Oil slides below US$65 bringing inflation relief — and trouble for producers
LONDON, June 1 — US President Donald Trump's tariffs, his call to 'drill baby drill' and especially a decision by Opec+ to hike crude output quotas have oil prices trading at lows not seen since the Covid pandemic.
That is good news for consumers but not so much for producers, analysts say.
A barrel of Brent North Sea crude, the international benchmark, stands below US$65 (RM276), a far cry from the more than the US$120 reached in 2022 following the invasion of Ukraine by major oil producer Russia.
Lower inflation
The fall in oil prices has contributed to a global slowdown for inflation, while also boosting growth in countries reliant on importing crude, such as much of Europe.
The US consumer price index, for example, was down 11.8 per cent year-on-year in April.
Cheaper crude 'increases the level of disposable income' consumers have to be spending on 'discretionary items' such as leisure and tourism, said Pushpin Singh, an economist at British research group Cebr.
The price of Brent has fallen by more than US$10 compared with a year ago, reducing the cost of various fuel types derived directly from oil.
This is helping to push down transportation and manufacturing costs that may, in the medium term, help further cut prices of consumer goods, Singh told AFP.
But he noted that while the drop in crude prices is partly a consequence of Trump's trade policies, the net effect on inflation remains difficult to predict amid threatened surges to other input costs, such as metals.
At the same time, 'cheaper oil can make renewable energy sources less competitive, potentially slowing investment in green technologies', Singh added.
Oil producers
As prices retreat however the undisputed losers are oil-producing countries, 'especially high-cost producers who at current and lower prices are forced to scale back production in the coming months', said Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank.
Oil trading close to or below US$60 'will obviously not be great for shale producers' either, said Rystad Energy analyst Jorge Leon.
'Having lower oil prices is going to be the detriment to their development,' he told AFP.
Some companies extracting oil and natural gas from shale rock have already announced reduced investment in the Permian Basin, located between Texas and New Mexico.
For the Opec+ oil alliance, led by Saudi Arabia and Russia, tolerance for low prices varies greatly.
Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait have monetary reserves allowing them to easily borrow to finance diversified economic projects, Leon said.
Hansen forecast that 'the long-term winners are likely to be major Opec+ producers, especially in the Middle East, as they reclaim market shares that were lost since 2022 when they embarked on voluntary production cuts'.
The 22-nation group began a series of cuts in 2022 to prop up crude prices, but Saudi Arabia, Russia and six other members surprised markets recently by sharply raising output.
On Saturday, the countries announced a huge increase in crude production for July with an additional 411,000 barrels a day.
Analysts say the hikes have likely been aimed at punishing Opec members that have failed to meet their quotas, but it also follows pressure from Trump to lower prices.
That is directly impacting the likes of Iran and Venezuela, whose economies depend heavily on oil revenues.
A lower-price environment also hurts Nigeria, which like other Opec+ members possesses a more limited ability to borrow funds, according to experts.
Bit non-Opec member Guyana, whose GDP growth has surged in recent years thanks to the discovery of oil, risks seeing its economy slow. — AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Free Malaysia Today
9 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump and China's Xi will likely speak this week, White House says
Donald Trump said he expects to speak with Xi Jinping, though China noted no recent talks had occurred between them. (AFP pic) WASHINGTON : President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping will likely speak this week, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Monday, days after Trump accused China of violating an agreement to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions. Leavitt is the third top Trump aide to forecast an imminent call between the two leaders to iron out differences on last month's tariff agreement in Geneva, among larger trade issues. It was not immediately clear when the two leaders will speak. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent told CBS' 'Face the Nation' on Sunday that Trump and Xi would speak 'very soon' to iron out trade issues including a dispute over critical minerals and China's restrictions of exports of certain minerals. Trump said on Friday he was sure that he would speak to Xi. China said in April that the two leaders had not had a conversation recently. Bessent led negotiations with China in Geneva last month that resulted in a temporary truce in the trade war between the world's two biggest economies, but progress since then has been slow, the US treasury chief told Fox News last week. The US-China agreement to dial back triple-digit tariffs for 90 days prompted a massive relief rally in global stocks. But it did nothing to address the underlying reasons for Trump's tariffs on Chinese goods, mainly longstanding US complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model, leaving those issues for future talks. A US trade court on Wednesday ruled that Trump overstepped his authority in imposing the bulk of his tariffs on imports from China and other countries under an emergency powers act. But less than 24 hours later, a federal appeals court reinstated the tariffs, saying it was pausing the trade court ruling to consider the government's appeal. The appeals court ordered the plaintiffs to respond by June 5 and the administration to respond by June 9.


Free Malaysia Today
12 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump wants Big Tech to own the dollar
The Spring Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank are usually placid, forgettable affairs. Not this year. Several central bankers returned home with a visceral sense of dread. The reason? The specter of the GENIUS Act – the stablecoin bill barreling towards passage by the US Congress hot on the heels of President Donald Trump's March 6 executive order establishing a strategic cryptocurrency reserve. Central bankers have hitherto seen cryptocurrencies as a nuisance that, thankfully, lacked the capacity to cause serious ruptures in the monetary systems under their care. But now they think that Trump's team is counting on cryptocurrencies pegged to the dollar as part of its strategy to rejig the global monetary system (and make the boss and his family a fortune in the process). What unsettled central bankers this spring was the policy's implications: a deliberate, chaotic unraveling of the twentieth century's monetary order, under which central banks reigned as the sole architects of money. While the GENIUS Act allows private stablecoins, another bill would bar the US Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC), thereby anointing corporate-issued tokens as the new guardians of dollar hegemony. This isn't innovation; it's a hostile takeover of the money supply. Lacking anything resembling serious regulation, stablecoins are neither stable nor merely an alternative dollar payment option. They are a Trojan horse for the privatisation of money. The European Central Bank (ECB) sees the danger. If securities migrate to the blockchain, with bonds, stocks, and derivatives becoming tokenised, then settlement must follow. The ECB's solution is a tokenised euro, ensuring public money remains the bedrock of finance. So far, the ECB has faced resistance to this plan from German and French private banks. Now, the ECB has another, bigger headache: the US is racing in the opposite direction. By banning CBDCs and green-lighting stablecoins, Trump's team is not just rejecting public digital money; it is outsourcing dollar supremacy to the darkest forces within Big Tech. The irony is grotesque. The same libertarians who railed against the government are now begging the state to anoint their stablecoins as de facto official currency. Worse, they demand access to the Federal Reserve's balance sheet, allowing private issuers to back their tokens with central bank reserves. Imagine a world where Tether, Circle, or some non-scam 'X Token' backed by Elon Musk enjoys the implicit backing of the US Treasury while operating outside banking regulations. This isn't just regulatory arbitrage; it's monetary feudalism. Lest we forget, nineteenth-century America was a monetary dystopia. With thousands of wildcat banks issuing private notes, frequent financial panics left the public, the working class in particular, holding worthless paper. Even JP Morgan was so appalled and felt so threatened that he decided to strong-arm the federal government and other bankers to establish the Federal Reserve as a public institution with a remit to stabilise money. Now, the US is hurtling backward – and dragging the rest of the world along. In a stunning reversal of reality, Trump's Jan 23 executive order on Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology defines dollar-backed stablecoins as instruments that will 'promote and protect the sovereignty of the US dollar'. But the GENIUS Act (whose final draft is not yet public) is a formula for unleashing a digital wildcat era, where stablecoins – pegged to the dollar but controlled by private actors – flood the global economy with digital pseudo dollars. Private stablecoins stand no chance of maintaining their tokens' dollar peg after they receive the official imprimatur of the federal authorities and their volume balloons. Even if countries ditch the greenback, they will remain trapped in its digital shadow. Europe is scrambling. The ECB, recognising the existential threat, is fast-tracking a 'wholesale CBDC': a digital euro for institutional use that acts as a stopgap – a quick and dirty hybrid system that syncs traditional payments with blockchain infrastructure and buys time until true atomic settlement can be pushed past the resistance of private bankers who profit from the status quo. But it may be too late. While Europe dithers with committees, the US is acting. The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation has already driven Tether out of Europe – not because MiCA is too strict, but because the EU's political leadership still does not grasp the stakes. If stablecoins become the default money of crypto markets, decentralised finance, and emerging economies, the ECB's half-baked digital euro will arrive to a battlefield where the war is already lost. Meanwhile developing countries face a brutal choice. Already struggling under the dollar's dominance, they must now either ban stablecoins (thus forfeiting access to crypto capital flows) or create their own to compete with the dollar's network effects. A third, unappetising alternative, is to surrender to a new – even more perilous – form of de facto dollarisation. The only central bank that has planned ahead is the People's Bank of China (PBOC). Having the luxury of its own, already functioning digital renminbi, the PBOC can afford to refuse lending legitimacy to stablecoins by banning them. But this sensible defiance leaves one gigantic dilemma unaddressed: China's public and private institutions hold accumulated savings of approximately US$4.5 trillion. Should they dump their dollars, thus giving a boost to the Trump team's plan to devalue the greenback, or hold them and remain exposed to the turbulence that Trump is so adept at stirring up? In the longer term, the danger is that monetary bifurcation exacerbates geopolitical and geo-economic uncertainty. Two parallel monetary systems – one based on public monies issued in China, India, and maybe the eurozone, and the other comprising private money, increasingly dominated by dollar-pegged stablecoins – would inevitably clash. Central bankers are not the only ones who should feel anxious. Yanis Varoufakis, a former finance minister of Greece, is leader of the MeRA25 party and professor of economics at the University of Athens. The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.


The Star
15 minutes ago
- The Star
U.S. stocks close higher despite trade headwinds
NEW YORK, June 2 (Xinhua) -- U.S. stocks ended higher on Monday, as investors appeared to look past renewed global trade tensions. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 35.41 points, or 0.08 percent, to 42,305.48. The S&P 500 added 24.25 points, or 0.41 percent, to 5,935.94. The Nasdaq Composite Index increased 128.85 points, or 0.67 percent, to 19,242.61. Ten of the 11 primary S&P 500 sectors ended in green, with energy and technology leading the gainers by adding 1.15 percent and 0.89 percent, respectively. Meanwhile, industrials bucked the trend by losing 0.24 percent. The United States has seriously undermined the consensus reached during the China-U.S. economic and trade talks in Geneva by successively introducing multiple discriminatory restrictive measures against China, China's Ministry of Commerce said Monday. These measures included issuing guidance on AI chip export controls, halting sales of chip design software to China, and announcing the revocation of visas for Chinese students, according to a spokesperson for the ministry. Meanwhile, friction with the European Union intensified after U.S. President Donald Trump announced plans to double tariffs on imported steel to 50 percent. In response, an EU spokesperson warned the move could derail ongoing negotiations, stating "this decision adds further uncertainty to the global economy and increases costs for consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic." "Markets see the latest round of tariff threats and ramped up rhetoric against China, the EU, and steel as nudges to move negotiations towards the finish line," said Jamie Cox, managing partner at Harris Financial Group. U.S. stocks entered June cautiously after a strong May rally, during which the S&P 500 jumped more than 6 percent, marking its best month since November 2023 and the strongest May performance since 1990. Despite fears that new tariffs could trigger inflation, Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said Monday that any price increases are likely to be short-lived. He added that this scenario could give the Fed room to make "positive" rate cuts in 2025. "I support looking through any tariff effects on near term-inflation when setting the policy rate," he said. As earnings season winds down, a few notable companies are still set to report this week, including CrowdStrike, Broadcom, DocuSign, and Lululemon. Looking ahead, markets are closely watching key economic data set for release this week, especially Friday's May nonfarm payrolls report, which could shed light on how ongoing trade disputes and shifting interest rate expectations are affecting the broader U.S. economy. On Monday, new data from the Institute for Supply Management showed continued contraction in the U.S. manufacturing sector, with imports falling to their lowest level since 2009.