American YouTuber Mykhailo Polyakov denied bail for illegal visit to Sentinelese island
American YouTuber Mykhailo Polyakov has been denied bail and faces up to five years in prison after attempting to make contact with the highly isolated Sentinelese tribe on North Sentinel Island.
The 24-year-old content creator, known online as Neo-Orientalist, has built a small following by posting videos of himself exploring high-risk locations, including Taliban-controlled regions in Afghanistan.
In March 2025, Polyakov reportedly landed on the restricted island with offerings of Diet Coke and a coconut, hoping to interact with the uncontacted tribe, which has long resisted any outside interference. Despite his efforts — including blowing a whistle and waiting on the beach — no members of the tribe appeared, and he left the area shortly afterward.
However, Indian authorities quickly apprehended him, citing violations of the Andaman & Nicobar Islands Protection of Aboriginal Tribes Regulation, 1956, which prohibits all unauthorized access to North Sentinel Island to preserve the tribe's way of life.
A senior police official, Hargobinder Singh Dhaliwal, stated that Polyakov's actions posed 'a serious threat' to the safety of the Sentinelese, who have had virtually no contact with the outside world for over 60,000 years. Polyakov was officially charged with entering a prohibited tribal reserve and appeared in court on April 15, where his bail was denied.
This case adds to a growing list of influencers facing legal consequences for reckless behavior abroad, following similar incidents involving content creators like Johnny Somali and Vitaly.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1634752114-0%2FZahir-Jaffer-(1)1634752114-0.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Zahir Jaffer's death sentence upheld as Supreme Court releases detailed verdict
A file photo of 30-year-old Zahir Jaffer talking to the media outside a courtroom in Islamabad. SCREENGRAB: EXPRESS Listen to article The Supreme Court of Pakistan has released its detailed written verdict in Noor Mukadam murder case, upholding the death sentence of convict Zahir Jaffer. The judgment spans 13 pages and reiterates the court's stance that Jaffer, who was found guilty of the brutal killing, is 'a ruthless killer' and 'not worthy of sympathy.' According to the verdict, the Supreme Court upheld the rulings of both lower courts, terming them correct and unanimous. A key element of the court's reasoning was based on the Silent Witness Theory—a legal principle that allows for video evidence to be accepted even in the absence of an eyewitness. Read: 'This is for every woman' The court noted, 'Authentic footage can serve as self-sufficient evidence, and recorded video or images can be presented as testimony.' The apex court stressed that footage obtained through a reliable system could be admissible on its own, citing a precedent from a bank robbery case where video footage was accepted without any eyewitness. It added that American courts have widely recognised the Silent Witness principle. In Jaffer's case, the court noted that CCTV footage, the DVR, and the hard disk were all admissible forms of evidence. The court stated that there was no indication of tampering in the video recordings, the identification of the accused was accurate, and the DNA report confirmed the rape. The murder weapon was also found to have the victim's blood on it. The verdict observed, 'The convict failed to provide any explanation for Noor's presence. Digital evidence is now considered primary testimony. If CCTV footage meets the set standards, no further verification is necessary.' Further, the court upheld Jaffer's death sentence for murder but converted his sentence for rape into life imprisonment. He was acquitted of the abduction charge, while his sentence for unlawfully confining Noor was maintained. The Supreme Court also ruled that the punishments for co-accused Muhammad Iftikhar and Muhammad Jan would stand. However, in a show of leniency, it ordered their release on the grounds that they had already served sufficient time. The judgment concluded with a note that Justice Ali Baqar Najafi would add a supplementary note to the verdict. Read More: 'Noor was kept in captivity for 3 days' Noor, 27, was brutally murdered on July 20, 2021, at a residence in Islamabad's F-7/4 sector. An FIR was lodged the same day, leading to the arrest of Jaffer at the crime scene. In February 2022, a district and sessions court handed Zahir the death penalty for murder and sentenced him to 25 years of rigorous imprisonment for rape. Two domestic staff members, Mohammad Iftikhar and Jan Mohammad, were each sentenced to 10 years in prison for their involvement. Zahir's parents, Zakir Jaffer and Asmat Adamji—both prominent business figures—were indicted in October 2021 but later acquitted. Similarly, six employees of Therapy Works, who arrived at the scene before the police, were also cleared of charges by the trial court. Read More: Noor Mukadam's killer claims insanity Previously, a three-member bench headed by Justice Hashim Kakar, and comprising Justices Ishtiaq Ibrahim and Ali Baqar Najafi, had dismissed Jaffer's appeal. The court upheld the Islamabad High Court's (IHC) previous ruling, which had affirmed the trial court's death sentence verdict and replaced Zahir's jail term for rape with an additional death penalty. During those hearings, Jaffer's defence counsel, Salman Safdar, argued that the prosecution's case rested heavily on CCTV footage and DVR recordings. He questioned the chain of custody of the digital evidence and contended that the footage could not be considered conclusive without full verification. His objections included claims that the footage, when presented to the IHC on a USB, could not be played, and therefore should not qualify as definitive proof. Despite these arguments, the apex court found the digital evidence reliable and legally admissible.
Business Recorder
15 hours ago
- Business Recorder
French antiques expert convicted
PARIS: A French court on Wednesday sentenced a top antiques expert to jail for duping the Palace of Versailles and wealthy collectors into buying furniture he had helped build, claiming it dated from the 18th century. The ruling from the court in Pontoise, north of Paris, caps one of the biggest forgery scandals to rock the rarified world of France's top museums. Bill Pallot, 61, along with five other people as well as a prominent gallery, stood trial in the spring. Pallot and woodcarver Bruno Desnoues were convicted of having produced and authenticated chairs they sold, which they passed off as historic pieces that once adorned the rooms of the likes of Madame du Barry, the mistress of Louis XV, or of Queen Marie-Antoinette. Customers duped by the pieces included the Palace of Versailles and wealthy collectors including a member of the Qatari royal family. Pallot was sentenced to a four-year term including four months behind bars, fined 200,000 euros ($230,000) and handed a five-year ban on working as an expert. He will not go to jail having spent time in detention after his arrest. Known for his distinctive long hair and three-piece suits, Pallot has been described by magazine Vanity Fair as "the world's leading expert on the works of 18th-century France." Paris Match branded him "the Bernard Madoff of art", referring to the late American financier who devised a notorious pyramid scheme. - 'A little harsh' - Pallot said the sentence was "a little harsh financially," although he was satisfied that his apartment would not be seized, contrary to the prosecutor's demand. "We thought we'd do it for fun, to see if the art market would notice or not," Pallot has told the court. "It went without a hitch," he added. Desnoues, a prominent woodcarver, was sentenced to a three-year term including four months behind bars, and fined 100,000 euros. In court, he presented himself as a humble artisan uninterested in money and motivated only by his love of art and "the pleasure of working, of making beautiful things". A lawyer for the Palace of Versailles implied the men got away too easily, denouncing "the particularly diabolical manoeuvres" of the two main defendants and pointing to "clean, white-collar trafficking." "When you are caught red-handed, you are not sentenced to very long prison terms," said Corinne Hershkovitch. "We feel that we are not protected for the future," she added. - 'Pallot's blessing' - The pair pocketed nearly 1.2 million euros in commissions. Galleries and auction houses made even more, selling fake furniture pieces to the Palace of Versailles and billionaire collectors. After the French Revolution, the Palace of Versailles was completely emptied, with thousands of royal furniture pieces and other items dispersed at revolutionary sales. Nearly half of Pallot and Desnoues' fakes were acquired through various channels by the Palace of Versailles, which has since the 1950s sought to refurnish the former home of French royalty. "Indeed, Versailles's decision to purchase the chairs hinged on Pallot's blessing," Vanity Fair said in 2018. "And based on Pallot's imprimatur, the government classified two of his fake lots as national treasures." Accused of failing to carry out sufficient checks, the prestigious Kraemer antique gallery was acquitted. The public prosecutor had sought a fine of 700,000 euros. Intermediaries between the forgers and the final buyers believed they had been misled by Pallot's reputation, and charges for most of them were dismissed during the eight-year-long investigation. Unnoticed for years, the scam caused an estimated 4.5 million euros in damage. The fraud was discovered by accident during an investigation into the lavish lifestyle of a Portuguese couple who were laundering Desnoues' money. When the scandal erupted in 2016, the ministry of culture swiftly ordered an audit of Versailles's acquisitions policy.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Trump defends LA Marines deployment amid more protests
Federal agents detain an individual after their hearing in an immigration court in New York City. Photo: AFP Hundreds of US Marines were expected in Los Angeles on Tuesday after President Donald Trump ordered their deployment in response to protests against immigration arrests and despite objections by state officials. The 700 elite troops will join around 4,000 National Guard soldiers, amping up the militarization of the tense situation in the sprawling city, which is home to millions of foreign-born and Latino residents. The small-scale and largely peaceful demonstrations — marred by sporadic but violent clashes between police and protesters — were entering their fifth day. In downtown LA's Little Tokyo neighborhood at night Monday, scores of protesters faced off with security officials in riot gear, some shooting fireworks at officers who fired back volleys of tear gas. Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom wrote on X that US Marines "shouldn't be deployed on American soil facing their own countrymen to fulfill the deranged fantasy of a dictatorial President. This is un-American." But Trump has branded the LA protesters "professional agitators and insurrectionists." "If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now," he wrote on Truth Social on Tuesday. Earlier, demonstrators marching with banners and handmade signs yelled "ICE out of LA" and "National Guard go away" — a reference to immigration agents and Guard soldiers. One small business owner in the city, whose property was graffitied during the protests, was supportive of Trump's strong-arm tactics. "I think it's needed to stop the vandalism," she told AFP, declining to give her name. Others were horrified. "They're meant to be protecting us, but instead, they're like, being sent to attack us," Kelly Diemer, 47, told AFP. "This is not a democracy anymore." LA police have detained dozens of protesters in recent days, while authorities in San Francisco and other US cities have also made arrests.
