RFK Jr. Swears He Won't Appoint a Load of Cranks to His Vaccine Panel
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been forced to promise not to replace the 17 members of a vaccine advisory panel he purged with 'ideological anti-vaxxers.'
Current and former employees at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have been protesting and calling for Kennedy to resign after he gutted the agency's leadership and dismissed the entire Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, an independent panel that recommends which vaccines to approve, NBC News reported.
The American Medical Association also adopted a resolution Tuesday calling for Kennedy to reverse his decision on the ACIP and asking the Senate Health Committee to investigate the dismissals, The New York Times reported.
President Donald Trump's secretary of health and human services had claimed that all of the existing members—a group of volunteer pediatricians, geriatricians, and other vaccine experts—had conflicts of interest related to funding from pharmaceutical companies.
In a social media post on X, Kennedy said on Tuesday night that he would be announcing their replacements 'over the coming days.'
'None of these individuals will be ideological anti-vaxxers,' he wrote. 'They will be highly credentialed physicians and scientists who will make extremely consequential public health determinations by applying evidence-based decision-making with objectivity and common sense.'
The former environmental lawyer has long been one of the country's most high-profile anti-vaccine crusaders. He has characterized his views as 'pro-safety.'
Before he ousted the ACIP members, Kennedy forced out the top vaccine expert at the Food and Drug Administration and appointed an anti-vaxxer without a medical degree to study the 'connection' between autism and vaccines.
Then he spread newer and crazier anti-vax conspiracy theories and announced the CDC would no longer recommend that healthy children and pregnant women receive the COVID-19 vaccine.
In a video posted to social media, he referred to the COVID-19 vaccine changes as 'common sense.'
Studies, however, have found that unvaccinated women who contract COVID-19 are more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit, give birth prematurely, lose their babies to stillbirth, or even die, ProPublica reported.
Officials at the CDC were reportedly blindsided by Kennedy's announcement on the issue.
Despite his accusations about the departing ACIP members, anyone who serves on the panel must undergo a rigorous vetting process and disclose conflicts, and can't vote on those vaccines, according to NBC.
Experts speaking to NBC questioned how members could be properly vetted within days. The Daily Beast has reached out to the Department of Health and Human Services for comment.
A new report in the Times also suggested partisan politics—not gold-standard scientific scrutiny—played a part in Kennedy's overhaul of ACIP.
A White House official and another unnamed source told the paper that Kennedy was concerned that the members had been appointed by a Democratic president and some had made donations to Democratic candidates.
Kennedy said in Tuesday's social media post that he would soon be sharing examples of the 'historical corruption' that made the replacements necessary.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What exactly is the US National Guard?
After protests against immigration raids in Los Angeles, President Donald Trump took the contentious step of mobilizing thousands of National Guard troops and hundreds of US Marines in response. While the use of the National Guard against the California governor's wishes is significant, in general these military personnel are trained for rapid response to emergencies within the United States. - Military reserve force - The National Guard is a military reserve force within the United States Armed Forces, meaning that most of its members serve part-time while holding civilian jobs or conducting other activities. As a response force, the National Guard can be mobilized rapidly to address emergency situations on US soil, typically natural disasters. When needed, National Guard units can also be activated for deployments into combat zones, especially if the United States is at war. Unlike branches of the US military, the National Guard performs both state- and federal-level functions, and is organized into groupings based in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the US territories of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the US Virgin Islands. As a state-based force, generally it is the governor of a state or territory who activates and commands the National Guard when needed. However, in some situations the National Guard can be "federalized" by the president, bringing it under the president's control until the specific federal mission has ended -- as is the case in Los Angeles currently. The latest budget from the Department of Defense authorizes 433,000 National Guard personnel in total, split across the Air National Guard and Army National Guard. This means that compared to other components of the US military, the National Guard is second only to the US Army in terms of size. - Emergency response - National Guard members are typically deployed during emergencies such as natural disasters at the request of governors and based on specific provisions in each state's laws. In the aftermath of events like hurricanes, wildfires, and floods, state National Guards are often called on to help evacuate dangerous areas, deliver supplies to places that would otherwise be cut off, or provide specialist equipment needed to clear hazardous debris. The largest National Guard deployment in recent years was during the COVID-19 pandemic, where troops helped construct and staff emergency care facilities, transport health supplies around the country, and coordinate other logistics. Outside of a natural disaster, deployment of the guard can be ordered in emergencies created by the breakdown of public order -- the provision that Trump controversially invoked when sending troops to California. - History with protest - The use of the National Guard to manage public unrest is not unique to Trump, even if the current deployment is unusual. During the widespread Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, more than half of US states activated National Guard troops to maintain order and help enforce curfews. Before that, they were also deployed to LA in 1992 to respond to riots that occurred after police officers who had beaten motorist Rodney King were acquitted at trial. At that time, riots, looting and arson attacks had spread across the city, with dozens of people killed and thousands injured. The National Guard was deployed during the 1950s and 60s Civil Rights era to help enforce school desegregation, following the Supreme Court's landmark Brown v. Board of Education ruling. In one of the force's darkest moments, in May 1970, members of the Ohio National Guard clashed with anti-war protesters at Kent State University. As unrest swelled, the troops opened fire, killing four unarmed students. The shootings sparked outrage, but also led to reform of the guard's use-of-force guidelines. cf/ksb/mlm
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - School choice continues to expand, even in blue and purple states
Press reports tend to draw a hard line between the 17 states which enacted universal school choice programs when both their legislatures and governors were Republican and the 33 others which have not. But it would be more accurate to say that choice is expanding everywhere, just with different structures. Even in states where at least one branch of government remains opposed to funding non-public education, the rapid growth of three inexpensive K-12 schooling options is making choice a reality for more students. The most popular of these low-cost alternatives is the so-called 'microschool,' a small educational venue which typically serves 16 pupils or less. Spontaneously formed by neighboring families during COVID-19, when the public schools were closed and open private schools were filled to capacity, these small-scale programs have continued to multiply, offering a more personalized learning experience in blue states as well as red. Today, according to National Microschooling Center CEO Dan Soifer, there are around 95,000 microschools across the U.S. serving over 1.5 million K-12 students. Another economical non-public option which has spread to states without legalized school choice is the 'church learning center.' As the name implies, this is a school which operates within a house of worship, typically during weekdays and at other times when its facilities are not used for religious services. Depending on the size of the church, its learning center can be as small as a microschool or serve hundreds of students. An accurate count of these church learning centers is harder to make, in part because there is no national organization representing all of them and also because the larger ones are reluctant to publicize themselves in ways that might invite regulation as a conventional private school. But a clear indicator of their popularity is the growing number of regional and denominational organizations dedicated to helping churches organize their own programs. In Kansas, for example, homeschool mom of six Delana Wallace runs the Heartland Education Reformation Organization, a nonprofit that advocates for 15 parish-sited schools and connects local clergy with educators interested in starting new ones. And in Boston, the city's Family Institute has successfully guided more than 20 religious groups in establishing their own Christian learning centers. At the other end of the country, in California, the Archdiocese of Los Angeles has encouraged the formation of five such schools. The third and final low-cost teaching venue is the 'hybrid school,' a term which refers less to a school's size, location, or curriculum than to how its students divide their time: two or three days a week online at home, and the other days in a more organized group setting. The provider of the structured portion can be a microschool or church learning center, but also a college, business, foundation or public charter school. One of the newer hybrid options is the traditional private or parochial school which runs a separate part-time academy. For example, the Canterbury Christian School in Los Altos, Calif., offers local homeschooled children a two day per week package of more conventional classroom instruction. 'If you're trying to support a family in a place like Silicon Valley, where ordinary homes cost $3-to-$4 million,' says the school's headmaster, Rev. Steve Macias, 'it's not easy to pay [our full-time tuition] with after-tax dollars.' What clearly helps all three kinds of low-cost schools to control their expenses is family involvement in program administration. Students' mothers and fathers work as classroom aids, break and lunchroom monitors, carpooling drivers, sports coaches and even teachers. Church learning centers have the added benefit of being able to draw on volunteer labor from their congregations. The second factor which controls expenses for these schools is that their typical student is registered as a homeschooler, which exempts them from a considerable regulatory burden. From the government's point of view, it is not the microschool, church learning center, or hybrid facility where the child is being educated, but the family home. The school itself is viewed as something more like a tutoring company, although the most accurate descriptor for the vast majority of them would be 'collaborative homeschool.' The final factor which has enabled microschools, church learning centers and hybrid schools to be seen as affordable options, even in the absence of government funding, is that all three of them have become increasingly reliant on the so-called 'classical curriculum.' That is to say, a curriculum which emphasizes logical reasoning over the memorization of facts, and the reading of the great books of Western civilization, especially those which inspired America's Founders. And while this educational methodology is not necessarily any less expensive than others, the evidence for its efficacy has convinced growing numbers of parents that they are getting an exceptional academic return for their investment. As the American Enterprise Institute's director of Education Policy Studies, Frederick M. Hess, has documented, classically educated students get exceptionally high scores on standardized achievement tests. As a result, they also have unusually high college acceptance rates. They even outperform on the SAT — an exam that the classical curriculum does not even attempt to 'teach to.' As for the actual cost of a microschool, church learning center or hybrid school, the answer depends on such factors as the ratio of paid staff to volunteers, the rent required to obtain a venue, and the extracurricular activities provided. On the low end is the Cornerstone Church in Uxbridge, Mass., which has long hosted a parent-run school called DELTIC Prep, short for 'Doing Education in Life Together in Christ.' It annually educates 70 to 90 students across multiple grades for just $15 to $75 each per year. There are programs which cost as much as $5,000 to $10,000, but still less than a conventional private or parochial school in their areas. Given the continuing reluctance of blue and purple state politicians to fund non-public education, school choice is indeed coming to their communities in a different way than in more conservative jurisdictions. But it is coming. Lewis M. Andrews is chair of the Kids' Scholarship Fund. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
After Purging Key Vaccine Panel, RFK Jr. Moves to Assert Control
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. took to Fox News to do what he does best: spread wildly incendiary misinformation about vaccines and public health. RFK Jr. was asked about his decision to fire the entire vaccine advisory committee of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a move that directly contradicted a confirmation process promise and set off alarms for experts. 'Ninety-seven percent of the people on the committee had conflicts of interest. This is a committee that has … we've gone up from 11 vaccines in 1986. Today, children get between 69 and 92 vaccines before they're 18. Not one of those vaccines—' 'That's really high,' Fox News's Martha McCallum said. 'Those are not all mandatory.' 'Those are all mandatory, and the reason there's 69 to 92 is some of the brands require three doses, some of them require four. But none of them have been safety tested. Except for the Covid vaccine, the only vaccine on the schedule that has gone through placebo-controlled trials prior to licensure was the Covid vaccine, so nobody has any idea what the risk profiles are on these products. And we don;t know whether they have anything to do with the epidemic of chronic disease, almost all the chronic disease … These are products designed to deregulate your immune system, change your immune system for like. And we are now having an epidemic of immune desregulation in our country and we don't have an idea … we're gonna investigate.' Kennedy Jr. is exaggerating about the number of vaccines before 18, which is closer to between 24 and 50. And many medical professionals have already stated their opposition to this placebo-controlled testing. 'The first vaccine for a disease is already proven safe through a placebo-controlled trial,' Senator Bill Cassidy—who was recently betrayed by Kennedy— told The Washington Post. 'Updating that vaccine does not require a new placebo-controlled trial to determine its safety. To require a placebo group would deny those patients access to the vaccine that has already been found safe.' There's also the fact that this kind of testing would be intentionally deceptive to patients. 'Ethics must be taken into account when you set up a study,' physician Stanley Plotkin said. 'Can I ethically agree to having people acquire the disease because they receive a placebo?' We should expect more delusional, crank-adjacent theories from perhaps our most important public sector.
