill and put forward the extended timeframe, has insisted it is 'a backstop' rather than a target, as she pledged to 'hold the Government's feet to the fire' on implementing legislation should the Bill pass.
The extended implementation period was one of a number of changes made since the Bill was first introduced to the Commons back in October.
– What other changes have there been?
The High Court safeguard was scrapped during the committee process (Alamy/PA)
The High Court safeguard has been dropped and replaced by expert panels – a change much-criticised by opponents who said it weakened the Bill, but something Ms Leadbeater has argued strengthens it.
At the end of a weeks-long committee process earlier this year to amend the Bill, Ms Leadbeater said rather than removing judges from the process, 'we are adding the expertise and experience of psychiatrists and social workers to provide extra protections in the areas of assessing mental capacity and detecting coercion while retaining judicial oversight'.
Changes were also made to ensure the establishment of independent advocates to support people with learning disabilities, autism or mental health conditions and to set up a disability advisory board to advise on legal implementation and impact on disabled people.
– Do we know much more about the potential impact of such a service coming in?
A Government impact assessment published earlier this month, estimated that between 164 and 787 assisted deaths could potentially take place in the first year of the service, rising to between 1,042 and 4,559 in year 10.
The establishment of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and three-member expert panels would cost an estimated average of between £10.9 million to £13.6 million per year, the document said.
It had 'not been possible' to estimate the overall implementation costs at this stage of the process, it added.
While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs 'is not stated as an objective of the policy', the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years.
– Do healthcare staff have to take part in assisted dying?
Doctors will not have to take part in assisted dying (Lynne Cameron/PA)
It was already the case that doctors would not have to take part, but Ms Leadbeater has also confirmed she will propose a clause to ensure 'anybody who does not want to be involved in the assisted dying process should not be forced to do so', meaning pharmacists and others will have the right not to participate.
On organisations such as hospices however, Ms Leadbeater said she wanted to give them 'the time and space to think about if and how they choose to have assisted dying as part of what they do'.
There is nothing in the Bill to say they have to, nor is there anything to say they do not have to, she said, adding on the Parliament Matters podcast that this is 'the best position to be in' and that nobody should be 'dictating to hospices what they do and don't do around assisted dying'.
– What is happening on Friday?
MPs will be in the House of Commons on Friday for the Bill's report stage (Malcolm Croft/PA)
The Bill is at report stage – where MPs will debate and vote on various amendments.
It is the first time the Bill is returning to the Commons since it passed second reading in a historic vote in November, when MPs supported it by a majority of 55.
With so many amendments proposed for debate during the five-hour sitting, report stage could possibly run into a second day next month.
That would mean a Third Reading vote – where MPs vote yes or no and decide whether to send the Bill on to the House of Lords – might be delayed for another time.
– What about assisted dying in the rest of the British Isles?
The Isle of Man's parliament took its final vote in favour of assisted dying in March (Alamy/PA)
The Isle of Man looks likely to become the first part of the British Isles to legalise assisted dying, after its proposed legislation passed through a final vote of the parliament's upper chamber in March.
In what was hailed a 'landmark moment', members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) on Tuesday voted in favour of the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill, backing its general principles.
It will now go forward for further scrutiny and amendments but will only become law if MSPs approve it in a final vote, which should take place later this year.
Any move to legalise assisted dying in Northern Ireland would have to be passed by politicians in the devolved Assembly at Stormont.
Jersey's parliament is expected to debate a draft law for an assisted dying service on the island for terminally ill people later this year.
With a likely 18-month implementation period if a law is approved, the earliest it could come into effect would be summer 2027.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Navarro responds to Musk-Trump feud
Navarro responds to Musk-Trump feud

Daily Mail​

time37 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Navarro responds to Musk-Trump feud

By Published: | Updated: Trump trade advisor Peter Navarro brushed off the exploding feud between President Trump and Elon Musk by comparing the world's richest man to something a consumer might forget about in the back of the fridge. Navarro, a Trump loyalist who served four months in prison for refusing to comply with a congressional subpoena, was among the first Trump Administration officials on camera after the Trump-Musk clash went into meltdown mode. The two men were completely at odds over Trump's tariffs, which prompted a reporter to ask Navarro at the White House whether he was glad to see Musk out of the fray. 'No, I'm not glad. Whatever,' Navarro replied. 'It's – people come and go from the White House. He was a Special Government Employee with an expiration date,' Navarro said. Musk served in government as a 'Special Government Employee,' and the administration cited the 130-day limit when explaining his departure, although Trump had the power to renew it. Trump himself used language Thursday that gave the impression he fired Musk. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave,' Trump wrote in just one of his slams on his former first buddy. Later, Navarro, 75, had something nice to say about Musk's team of programmers and aides who got access to agency computer systems and searched for contracts. 'I work with the DOGE folks a lot here, and I've got a very special project, which at some point I'll come out here and talk about with them,' Navarro said. He claimed to have identified a government computer program that 'is run like a 1950s IBM punch card operation at great expense.' 'We're going to turn that from a Model T into a Ferrari,' he said. But he refused to divulge specifics on an extraordinary intervention. 'Stay tuned,' he said. Navarro has been a key proponent of Trump's tariffs, during both the first and second term, helping promote Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs that the administration calls 'reciprocal' to hit back at countries running a trade surplus with the U.S. In his stunning clash with Trump Thursday, Musk wrote that 'The Trump Tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year.' That put him at odds with Trump's cherished policy – and Trump's 'favorite word' in the dictionary – even while taking on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which is Trump's top legislative priority. Navarro tried to smooth over the policy differences.

The new Indian railway arch bridge 35m higher than Eiffel Tower
The new Indian railway arch bridge 35m higher than Eiffel Tower

The Independent

time43 minutes ago

  • The Independent

The new Indian railway arch bridge 35m higher than Eiffel Tower

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated the Chenab Railway Bridge, the world's tallest railway arch bridge at 359m above the Chenab River, 35m taller than the Eiffel Tower, in the Reasi district of Jammu and Kashmir. The bridge, a key part of the Udhampur-Srinagar-Baramulla Rail Link (USBRL) project, connects the Kashmir region with the rest of India via an all-weather rail line, spanning 1,315m and designed to last 120 years. Construction involved stabilising slopes in the fractured Himalayan geology, using cement grouting, steel rod reinforcement. The USBRL project, approved in 2003, includes 36 tunnels and 943 bridges, costing Rs437.8bn (£3.7bn), with the Chenab Bridge alone costing approximately Rs14.86bn (£128m). The Chenab Bridge is expected to significantly reduce travel time between Katra and Srinagar to three hours via the Vande Bharat Express.

How much Elon Musk stands to lose in Trump spat as his staggering government contracts are revealed
How much Elon Musk stands to lose in Trump spat as his staggering government contracts are revealed

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

How much Elon Musk stands to lose in Trump spat as his staggering government contracts are revealed

Elon Musk 's revenge war against Donald Trump has seen the Tesla billionaire savage his former boss with toxic insults on his platform X. But it might be the president who gets the last laugh - as the fallout threatens to lose the SpaceX founder billions of dollars. Trump has threatened to cut off huge federal loans and subsidies to Musk's companies after they fell out over the 'Big Beautiful Bill'. In the last twenty or so years, the tech guru's firms have received some $38billion in government contracts, according to The Washington Post. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on Thursday. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' The threat came after the world's richest man, worth over $330billion, torched Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' as a ' disgusting abomination,' largely because it's projected to add trillions of dollars to the deficit. Tesla and SpaceX - Musk's biggest companies - have received by far the most help from the government over the years. SpaceX President and COO Gwynne Shotwell estimates that SpaceX has gotten $22billion in federal spending. And last year alone, at least a quarter of the rocket designer's revenue came directly from federal contracts valued at $3.8billion. Tesla has already had $11.4billion in regulatory credits from environmentally-focused federal and state programs looking to boost the number of zero-emission vehicles. At least $2.1billion of that total has been to help Tesla develop new cars and improve upon its battery technology, according to advocacy group Good Jobs First. Trump hasn't yet said he wants to get rid of these regulatory credits, which is good for Musk because his companies get these credits for free and can sell them for virtually 100 percent profit. Though these credits make up a relatively small percentage of Tesla's revenue, they represent a staggering 32 percent of the company's profits since 2014, according to E&E News. What could be worrying to Musk is that there are 52 ongoing contracts with seven different government agencies that are set to pay his companies an additional $11.8 billion over the next few years, according an analysis from The Post. If Musk as DOGE chief was able to cancel government contracts he felt were wasteful, there's no reason to believe Trump as president wouldn't be able to do the same to Tesla, SpaceX and others. Starlink, a satellite internet service, is one of Musk's smaller companies and is far less reliant on government assistance. While Tesla and SpaceX have received billions, Starlink has only gotten about $6 million from various federal agencies in 2022 and 2023. That includes a pledge from the Department of Defense back in 2022 to buy $1.9million worth of Starlink technology. Though Starlink may be able to weather a potential boycott from Trump, investors are worried about Tesla's fortunes given its large reliance on the federal government. Shares of Tesla plummeted nearly 12 percent on Thursday, when the worst of the jabs between Trump and Musk were happening. It's stark reversal from just several months ago, when Trump was helping Musk sell Tesla cars on the South Lawn of White House. Before markets closed on Thursday, Musk dramatically claimed that Trump is in the Epstein files, which he said explained why they haven't been released in full by the Justice Department. Trump didn't directly respond to the Epstein accusation, instead posting what amounted to a shrug on Truth Social. He also shifted the focus back to the 'big, beautiful bill,' which he continues to vehemently support despite Musk's qualms. 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago,' Trump wrote. 'This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress.' Musk's attacks on the bill further complicates its passage in the Senate, where the 53 GOP senators already weren't in lockstep on certain provisions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store